Как пишется нагорный карабах

Синонимы слова «НАГОРНЫЙ КАРАБАХ»:

СТРАНА

Смотреть что такое НАГОРНЫЙ КАРАБАХ в других словарях:

Всего найдено: 52

Здравствуйте! Как правильно написать слово (ДО)КАРАНТИННЫЙ (период)? Спасибо.

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Верно: докарантинный период.

Добрый день. Подскажите, пожалуйста, является ли выражение «фильм о фильме» (небольшая документальная лента, рассказывающая о съёмках полнометражной игровой кинокартины) тем устойчивым выражением, что не требует при себе кавычек? Или кавычки тут всё-таки нужны? Заранее благодарю.

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Это сочетание не требует использования кавычек.

Не дождалась ответа, уже в 3ий раз дублирую вопросы: В каких случаях обособляется «по сравнению»? У пациентов с начальным образованием достоверно ниже были показатели кардиографии(,) по сравнению с пациентами со средним образованием и образованием выше среднего. В группе пациентов с начальным образованием показатели эхокардиографии также оказались значимо выше(,) по сравнению с группой пациентов, имеющих образование выше среднего. Группы различались по полу: в группе пациентов с низким доходом наблюдалась наименьшая доля мужчин, что было значимо меньше(,) по сравнению с пациентами со средним доходом. Обособляется ли «в зависимости от» В зависимости от уровня дохода(,) достоверные межгрупповые различия были выявлены в отношении следующих показателей: ИИЛ, ГМБ, КДО ЛЖ. Предтавлена сравнительная характеристика ангиографических показателей и результатов ЧКВ(,) в зависимости от уровня дохода. Корректен ли вариант опросник был валидизирован» или правильно «валидирован»?

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Об обособлении оборотов с предлогами по сравнению и в зависимости от читайте в «Справочнике по пунктуации».

В Ваших примерах эти обороты обособлять не нужно.

ЕСЛИ НЕ ОШИБАЮСЬ, ЭТО УЖЕ ПЯТАЯ ПОПЫТКА ПОЛУЧИТЬ ОТВЕТ…Уважаемая справочная служба русского языка! Некоторое время тому назад вы любезно утолили мой голод касательно информации, предоставленной ниже. Нечто похожее я направлял в ваш адрес совсем недавно. Но осадочек, как говорится, остался. ИТАК. Вопрос 293533 «Девушка, по образованию преподаватель белорусского и русского языка, ушла ..» На мой взгляд, правильнее написать «Девушка, по образованию преподаватель белорусского и русского языкОВ, ушла…» Хотелось бы еще получить и ссылку на данное правило. Благодарю. ВАШ ОТВЕТ. Имя существительное ставится в форме множественного числа, если подчеркивается наличие нескольких предметов, например: биологический и химический методы; академическое и массовое издания произведений классиков; широкоэкранный и обычный варианты фильма; марганцевая и хромовая руды; соляная и серная кислоты; кузнечно-прессовый и сборочный цехи; золотая и серебряная медали; гидроэнергетическая и оросительная системы; токарный и фрезерный станки; всасывающий и напорный патрубки насоса; овечья и телячья шкуры; разрыв между первым и последним гонщиками; встречи с болгарской и польской футбольными командами. Корректно: языков. И ВОТ ЕЩЕ ПОХОЖИЙ ВОПРОС. Номер 295869. «…хитроумные тесты с вопросами на засыпку по английскому или русскому языкУ». На мой взгляд, правильно написать «хитроумные тесты с вопросами на засыпку по английскому или русскому языкАМ». Разделяет ли мою позицию справочная служба русского языка? Спасибо. Ответ справочной службы русского языка Согласно рекомендациям справочника Д. Э. Розенталя, существительное, которому предшествует два или несколько определений, указывающих на разновидности предметов, ставится в форме единственного числа, если между определениями стоят противительные, разделительные или сопоставительные союзы, например: латинский или готический шрифт. Поэтому верно: по английскому или русскому языку. Нет ли здесь противоречий. Премного благодарствуйте. Жду ваших пояснений.

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Все верно. Разные союзы — разные формы существительных.

Здравствуйте! Подскажите пожалуйста как правильно сокращать дактилоскопическая карта «дактокарта» или «дактилокарта»? Спасибо

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

В документах сокращение использовать не следует. Необходимо полное написание (в виде словосочетания).

«Девушка, по образованию преподаватель белорусского и русского языка, ушла ..» На мой взгляд, правильнее написать «Девушка, по образованию преподаватель белорусского и русского языкОВ, ушла…» Хотелось бы еще получить и ссылку на данное правило. К слову сказать, вопрос задается пятый раз…Думается, пришла очередь уже получить ответ. Благодарю.

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Имя существительное ставится в форме  множественного числа, если подчеркивается наличие нескольких предметов, например: биологический и химический методы; академическое и массовое издания произведений классиков; широкоэкранный и обычный варианты фильма; марганцевая и хромовая руды; соляная и серная кислоты; кузнечно-прессовый и сборочный цехи; золотая и серебряная медали; гидроэнергетическая и оросительная системы; токарный и фрезерный станки; всасывающий и напорный патрубки насоса; овечья и телячья шкуры; разрыв между первым и последним гонщиками; встречи с болгарской и польской футбольными командами.

Корректно: языков.

Добрый день! Подскажите, пожалуйста, как правильнее: токарИ или токарЯ. Детям в домашнем задании попались слова ТОКАРЬ и СЛЕСАРЬ, которые надо было поставить в форму И.п. мн.ч. Мы сделали токарИ и слесарИ, согласно словарю, представленному на данном сайте. Нам зачеркнули. Учитель недавно повышала квалификацию, и на этих курсах строго-настрого сказали, что сейчас верна формы с окончанием Я. Помогите, пожалуйста, нам разрешить спор. А главное, научить детей правильному употреблению слова. Заранее спасибо

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Обе формы им.п. мн. ч. верны. 

Орфографический словарь

токарь, -я, мн. -и, -ей и —я, —ей

Большой толковый словарь

ТОКАРЬ, -я; мн. токаря, —ей и токари, -ей; м. Рабочий, специалист по обработке металла, дерева и т.п. путём обточки. Т. по металлу.Т. по дереву. Токарь-фрезеровщик. 

Гадолинийсодержащее контрастрое средство или гадолиний-содержащее? или гадолиний содержащее? в научной литературе чаще встречается слитное написание, но встречаются и другие способы. Есть правило?

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Слитное написание соответствует современной норме. Основное правило таково: сложные прилагательные с подчинительным отношением основ и без суффикса в первой части пишутся слитно, напр.: колесотокарный, йодосодержащий и йодсодержащий, овощемоечный, рельсоукладочный, сталелитейный. (Подробнее см. здесь.)

Нужна ли запятая (которая в скобках, перед И) в предложении: «Хотя электрокар сам выехал на сцену(,) и представители компании показали, как он слушается голосовых команд, речь о серийном производстве пока что не идет»? Или здесь однородные придаточные предложения?

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Указанная запятая не нужна: это предложение с однородными придаточными.

Здравствуйте. Часто пишут с больших букв Нагорно-Карабахский конфликт, как имя собственное. Правильно ли это? Или лучше с маленьких? «Встреча по урегулированию нагорно-карабахского конфликта».

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Правильно написание строчными (т. к. это не собственное наименование). Обратите внимание: в последнем издании «Русского орфографического словаря» РАН (4-е изд. М., 2012) зафиксировано слитное написание: нагорнокарабахский. Таким образом, правильно: нагорнокарабахский конфликт или просто карабахский конфликт (такой вариант употребляется чаще).

У вас в орфографическом словаре написано: нагорнокарабахский (от Нагорный Карабах); а в орфографическом словаре того же автора, В. В. Лопатина, «Прописная или строчная?» (2011) на с. 291 написано: нагорно-карабахский (от Нагорный Карабах). Где ошибка?

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

В последнем по времени издания печатном «Русском орфографическом словаре» – слитное написание. Нужно писать слитно.

Нагорно-Карабахский конфликт или Нагорнокарабахский конфликт? Почему?

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Правильно написание строчными (т. к. это не собственное наименование). «Русский орфографический словарь» РАН (4-е изд. М., 2012) фиксирует слитное написание: нагорнокарабахский. Но чаще употребляется вариант карабахский конфликт.

Как правильно, «гипсокартоновый» или «гипсокартонный»? Спасибо.

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Словарная фиксация: гипсокартонный. См.: Русский орфографический словарь РАН / Под ред. В. В. Лопатина, О. Е. Ивановой. – 4-е изд., испр. и доп. – М., 2012.

Нужна ли точка после кавычек в данном предложении:
В 1965 году на экраны вышла кинокартина Ричарда Лестера «Help!»(.)

Заранее благодарю за ответ.

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Точка нужна, она относится ко всему предложению (а восклицательный знак – к названию в кавычках).

Здравствуйте. В каких случаях выделяется запятыми деепричастный оборот «исходя из…»?

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

ИСХОДЯ ИЗ (чего), предлог 

Обороты, присоединяемые предлогом «исходя из», обычно обособляются (за исключением тех случаев, когда оборот входит в состав сказуемого или тесно связан с ним по смыслу).

Исходя из прошлого опыта, догадываюсь, что это с плиты свалилась сковорода. В. Токарева, Будет другое лето. Исходя из этого, мы засыпаем в амбар для колхозников две с половиной тысячи центнеров. Б. Можаев, В Солдатове у Лозового. Исходя из цифр переписей, показаний свидетелей и других данных, исследователи находят, что число погибших превышало 7 миллионов человек. А. Кузнецов, Бабий Яр. Исходя из этого, ум служит единственно возможным источником наслаждения. А. Чехов, Палата № 6. Мы по-прежнему пытались прогнозировать свое и общее будущее исходя из разумных посылок. Е. Гинзбург, Крутой маршрут. Проект разработан исходя из запланированной стоимости.

Обороты со словами «исходя из» не отделяются знаком препинания от предшествующего союза «а», если оборот нельзя изъять из состава предложения или переместить.

Я ведь не по восторженности отпустил тогда Ислам-бека, господин полковник, а исходя из внутренних убеждений и совести своей. Б. Васильев, Были и небыли.

http://www.gramota.ru/spravka/punctum/58_248

Всего найдено: 4

Здравствуйте. Часто пишут с больших букв Нагорно-Карабахский конфликт, как имя собственное. Правильно ли это? Или лучше с маленьких? «Встреча по урегулированию нагорно-карабахского конфликта».

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Правильно написание строчными (т. к. это не собственное наименование). Обратите внимание: в последнем издании «Русского орфографического словаря» РАН (4-е изд. М., 2012) зафиксировано слитное написание: нагорнокарабахский. Таким образом, правильно: нагорнокарабахский конфликт или просто карабахский конфликт (такой вариант употребляется чаще).

У вас в орфографическом словаре написано: нагорнокарабахский (от Нагорный Карабах); а в орфографическом словаре того же автора, В. В. Лопатина, «Прописная или строчная?» (2011) на с. 291 написано: нагорно-карабахский (от Нагорный Карабах). Где ошибка?

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

В последнем по времени издания печатном «Русском орфографическом словаре» – слитное написание. Нужно писать слитно.

Нагорно-Карабахский конфликт или Нагорнокарабахский конфликт? Почему?

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Правильно написание строчными (т. к. это не собственное наименование). «Русский орфографический словарь» РАН (4-е изд. М., 2012) фиксирует слитное написание: нагорнокарабахский. Но чаще употребляется вариант карабахский конфликт.

В Карабахе есть город Шуши. Армяне ее называют Шуши, азербайджанцы — Шуша.
Мея интересует как склоняется название города в том и другом варианте.
Заранее спасибо!

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Словари фиксируют только один вариант — _Шуша_, очевидно, его следует считать нормативным. Склоняется: _Шуша, Шуши, Шуше_ и т. д.

For the de facto independent state formerly named Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, see Republic of Artsakh.

Nagorno-Karabakh (Upper Karabakh)
Location and extent of the former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast (lighter color)
Area
• Total	4,400 km2 (1,700 sq mi)
• Water (%)	negligible
Population
• 2013 estimate	146,573[1]
• 2010 census	141,400[2]
• Density	29/km2 (75.1/sq mi)
Time zone	UTC+4

Nagorno-Karabakh ( nə-GOR-noh kar-ə-BAHK^[3]), also referred to as Artsakh by Armenians, is a landlocked region in the South Caucasus, within the mountainous range of Karabakh, lying between Lower Karabakh and Syunik, and covering the southeastern range of the Lesser Caucasus mountains. The region is mostly mountainous and forested.

Nagorno-Karabakh is a disputed territory, internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan,^[4][5] but most of it is governed by the unrecognised Republic of Artsakh (also known as the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (NKR)) since the first Nagorno-Karabakh War. Since the end of the war in 1994, representatives of the governments of Armenia and Azerbaijan have been holding peace talks mediated by the OSCE Minsk Group on the region’s disputed status.^[6]

The region is usually equated with the administrative borders of the former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast, comprising 4,400 square kilometres (1,700 sq mi). The historical area of the region, however, encompasses approximately 8,223 square kilometres (3,175 sq mi).^[7][8]

On 27 September 2020, a new war erupted in Nagorno-Karabakh and the surrounding territories, which saw both the armed forces of Azerbaijan and Armenia report military and civilian casualties.^[9] Azerbaijan made significant gains during the war, regaining most of the occupied territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh and large parts of Nagorno-Karabakh, including the culturally significant city of Shusha. The war ended on 10 November 2020, when a trilateral ceasefire agreement was signed between Azerbaijan, Armenia and Russia, which forced Armenia to return all the remaining occupied territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh.

Etymology

The prefix Nagorno- derives from the Russian attributive adjective nagorny (нагорный), which means «highland». The Azerbaijani names of the region include the similar adjectives dağlıq (mountainous) or yuxarı (upper). Such words are not used in the Armenian name, but appeared in the region’s official name during the Soviet era as Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast. Other languages apply their own wording for mountainous, upper, or highland; for example, the official name used by the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic in French is Haut-Karabakh, meaning «Upper Karabakh».

The names for the region in the various local languages all translate to «mountainous Karabakh», or «mountainous black garden»:

Armenians living in the area often call Nagorno-Karabakh Artsakh (Armenian: Արցախ), the name of the 10th province of the ancient Kingdom of Armenia. Urartian inscriptions (9th–7th centuries BC) use the name Urtekhini for the region. Ancient Greek sources called the area Orkhistene.^[10]

History

Antiquity and Early Middle Ages

Nagorno-Karabakh falls within the lands occupied by peoples known to modern archaeologists as the Kura-Araxes culture, who lived between the two rivers Kura and Araxes.

The ancient population of the region consisted of various autochthonous local and migrant tribes who were mostly non-Indo-Europeans.^[13] According to the prevailing western theory, these natives intermarried with Armenians who came to the region after its inclusion into Armenia in the 2nd or possibly earlier, the 4th century BC.^[14] Other scholars suggest that the Armenians settled in the region as early as the 7th century BC.^[15]

In around 180 BC, Artsakh became one of the 15 provinces of the Armenian Kingdom and remained so until the 4th century.^[16] While formally having the status of a province (nahang), Artsakh possibly formed a principality on its own — like Armenia’s province of Syunik. Other theories suggest that Artsakh was a royal land, belonging directly to the king of Armenia.^[17] King Tigran the Great of Armenia (ruled from 95 to 55 BC) founded in Artsakh one of four cities named «Tigranakert» after himself.^[18] The ruins of the ancient Tigranakert, located 50 km (30 mi) north-east of Stepanakert, are being studied by a group of international scholars.

In 387 AD, after the partition of Armenia between the Roman Empire and Sassanid Persia, two Armenian provinces, Artsakh and Utik, became part of the Sassanid satrapy of Caucasian Albania, which, in turn, came under strong Armenian religious and cultural influence.^[19][20] At the time the population of Artsakh and Utik consisted of Armenians and several Armenized tribes.^[13]

Armenian culture and civilization flourished in the early medieval Nagorno-Karabakh. In the 5th century, the first-ever Armenian school was opened on the territory of modern Nagorno-Karabakh at Amaras Monastery by the efforts of St. Mesrop Mashtots, the inventor of the Armenian alphabet.^[21] St. Mesrop was very active in preaching the Gospel in Artsakh and Utik. Overall, Mesrop Mashtots made three trips to Artsakh and Utik, ultimately reaching pagan territories at the foothills of the Greater Caucasus.^[22] The 7th-century Armenian linguist and grammarian Stephanos Syunetsi stated in his work that Armenians of Artsakh had their own dialect, and encouraged his readers to learn it.^[23]

High Middle Ages

Around the mid 7th century, the region was conquered by the invading Muslim Arabs through the Muslim conquest of Persia. Subsequently, it was ruled by local governors endorsed by the Caliphate. According to some sources, in 821, the Armenian^[24] prince Sahl Smbatian revolted in Artsakh and established the House of Khachen, which ruled Artsakh as a principality until the early 19th century.^[25] According to other sources, Sahl Smbatian «was of the Zamirhakan family of kings,» and in the year 837–838, he acquired sovereignty over Armenia, Georgia, and Albania.^[26][27] The name «Khachen» originated from Armenian word «khach,» which means «cross».^[28] By 1000 the House of Khachen proclaimed the Kingdom of Artsakh with John Senecherib as its first ruler.^[29] Initially Dizak, in southern Artsakh, formed also a kingdom ruled by the ancient House of Aranshahik, descended of the earliest Kings of Caucasian Albania. In 1261, after the daughter of the last king of Dizak married the king of Artsakh, Armenian^[30] prince Hasan Jalal Dola, the two states merged into one^[25] Armenian^[31] Principality of Khachen. Subsequently, Artsakh continued to exist as a de facto independent principality.

Late Middle Ages

In the 15th century, the territory of Karabakh was part of the states ruled subsequently by the Kara Koyunlu and Ak Koyunlu Turkic tribal confederations. According to Abu Bakr Tihrani, during the period of Jahan Shah (1438–1468), the ruler of Kara Koyunlu, Piri bey Karamanli held the governorship of Karabakh.^[34] However, according to Robert H. Hewsen, the Turkoman lord Jahan Shah (1437–67) assigned the governorship of upper Karabakh to local Armenian princes, allowing a native Armenian leadership to emerge consisting of five noble families led by princes who held the titles of meliks.^[25] These dynasties represented the branches of the earlier House of Khachen and were the descendants of the medieval kings of Artsakh. Their lands were often referred to as the Country of Khamsa (five in Arabic). In a Charter (2 June 1799) of the Emperor Paul I titled «About their admission to Russian suzerainty, land allocation, rights and privileges», it was noted that the Christian heritage of the Karabakh region and all their people were admitted to the Russian suzerainty.^[35] However, according to Robert Hewsen, the Russian Empire recognized the sovereign status of the five princes in their domains by the charter of Emperor Paul I dated 2 June 1799.^[36]

The Armenian meliks were granted supreme command over neighbouring Armenian principalities and Muslim khans in the Caucasus by the Iranian king Nader Shah, in return for the meliks’ victories over the invading Ottoman Turks in the 1720s.^[37] These five principalities^[38][39] in Karabakh were ruled by Armenian families who had received the title Melik (prince) and were the following:

• Principality of Gulistan – under the leadership of the Melik-Beglarian family
• Principality of Jraberd – under the leadership of the Melik-Israelian family
• Principality of Khachen – under the leadership of the Hasan-Jalalian family
• Principality of Varanda – under the leadership of the Melik-Shahnazarian family
• Principality of Dizak – under the leadership of the Melik-Avanian family

From 1501 to 1736, during the existence of the Safavid Empire, the province of Karabakh was governed by Ziyadoglu Gajar’s dynasty. Ziyadoglu Gajar’s dynasty ruled the province of Karabakh until Nader Shah took over Karabakh from their rule.^[40] The Armenian meliks maintained full control over the region until the mid-18th century.^{[citation needed]} In the early 18th century, Iran’s Nader Shah took Karabakh out of control of the Ganja khans in punishment for their support of the Safavids, and placed it under his own control^[41][42] In the mid-18th century, as internal conflicts between the meliks led to their weakening, the Karabakh Khanate was formed. The Karabakh khanate, one of the largest khanates under Iranian suzerainty,^[43] was headed by Panah-Ali khan Javanshir. For the reinforcement of the power of Karabakh khanate, Khan of Karabakh, Panah-Ali khan Javanshir, built up “the fortress of Panahabad (today Shusha)” in 1751. During that time, Otuziki, Javanshir, Kebirli, and other Turkic tribes constituted the majority of the overall population.

Modern era

Karabakh (including modern-day Nagorno-Karabakh), became a protectorate of the Russian Empire by the Kurekchay Treaty, signed between Ibrahim Khalil Khan of Karabakh and general Pavel Tsitsianov on behalf of Tsar Alexander I in 1805, according to which the Russian monarch recognized Ibrahim Khalil Khan and his descendants as the sole hereditary rulers of the region.^[44][45][46] However, its new status was only confirmed following the outcome of the Russo-Persian War (1804-1813), when through the loss in the war, Persia formally ceded Karabakh to the Russian Empire per the Treaty of Gulistan (1813),^{[47][48][49][50]} before the rest of Transcaucasia was incorporated into the Empire in 1828 by the Treaty of Turkmenchay, which came as an outcome of the Russo-Persian War (1826-1828).

In 1822, 9 years after it passed from Iranian to Russian control, the Karabakh Khanate was dissolved and the area became part of the Elisabethpol Governorate within the Russian Empire. In 1823 the five districts corresponding roughly to modern-day Nagorno-Karabakh were 90.8% Armenian-populated.^[51][52]

Soviet era

After the Russian Revolution of 1917, Karabakh became part of the Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic, but this soon dissolved into separate Armenian, Azerbaijani, and Georgian states. Over the next two years (1918–1920), there were a series of short wars between Armenia and Azerbaijan over several regions, including Karabakh. In July 1918, the First Armenian Assembly of Nagorno-Karabakh declared the region self-governing and created a National Council and government.^[53] Later, Ottoman troops entered Karabakh, meeting armed resistance by Armenians.

After the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in World War I, British troops occupied Karabakh. The British command provisionally affirmed Khosrov bey Sultanov (appointed by the Azerbaijani government) as the governor-general of Karabakh and Zangezur, pending a final decision by the Paris Peace Conference.^[54] The decision was opposed by Karabakh Armenians. In February 1920, the Karabakh National Council preliminarily agreed to Azerbaijani jurisdiction, while Armenians elsewhere in Karabakh continued guerrilla fighting, never accepting the agreement.^[53] The agreement itself was soon annulled by the Ninth Karabagh Assembly, which declared union with Armenia in April.^[53][55]

In April 1920, while the Azerbaijani army was locked in Karabakh fighting local Armenian forces, Azerbaijan was taken over by Bolsheviks. On 10 August 1920, Armenia signed a preliminary agreement with the Bolsheviks, agreeing to a temporary Bolshevik occupation of these areas until final settlement would be reached.^[56] In 1921, Armenia and Georgia were also taken over by the Bolsheviks. After the Sovietization of Armenia and Azerbaijan, the Kavbiuro (Caucasian Bureau of the Central Committee of the Russian Communist Party (Bolshevik)) decided that Karabakh would remain within Azerbaijan SSR with broad regional autonomy, with the administrative centre in the city of Shusha (the administrative center was later moved to Stepanakert).^[57] The oblast’s borders were drawn to include Armenian villages and to exclude as much as possible Azerbaijani villages.^[58] The resulting district ensured an Armenian majority.

With the Soviet Union firmly in control of the region, the conflict over the region died down for several decades until the beginning of the dissolution of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s and early 1990s, when the question of Nagorno-Karabakh re-emerged. Accusing the Azerbaijani SSR government of conducting forced Azerification of the region, the majority Armenian population, with ideological and material support from the Armenian SSR, started a movement to have the autonomous oblast transferred to the Armenian SSR.^[59] In August 1987, Karabakh Armenians sent a petition for union with Armenia with tens of thousands of signatures to Moscow.^[60]

War and secession

On 13 February 1988, Karabakh Armenians began demonstrating in Stepanakert, in favour of unification with the Armenian republic. Six days later they were joined by mass marches in Yerevan. On 20 February, the Soviet of People’s Deputies in Karabakh voted 110 to 17 to request the transfer of the region to Armenia. This unprecedented action by a regional Soviet brought out tens of thousands of demonstrations both in Stepanakert and Yerevan, but Moscow rejected the Armenians’ demands. On 20 February 1988, 2 Azeri girls had been raped in Stepanakert, this caused wide outrage in the Azeri town of Aghdam, where the first direct confrontation of the conflict occurred as a large group of Azeris marched from Agdam to the Armenian populated town of Askeran. The confrontation between the Azeris and the police near Askeran degenerated into the Askeran clash, which left two Azeris dead, one of them allegedly killed by an Azeri police officer, as well as 50 Armenian villagers and an unknown number of Azeris and police injured.^[61][62][63] Large numbers of refugees left Armenia and Azerbaijan as violence began against the minority populations of the respective countries.^[64] On 7 July 1988, the European Parliament passed a resolution that condemned the violence employed against Armenian demonstrators in Azerbaijan, and supported the demand of the Armenians for reunification with the Soviet Republic of Armenia.^[65]

On 29 November 1989, direct rule in Nagorno-Karabakh was ended and the region was returned to Azerbaijani administration.^[66] The Soviet policy backfired, however, when a joint session of the Armenian Supreme Soviet and the National Council, the legislative body of Nagorno-Karabakh, proclaimed the unification of Nagorno-Karabakh with Armenia.^{[citation needed]} On 26 November 1991 Azerbaijan abolished the status of Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast, rearranging the administrative division and bringing the territory under direct control of Azerbaijan.^[67]

On 10 December 1991, in a referendum boycotted by local Azerbaijanis,^[63] Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh approved the creation of an independent state. A Soviet proposal for enhanced autonomy for Nagorno-Karabakh within Azerbaijan satisfied neither side and a full-scale war subsequently erupted between Azerbaijan and Nagorno-Karabakh, with the latter receiving support from Armenia.^{[68][69][70][71]} According to Armenia’s former president, Levon Ter-Petrossian, the Karabakh leadership approach was maximalist and «they thought they could get more.»^[72][73][74]

The struggle over Nagorno-Karabakh escalated after both Armenia and Azerbaijan attained independence from the Soviet Union in 1991. In the post-Soviet power vacuum, military action between Azerbaijan and Armenia was heavily influenced by the Russian military. Furthermore, both the Armenian and Azerbaijani military employed a large number of mercenaries from Ukraine and Russia.^[75] Between fifteen and twenty-five hundred Afghan mujahideen, along with fighters from Chechnya, participated in the fighting on Azerbaijan’s side,^[63] as well heavy artillery and tanks provided to Armenia by Russia.^[63] Many survivors from the Azerbaijani side found shelter in 12 emergency camps set up in other parts of Azerbaijan to cope with the growing number of internally displaced people due to the first Nagorno-Karabakh war.^[76]

By the end of 1993, the conflict had caused about 30,000 casualties^[77] and created hundreds of thousands of refugees on both sides.^{[citation needed]} By May 1994, the Armenians were in control of 14% of the territory of Azerbaijan.^[78] At that stage, for the first time during the conflict, the Azerbaijani government recognized Nagorno-Karabakh as a third party in the war and started direct negotiations with the Karabakh authorities. As a result, a ceasefire was reached on 12 May 1994 through Russian mediation.

Post-1994 ceasefire

Despite the ceasefire, fatalities due to armed conflicts between Armenian and Azerbaijani soldiers continued.^[79] On 25 January 2005, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) adopted PACE Resolution 1416, which condemned ethnic cleansing against Azerbaijanis.^[80][81] On 15–17 May 2007 the 34th session of the Council of Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the Organization of Islamic Conference adopted resolution No. 7/34-P, considering the occupation of Azerbaijani territory as the aggression of Armenia against Azerbaijan and recognizing the actions against Azerbaijani civilians as a crime against humanity, and condemning the destruction of archaeological, cultural and religious monuments in the occupied territories.^[82] The 11th session of the summit of the Organization of the Islamic Conference held on 13–14 March 2008 in Dakar adopted resolution No. 10/11-P (IS). In the resolution, OIC member states condemned the occupation of Azerbaijani lands by Armenian forces and Armenian aggression against Azerbaijan, ethnic cleansing against the Azeri population, and charged Armenia with the «destruction of cultural monuments in the occupied Azerbaijani territories».^[83] On 14 March of the same year the UN General Assembly adopted Resolution No. 62/243 which «demands the immediate, complete and unconditional withdrawal of all Armenian forces from all occupied territories of the Republic of Azerbaijan».^[84] On 18–20 May 2010, the 37th session of the Council of Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the Organization of Islamic Conference in Dushanbe adopted another resolution condemning the aggression of Armenia against Azerbaijan, recognizing the actions against Azerbaijani civilians as a crime against humanity and condemning the destruction of archaeological, cultural, and religious monuments in occupied territories.^[85] On 20 May of the same year, the European Parliament in Strasbourg adopted the resolution on «The need for an EU Strategy for the South Caucasus» on the basis of the report by Evgeni Kirilov, the Bulgarian member of the Parliament.^[86][87] The resolution states in particular that «the occupied Azerbaijani regions around Nagorno-Karabakh must be cleared as soon as possible».^[88] On 26 January 2016, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) adopted Resolution 2085, which deplored the fact that the occupation by Armenia of Nagorno-Karabakh and other adjacent areas of Azerbaijan creates humanitarian and environmental problems for the citizens of Azerbaijan, condemned ethnic cleansing against Azerbaijanis and Assembly requested immediate withdrawal of Armenian armed forces from the region concerned.^[89][90][91]

Several^[quantify] world leaders have met with the presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan over the years, but efforts to maintain the ceasefire have failed.^[92]

On 2 April 2016 Azerbaijani and Armenian forces again clashed in the region.^{[citation needed]} The Armenian Defense Ministry alleged that Azerbaijan launched an offensive to seize territory in the region. At least 30 soldiers were killed during the fighting and a Mil Mi-24 helicopter and tank were also destroyed, with 12 of the fallen soldiers belonging to the Azerbaijani forces and the other 18 belonging to the Armenian forces, as well as an additional 35 Armenian soldiers reportedly wounded.^[93][94]

2020 war and ceasefire agreement

On 27 September 2020, a new war erupted in Nagorno-Karabakh and the surrounding territories.^[9] The United Nations strongly condemned the conflict and called on both sides to deescalate tensions and resume meaningful negotiations without delay.^[95]

Azerbaijan made significant gains during the war, regaining most of the occupied territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh and large parts of Nagorno-Karabakh, including the culturally significant city of Shusha.^[96]

The war ended on 10 November 2020, when a trilateral ceasefire agreement was signed between Azerbaijan, Armenia and Russia, which forced Armenia to return all the remaining occupied territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh.^[97]

Geography

Nagorno-Karabakh has a total area of 4,400 square kilometres (1,699 sq mi).^[98] Approximately half of Nagorno-Karabakh terrain is over 950 metres (3,120 ft) above sea level.^[99] The borders of Nagorno-Karabakh resemble a kidney bean with the indentation on the east side. It has tall mountain ridges along the northern edge and along the west and mountainous south. The part near the indentation of the kidney bean itself is a relatively flat valley, with the two edges of the bean, the districts of Martakert and Martuni, having flatlands as well. Other flatter valleys exist around the Sarsang reservoir, Hadrut, and the south. The entire region lies, on average, 1,100 metres (3,600 ft) above sea level.^[99] Notable peaks include the border mountain Murovdag and the Great Kirs mountain chain in the junction of Shusha and Hadrut districts. The territory of modern Nagorno-Karabakh forms a portion of the historic region of Karabakh, which lies between the rivers Kura and Araxes, and the modern Armenia-Azerbaijan border. Nagorno-Karabakh in its modern borders is part of the larger region of Upper Karabakh.

Nagorno-Karabakh does not directly border Armenia but is connected to the latter through the Lachin corridor, a mountain pass under the control of the Russian peacekeeping forces in Nagorno-Karabakh.

The major cities of the region are Stepanakert, which serves as the capital of the unrecognised Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, and Shusha, which lies partially in ruins. Vineyards, orchards, and mulberry groves for silkworms are developed in the valleys.^[100]

Environment

Nagorno-Karabakh’s environment vary from steppe on the Kura lowland through dense forests of oak, hornbeam, and beech on the lower mountain slopes to birchwood and alpine meadows higher up. The region possesses numerous mineral springs and deposits of zinc, coal, lead, gold, marble, and limestone.^[101]

Demographics

Antiquity – 1918

Historically, the inhabitants of Nagorno-Karabakh—then part of the province of Artsakh—were confirmed by Ancient Greek and Roman sources «long before our era» to be Armenian.^{[102][better source needed]} In the early 15th century, German traveller Johann Schiltberger after visiting the region stated that «although the Muslims had taken possession of Karabagh, there were still Armenian villages in the region».^[103] Historian Victor Schnirelmann writes that «In the mid-18th century, … Turkic tribes … gained access to the highland territories [of Karabakh] and began to settle in Shusha … by the end of the 18th century, a substantial number of its former Armenian inhabitants had left Nagorny Karabagh. Just at the turn of the 19th century, the Turkic population significantly outnumbered the local Armenians, but this only lasted … [until the] end of the 1820s, [when] the Armenians began to come back to Karabagh, and they accounted for the majority of its population by the mid-19th century».^[104] Edmund Herzig and Marina Kurkchiyan present an alternative view that «Armenians had already been a majority in some areas such as mountainous Karabagh», compared to the Yerevan province which had «regained an Armenian majority for the first time in several hundred years.»^[105]

According to an 1823 Russian survey published in Tiflis (present-day Tbilisi) in 1866,^[103] Armenians made up 97 percent of the population in the five districts (mahals) of Nagorno-Karabakh,^[106] thus proving, contrary to claims in Azerbaijani historiography, that Armenians formed an overwhelming majority of Nagorno-Karabakh prior to 1828. Historian George Bournoutian writes that Russian statistics from 1810 show that Armenians made up 21 percent of the Karabakh region’s population; In 1823, the Armenian population of Karabakh had increased by 30 percent «after the return of those who had fled the region», and by 1832, the Armenian population had increased to one-third of Karabakh. Moreover, the «one-third» of the population of Karabakh composed of Armenians resided in one-third of the territory of Karabakh, the mountainous territory (i.e. Nagorno-Karabakh), where they «constituted an overwhelming majority of the population.»^[103]

1918–1920

According to Armenian sources, the «historical Nagorno-Karabakh» region had a population of 300,000–330,000 in 1918–1920, rising to 700,000–800,000 by 1988. As a result of «Turkish-Azerbaijani aggression», the region’s population declined by 20 percent in 1918–1920.^[107] In this period, Azerbaijani forces carried out massacres against Armenians in Ghaibalishen, Jamilli, Karkijahan, and Pahlul (600–700 dead^[108]), Stepanakert (several hundred dead^[109]), and Shusha (several hundred^[110] to 12,000 dead^[111]). As a result of the Shusha massacre, 5,000–6,000 Armenians were displaced to the regions of Varanda and Dizak.^[112] By 11 April 1920, some thirty villages in Nagorno-Karabakh had been «devastated» by Azerbaijani forces as a result of the uprising, leaving 25,000 homeless (including nearly 6,000 refugees from Shusha).^[113]

1921–1987

1923 statistics indicate that the NKAO was 94.8 percent Armenian, numbering 149,600, whilst the Azerbaijani population numbered 7,700. Historian Cory Welt writes of a «discrepancy» of the Armenian population jumping by over 25,000 individuals between the 1921 and 1923 censuses, also pointing out that the Armenian population declined to 111,700 in 1926, thus indicating an «unexplained drop» of 38,000 individuals.^[114] In the 1920s, the NKAO had a population of 131,500 people, 94.4 percent (124,136) of whom were ethnic Armenians and only 5.6 percent (7,364) of whom were ethnic Azerbaijanis.^[105] In 1933, Nagorno-Karabakh had a population of 147,308, 10,751 (7.3 percent) of whom were urban dwellers, and 136,557 (92.7 percent) of whom were rural residents.^[115] On 1 January 1973, the oblast had a population of 153,000.^[116]

Discrimination and stagnation

Whilst the region was a part of the Azerbaijan SSR, the Armenian share of the population dropped from 94.7 to 76.9 percent, whilst the Azerbaijani share of the population quadrupled from 5.1 to 21.5 percent^[105] as a result of «migratory influx»^[107]—indicative of the socio-economic difficulties local Armenians experienced under Soviet Azerbaijani leadership which led them to emigrate from Karabakh.^[105] Emeritus professor of law M. Cherif Bassiouni writes of the stagnation of the Armenian population «due to the discriminatory policies of Azerbaijani authorities that compelled Armenians to emigrate»; also adding that 600,000 Armenians from Karabakh reside in Armenia and the countries of the CIS.^[107] Stuart J. Kaufman, a professor of political science and international relations,^[117] writes of the difficulties of Karabakh Armenians:

In Mountainous Karabagh, Armenian-language education was not easily available, Armenian history was not taught at all, and those who went to Armenia for training were discriminated against in competing for jobs in the province, since even routine hiring had to be cleared with Baku. Underinvestment in the region—also blamed on Baku—meant less economic development and poor infrastructure even by Soviet standards, and therefore fewer jobs overall, especially for Armenians. Cultural ties with Armenia were strangled in red tape in Baku, and a decision to make Armenian-language television available in the region was left unimplemented. One result of these policies was a continuing exodus of Armenians from Karabagh in search of greener pastures.^[118]

1988 – present

Following the Sumgait pogrom and the exodus of Azerbaijanis from Armenia, Azerbaijanis in Stepanakert and Armenians in Shusha were expelled in September 1988. As local Armenian forces gained possession of Nagorno-Karabakh and surrounding districts (amounting to 14 percent of the internationally recognised territory of Azerbaijan) during the First Nagorno-Karabakh war, hundreds of thousands of Azerbaijanis were expelled from their lands.^[63] During the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War, Azerbaijan regained control over the surrounding districts and southern parts of the former NKAO, thus displacing approximately 70,000 Armenians.^[119]

Historical ethnic composition of the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast in 1921–1989

Ethnic group	1921[114][120]	1923[102][114]	1925[102]	1926[102][121]	1939[102][122]	1959[102][123]	1970[102][124]	1979[102][125]	1989[126]
Number	%	Number	%	Number	%	Number	%	Number	%	Number	%	Number	%	Number	%	Number	%
Armenians	122,426	94.73	149,600	94.8	142,470	90.28	111,694	89.24	132,800	88.04	110,053	84.39	121,068	80.54	123,076	75.89	145,450	76.92
Azerbaijanis[a]	6,550	5.07	7,700	4.9	15,261	9.67	12,592	10.06	14,053	9.32	17,995	13.80	27,179	18.08	37,264	22.98	40,688	21.52
Russians	267	0.21	500	0.3	46	0.03	596	0.48	3,174	2.10	1,790	1.37	1,310	0.87	1,265	0.78	1,922	1.02
Ukrainians	30	0.02	35	0.03	436	0.29	238	0.18	193	0.13	140	0.09	416	0.22
Belarusians	12	0.01	11	0.01	32	0.02	35	0.02	37	0.02	79	0.04
Greeks	68	0.05	74	0.05	67	0.05	33	0.02	56	0.03	72	0.04
Tatars	6	0.00	29	0.02	36	0.03	25	0.02	41	0.03	64	0.03
Georgians	5	0.00	25	0.02	16	0.01	22	0.01	17	0.01	57	0.03
Others	151	0.12	235	0.16	179	0.14	448	0.30	285	0.18	337	0.18
TOTAL	129,243[b]	100.00	157,800	100.0	157,807	100.00	125,159	100.00	150,837	100.00	130,406	100.00	150,313	100.00	162,181	100.00	189,085	100.00

Transport

Location	ICAO	DAFIF	IATA	Airport name	Coordinates
Stepanakert	UBBS	UB13		Stepanakert Airport[127]	39°54′05″N 46°47′13″E / 39.90139°N 46.78694°E

During the rule of the Soviet Union, the Yevlakh–Aghdam–Stepanakert line connected the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region with the main part of Azerbaijan. After the Nagorno-Karabakh war and the abandonment of Ağdam, the line’s service was cut back to service only between Yevlax and Kətəlparaq, without any present section at the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic. The former railway line between Kətəlparaq and Stepanakert has been almost completely destroyed.

The (Tbilisi–Gyumri–)Yerevan–Nakhchivan–Horadiz–Shirvan(–Baku) main railway was also dismantled from the NKR between Ordubad and Horadiz, as well as a by-line from Mincivan to the Armenian city of Kapan. Currently, the Azerbaijani trains only travel to Horadiz. The Ordubad–Horadiz section has been demolished, leaving the NKR with no intact, active railway line in their territory. The railway at the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic still operates, but it is separated from the main Azerbaijani lines, and only has a connection to Iran.

See also

• Timeline of Artsakh history
• Community for Democracy and Rights of Nations
• List of active separatist movements in Europe
• Janapar – the hiking trail across Nagorno-Karabakh
• Outline of Nagorno-Karabakh
• Post-Soviet states
• Yekbûn

Notes

References

Bibliography

Further reading

• Tsibenko, Veronika (2018). «Karabakh, Nagorno». In Fleet, Kate; Krämer, Gudrun; Matringe, Denis; Nawas, John; Stewart, Devin J. (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam, THREE. Brill Online. ISSN 1873-9830.
• Torres, Ricardo Juan (2022). «The role of Nagorno-Karabakh in the shaping of Armenian and Azeri identity». Consejo Argentino para las Relaciones Internacionales (CARI).

External links

• Articles and Photography on Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh) from UK Photojournalist Russell Pollard
• All UN Security Council resolutions on Nagorno-Karabakh, courtesy U.S. State department
• Nagorno-Karabakh Agreement of 2 November 2008 and country profile from BBC News Online
• Article on the 10 December Referendum from Russia Profile
• The conflict over the Nagorno-Karabakh region dealt with by the OSCE Minsk Conference — Report by rapporteur David Atkinson presented to Political Affairs Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe
• Conciliation Resources – Accord issue: The limits of leadership – Elites and societies in the Nagorny Karabakh peace process also key texts & agreements and chronology (in English & Russian)
• Independence of Kosovo and the Nagorno-Karabakh Issue
• Interview with Thomas De Waal
• Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty. Nagorno-Karabakh: Timeline Of The Long Road To Peace
• Resolution #1416 from the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe
• USIP — Nagorno-Karabakh Searching for a Solution: Key points, by Patricia Carley, Publication of the United States Institute of Peace (USIP)
• USIP — Sovereignty after Empire Self-Determination Movements in the Former Soviet Union. Case Studies: Nagorno-Karabakh. by Galina Starovoitova, Publication of the United States Institute of Peace (USIP)
• Photo Series Nagorno-Karabakh 2008–2011 – daily life, front line, mine clearance, culture, religion.

For the de facto independent state formerly named Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, see Republic of Artsakh.

Nagorno-Karabakh (Upper Karabakh)
Location and extent of the former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast (lighter color)
Area
• Total	4,400 km2 (1,700 sq mi)
• Water (%)	negligible
Population
• 2013 estimate	146,573[1]
• 2010 census	141,400[2]
• Density	29/km2 (75.1/sq mi)
Time zone	UTC+4

Nagorno-Karabakh ( nə-GOR-noh kar-ə-BAHK^[3]), also referred to as Artsakh by Armenians, is a landlocked region in the South Caucasus, within the mountainous range of Karabakh, lying between Lower Karabakh and Syunik, and covering the southeastern range of the Lesser Caucasus mountains. The region is mostly mountainous and forested.

Nagorno-Karabakh is a disputed territory, internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan,^[4][5] but most of it is governed by the unrecognised Republic of Artsakh (also known as the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (NKR)) since the first Nagorno-Karabakh War. Since the end of the war in 1994, representatives of the governments of Armenia and Azerbaijan have been holding peace talks mediated by the OSCE Minsk Group on the region’s disputed status.^[6]

The region is usually equated with the administrative borders of the former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast, comprising 4,400 square kilometres (1,700 sq mi). The historical area of the region, however, encompasses approximately 8,223 square kilometres (3,175 sq mi).^[7][8]

On 27 September 2020, a new war erupted in Nagorno-Karabakh and the surrounding territories, which saw both the armed forces of Azerbaijan and Armenia report military and civilian casualties.^[9] Azerbaijan made significant gains during the war, regaining most of the occupied territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh and large parts of Nagorno-Karabakh, including the culturally significant city of Shusha. The war ended on 10 November 2020, when a trilateral ceasefire agreement was signed between Azerbaijan, Armenia and Russia, which forced Armenia to return all the remaining occupied territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh.

Etymology

The prefix Nagorno- derives from the Russian attributive adjective nagorny (нагорный), which means «highland». The Azerbaijani names of the region include the similar adjectives dağlıq (mountainous) or yuxarı (upper). Such words are not used in the Armenian name, but appeared in the region’s official name during the Soviet era as Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast. Other languages apply their own wording for mountainous, upper, or highland; for example, the official name used by the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic in French is Haut-Karabakh, meaning «Upper Karabakh».

The names for the region in the various local languages all translate to «mountainous Karabakh», or «mountainous black garden»:

Armenians living in the area often call Nagorno-Karabakh Artsakh (Armenian: Արցախ), the name of the 10th province of the ancient Kingdom of Armenia. Urartian inscriptions (9th–7th centuries BC) use the name Urtekhini for the region. Ancient Greek sources called the area Orkhistene.^[10]

History

Antiquity and Early Middle Ages

Nagorno-Karabakh falls within the lands occupied by peoples known to modern archaeologists as the Kura-Araxes culture, who lived between the two rivers Kura and Araxes.

The ancient population of the region consisted of various autochthonous local and migrant tribes who were mostly non-Indo-Europeans.^[13] According to the prevailing western theory, these natives intermarried with Armenians who came to the region after its inclusion into Armenia in the 2nd or possibly earlier, the 4th century BC.^[14] Other scholars suggest that the Armenians settled in the region as early as the 7th century BC.^[15]

In around 180 BC, Artsakh became one of the 15 provinces of the Armenian Kingdom and remained so until the 4th century.^[16] While formally having the status of a province (nahang), Artsakh possibly formed a principality on its own — like Armenia’s province of Syunik. Other theories suggest that Artsakh was a royal land, belonging directly to the king of Armenia.^[17] King Tigran the Great of Armenia (ruled from 95 to 55 BC) founded in Artsakh one of four cities named «Tigranakert» after himself.^[18] The ruins of the ancient Tigranakert, located 50 km (30 mi) north-east of Stepanakert, are being studied by a group of international scholars.

In 387 AD, after the partition of Armenia between the Roman Empire and Sassanid Persia, two Armenian provinces, Artsakh and Utik, became part of the Sassanid satrapy of Caucasian Albania, which, in turn, came under strong Armenian religious and cultural influence.^[19][20] At the time the population of Artsakh and Utik consisted of Armenians and several Armenized tribes.^[13]

Armenian culture and civilization flourished in the early medieval Nagorno-Karabakh. In the 5th century, the first-ever Armenian school was opened on the territory of modern Nagorno-Karabakh at Amaras Monastery by the efforts of St. Mesrop Mashtots, the inventor of the Armenian alphabet.^[21] St. Mesrop was very active in preaching the Gospel in Artsakh and Utik. Overall, Mesrop Mashtots made three trips to Artsakh and Utik, ultimately reaching pagan territories at the foothills of the Greater Caucasus.^[22] The 7th-century Armenian linguist and grammarian Stephanos Syunetsi stated in his work that Armenians of Artsakh had their own dialect, and encouraged his readers to learn it.^[23]

High Middle Ages

Around the mid 7th century, the region was conquered by the invading Muslim Arabs through the Muslim conquest of Persia. Subsequently, it was ruled by local governors endorsed by the Caliphate. According to some sources, in 821, the Armenian^[24] prince Sahl Smbatian revolted in Artsakh and established the House of Khachen, which ruled Artsakh as a principality until the early 19th century.^[25] According to other sources, Sahl Smbatian «was of the Zamirhakan family of kings,» and in the year 837–838, he acquired sovereignty over Armenia, Georgia, and Albania.^[26][27] The name «Khachen» originated from Armenian word «khach,» which means «cross».^[28] By 1000 the House of Khachen proclaimed the Kingdom of Artsakh with John Senecherib as its first ruler.^[29] Initially Dizak, in southern Artsakh, formed also a kingdom ruled by the ancient House of Aranshahik, descended of the earliest Kings of Caucasian Albania. In 1261, after the daughter of the last king of Dizak married the king of Artsakh, Armenian^[30] prince Hasan Jalal Dola, the two states merged into one^[25] Armenian^[31] Principality of Khachen. Subsequently, Artsakh continued to exist as a de facto independent principality.

Late Middle Ages

In the 15th century, the territory of Karabakh was part of the states ruled subsequently by the Kara Koyunlu and Ak Koyunlu Turkic tribal confederations. According to Abu Bakr Tihrani, during the period of Jahan Shah (1438–1468), the ruler of Kara Koyunlu, Piri bey Karamanli held the governorship of Karabakh.^[34] However, according to Robert H. Hewsen, the Turkoman lord Jahan Shah (1437–67) assigned the governorship of upper Karabakh to local Armenian princes, allowing a native Armenian leadership to emerge consisting of five noble families led by princes who held the titles of meliks.^[25] These dynasties represented the branches of the earlier House of Khachen and were the descendants of the medieval kings of Artsakh. Their lands were often referred to as the Country of Khamsa (five in Arabic). In a Charter (2 June 1799) of the Emperor Paul I titled «About their admission to Russian suzerainty, land allocation, rights and privileges», it was noted that the Christian heritage of the Karabakh region and all their people were admitted to the Russian suzerainty.^[35] However, according to Robert Hewsen, the Russian Empire recognized the sovereign status of the five princes in their domains by the charter of Emperor Paul I dated 2 June 1799.^[36]

The Armenian meliks were granted supreme command over neighbouring Armenian principalities and Muslim khans in the Caucasus by the Iranian king Nader Shah, in return for the meliks’ victories over the invading Ottoman Turks in the 1720s.^[37] These five principalities^[38][39] in Karabakh were ruled by Armenian families who had received the title Melik (prince) and were the following:

• Principality of Gulistan – under the leadership of the Melik-Beglarian family
• Principality of Jraberd – under the leadership of the Melik-Israelian family
• Principality of Khachen – under the leadership of the Hasan-Jalalian family
• Principality of Varanda – under the leadership of the Melik-Shahnazarian family
• Principality of Dizak – under the leadership of the Melik-Avanian family

From 1501 to 1736, during the existence of the Safavid Empire, the province of Karabakh was governed by Ziyadoglu Gajar’s dynasty. Ziyadoglu Gajar’s dynasty ruled the province of Karabakh until Nader Shah took over Karabakh from their rule.^[40] The Armenian meliks maintained full control over the region until the mid-18th century.^{[citation needed]} In the early 18th century, Iran’s Nader Shah took Karabakh out of control of the Ganja khans in punishment for their support of the Safavids, and placed it under his own control^[41][42] In the mid-18th century, as internal conflicts between the meliks led to their weakening, the Karabakh Khanate was formed. The Karabakh khanate, one of the largest khanates under Iranian suzerainty,^[43] was headed by Panah-Ali khan Javanshir. For the reinforcement of the power of Karabakh khanate, Khan of Karabakh, Panah-Ali khan Javanshir, built up “the fortress of Panahabad (today Shusha)” in 1751. During that time, Otuziki, Javanshir, Kebirli, and other Turkic tribes constituted the majority of the overall population.

Modern era

Karabakh (including modern-day Nagorno-Karabakh), became a protectorate of the Russian Empire by the Kurekchay Treaty, signed between Ibrahim Khalil Khan of Karabakh and general Pavel Tsitsianov on behalf of Tsar Alexander I in 1805, according to which the Russian monarch recognized Ibrahim Khalil Khan and his descendants as the sole hereditary rulers of the region.^[44][45][46] However, its new status was only confirmed following the outcome of the Russo-Persian War (1804-1813), when through the loss in the war, Persia formally ceded Karabakh to the Russian Empire per the Treaty of Gulistan (1813),^{[47][48][49][50]} before the rest of Transcaucasia was incorporated into the Empire in 1828 by the Treaty of Turkmenchay, which came as an outcome of the Russo-Persian War (1826-1828).

In 1822, 9 years after it passed from Iranian to Russian control, the Karabakh Khanate was dissolved and the area became part of the Elisabethpol Governorate within the Russian Empire. In 1823 the five districts corresponding roughly to modern-day Nagorno-Karabakh were 90.8% Armenian-populated.^[51][52]

Soviet era

After the Russian Revolution of 1917, Karabakh became part of the Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic, but this soon dissolved into separate Armenian, Azerbaijani, and Georgian states. Over the next two years (1918–1920), there were a series of short wars between Armenia and Azerbaijan over several regions, including Karabakh. In July 1918, the First Armenian Assembly of Nagorno-Karabakh declared the region self-governing and created a National Council and government.^[53] Later, Ottoman troops entered Karabakh, meeting armed resistance by Armenians.

After the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in World War I, British troops occupied Karabakh. The British command provisionally affirmed Khosrov bey Sultanov (appointed by the Azerbaijani government) as the governor-general of Karabakh and Zangezur, pending a final decision by the Paris Peace Conference.^[54] The decision was opposed by Karabakh Armenians. In February 1920, the Karabakh National Council preliminarily agreed to Azerbaijani jurisdiction, while Armenians elsewhere in Karabakh continued guerrilla fighting, never accepting the agreement.^[53] The agreement itself was soon annulled by the Ninth Karabagh Assembly, which declared union with Armenia in April.^[53][55]

In April 1920, while the Azerbaijani army was locked in Karabakh fighting local Armenian forces, Azerbaijan was taken over by Bolsheviks. On 10 August 1920, Armenia signed a preliminary agreement with the Bolsheviks, agreeing to a temporary Bolshevik occupation of these areas until final settlement would be reached.^[56] In 1921, Armenia and Georgia were also taken over by the Bolsheviks. After the Sovietization of Armenia and Azerbaijan, the Kavbiuro (Caucasian Bureau of the Central Committee of the Russian Communist Party (Bolshevik)) decided that Karabakh would remain within Azerbaijan SSR with broad regional autonomy, with the administrative centre in the city of Shusha (the administrative center was later moved to Stepanakert).^[57] The oblast’s borders were drawn to include Armenian villages and to exclude as much as possible Azerbaijani villages.^[58] The resulting district ensured an Armenian majority.

With the Soviet Union firmly in control of the region, the conflict over the region died down for several decades until the beginning of the dissolution of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s and early 1990s, when the question of Nagorno-Karabakh re-emerged. Accusing the Azerbaijani SSR government of conducting forced Azerification of the region, the majority Armenian population, with ideological and material support from the Armenian SSR, started a movement to have the autonomous oblast transferred to the Armenian SSR.^[59] In August 1987, Karabakh Armenians sent a petition for union with Armenia with tens of thousands of signatures to Moscow.^[60]

War and secession

On 13 February 1988, Karabakh Armenians began demonstrating in Stepanakert, in favour of unification with the Armenian republic. Six days later they were joined by mass marches in Yerevan. On 20 February, the Soviet of People’s Deputies in Karabakh voted 110 to 17 to request the transfer of the region to Armenia. This unprecedented action by a regional Soviet brought out tens of thousands of demonstrations both in Stepanakert and Yerevan, but Moscow rejected the Armenians’ demands. On 20 February 1988, 2 Azeri girls had been raped in Stepanakert, this caused wide outrage in the Azeri town of Aghdam, where the first direct confrontation of the conflict occurred as a large group of Azeris marched from Agdam to the Armenian populated town of Askeran. The confrontation between the Azeris and the police near Askeran degenerated into the Askeran clash, which left two Azeris dead, one of them allegedly killed by an Azeri police officer, as well as 50 Armenian villagers and an unknown number of Azeris and police injured.^[61][62][63] Large numbers of refugees left Armenia and Azerbaijan as violence began against the minority populations of the respective countries.^[64] On 7 July 1988, the European Parliament passed a resolution that condemned the violence employed against Armenian demonstrators in Azerbaijan, and supported the demand of the Armenians for reunification with the Soviet Republic of Armenia.^[65]

On 29 November 1989, direct rule in Nagorno-Karabakh was ended and the region was returned to Azerbaijani administration.^[66] The Soviet policy backfired, however, when a joint session of the Armenian Supreme Soviet and the National Council, the legislative body of Nagorno-Karabakh, proclaimed the unification of Nagorno-Karabakh with Armenia.^{[citation needed]} On 26 November 1991 Azerbaijan abolished the status of Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast, rearranging the administrative division and bringing the territory under direct control of Azerbaijan.^[67]

On 10 December 1991, in a referendum boycotted by local Azerbaijanis,^[63] Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh approved the creation of an independent state. A Soviet proposal for enhanced autonomy for Nagorno-Karabakh within Azerbaijan satisfied neither side and a full-scale war subsequently erupted between Azerbaijan and Nagorno-Karabakh, with the latter receiving support from Armenia.^{[68][69][70][71]} According to Armenia’s former president, Levon Ter-Petrossian, the Karabakh leadership approach was maximalist and «they thought they could get more.»^[72][73][74]

The struggle over Nagorno-Karabakh escalated after both Armenia and Azerbaijan attained independence from the Soviet Union in 1991. In the post-Soviet power vacuum, military action between Azerbaijan and Armenia was heavily influenced by the Russian military. Furthermore, both the Armenian and Azerbaijani military employed a large number of mercenaries from Ukraine and Russia.^[75] Between fifteen and twenty-five hundred Afghan mujahideen, along with fighters from Chechnya, participated in the fighting on Azerbaijan’s side,^[63] as well heavy artillery and tanks provided to Armenia by Russia.^[63] Many survivors from the Azerbaijani side found shelter in 12 emergency camps set up in other parts of Azerbaijan to cope with the growing number of internally displaced people due to the first Nagorno-Karabakh war.^[76]

By the end of 1993, the conflict had caused about 30,000 casualties^[77] and created hundreds of thousands of refugees on both sides.^{[citation needed]} By May 1994, the Armenians were in control of 14% of the territory of Azerbaijan.^[78] At that stage, for the first time during the conflict, the Azerbaijani government recognized Nagorno-Karabakh as a third party in the war and started direct negotiations with the Karabakh authorities. As a result, a ceasefire was reached on 12 May 1994 through Russian mediation.

Post-1994 ceasefire

Despite the ceasefire, fatalities due to armed conflicts between Armenian and Azerbaijani soldiers continued.^[79] On 25 January 2005, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) adopted PACE Resolution 1416, which condemned ethnic cleansing against Azerbaijanis.^[80][81] On 15–17 May 2007 the 34th session of the Council of Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the Organization of Islamic Conference adopted resolution No. 7/34-P, considering the occupation of Azerbaijani territory as the aggression of Armenia against Azerbaijan and recognizing the actions against Azerbaijani civilians as a crime against humanity, and condemning the destruction of archaeological, cultural and religious monuments in the occupied territories.^[82] The 11th session of the summit of the Organization of the Islamic Conference held on 13–14 March 2008 in Dakar adopted resolution No. 10/11-P (IS). In the resolution, OIC member states condemned the occupation of Azerbaijani lands by Armenian forces and Armenian aggression against Azerbaijan, ethnic cleansing against the Azeri population, and charged Armenia with the «destruction of cultural monuments in the occupied Azerbaijani territories».^[83] On 14 March of the same year the UN General Assembly adopted Resolution No. 62/243 which «demands the immediate, complete and unconditional withdrawal of all Armenian forces from all occupied territories of the Republic of Azerbaijan».^[84] On 18–20 May 2010, the 37th session of the Council of Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the Organization of Islamic Conference in Dushanbe adopted another resolution condemning the aggression of Armenia against Azerbaijan, recognizing the actions against Azerbaijani civilians as a crime against humanity and condemning the destruction of archaeological, cultural, and religious monuments in occupied territories.^[85] On 20 May of the same year, the European Parliament in Strasbourg adopted the resolution on «The need for an EU Strategy for the South Caucasus» on the basis of the report by Evgeni Kirilov, the Bulgarian member of the Parliament.^[86][87] The resolution states in particular that «the occupied Azerbaijani regions around Nagorno-Karabakh must be cleared as soon as possible».^[88] On 26 January 2016, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) adopted Resolution 2085, which deplored the fact that the occupation by Armenia of Nagorno-Karabakh and other adjacent areas of Azerbaijan creates humanitarian and environmental problems for the citizens of Azerbaijan, condemned ethnic cleansing against Azerbaijanis and Assembly requested immediate withdrawal of Armenian armed forces from the region concerned.^[89][90][91]

Several^[quantify] world leaders have met with the presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan over the years, but efforts to maintain the ceasefire have failed.^[92]

On 2 April 2016 Azerbaijani and Armenian forces again clashed in the region.^{[citation needed]} The Armenian Defense Ministry alleged that Azerbaijan launched an offensive to seize territory in the region. At least 30 soldiers were killed during the fighting and a Mil Mi-24 helicopter and tank were also destroyed, with 12 of the fallen soldiers belonging to the Azerbaijani forces and the other 18 belonging to the Armenian forces, as well as an additional 35 Armenian soldiers reportedly wounded.^[93][94]

2020 war and ceasefire agreement

On 27 September 2020, a new war erupted in Nagorno-Karabakh and the surrounding territories.^[9] The United Nations strongly condemned the conflict and called on both sides to deescalate tensions and resume meaningful negotiations without delay.^[95]

Azerbaijan made significant gains during the war, regaining most of the occupied territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh and large parts of Nagorno-Karabakh, including the culturally significant city of Shusha.^[96]

The war ended on 10 November 2020, when a trilateral ceasefire agreement was signed between Azerbaijan, Armenia and Russia, which forced Armenia to return all the remaining occupied territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh.^[97]

Geography

Nagorno-Karabakh has a total area of 4,400 square kilometres (1,699 sq mi).^[98] Approximately half of Nagorno-Karabakh terrain is over 950 metres (3,120 ft) above sea level.^[99] The borders of Nagorno-Karabakh resemble a kidney bean with the indentation on the east side. It has tall mountain ridges along the northern edge and along the west and mountainous south. The part near the indentation of the kidney bean itself is a relatively flat valley, with the two edges of the bean, the districts of Martakert and Martuni, having flatlands as well. Other flatter valleys exist around the Sarsang reservoir, Hadrut, and the south. The entire region lies, on average, 1,100 metres (3,600 ft) above sea level.^[99] Notable peaks include the border mountain Murovdag and the Great Kirs mountain chain in the junction of Shusha and Hadrut districts. The territory of modern Nagorno-Karabakh forms a portion of the historic region of Karabakh, which lies between the rivers Kura and Araxes, and the modern Armenia-Azerbaijan border. Nagorno-Karabakh in its modern borders is part of the larger region of Upper Karabakh.

Nagorno-Karabakh does not directly border Armenia but is connected to the latter through the Lachin corridor, a mountain pass under the control of the Russian peacekeeping forces in Nagorno-Karabakh.

The major cities of the region are Stepanakert, which serves as the capital of the unrecognised Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, and Shusha, which lies partially in ruins. Vineyards, orchards, and mulberry groves for silkworms are developed in the valleys.^[100]

Environment

Nagorno-Karabakh’s environment vary from steppe on the Kura lowland through dense forests of oak, hornbeam, and beech on the lower mountain slopes to birchwood and alpine meadows higher up. The region possesses numerous mineral springs and deposits of zinc, coal, lead, gold, marble, and limestone.^[101]

Demographics

Antiquity – 1918

Historically, the inhabitants of Nagorno-Karabakh—then part of the province of Artsakh—were confirmed by Ancient Greek and Roman sources «long before our era» to be Armenian.^{[102][better source needed]} In the early 15th century, German traveller Johann Schiltberger after visiting the region stated that «although the Muslims had taken possession of Karabagh, there were still Armenian villages in the region».^[103] Historian Victor Schnirelmann writes that «In the mid-18th century, … Turkic tribes … gained access to the highland territories [of Karabakh] and began to settle in Shusha … by the end of the 18th century, a substantial number of its former Armenian inhabitants had left Nagorny Karabagh. Just at the turn of the 19th century, the Turkic population significantly outnumbered the local Armenians, but this only lasted … [until the] end of the 1820s, [when] the Armenians began to come back to Karabagh, and they accounted for the majority of its population by the mid-19th century».^[104] Edmund Herzig and Marina Kurkchiyan present an alternative view that «Armenians had already been a majority in some areas such as mountainous Karabagh», compared to the Yerevan province which had «regained an Armenian majority for the first time in several hundred years.»^[105]

According to an 1823 Russian survey published in Tiflis (present-day Tbilisi) in 1866,^[103] Armenians made up 97 percent of the population in the five districts (mahals) of Nagorno-Karabakh,^[106] thus proving, contrary to claims in Azerbaijani historiography, that Armenians formed an overwhelming majority of Nagorno-Karabakh prior to 1828. Historian George Bournoutian writes that Russian statistics from 1810 show that Armenians made up 21 percent of the Karabakh region’s population; In 1823, the Armenian population of Karabakh had increased by 30 percent «after the return of those who had fled the region», and by 1832, the Armenian population had increased to one-third of Karabakh. Moreover, the «one-third» of the population of Karabakh composed of Armenians resided in one-third of the territory of Karabakh, the mountainous territory (i.e. Nagorno-Karabakh), where they «constituted an overwhelming majority of the population.»^[103]

1918–1920

According to Armenian sources, the «historical Nagorno-Karabakh» region had a population of 300,000–330,000 in 1918–1920, rising to 700,000–800,000 by 1988. As a result of «Turkish-Azerbaijani aggression», the region’s population declined by 20 percent in 1918–1920.^[107] In this period, Azerbaijani forces carried out massacres against Armenians in Ghaibalishen, Jamilli, Karkijahan, and Pahlul (600–700 dead^[108]), Stepanakert (several hundred dead^[109]), and Shusha (several hundred^[110] to 12,000 dead^[111]). As a result of the Shusha massacre, 5,000–6,000 Armenians were displaced to the regions of Varanda and Dizak.^[112] By 11 April 1920, some thirty villages in Nagorno-Karabakh had been «devastated» by Azerbaijani forces as a result of the uprising, leaving 25,000 homeless (including nearly 6,000 refugees from Shusha).^[113]

1921–1987

1923 statistics indicate that the NKAO was 94.8 percent Armenian, numbering 149,600, whilst the Azerbaijani population numbered 7,700. Historian Cory Welt writes of a «discrepancy» of the Armenian population jumping by over 25,000 individuals between the 1921 and 1923 censuses, also pointing out that the Armenian population declined to 111,700 in 1926, thus indicating an «unexplained drop» of 38,000 individuals.^[114] In the 1920s, the NKAO had a population of 131,500 people, 94.4 percent (124,136) of whom were ethnic Armenians and only 5.6 percent (7,364) of whom were ethnic Azerbaijanis.^[105] In 1933, Nagorno-Karabakh had a population of 147,308, 10,751 (7.3 percent) of whom were urban dwellers, and 136,557 (92.7 percent) of whom were rural residents.^[115] On 1 January 1973, the oblast had a population of 153,000.^[116]

Discrimination and stagnation

Whilst the region was a part of the Azerbaijan SSR, the Armenian share of the population dropped from 94.7 to 76.9 percent, whilst the Azerbaijani share of the population quadrupled from 5.1 to 21.5 percent^[105] as a result of «migratory influx»^[107]—indicative of the socio-economic difficulties local Armenians experienced under Soviet Azerbaijani leadership which led them to emigrate from Karabakh.^[105] Emeritus professor of law M. Cherif Bassiouni writes of the stagnation of the Armenian population «due to the discriminatory policies of Azerbaijani authorities that compelled Armenians to emigrate»; also adding that 600,000 Armenians from Karabakh reside in Armenia and the countries of the CIS.^[107] Stuart J. Kaufman, a professor of political science and international relations,^[117] writes of the difficulties of Karabakh Armenians:

In Mountainous Karabagh, Armenian-language education was not easily available, Armenian history was not taught at all, and those who went to Armenia for training were discriminated against in competing for jobs in the province, since even routine hiring had to be cleared with Baku. Underinvestment in the region—also blamed on Baku—meant less economic development and poor infrastructure even by Soviet standards, and therefore fewer jobs overall, especially for Armenians. Cultural ties with Armenia were strangled in red tape in Baku, and a decision to make Armenian-language television available in the region was left unimplemented. One result of these policies was a continuing exodus of Armenians from Karabagh in search of greener pastures.^[118]

1988 – present

Following the Sumgait pogrom and the exodus of Azerbaijanis from Armenia, Azerbaijanis in Stepanakert and Armenians in Shusha were expelled in September 1988. As local Armenian forces gained possession of Nagorno-Karabakh and surrounding districts (amounting to 14 percent of the internationally recognised territory of Azerbaijan) during the First Nagorno-Karabakh war, hundreds of thousands of Azerbaijanis were expelled from their lands.^[63] During the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War, Azerbaijan regained control over the surrounding districts and southern parts of the former NKAO, thus displacing approximately 70,000 Armenians.^[119]

Historical ethnic composition of the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast in 1921–1989

Ethnic group	1921[114][120]	1923[102][114]	1925[102]	1926[102][121]	1939[102][122]	1959[102][123]	1970[102][124]	1979[102][125]	1989[126]
Number	%	Number	%	Number	%	Number	%	Number	%	Number	%	Number	%	Number	%	Number	%
Armenians	122,426	94.73	149,600	94.8	142,470	90.28	111,694	89.24	132,800	88.04	110,053	84.39	121,068	80.54	123,076	75.89	145,450	76.92
Azerbaijanis[a]	6,550	5.07	7,700	4.9	15,261	9.67	12,592	10.06	14,053	9.32	17,995	13.80	27,179	18.08	37,264	22.98	40,688	21.52
Russians	267	0.21	500	0.3	46	0.03	596	0.48	3,174	2.10	1,790	1.37	1,310	0.87	1,265	0.78	1,922	1.02
Ukrainians	30	0.02	35	0.03	436	0.29	238	0.18	193	0.13	140	0.09	416	0.22
Belarusians	12	0.01	11	0.01	32	0.02	35	0.02	37	0.02	79	0.04
Greeks	68	0.05	74	0.05	67	0.05	33	0.02	56	0.03	72	0.04
Tatars	6	0.00	29	0.02	36	0.03	25	0.02	41	0.03	64	0.03
Georgians	5	0.00	25	0.02	16	0.01	22	0.01	17	0.01	57	0.03
Others	151	0.12	235	0.16	179	0.14	448	0.30	285	0.18	337	0.18
TOTAL	129,243[b]	100.00	157,800	100.0	157,807	100.00	125,159	100.00	150,837	100.00	130,406	100.00	150,313	100.00	162,181	100.00	189,085	100.00

Transport

Location	ICAO	DAFIF	IATA	Airport name	Coordinates
Stepanakert	UBBS	UB13		Stepanakert Airport[127]	39°54′05″N 46°47′13″E / 39.90139°N 46.78694°E

During the rule of the Soviet Union, the Yevlakh–Aghdam–Stepanakert line connected the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region with the main part of Azerbaijan. After the Nagorno-Karabakh war and the abandonment of Ağdam, the line’s service was cut back to service only between Yevlax and Kətəlparaq, without any present section at the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic. The former railway line between Kətəlparaq and Stepanakert has been almost completely destroyed.

The (Tbilisi–Gyumri–)Yerevan–Nakhchivan–Horadiz–Shirvan(–Baku) main railway was also dismantled from the NKR between Ordubad and Horadiz, as well as a by-line from Mincivan to the Armenian city of Kapan. Currently, the Azerbaijani trains only travel to Horadiz. The Ordubad–Horadiz section has been demolished, leaving the NKR with no intact, active railway line in their territory. The railway at the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic still operates, but it is separated from the main Azerbaijani lines, and only has a connection to Iran.

See also

• Timeline of Artsakh history
• Community for Democracy and Rights of Nations
• List of active separatist movements in Europe
• Janapar – the hiking trail across Nagorno-Karabakh
• Outline of Nagorno-Karabakh
• Post-Soviet states
• Yekbûn

Notes

References

Bibliography

Further reading

• Tsibenko, Veronika (2018). «Karabakh, Nagorno». In Fleet, Kate; Krämer, Gudrun; Matringe, Denis; Nawas, John; Stewart, Devin J. (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam, THREE. Brill Online. ISSN 1873-9830.
• Torres, Ricardo Juan (2022). «The role of Nagorno-Karabakh in the shaping of Armenian and Azeri identity». Consejo Argentino para las Relaciones Internacionales (CARI).

External links

• Articles and Photography on Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh) from UK Photojournalist Russell Pollard
• All UN Security Council resolutions on Nagorno-Karabakh, courtesy U.S. State department
• Nagorno-Karabakh Agreement of 2 November 2008 and country profile from BBC News Online
• Article on the 10 December Referendum from Russia Profile
• The conflict over the Nagorno-Karabakh region dealt with by the OSCE Minsk Conference — Report by rapporteur David Atkinson presented to Political Affairs Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe
• Conciliation Resources – Accord issue: The limits of leadership – Elites and societies in the Nagorny Karabakh peace process also key texts & agreements and chronology (in English & Russian)
• Independence of Kosovo and the Nagorno-Karabakh Issue
• Interview with Thomas De Waal
• Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty. Nagorno-Karabakh: Timeline Of The Long Road To Peace
• Resolution #1416 from the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe
• USIP — Nagorno-Karabakh Searching for a Solution: Key points, by Patricia Carley, Publication of the United States Institute of Peace (USIP)
• USIP — Sovereignty after Empire Self-Determination Movements in the Former Soviet Union. Case Studies: Nagorno-Karabakh. by Galina Starovoitova, Publication of the United States Institute of Peace (USIP)
• Photo Series Nagorno-Karabakh 2008–2011 – daily life, front line, mine clearance, culture, religion.

Наго́рный Караба́х (азерб. Dağlıq Qarabağ, арм. Լեռնային Ղարաբաղ) — регион в Закавказье, в восточной части Армянского нагорья^[1][2][3].

Фактически бо́льшая его часть контролируется непризнанной Нагорно-Карабахской Республикой, согласно административно-территориальному делению Азербайджанской Республики находится на его территории. Занимает восточные и юго-восточные горные и предгорные районы Малого Кавказа, вместе с Равнинным Карабахом составляет географическую область Карабах.

Происхождение и неоднозначность термина

Слово «Карабах» составлено из тюркского «кара» — чёрный и персидского «баг» — сад. По-армянски регион называется арм. Լեռնային Ղարաբաղ (читается Лернаин Гарабаг), по-азербайджански — азерб. Dağlıq Qarabağ или азерб. Yuxarı Qarabağ. Для обозначения территории армяне также часто используют название провинции Великой Армении Арцах (арм. Արցախ), охватывавший регион в древности.

Нередко термином Нагорный Карабах называют Нагорно-Карабахскую Республику^[4][5][6], хотя её заявленная и фактически контролируемая территории географически с Нагорным Карабахом совпадают частично.

История

История Нагорного Карабаха
Доисторический период
Азыхская пещера
Античность
Великая Армения (Арцах) Кавказская Албания
Средние века
Хаченское княжество Государство Сефевидов
Новое время
Меликства Хамсы Карабахское ханство
XIX—XX
Гюлистанский мирный договор Елизаветпольская губерния Армяно-азербайджанская война Азербайджанская ССР (НКАО) Карабахский конфликт Нагорно-Карабахская Республика, Азербайджанская Республика

Автохтонным населением региона были различные кавказские племена. Не позже чем со II в. до н. э. регион вошел в состав Великой Армении, как провинция Арцах^[7] (в греко-римских источниках Орхистена^[8]). С начала II века до н. э. до 90-х гг. IV века н. э. территория современного Нагорного Карабаха находилась в границах армянского государства Великая Армения династии Арташесидов, затем Аршакидов северо-восточная граница которого проходила по реке Кура^[9]. После падения Великой Армении Арцах отошли к вассальной от Персии^[10] Кавказской Албании^[11][12][13]. В период долгого нахождения в составе Армении регион был арменизован^[14]. Антропологические исследования показывают, что нынешние карабахские армяне являются прямыми физическими потомками автохтонного населения области^[15][16]. С этой эпохи на территории Нагорного Карабаха процветает армянская культура^[17]. Согласно сообщениям исторического источника 700 года, население древнеармянской провинции^[18] Арцах говорило не просто по-армянски^[19], но и на своём собственном диалекте армянского языка^[20][21].

Ал-Истахри, арабский автор X века, сообщает:

«… за Берда’а и Шамкуром народ из племени армян…» «Путь из Берда’а в Дабиль идет по землям армян, и все эти города в царстве Санбата, сына Ашута»[22]

В IX—XI веках территория Нагорного Карабаха входит в состав восстановленного Армянского государства Багратидов^[23]. В начале IX века под предводительстом Сахла Смбатяна (Сахл ибн Сунбат ал-Армани^[24]), которого Каганкатваци именует «Саhлем из рода hАйка»^[25], на территории Нагорного Карабаха образовалось армянское феодальное княжество Хачен. С XIII века там правили армянские^[26] княжеские династии Гасан-Джалаляны и Допяны — ответвления потомков Сахля Смбатяна. Как отмечают авторы академической «Истории Востока» а также другие авторитетные российские историки, в XII—XIII веках армянонаселенный^[26][27][28] Нагорный Карабах становится одним из центров армянской культуры^[29][28][30]. После сельджукского завоевания Армении в Хачене продолжает существовать армянское правление^[31], являвшейся центром армянской политической жизни^[29].

На рубеже XVI—XVII веков Хачен распался^[32][33], а на его месте постепенно образовались пять армянских^[34][35] княжеств (Хачен, Дизак, Варанда, Джраберд и Гюлистан), которые соответственно получили название «Хамса» — «Пятерка».

Эти меликства, подчинявшиеся беглербеку Карабаха (с резиденцией в Гяндже), просуществовали до второй половины XVIII века^[37][38][39]. Институт меликств в Нагорном Карабахе окончательно был сформирован при иранском шахе Аббасе I^[33]. После распада в конце XIV века армянского царства Киликии практически только в Карабахе сохранились остатки армянского государственного устройства^[40][39].

Российский историк конца XIX-го века П. Г. Бутков ссылаясь на Санкт-Петербургские ведомости от 1743 года приводит следующую цитату:

В Нагорном Карабахе находился Гандзасарский (агванский) католиксат Армянской церкви (Из письма Есаи Гасан-Джалаляна к Петру I):

В 1720-гг. Нагорный Карабах становится одним из центров национально-освободительной борьбы армян против Османской оккупации^[43][33]. В этой борьбе армяне Нагорного Карабаха были воодушевлены также персидским походом Петра I^[44][45].

В документе конца XVIII веке говорится:

В 1747 году в Равнинном Карабахе было образовано Карабахское ханство, которое вскоре установило власть над преимущественно армянонаселенным^[47] Нагорным Карабахом: первые два карабахских хана — Панах и Ибрагим — подчинили своей власти армянских меликов, утвердившись в центре армянского меликства Варанда — в построенном Панахом городе-крепости Шуше^[48]. В результате междоусобиц^[49] между армянскими меликами, первые за свою историю Нагорный Карабах оказался под властю тюркского правителя^[33][50]. После этих событий, с середины XVIII века, наблюдается массовый отток армянского населения из Нагорного Карабаха, и, наоборот, тюркские переселения^[51]. Изначально она находилась под персидским, с 1805 г. — под русским суверенитетом. Ханство было занято русскими войсками во время русско-персидской войны и принято в российское подданство по трактату 14 мая 1805 года.^[52]

Формально оно было признано за Россией по российско-персидскому Гюлистанскому мирному договору 1813 года.

После ликвидации ханства в 1823 году Нагорный Карабах представлял собой сначала часть Карабахской провинции, затем — часть нескольких уездов Елизаветпольской губернии.

В 1917 году в связи с развалом Российской империи и выходом из под власти последней, Карабах фактически представлял собой государство управляемое Собранием Армян Карабаха. Азербайджанцы строящие свое государство, несмотря на абсолютное большинство армян в регионе оспорили право армян управлять Карабахом. Регион стал на несколько лет ареной ожесточённых столкновений между азербайджанцами и армянами. Для решения территориального спора в свою пользу азербайджанцы прибегали к помощи англичан, турков и большевиков. С иностранной помощью Азербайджан добился успеха^[53].

Население

XIX век

По данным переписей первой половины XIX века, около трети населения всей территории всего Карабаха (вместе с равнинной его частью) составляли армяне, и около двух третей азербайджанцы^[54][55]. Джордж Бурнутян указывает, что в переписях показано: армянское население было, в основном, сосредоточено в 8 из 21 магалов (районов) Карабаха, из которых 5 составляют современную территорию Нагорного Карабаха, а 3 входят в современную территорию Зангезура. Таким образом, 35 процентов населения Карабаха (армяне) проживали на 38 процентах земли (в Нагорном Карабахе), составляя на ней абсолютное большинство (около 90 %) ^[54]. Согласно к.и.н. Анатолию Ямскову, следует учитывать тот факт, что переписи населения велись в зимний период, когда кочевое азербайджанское население находилось на равнинах, а в летние месяцы оно поднималось на высокогорные пастбища, меняя демографическую ситуацию в горных районах. Однако Ямсков отмечает, что точка зрения на права кочевых народов считаться полноценным населением сезонно используемой ими кочевой территории, на сегодняшний момент не разделяется большинством авторов, как из постсоветских стран, так и из стран «дальнего зарубежья», включая и проармянские, и проазербайджанские работы; в российском Закавказье XIX века эта территория могла являться собственностью только оседлого населения^[55].

Однако некоторые азербайджанские авторы, например кандидат политических наук Адиль Багиров в соавторстве с американским политиком Камероном Брауном, возражают против утверждений об историческом преобладании армян в Нагорном Карабахе, указывая статистику XIX века по всему Карабаху (с чисто азербайджанонаселенным равнинным Карабахом и частично азербайджанонаселенным Зангезуром), которая показывает азербайджанское большинство в бывшем Карабахском ханстве (без выделения отдельных районов)^[56].

Население Нагорного Карабаха в начале ХХ века

Согласно переписи 1923 года, в новообразованной НКАО армяне составляли 94 %; из оставшихся 6 % подавляющее число были азербайджанцы. Среди других меньшинств выделялись курды, издавна населяющие эти земли и русские, переселенцы или потомки переселенцев XIX-ХХ веков; было также некоторое количество греков, также колонистов XIX в. ^[57][58]

В 1918 году карабахские армяне утверждали:

По статистическим данным, относящимся к последним годам, армянское население Елизаветпольского, Джеванширского, Шушинского, Карягинского и Зангезурского уездов, распределенное почти исключительно в нагорных частях этих уездов, составляет 300.000 душ и является абсолютным большинством в сравнении с татарами и другими этническими группами, которые лишь в некоторых местностях составляют более или менее значительную часть населения, тогда как армяне всюду представляют сплошную массу. Следовательно, мусульманская часть населения может состоять лишь на положении меньшинства, и из-за этого меньшинства в 3-4 десятки тысяч нельзя приносить в жертву кровные интересы народа^[59]

В 1918—1920 годах эта область была спорной между Арменией и Азербайджаном; после советизации Армении и Азербайджана, решением Кавбюро ЦК РКП(б) от 4 июля 1921 г. было решено передать Нагорный Карабах Армении, но окончательное решение оставить за ЦК РКП(б), однако новым решением от 5 июля он был оставлен в составе Азербайджана с предоставлением широкой областной автономии^[60]. В 1923 году из армянонаселенной части Нагорного Карабаха (без Шаумянского и части Ханларских районов) в составе Азербайджанской ССР была образована Автономная область Нагорного Карабаха (АОНК). В 1937 году АОНК была преобразована в Нагорно-Карабахскую автономную область (НКАО).

Этноязыковая динамика

Население НКАО

Год	Население	армяне	азербайджанцы	русские
1923	157800	149600 (94 %)	7700 (6 %)
1926	125.159	111.694 (89,2 %)	12.592 (10,1 %)	596 (0,5 %)
1939	НКАО	150.837	132.800 (88,0 %)	14.053 (9,3 %)	3.174 (2,1 %)
Степанакерт	10.459	9.079 (86,8 %)	672 (6,4 %)	563 (5,4 %)
Гадрутский район	27.128	25.975 (95,7 %)	727 (2,7 %)	349 (1,3 %)
Мардакертский район	40.812	36.453 (89,3 %)	2.833 (6,9 %)	1.244 (3,0 %)
Мартунинский район	32.298	30.235 (93,6 %)	1.501 (4,6 %)	457 (1,4 %)
Степанакертский район	29.321	26.881 (91,7 %)	2.014 (6,9 %)	305 (1,0 %)
Шушинский район	10.818	4.177 (38,6 %)	6.306 (58,3 %)	256 (2,4 %)
1959	130.406	110.053 (84,4 %)	17.995 (13,8 %)	1.790 (1,6 %)
1970	150.313	121.068 (80,5 %)	27.179 (18,1 %)	1.310 (0,9 %)
1979	162.181	123.076 (75,9 %)	37.264 (23,0 %)	1.265 (0,8 %)

За годы советской власти процент азербайджанского населения НКАО возрос до 23 %. Армянские авторы объясняют это целенаправленной политикой властей Азербайджанской ССР по изменению демографической ситуации в регионе в пользу азербайджанцев. Похожие этнические сдвиги в сторону титульной национальности наблюдались также в автономных республиках Грузинской ССР: Абхазии, Южной Осетии и Аджарии.^[61] Доля русского населения в Нагорном Карабахе, как следует из таблицы, стремительно увеличивалась в довоенные годы и, достигнув максимума в 1939 г., начала столь же стремительно сокращаться, что коррелирует с процессами, происходившими во всем Азербайджане и вообще во всем Закавказье.

Из пяти районов НКАО азербайджанцы составляли большинство в самом маленьком по площади Шушинском районе, где в 1989 году, согласно последней советской переписи, проживало 23156 человек, из которых 21,234 (91.7 %) были азербайджанцами и 1,620 (7 %) армянами. В самом городе Шуша проживало 17000 из которых 98 % были азербайджанцами.^[62] Однако перепись 1939 года дает другие данные: население Шушинского района 10818, из которых азербайджанцев 6306 (58,3 %) и армян 4177 (38,6 %). Причем большая часть азербайджанцев жила в Шуше, население которой было 5424 человека, в сельской части района армяне составляли большинство. Население же города Шуша, в 1883 году составляло 25656 человек, из которых 56,5 % армян и 43,2 % азербайджанцев^[63], но подавляющее большинство армян были убиты или покинули город в результате Шушинской резни в конце марта 1920 года.^[64] В 1939 году наиболее велика доля русских была в Степанакерте (5,4 %).

В остальных 4 районах и городе Степанакерт азербайджанцы являлись меньшинством, однако и в них имелись населённые пункты с преимущественно азербайджанским населением. Азербайджанскими населенными пунктами в этих 4 районах являлись сёла Умудлу, Ходжалы и другие.

См. также

• Нагорно-Карабахская Республика
• Равнинный Карабах
• Арцах
• Миацум
• Лачинский коридор
• Карабахский конфликт

Примечания

Ссылки

• Кавказский край // Энциклопедический словарь Брокгауза и Ефрона: В 86 томах (82 т. и 4 доп.). — СПб., 1890—1907.
• Нагорный Карабах в Словаре современных географических названий
• Нагорный Карабах в Современном толковом словаре
• Население Автономной области Нагорного Карабаха и прилегающих районов по переписи населения АзССР 1921 года

Нагорный Карабах

⇒ Правильное написание:

Нагорный Карабах

⇒ Гласные буквы в слове:

Нагорный Карабах

гласные выделены красным

гласными являются: а, о, ы, а, а, а

общее количество гласных: 6 (шесть)

• ударная гласная:

Наго́рный Караба́х

ударная гласная выделена знаком ударения « ́»

ударение падает на буквы: о, а,

• безударные гласные:

Нагорный Карабах

безударные гласные выделены пунктирным подчеркиванием «  »

безударными гласными являются: а, ы, а, а

общее количество безударных гласных: 4 (четыре)

⇒ Согласные буквы в слове:

Нагорный Карабах

согласные выделены зеленым

согласными являются: Н, г, р, н, й, К, р, б, х

общее количество согласных: 9 (девять)

• звонкие согласные:

Нагорный Карабах

звонкие согласные выделены одинарным подчеркиванием «  »

звонкими согласными являются: Н, г, р, н, й, р, б

общее количество звонких согласных: 7 (семь)

• глухие согласные:

Нагорный Карабах

глухие согласные выделены двойным подчеркиванием «  »

глухими согласными являются: К, х

общее количество глухих согласных: 2 (две)

⇒ Формы слова:

Наго́рный Караба́х

⇒ Количество букв и слогов:

гласных букв: 6 (шесть)

согласных букв: 9 (девять)

всего букв: 15 (пятнадцать)

всего слогов: 6 (шесть)