Лавкрафт как пишется на английском

H. P. Lovecraft

Lovecraft in 1934, facing left and looking right

Lovecraft in 1934

Born Howard Phillips Lovecraft
August 20, 1890
Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.
Died March 15, 1937 (aged 46)
Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.
Resting place Swan Point Cemetery, Providence
41°51′14″N 71°22′52″W / 41.854021°N 71.381068°W
Pen name
  • Grandpa Theobald
  • E’ch-Pi-El
Occupation
  • Short story writer
  • editor
  • novelist
  • poet
Genre Lovecraftian horror, weird fiction, horror fiction, science fiction, gothic fiction, fantasy
Literary movement
  • Cosmicism
  • Aestheticism
  • Decadents
Years active 1917–1937
Notable works
  • «The Call of Cthulhu»
  • The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath
  • At the Mountains of Madness
  • The Shadow over Innsmouth
  • The Shadow Out of Time
Spouse

Sonia Greene

(m. )​

Signature
Lovecraft signature.svg

Howard Phillips Lovecraft (; August 20, 1890 – March 15, 1937) was an American writer of weird, science, fantasy, and horror fiction. He is best known for his creation of the Cthulhu Mythos.[a]

Born in Providence, Rhode Island, Lovecraft spent most of his life in New England. After his father’s institutionalization in 1893, he lived affluently until his family’s wealth dissipated after the death of his grandfather. Lovecraft then lived with his mother, in reduced financial security, until her institutionalization in 1919. He began to write essays for the United Amateur Press Association, and in 1913 wrote a critical letter to a pulp magazine that ultimately led to his involvement in pulp fiction. He became active in the speculative fiction community and was published in several pulp magazines. Lovecraft moved to New York City, marrying Sonia Greene in 1924, and later became the center of a wider group of authors known as the «Lovecraft Circle». They introduced him to Weird Tales, which would become his most prominent publisher. Lovecraft’s time in New York took a toll on his mental state and financial conditions. He returned to Providence in 1926 and produced some of his most popular works, including The Call of Cthulhu, At the Mountains of Madness, The Shadow over Innsmouth, and The Shadow Out of Time. He would remain active as a writer for 11 years until his death from intestinal cancer at the age of 46.

Lovecraft’s literary corpus is based around the idea of cosmicism, which was simultaneously his personal philosophy and the main theme of his fiction. Cosmicism posits that humanity is an insignificant part of the cosmos, and could be swept away at any moment. He incorporated fantasy and science fiction elements into his stories, representing the perceived fragility of anthropocentrism. This was tied to his ambivalent views on knowledge. His works were largely set in a fictionalized version of New England. Civilizational decline also plays a major role in his works, as he believed that the West was in decline during his lifetime. Lovecraft’s early political opinions were conservative and traditionalist; additionally, he held a number of racist views for much of his adult life. Following the Great Depression, Lovecraft became a socialist, no longer believing a just aristocracy would make the world more fair.

Throughout his adult life, Lovecraft was never able to support himself from earnings as an author and editor. He was virtually unknown during his lifetime and was almost exclusively published in pulp magazines before his death. A scholarly revival of Lovecraft’s work began in the 1970s, and he is now regarded as one of the most significant 20th-century authors of supernatural horror fiction. Many direct adaptations and spiritual successors followed. Works inspired by Lovecraft, adaptations or original works, began to form the basis of the Cthulhu Mythos, which utilizes Lovecraft’s characters, setting, and themes.

Biography

Early life and family tragedies

A family portrait of Sarah, Howard, and Winfield Lovecraft in 1892

Sarah, Howard, and Winfield Lovecraft in 1892

Lovecraft was born in his family home on August 20, 1890, in Providence, Rhode Island. He was the only child of Winfield Scott Lovecraft and Sarah Susan (née Phillips) Lovecraft.[2] Susie’s family was of substantial means at the time of their marriage, as her father, Whipple Van Buren Phillips, was involved in business ventures.[3] In April 1893, after a psychotic episode in a Chicago hotel, Winfield was committed to Butler Hospital in Providence. His medical records state that he had been «doing and saying strange things at times» for a year before his commitment.[4] The person who reported these symptoms is unknown.[5] Winfield spent five years in Butler before dying in 1898. His death certificate listed the cause of death as general paresis, a term synonymous with late-stage syphilis.[6] Throughout his life, Lovecraft maintained that his father fell into a paralytic state, due to insomnia and overwork, and remained that way until his death. It is not known whether Lovecraft was simply kept ignorant of his father’s illness or whether his later statements were intentionally misleading.[7]

After his father’s institutionalization, Lovecraft resided in the family home with his mother, his maternal aunts Lillian and Annie, and his maternal grandparents Whipple and Robie.[8] According to family friends, his mother, known as Susie, doted on the young Lovecraft excessively, pampering him and never letting him out of her sight.[9] Lovecraft later recollected that his mother was «permanently stricken with grief» after his father’s illness. Whipple became a father figure to Lovecraft in this time, Lovecraft noting that his grandfather became the «centre of my entire universe». Whipple, who often traveled to manage his business, maintained correspondence by letter with the young Lovecraft who, by the age of three, was already proficient at reading and writing.[10]

Whipple encouraged the young Lovecraft to have an appreciation of literature, especially classical literature and English poetry. In his old age, he helped raise the young H. P. Lovecraft and educated him not only in the classics, but also in original weird tales of «winged horrors» and «deep, low, moaning sounds» which he created for his grandchild’s entertainment. The original sources of Phillips’ weird tales are unidentified. Lovecraft himself guessed that they originated from Gothic novelists like Ann Radcliffe, Matthew Lewis, and Charles Maturin.[11] It was during this period that Lovecraft was introduced to some of his earliest literary influences, such as The Rime of the Ancient Mariner illustrated by Gustave Doré, One Thousand and One Nights, Thomas Bulfinch’s Age of Fable, and Ovid’s Metamorphoses.[12]

While there is no indication that Lovecraft was particularly close to his grandmother Robie, her death in 1896 had a profound effect on him. By his own account, it sent his family into «a gloom from which it never fully recovered». His mother and aunts wore black mourning dresses that «terrified» him. This is also the time that Lovecraft, approximately five-and-a-half years old, started having nightmares that later would inform his fictional writings. Specifically, he began to have recurring nightmares of beings he referred to as «night-gaunts». He credited their appearance to the influence of Doré’s illustrations, which would «whirl me through space at a sickening rate of speed, the while fretting & impelling me with their detestable tridents.» Thirty years later, night-gaunts would appear in Lovecraft’s fiction.[13]

Lovecraft’s earliest known literary works were written at the age of seven, and were poems restyling the Odyssey and other Greco-Roman mythological stories.[14] Lovecraft would later write that during his childhood he was fixated on the Greco-Roman pantheon, and briefly accepted them as genuine expressions of divinity, foregoing his Christian upbringing.[15] He recalled, at five years old, being told Santa Claus did not exist and retorted by asking why «God is not equally a myth?»[16] At the age of eight, he took a keen interest in the sciences, particularly astronomy and chemistry. He also examined the anatomical books that were held in the family library, which taught him the specifics of human reproduction that were not yet explained to him. As a result, he found that it «virtually killed my interest in the subject.»[17]

In 1902, according to Lovecraft’s later correspondence, astronomy became a guiding influence on his worldview. He began publishing the periodical Rhode Island Journal of Astronomy, using the hectograph printing method.[18] Lovecraft went in and out of elementary school repeatedly, oftentimes with home tutors making up for the lost years, missing time due to health concerns that have not been determined. The written recollections of his peers described him as withdrawn but welcoming to those who shared his then-current fascination with astronomy, inviting them to look through his prized telescope.[19]

Education and financial decline

By 1900, Whipple’s various business concerns were suffering a downturn, which resulted in the slow erosion of his family’s wealth. He was forced to let his family’s hired servants go, leaving Lovecraft, Whipple, and Susie, being the only unmarried sister, alone in the family home.[20] In the spring of 1904, Whipple’s largest business venture suffered a catastrophic failure. Within months, he died at age 70 due to a stroke. After Whipple’s death, Susie was unable to financially support the upkeep of the expansive family home on what remained of the Phillips’ estate. Later that year, she was forced to move to a small duplex with her son.[21]

Whipple Van Buren Phillips facing right

Whipple Van Buren Phillips

Lovecraft called this time one of the darkest of his life, remarking in a 1934 letter that he saw no point in living anymore; he considered the possibility of committing suicide. His scientific curiosity and desire to know more about the world prevented him from doing so.[22] In fall 1904, he entered high school. Much like his earlier school years, Lovecraft was periodically removed from school for long periods for what he termed «near breakdowns». He did say, though, that while having some conflicts with teachers, he enjoyed high school, becoming close with a small circle of friends. Lovecraft also performed well academically, excelling in particular at chemistry and physics.[23] Aside from a pause in 1904, he also resumed publishing the Rhode Island Journal of Astronomy as well as starting the Scientific Gazette, which dealt mostly with chemistry.[24] It was also during this period that Lovecraft produced the first of the fictional works that he would later be known for, namely «The Beast in the Cave» and «The Alchemist».[25]

It was in 1908, prior to what would have been his high school graduation, that Lovecraft suffered another unidentified health crisis, though this instance was more severe than his prior illnesses.[26] The exact circumstances and causes remain unknown. The only direct records are Lovecraft’s own correspondence wherein he retrospectively described it variously as a «nervous collapse» and «a sort of breakdown», in one letter blaming it on the stress of high school despite his enjoying it.[27] In another letter concerning the events of 1908, he notes, «I was and am prey to intense headaches, insomnia, and general nervous weakness which prevents my continuous application to any thing.»[26]

Though Lovecraft maintained that he was going to attend Brown University after high school, he never graduated and never attended school again. Whether Lovecraft suffered from a physical ailment, a mental one, or some combination thereof has never been determined. An account from a high school classmate described Lovecraft as exhibiting «terrible tics» and that at times «he’d be sitting in his seat and he’d suddenly up and jump». Harry Brobst, a psychology professor, examined the account and claimed that chorea minor was the probable cause of Lovecraft’s childhood symptoms, while noting that instances of chorea minor after adolescence are very rare.[27] In his letters, Lovecraft acknowledged that he suffered from bouts of chorea as a child.[28] Brobst further ventured that Lovecraft’s 1908 breakdown was attributed to a «hysteroid seizure», a term that has become synonymous with atypical depression.[29] In another letter concerning the events of 1908, Lovecraft stated that he «could hardly bear to see or speak to anyone, & liked to shut out the world by pulling down dark shades & using artificial light.»[30]

Earliest recognition

Few of Lovecraft and Susie’s activities between late 1908 and 1913 were recorded.[31] Lovecraft described the steady continuation of their financial decline highlighted by his uncle’s failed business that cost Susie a large portion of their already dwindling wealth.[32] One of Susie’s friends, Clara Hess, recalled a visit during which Susie spoke continuously about Lovecraft being «so hideous that he hid from everyone and did not like to walk upon the streets where people could gaze on him.» Despite Hess’ protests to the contrary, Susie maintained this stance.[33] For his part, Lovecraft said he found his mother to be «a positive marvel of consideration».[34] A next-door neighbor later pointed out that what others in the neighborhood often assumed were loud, nocturnal quarrels between mother and son, were actually recitations of Shakespeare, an activity that seemed to delight mother and son.[35]

During this period, Lovecraft revived his earlier scientific periodicals.[31] He endeavored to commit himself to the study of organic chemistry, Susie buying the expensive glass chemistry assemblage he wanted.[36] Lovecraft found his studies were stymied by the mathematics involved, which he found boring and would cause headaches that would incapacitate him for the remainder of the day.[37] Lovecraft’s first non-self-published poem appeared in a local newspaper in 1912. Called Providence in 2000 A.D., it envisioned a future where Americans of English descent were displaced by Irish, Italian, Portuguese, and Jewish immigrants.[38] In this period he also wrote racist poetry, including «New-England Fallen» and «On the Creation of Niggers», but there is no indication that either were published during his lifetime.[39]

In 1911, Lovecraft’s letters to editors began appearing in pulp and weird-fiction magazines, most notably Argosy.[40] A 1913 letter critical of Fred Jackson, one of Argosy’s more prominent writers, started Lovecraft down a path that would define the remainder of his career as a writer. In the following letters, Lovecraft described Jackson’s stories as being «trivial, effeminate, and, in places, coarse». Continuing, Lovecraft argued that Jackson’s characters exhibit the «delicate passions and emotions proper to negroes and anthropoid apes.»[41] This sparked a nearly year-long feud in the magazine’s letters section between the two writers and their respective supporters. Lovecraft’s most prominent opponent was John Russell, who often replied in verse, and to whom Lovecraft felt compelled to reply because he respected Russell’s writing skills.[42] The most immediate effect of this feud was the recognition garnered from Edward F. Daas, then head editor of the United Amateur Press Association (UAPA).[43] Daas invited Russell and Lovecraft to join the organization and both accepted, Lovecraft in April 1914.[44]

Rejuvenation and tragedy

With the advent of United I obtained a renewed will to live; a renewed sense of existence as other than a superfluous weight; and found a sphere in which I could feel that my efforts were not wholly futile. For the first time I could imagine that my clumsy gropings after art were a little more than faint cries lost in the unlistening void.

—Lovecraft in 1921.[45]

Lovecraft immersed himself in the world of amateur journalism for most of the following decade.[45] During this period, he advocated for amateurism’s superiority to commercialism.[46] Lovecraft defined commercialism as writing for what he considered low-brow publications for pay. This was contrasted with his view of «professional publication», which was what he called writing for what he considered respectable journals and publishers. He thought of amateur journalism as serving as practice for a professional career.[47]

Lovecraft was appointed chairman of the Department of Public Criticism of the UAPA in late 1914.[48] He used this position to advocate for what he saw as the superiority of archaic English language usage. Emblematic of the Anglophilic opinions he maintained throughout his life, he openly criticized other UAPA contributors for their «Americanisms» and «slang». Often, these criticisms were embedded in xenophobic and racist statements that the «national language» was being negatively changed by immigrants.[49] In mid-1915, Lovecraft was elected vice-president of the UAPA.[50] Two years later, he was elected president and appointed other board members who mostly shared his belief in the supremacy of British English over modern American English.[51] Another significant event of this time was the beginning of World War I. Lovecraft published multiple criticisms of the American government and public’s reluctance to join the war to protect England, which he viewed as America’s ancestral homeland.[52]

In 1916, Lovecraft published his first short story, «The Alchemist», in the main UAPA journal, which was a departure from his usual verse. Due to the encouragement of W. Paul Cook, another UAPA member and future lifelong friend, Lovecraft began writing and publishing more prose fiction.[53] Soon afterwards, he wrote «The Tomb» and «Dagon».[54] «The Tomb», by Lovecraft’s own admission, was greatly influenced by the style and structure of Edgar Allan Poe’s works.[55] Meanwhile, «Dagon» is considered Lovecraft’s first work that displays the concepts and themes that his writings would later become known for.[56] Lovecraft published another short story, «Beyond the Wall of Sleep» in 1919, which was his first science fiction story.[57]

Lovecraft in 1915, facing forward and looking right

Lovecraft’s term as president of the UAPA ended in 1918, and he returned to his former post as chairman of the Department of Public Criticism.[58] In 1917, as Lovecraft related to Kleiner, Lovecraft made an aborted attempt to enlist in the United States Army. Though he passed the physical exam,[59] he told Kleiner that his mother threatened to do anything, legal or otherwise, to prove that he was unfit for service.[60] After his failed attempt to serve in World War I, he attempted to enroll in the Rhode Island National Guard, but his mother used her family connections to prevent it.[61]

During the winter of 1918–1919, Susie, exhibiting the symptoms of a nervous breakdown, went to live with her elder sister, Lillian. The nature of Susie’s illness is unclear, as her medical papers were later destroyed in a fire at Butler Hospital.[62] Winfield Townley Scott, who was able to read the papers before the fire, described Susie as having suffered a psychological collapse.[62] Neighbour and friend Clara Hess, interviewed in 1948, recalled instances of Susie describing «weird and fantastic creatures that rushed out from behind buildings and from corners at dark.»[63] In the same account, Hess described a time when they crossed paths in downtown Providence and Susie was unaware of where she was.[63] In March 1919, she was committed to Butler Hospital, like her husband before her.[64] Lovecraft’s immediate reaction to Susie’s commitment was visceral, writing to Kleiner that «existence seems of little value», and that he wished «it might terminate».[65] During Susie’s time at Butler, Lovecraft periodically visited her and walked the large grounds with her.[66]

Late 1919 saw Lovecraft become more outgoing. After a period of isolation, he began joining friends in trips to writer gatherings; the first being a talk in Boston presented by Lord Dunsany, whom Lovecraft had recently discovered and idolized.[67] In early 1920, at an amateur writer convention, he met Frank Belknap Long, who would end up being Lovecraft’s most influential and closest confidant for the remainder of his life.[68] The influence of Dunsany is apparent in his 1919 output, which is part of what would be called Lovecraft’s Dream Cycle, including «The White Ship» and «The Doom That Came to Sarnath».[69] In early 1920, he wrote «The Cats of Ulthar» and «Celephaïs», which were also strongly influenced by Dunsany.[70]

It was later in 1920 that Lovecraft began publishing the earliest Cthulhu Mythos stories. The Cthulhu Mythos, a term coined by later authors, encompasses Lovecraft’s stories that share a commonality in the revelation of cosmic insignificance, initially realistic settings, and recurring entities and texts.[71] The prose poem «Nyarlathotep» and the short story «The Crawling Chaos», in collaboration with Winifred Virginia Jackson, were written in late 1920.[72] Following in early 1921 came «The Nameless City», the first story that falls definitively within the Cthulhu Mythos. In it is one of Lovecraft’s most enduring phrases, a couplet recited by Abdul Alhazred; «That is not dead which can eternal lie; And with strange aeons even death may die.»[73] In the same year, he also wrote «The Outsider», which has become one of Lovecraft’s most heavily analyzed, and differently interpreted, stories.[74] It has been variously interpreted as being autobiographical, an allegory of the psyche, a parody of the afterlife, a commentary on humanity’s place in the universe, and a critique of progress.[75]

On May 24, 1921, Susie died in Butler Hospital, due to complications from an operation on her gallbladder five days earlier.[76] Lovecraft’s initial reaction, expressed in a letter written nine days after Susie’s death, was a deep state of sadness that crippled him physically and emotionally. He again expressed a desire that his life might end.[77] Lovecraft’s later response was relief, as he had become able to live independently from his mother. His physical health also began to improve, although he was unaware of the exact cause.[78] Despite Lovecraft’s reaction, he continued to attend amateur journalist conventions. Lovecraft met his future wife, Sonia Greene, at one such convention in July.[79]

Marriage and New York

Sonia Green with her arm around Lovecraft in 1921

Lovecraft and Sonia Greene on July 5, 1921

Lovecraft’s aunts disapproved of his relationship with Sonia. Lovecraft and Greene married on March 3, 1924, and relocated to her Brooklyn apartment at 259 Parkside Avenue; she thought he needed to leave Providence to flourish and was willing to support him financially.[80] Greene, who had been married before, later said Lovecraft had performed satisfactorily as a lover, though she had to take the initiative in all aspects of the relationship. She attributed Lovecraft’s passive nature to a stultifying upbringing by his mother.[81] Lovecraft’s weight increased to 200 lb (91 kg) on his wife’s home cooking.[82]

He was enthralled by New York, and, in what was informally dubbed the Kalem Club, he acquired a group of encouraging intellectual and literary friends who urged him to submit stories to Weird Tales. Its editor, Edwin Baird, accepted many of Lovecraft’s stories for the ailing publication, including «Under the Pyramids», which was ghostwritten for Harry Houdini.[83] Established informally some years before Lovecraft arrived in New York, the core Kalem Club members were boys’ adventure novelist Henry Everett McNeil, the lawyer and anarchist writer James Ferdinand Morton Jr., and the poet Reinhardt Kleiner.[84]

On January 1, 1925, Sonia moved from Parkside to Cleveland in response to a job opportunity, and Lovecraft left for a small first-floor apartment on 169 Clinton Street «at the edge of Red Hook»—a location which came to discomfort him greatly.[85] Later that year, the Kalem Club’s four regular attendees were joined by Lovecraft along with his protégé Frank Belknap Long, bookseller George Willard Kirk, and Samuel Loveman.[86] Loveman was Jewish, but he and Lovecraft became close friends in spite of the latter’s antisemitic attitudes.[87] By the 1930s, writer and publisher Herman Charles Koenig would be one of the last to become involved with the Kalem Club.[88]

Not long after the marriage, Greene lost her business and her assets disappeared in a bank failure.[89] Lovecraft made efforts to support his wife through regular jobs, but his lack of previous work experience meant he lacked proven marketable skills.[90] The publisher of Weird Tales was attempting to make the loss-making magazine profitable and offered the job of editor to Lovecraft, who declined, citing his reluctance to relocate to Chicago on aesthetic grounds.[91] Baird was succeeded by Farnsworth Wright, whose writing Lovecraft had criticized. Lovecraft’s submissions were often rejected by Wright. This may have been partially due to censorship guidelines imposed in the aftermath of a Weird Tales story that hinted at necrophilia, although after Lovecraft’s death, Wright accepted many of the stories he had originally rejected.[92]

Sonia also became ill and immediately after recovering, relocated to Cincinnati, and then to Cleveland; her employment required constant travel.[93] Added to his feelings of failure in a city with a large immigrant population, Lovecraft’s single-room apartment was burgled, leaving him with only the clothes he was wearing.[94] In August 1925, he wrote «The Horror at Red Hook» and «He», in the latter of which the narrator says «My coming to New York had been a mistake; for whereas I had looked for poignant wonder and inspiration […] I had found instead only a sense of horror and oppression which threatened to master, paralyze, and annihilate me.»[95] This was an expression of his despair at being in New York.[96] It was at around this time he wrote the outline for «The Call of Cthulhu», with its theme of the insignificance of all humanity.[97] During this time, Lovecraft wrote «Supernatural Horror in Literature» on the eponymous subject. It later became one of the most influential essays on supernatural horror.[98] With a weekly allowance Greene sent, Lovecraft moved to a working-class area of Brooklyn Heights, where he resided in a tiny apartment. He had lost approximately 40 pounds (18 kg) of body weight by 1926, when he left for Providence.[99]

Return to Providence and death

The Samuel B. Mumford House, slightly obscured by trees

Lovecraft’s final home, May 1933 until March 10, 1937

Back in Providence, Lovecraft lived with his aunts in a «spacious brown Victorian wooden house» at 10 Barnes Street until 1933.[100] He then moved to 66 Prospect Street, which would become his final home.[b][101] The period beginning after his return to Providence contains some of his most prominent works, including The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath, The Case of Charles Dexter Ward, «The Call of Cthulhu» and The Shadow over Innsmouth.[102] The former two stories are partially autobiographical, as scholars have argued that The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath is about Lovecraft’s return to Providence and The Case of Charles Dexter Ward is, in part, about the city itself.[103] The former story also represents a partial repudiation of Dunsany’s influence, as Lovecraft had decided that his style did not come to him naturally.[104] At this time, he frequently revised work for other authors and did a large amount of ghostwriting, including The Mound, «Winged Death», and «The Diary of Alonzo Typer». Client Harry Houdini was laudatory, and attempted to help Lovecraft by introducing him to the head of a newspaper syndicate. Plans for a further project were ended by Houdini’s death in 1926.[105] After returning, he also began to engage in antiquarian travels across the eastern seaboard during the summer months.[106] During the spring–summer of 1930, Lovecraft visited, among other locations, New York City, Brattleboro, Vermont, Wilbraham, Massachusetts, Charleston, South Carolina, and Quebec City.[c][108]

Later, in August, Robert E. Howard wrote a letter to Weird Tales praising a then-recent reprint of H. P. Lovecraft’s «The Rats in the Walls» and discussing some of the Gaelic references used within.[109] Editor Farnsworth Wright forwarded the letter to Lovecraft, who responded positively to Howard, and soon the two writers were engaged in a vigorous correspondence that would last for the rest of Howard’s life.[110] Howard quickly became a member of the Lovecraft Circle, a group of writers and friends all linked through Lovecraft’s voluminous correspondence, as he introduced his many like-minded friends to one another and encouraged them to share their stories, utilize each other’s fictional creations, and help each other succeed in the field of pulp fiction.[111]

Meanwhile, Lovecraft was increasingly producing work that brought him no remuneration.[112] Affecting a calm indifference to the reception of his works, Lovecraft was in reality extremely sensitive to criticism and easily precipitated into withdrawal. He was known to give up trying to sell a story after it had been once rejected.[113] Sometimes, as with The Shadow over Innsmouth, he wrote a story that might have been commercially viable but did not try to sell it. Lovecraft even ignored interested publishers. He failed to reply when one inquired about any novel Lovecraft might have ready: although he had completed such a work, The Case of Charles Dexter Ward, it was never typed up.[114] A few years after Lovecraft had moved to Providence, he and his wife Sonia Greene, having lived separately for so long, agreed to an amicable divorce. Greene moved to California in 1933 and remarried in 1936, unaware that Lovecraft, despite his assurances to the contrary, had never officially signed the final decree.[115]

As a result of the Great Depression, he shifted towards socialism, decrying both his prior political beliefs and the rising tide of fascism.[116] He thought that socialism was a workable middle ground between what he saw as the destructive impulses of both the capitalists and the Marxists of his day. This was based in a general opposition to cultural upheaval, as well as support for an ordered society. Electorally, he supported Franklin D. Roosevelt, but he thought that the New Deal was not sufficiently leftist. Lovecraft’s support for it was based in his view that no other set of reforms were possible at that time.[117]

Lovecraft's personal grave, facing forward

H. P. Lovecraft’s gravestone

In late 1936, he witnessed the publication of The Shadow over Innsmouth as a paperback book.[d] 400 copies were printed, and the work was advertised in Weird Tales and several fan magazines. However, Lovecraft was displeased, as this book was riddled with errors that required extensive editing. It sold slowly and only approximately 200 copies were bound. The remaining 200 copies were destroyed after the publisher went out of business for the next seven years. By this point, Lovecraft’s literary career was reaching its end. Shortly after having written his last original short story, «The Haunter of the Dark», he stated that the hostile reception of At the Mountains of Madness had done «more than anything to end my effective fictional career». His declining psychological and physical states made it impossible for him to continue writing fiction.[120]

On June 11, Robert E. Howard was informed that his chronically ill mother would not awaken from her coma. He walked out to his car and committed suicide with a pistol that he had stored there. His mother died shortly thereafter.[121] This deeply affected Lovecraft, who consoled Howard’s father through correspondence. Almost immediately after hearing about Howard’s death, Lovecraft wrote a brief memoir titled «In Memoriam: Robert Ervin Howard», which he distributed to his correspondents.[122] Meanwhile, Lovecraft’s physical health was deteriorating. He was suffering from an affliction that he referred to as «grippe».[e][124]

Due to his fear of doctors, Lovecraft was not examined until a month before his death. After seeing a doctor, he was diagnosed with terminal cancer of the small intestine.[125] He remained hospitalized until he died. He lived in constant pain until his death on March 15, 1937, in Providence. In accordance with his lifelong scientific curiosity, he kept a diary of his illness until he was physically incapable of holding a pen.[126] Lovecraft was listed along with his parents on the Phillips family monument.[127] In 1977, fans erected a headstone in Swan Point Cemetery on which they inscribed his name, the dates of his birth and death, and the phrase «I AM PROVIDENCE»—a line from one of his personal letters.[128]

Personal views

Politics

An illustration by Virgil Finlay of Lovecraft as an eighteenth-century gentleman

H. P. Lovecraft as an eighteenth-century gentleman by Virgil Finlay

Lovecraft began his life as a Tory,[129] which was likely the result of his conservative upbringing. His family supported the Republican Party for the entirety of his life. While it is unclear how consistently he voted, he voted for Herbert Hoover in the 1928 presidential election.[130] Rhode Island as a whole remained politically conservative and Republican into the 1930s.[131] Lovecraft himself was an Anglophile who supported the British monarchy. He opposed democracy and thought that the United States should be governed by an aristocracy. This viewpoint emerged during his youth and lasted until the end of the 1920s.[132] During World War I, his Anglophilia caused him to strongly support the entente against the Central Powers. Many of his earlier poems were devoted to then-current political subjects, and he published several political essays in his amateur journal, The Conservative.[133] He was a teetotaler who supported the implementation of Prohibition, which was one of the few reforms that he supported during the early part of his life.[134] While remaining a teetotaller, he later became convinced that Prohibition was ineffectual in the 1930s.[135] His personal justification for his early political viewpoints was primarily based on tradition and aesthetics.[136]

As a result of the Great Depression, Lovecraft reexamined his political views.[137] Initially, he thought that affluent people would take on the characteristics of his ideal aristocracy and solve America’s problems. When this did not occur, he became a socialist. This shift was caused by his observation that the Depression was harming American society. It was also influenced by the increase in socialism’s political capital during the 1930s. One of the main points of Lovecraft’s socialism was its opposition to Soviet Marxism, as he thought that a Marxist revolution would bring about the destruction of American civilization. Lovecraft thought that an intellectual aristocracy needed to be formed to preserve America.[138] His ideal political system is outlined in his 1933 essay «Some Repetitions on the Times». Lovecraft used this essay to echo the political proposals that had been made over the course of the last few decades. In this essay, he advocates governmental control of resource distribution, fewer working hours and a higher wage, and unemployment insurance and old age pensions. He also outlines the need for an oligarchy of intellectuals. In his view, power must be restricted to those who are sufficiently intelligent and educated.[139] He frequently used the term «fascism» to describe this form of government, but, according to S. T. Joshi, it bears little resemblance to that ideology.[140]

Lovecraft had varied views on the political figures of his day. He was an ardent supporter of Franklin D. Roosevelt.[141] He saw that Roosevelt was trying to steer a middle course between the conservatives and the revolutionaries, which he approved of. While he thought that Roosevelt should have been enacting more progressive policies, he came to the conclusion that the New Deal was the only realistic option for reform. He thought that voting for his opponents on the political left would be a wasted effort.[142] Internationally, like many Americans, he initially expressed support for Adolf Hitler. More specifically, he thought that Hitler would preserve German culture. However, he thought that Hitler’s racial policies should be based on culture rather than descent. There is evidence that, at the end of his life, Lovecraft began to oppose Hitler. According to Harry K. Brobst, Lovecraft’s downstairs neighbor went to Germany and witnessed Jews being beaten. Lovecraft and his aunt were angered by this. His discussions of Hitler drop off after this point.[143]

Atheism

Lovecraft was an atheist. His viewpoints on religion are outlined in his 1922 essay «A Confession of Unfaith». In this essay, he describes his shift away from the Protestantism of his parents to the atheism of his adulthood. Lovecraft was raised by a conservative Protestant family. He was introduced to the Bible and the mythos of Saint Nicholas when he was two. He passively accepted both of them. Over the course of the next few years, he was introduced to Grimms’ Fairy Tales and One Thousand and One Nights, favoring the latter. In response, Lovecraft took on the identity of «Abdul Alhazred», a name he would later use for the author of the Necronomicon.[144] Lovecraft experienced a brief period as a Greco-Roman pagan shortly thereafter.[145] According to this account, his first moment of skepticism occurred before his fifth birthday, when he questioned if God is a myth after learning that Santa Claus is not real. In 1896, he was introduced to Greco-Roman myths and became «a genuine pagan».[15]

This came to an end in 1902, when Lovecraft was introduced to space. He later described this event as the most poignant in his life. In response to this discovery, Lovecraft took to studying astronomy and described his observations in the local newspaper.[146] Before his thirteenth birthday, he had become convinced of humanity’s impermanence. By the time he was seventeen, he had read detailed writings that agreed with his worldview. Lovecraft ceased writing positively about progress, instead developing his later cosmic philosophy. Despite his interests in science, he had an aversion to realistic literature, so he became interested in fantastical fiction. Lovecraft became pessimistic when he entered amateur journalism in 1914. The Great War seemed to confirm his viewpoints. He began to despise philosophical idealism. Lovecraft took to discussing and debating his pessimism with his peers, which allowed him to solidify his philosophy. His readings of Friedrich Nietzsche and H. L. Mencken, among other pessimistic writers, furthered this development. At the end of his essay, Lovecraft states that all he desired was oblivion. He was willing to cast aside any illusion that he may still have held.[147]

Race

Race is the most controversial aspect of Lovecraft’s legacy, expressed in many disparaging remarks against non-Anglo-Saxon races and cultures in his works. Scholars have argued that these racial attitudes were common in the American society of his day, particularly in New England.[148] As he grew older, his original racial worldview became a classism or elitism, which regarded the superior race to include all those self-ennobled through high culture. Lovecraft was a white supremacist.[149] Despite this, he did not hold all white people in uniform high regard, but rather esteemed English people and those of English descent.[150] In his early published essays, private letters, and personal utterances, he argued for a strong color line to preserve race and culture.[151] His arguments were supported using disparagements of various races in his journalism and letters, and allegorically in some of his fictional works that depict miscegenation between humans and non-human creatures.[152] This is evident in his portrayal of the Deep Ones in The Shadow over Innsmouth. Their interbreeding with humanity is framed as being a type of miscegenation that corrupts both the town of Innsmouth and the protagonist.[153]

Initially, Lovecraft showed sympathy to minorities who adopted Western culture, even to the extent of marrying a Jewish woman he viewed as being «well assimilated».[154] By the 1930s, Lovecraft’s views on ethnicity and race had moderated.[155] He supported ethnicities’ preserving their native cultures; for example, he thought that «a real friend of civilisation wishes merely to make the Germans more German, the French more French, the Spaniards more Spanish, & so on.»[156] This represented a shift from his previous support for cultural assimilation. His shift was partially the result of his exposure to different cultures through his travels and circle. The former resulted in him writing positively about Québécois and First Nations cultural traditions in his travelogue of Quebec.[157] However, this did not represent a complete elimination of his racial prejudices.[158]

Influences

Lovecraft was influenced by Edgar Allan Poe and Lord Dunsany.

His interest in weird fiction began in his childhood when his grandfather, who preferred Gothic stories, would tell him stories of his own design.[12] Lovecraft’s childhood home on Angell Street had a large library that contained classical literature, scientific works, and early weird fiction. At the age of five, Lovecraft enjoyed reading One Thousand and One Nights, and was reading Nathaniel Hawthorne a year later.[159] He was also influenced by the travel literature of John Mandeville and Marco Polo.[160] This led to his discovery of gaps in then-contemporary science, which prevented Lovecraft from committing suicide in response to the death of his grandfather and his family’s declining financial situation during his adolescence.[160] These travelogues may have also had an influence on how Lovecraft’s later works describe their characters and locations. For example, there is a resemblance between the powers of the Tibetan enchanters in The Travels of Marco Polo and the powers unleashed on Sentinel Hill in «The Dunwich Horror».[160]

One of Lovecraft’s most significant literary influences was Edgar Allan Poe, whom he described as his «God of Fiction».[161] Poe’s fiction was introduced to Lovecraft when the latter was eight years old. His earlier works were significantly influenced by Poe’s prose and writing style.[162] He also made extensive use of Poe’s unity of effect in his fiction.[163] Furthermore, At the Mountains of Madness directly quotes Poe and was influenced by The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket.[164] One of the main themes of the two stories is to discuss the unreliable nature of language as a method of expressing meaning.[165] In 1919, Lovecraft’s discovery of the stories of Lord Dunsany moved his writing in a new direction, resulting in a series of fantasies. Throughout his life, Lovecraft referred to Dunsany as the author who had the greatest impact on his literary career. The initial result of this influence was the Dream Cycle, a series of fantasies that originally take place in prehistory, but later shift to a dreamworld setting.[166] By 1930, Lovecraft decided that he would no longer write Dunsanian fantasies, arguing that the style did not come naturally to him.[167] Additionally, he also read and cited Arthur Machen and Algernon Blackwood as influences in the 1920s.[168]

Aside from horror authors, Lovecraft was significantly influenced by the Decadents, the Puritans, and the Aesthetic movement.[169] In «H. P. Lovecraft: New England Decadent», Barton Levi St. Armand, a professor emeritus of English and American studies at Brown University, has argued that these three influences combined to define Lovecraft as a writer.[170] He traces this influence to both Lovecraft’s stories and letters, noting that he actively cultivated the image of a New England gentleman in his letters.[169] Meanwhile, his influence from the Decadents and the Aesthetic Movement stems from his readings of Edgar Allan Poe. Lovecraft’s aesthetic worldview and fixation on decline stems from these readings. The idea of cosmic decline is described as having been Lovecraft’s response to both the Aesthetic Movement and the 19th century Decadents.[171] St. Armand describes it as being a combination of non-theological Puritan thought and the Decadent worldview.[172] This is used as a division in his stories, particularly in «The Horror at Red Hook», «Pickman’s Model», and «The Music of Erich Zann». The division between Puritanism and Decadence, St. Armand argues, represents a polarization between an artificial paradise and oneiriscopic visions of different worlds.[173]

A non-literary inspiration came from then-contemporary scientific advances in biology, astronomy, geology, and physics.[174] Lovecraft’s study of science contributed to his view of the human race as insignificant, powerless, and doomed in a materialistic and mechanistic universe.[175] Lovecraft was a keen amateur astronomer from his youth, often visiting the Ladd Observatory in Providence, and penning numerous astronomical articles for his personal journal and local newspapers.[176] Lovecraft’s materialist views led him to espouse his philosophical views through his fiction; these philosophical views came to be called cosmicism. Cosmicism took on a more pessimistic tone with his creation of what is now known as the Cthulhu Mythos, a fictional universe that contains alien deities and horrors. The term «Cthulhu Mythos» was likely coined by later writers after Lovecraft’s death.[1] In his letters, Lovecraft jokingly called his fictional mythology «Yog-Sothothery».[177]

Dreams had a major role in Lovecraft’s literary career.[178] In 1991, as a result of his rising place in American literature, it was popularly thought that Lovecraft extensively transcribed his dreams when writing fiction. However, the majority of his stories are not transcribed dreams. Instead, many of them are directly influenced by dreams and dreamlike phenomena. In his letters, Lovecraft frequently compared his characters to dreamers. They are described as being as helpless as a real dreamer who is experiencing a nightmare. His stories also have dreamlike qualities. The Randolph Carter stories deconstruct the division between dreams and reality. The dreamlands in The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath are a shared dreamworld that can be accessed by a sensitive dreamer. Meanwhile, in «The Silver Key», Lovecraft mentions the concept of «inward dreams», which implies the existence of outward dreams. Burleson compares this deconstruction to Carl Jung’s argument that dreams are the source of archetypal myths. Lovecraft’s way of writing fiction required both a level of realism and dreamlike elements. Citing Jung, Burleson argues that a writer may create realism by being inspired by dreams.[179]

Themes

Now all my tales are based on the fundamental premise that common human laws and interests and emotions have no validity or significance in the vast cosmos-at-large. To me there is nothing but puerility in a tale in which the human form—and the local human passions and conditions and standards—are depicted as native to other worlds or other universes. To achieve the essence of real externality, whether of time or space or dimension, one must forget that such things as organic life, good and evil, love and hate, and all such local attributes of a negligible and temporary race called mankind, have any existence at all. Only the human scenes and characters must have human qualities. These must be handled with unsparing realism, (not catch-penny romanticism) but when we cross the line to the boundless and hideous unknown—the shadow-haunted Outside—we must remember to leave our humanity and terrestrialism at the threshold.

— H. P. Lovecraft, in note to the editor of Weird Tales, on resubmission of «The Call of Cthulhu»[180]

Cosmicism

The central theme of Lovecraft’s corpus is cosmicism. Cosmicism is a literary philosophy that argues that humanity is an insignificant force in the universe. Despite appearing pessimistic, Lovecraft thought of himself being as being a cosmic indifferentist, which is expressed in his fiction. In it, human beings are often subject to powerful beings and other cosmic forces, but these forces are not so much malevolent as they are indifferent toward humanity. He believed in a meaningless, mechanical, and uncaring universe that human beings could never fully understand. There is no allowance for beliefs that could not be supported scientifically.[181] Lovecraft first articulated this philosophy in 1921, but he did not fully incorporate it into his fiction until five years later. «Dagon», «Beyond the Wall of Sleep», and «The Temple» contain early depictions of this concept, but the majority of his early tales do not analyze the concept. «Nyarlathotep» interprets the collapse of human civilization as being a corollary to the collapse of the universe. «The Call of Cthulhu» represents an intensification of this theme. In it, Lovecraft introduces the idea of alien influences on humanity, which would come to dominate all subsequent works.[182] In these works, Lovecraft expresses cosmicism through the usage of confirmation rather than revelation. Lovecraftian protagonists do not learn that they are insignificant. Instead, they already know it and have it confirmed to them through an event.[183]

Knowledge

Lovecraft’s fiction reflects his own ambivalent views regarding the nature of knowledge.[184] This expresses itself in the concept of forbidden knowledge. In Lovecraft’s stories, happiness is only achievable through blissful ignorance. Trying to know things that are not meant to be known leads to harm and psychological danger. This concept intersects with several other ideas. This includes the idea that the visible reality is an illusion masking the horrific true reality. Similarly, there are also intersections with the concepts of ancient civilizations that exert a malign influence on humanity and the general philosophy of cosmicism.[185] According to Lovecraft, self-knowledge can bring ruin to those who seek it. Those seekers would become aware of their own insignificance in the wider cosmos and would be unable to bear the weight of this knowledge. Lovecraftian horror is not achieved through external phenomenon. Instead, it is reached through the internalized psychological impact that knowledge has on its protagonists. «The Call of Cthulhu», The Shadow over Innsmouth, and The Shadow Out of Time feature protagonists who experience both external and internal horror through the acquisition of self-knowledge.[186] The Case of Charles Dexter Ward also reflects this. One of its central themes is the danger of knowing too much about one’s family history. Charles Dexter Ward, the protagonist, engages in historical and genealogical research that ultimately leads to both madness and his own self-destruction.[187]

Decline of civilization

For much of his life, Lovecraft was fixated on the concepts of decline and decadence. More specifically, he thought that the West was in a state of terminal decline.[188] Starting in the 1920s, Lovecraft became familiar with the work of the German conservative-revolutionary theorist Oswald Spengler, whose pessimistic thesis of the decadence of the modern West formed a crucial element in Lovecraft’s overall anti-modern worldview.[189] Spenglerian imagery of cyclical decay is a central theme in At the Mountains of Madness. S. T. Joshi, in H. P. Lovecraft: The Decline of the West, places Spengler at the center of his discussion of Lovecraft’s political and philosophical ideas. According to him, the idea of decline is the single idea that permeates and connects his personal philosophy. The main Spenglerian influence on Lovecraft would be his view that politics, economics, science, and art are all interdependent aspects of civilization. This realization led him to shed his personal ignorance of then-current political and economic developments after 1927.[190] Lovecraft had developed his idea of Western decline independently, but Spengler gave it a clear framework.[191]

Science

Lovecraft shifted supernatural horror away from its previous focus on human issues to a focus on cosmic ones. In this way, he merged the elements of supernatural fiction that he deemed to be scientifically viable with science fiction. This merge required an understanding of both supernatural horror and then-contemporary science.[192] Lovecraft used this combined knowledge to create stories that extensively reference trends in scientific development. Beginning with «The Shunned House», Lovecraft increasingly incorporated elements of both Einsteinian science and his own personal materialism into his stories. This intensified with the writing of «The Call of Cthulhu», where he depicted alien influences on humanity. This trend would continue throughout the remainder of his literary career. «The Colour Out of Space» represents what scholars have called the peak of this trend. It portrays an alien lifeform whose otherness prevents it from being defined by then-contemporary science.[193]

Another part of this effort was the repeated usage of mathematics in an effort to make his creatures and settings appear more alien. Tom Hull, a mathematician, regards this as enhancing his ability to invoke a sense of otherness and fear. He attributes this use of mathematics to Lovecraft’s childhood interest in astronomy and his adulthood awareness of non-Euclidean geometry.[194] Another reason for his use of mathematics was his reaction to the scientific developments of his day. These developments convinced him that humanity’s primary means of understanding the world was no longer trustable. Lovecraft’s usage of mathematics in his fiction serves to convert otherwise supernatural elements into things that have in-universe scientific explanations. «The Dreams in the Witch House» and The Shadow Out of Time both have elements of this. The former uses a witch and her familiar, while the latter uses the idea of mind transference. These elements are explained using scientific theories that were prevalent during Lovecraft’s lifetime.[195]

Lovecraft Country

Setting plays a major role in Lovecraft’s fiction. Lovecraft Country, a fictionalized version of New England, serves as the central hub for his mythos. It represents the history, culture, and folklore of the region, as interpreted by Lovecraft. These attributes are exaggerated and altered to provide a suitable setting for his stories. The names of the locations in the region were directly influenced by the names of real locations in the region, which was done to increase their realism.[196] Lovecraft’s stories use their connections with New England to imbue themselves with the ability to instill fear.[197] Lovecraft was primarily inspired by the cities and towns in Massachusetts. However, the specific location of Lovecraft Country is variable, as it moved according to Lovecraft’s literary needs. Starting with areas that he thought were evocative, Lovecraft redefined and exaggerated them under fictional names. For example, Lovecraft based Arkham on the town of Oakham and expanded it to include a nearby landmark.[198] Its location was moved, as Lovecraft decided that it would have been destroyed by the recently-built Quabbin Reservoir. This is alluded to in «The Colour Out of Space», as the «blasted heath» is submerged by the creation of a fictionalized version of the reservoir.[199] Similarly, Lovecraft’s other towns were based on other locations in Massachusetts. Innsmouth was based on Newburyport, and Dunwich was based on Greenwich. The vague locations of these towns also played into Lovecraft’s desire to create a mood in his stories. In his view, a mood can only be evoked through reading.[200]

Critical reception

Literary

Early efforts to revise an established literary view of Lovecraft as an author of ‘pulp’ were resisted by some eminent critics; in 1945, Edmund Wilson sneered: «the only real horror in most of these fictions is the horror of bad taste and bad art.» However, Wilson praised Lovecraft’s ability to write about his chosen field; he described him as having written about it «with much intelligence».[201] According to L. Sprague de Camp, Wilson later improved his opinion of Lovecraft, citing a report of David Chavchavadze that Wilson had included a Lovecraftian reference in Little Blue Light: A Play in Three Acts. After Chavchavadze met with him to discuss this, Wilson revealed that he had been reading a copy of Lovecraft’s correspondence.[f][203] Two years before Wilson’s critique, Lovecraft’s works were reviewed by Winfield Townley Scott, the literary editor of The Providence Journal. He argued that Lovecraft was one of the most significant Rhode Island authors and that it was regrettable that he had received little attention from mainstream critics at the time.[204] Mystery and Adventure columnist Will Cuppy of the New York Herald Tribune recommended to readers a volume of Lovecraft’s stories in 1944, asserting that «the literature of horror and macabre fantasy belongs with mystery in its broader sense.»[205]

By 1957, Floyd C. Gale of Galaxy Science Fiction said that Lovecraft was comparable to Robert E. Howard, stating that «they appear more prolific than ever,» noting L. Sprague de Camp, Björn Nyberg, and August Derleth’s usage of their creations.[206] Gale also said that «Lovecraft at his best could build a mood of horror unsurpassed; at his worst, he was laughable.»[206] In 1962, Colin Wilson, in his survey of anti-realist trends in fiction The Strength to Dream, cited Lovecraft as one of the pioneers of the «assault on rationality» and included him with M. R. James, H. G. Wells, Aldous Huxley, J. R. R. Tolkien and others as one of the builders of mythicised realities contending against what he considered the failing project of literary realism.[207] Subsequently, Lovecraft began to acquire the status of a cult writer in the counterculture of the 1960s, and reprints of his work proliferated.[208]

Michael Dirda, a reviewer for The Times Literary Supplement, has described Lovecraft as being a «visionary» who is «rightly regarded as second only to Edgar Allan Poe in the annals of American supernatural literature.» According to him, Lovecraft’s works prove that mankind cannot bear the weight of reality, as the true nature of reality cannot be understood by either science or history. In addition, Dirda praises Lovecraft’s ability to create an uncanny atmosphere. This atmosphere is created through the feeling of wrongness that pervades the objects, places, and people in Lovecraft’s works. He also comments favorably on Lovecraft’s correspondence, and compares him to Horace Walpole. Particular attention is given to his correspondence with August Derleth and Robert E. Howard. The Derleth letters are called «delightful», while the Howard letters are described as being an ideological debate. Overall, Dirda believes that Lovecraft’s letters are equal to, or better than, his fictional output.[209]

Los Angeles Review of Books reviewer Nick Mamatas has stated that Lovecraft was a particularly difficult author, rather than a bad one. He described Lovecraft as being «perfectly capable» in the fields of story logic, pacing, innovation, and generating quotable phrases. However, Lovecraft’s difficulty made him ill-suited to the pulps; he was unable to compete with the popular recurring protagonists and damsel-in-distress stories. Furthermore, he compared a paragraph from The Shadow Out of Time to a paragraph from the introduction to The Economic Consequences of the Peace. In Mamatas’ view, Lovecraft’s quality is obscured by his difficulty, and his skill is what has allowed his following to outlive the followings of other then-prominent authors, such as Seabury Quinn and Kenneth Patchen.[210]

In 2005, the Library of America published a volume of Lovecraft’s works. This volume was reviewed by many publications, including The New York Times Book Review and The Wall Street Journal, and sold 25,000 copies within a month of release. The overall critical reception of the volume was mixed.[211] Several scholars, including S. T. Joshi and Alison Sperling, have said that this confirms H. P. Lovecraft’s place in the western canon.[212] The editors of The Age of Lovecraft, Carl H. Sederholm and Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock, attributed the rise of mainstream popular and academic interest in Lovecraft to this volume, along with the Penguin Classics volumes and the Modern Library edition of At the Mountains of Madness. These volumes led to a proliferation of other volumes containing Lovecraft’s works. According to the two authors, these volumes are part of a trend in Lovecraft’s popular and academic reception: increased attention by one audience causes the other to also become more interested. Lovecraft’s success is, in part, the result of his success.[213]

Lovecraft’s style has often been subject to criticism,[214] but scholars such as S. T. Joshi have argued that Lovecraft consciously utilized a variety of literary devices to form a unique style of his own—these include prose-poetic rhythm, stream of consciousness, alliteration, and conscious archaism.[215] According to Joyce Carol Oates, Lovecraft and Edgar Allan Poe have exerted a significant influence on later writers in the horror genre.[216] Horror author Stephen King called Lovecraft «the twentieth century’s greatest practitioner of the classic horror tale.»[217] King stated in his semi-autobiographical non-fiction book Danse Macabre that Lovecraft was responsible for his own fascination with horror and the macabre and was the largest influence on his writing.[218]

Philosophical

H. P. Lovecraft’s writings have influenced the speculative realist philosophical movement during the early twentieth-first century. The four founders of the movement, Ray Brassier, Iain Hamilton Grant, Graham Harman, and Quentin Meillassoux, have cited Lovecraft as an inspiration for their worldviews.[219] Graham Harman wrote a monograph, Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy, about Lovecraft and philosophy. In it, he argues that Lovecraft was a «productionist» author. He describes Lovecraft as having been an author who was uniquely obsessed with gaps in human knowledge.[220] He goes further and asserts Lovecraft’s personal philosophy as being in opposition to both idealism and David Hume. In his view, Lovecraft resembles Georges Braque, Pablo Picasso, and Edmund Husserl in his division of objects into different parts that do not exhaust the potential meanings of the whole. The anti-idealism of Lovecraft is represented through his commentary on the inability of language to describe his horrors.[221] Harman also credits Lovecraft with inspiring parts of his own articulation of object-oriented ontology.[222] According to Lovecraft scholar Alison Sperling, this philosophical interpretation of Lovecraft’s fiction has caused other philosophers in Harmon’s tradition to write about Lovecraft. These philosophers seek to remove human perception and human life from the foundations of ethics. These scholars have used Lovecraft’s works as the central example of their worldview. They base this usage in Lovecraft’s arguments against anthropocentrism and the ability of the human mind to truly understand the universe. They have also played a role in Lovecraft’s improving literary reputation by focusing on his interpretation of ontology, which gives him a central position in Anthropocene studies.[223]

Legacy

Lovecraft memorial plaque with silhouette by Perry, slightly facing left

H. P. Lovecraft memorial plaque at 22 Prospect Street in Providence. Portrait by silhouettist E. J. Perry.

Lovecraft was relatively unknown during his lifetime. While his stories appeared in prominent pulp magazines such as Weird Tales, not many people knew his name.[224] He did, however, correspond regularly with other contemporary writers such as Clark Ashton Smith and August Derleth,[225] who became his friends, even though he never met them in person. This group became known as the «Lovecraft Circle», since their writings freely borrowed Lovecraft’s motifs, with his encouragement. He borrowed from them as well. For example, he made use of Clark Ashton Smith’s Tsathoggua in The Mound.[226]

After Lovecraft’s death, the Lovecraft Circle carried on. August Derleth founded Arkham House with Donald Wandrei to preserve Lovecraft’s works and keep them in print.[227] He added to and expanded on Lovecraft’s vision, not without controversy.[228] While Lovecraft considered his pantheon of alien gods a mere plot device, Derleth created an entire cosmology, complete with a war between the good Elder Gods and the evil Outer Gods, such as Cthulhu and his ilk. The forces of good were supposed to have won, locking Cthulhu and others beneath the earth, the ocean, and elsewhere. Derleth’s Cthulhu Mythos stories went on to associate different gods with the traditional four elements of fire, air, earth, and water, which did not line up with Lovecraft’s original vision of his mythos. However, Derleth’s ownership of Arkham House gave him a position of authority in Lovecraftiana that would not dissipate until his death, and through the efforts of Lovecraft scholars in the 1970s.[229]

Lovecraft’s works have influenced many writers and other creators. Stephen King has cited Lovecraft as a major influence on his works. As a child in the 1960s, he came across a volume of Lovecraft’s works which inspired him to write his fiction. He goes on to argue that all works in the horror genre that were written after Lovecraft were influenced by him.[217] In the field of comics, Alan Moore has described Lovecraft as having been a formative influence on his graphic novels.[230] Film director John Carpenter’s films include direct references and quotations of Lovecraft’s fiction, in addition to their use of a Lovecraftian aesthetic and themes. Guillermo del Toro has been similarly influenced by Lovecraft’s corpus.[231]

The first World Fantasy Awards were held in Providence in 1975. The theme was «The Lovecraft Circle». Until 2015, winners were presented with an elongated bust of Lovecraft that was designed by cartoonist Gahan Wilson, nicknamed the «Howard».[232] In November 2015 it was announced that the World Fantasy Award trophy would no longer be modeled on H. P. Lovecraft in response to the author’s views on race.[233] After the World Fantasy Award dropped their connection to Lovecraft, The Atlantic commented that «In the end, Lovecraft still wins—people who’ve never read a page of his work will still know who Cthulhu is for years to come, and his legacy lives on in the work of Stephen King, Guillermo del Toro, and Neil Gaiman.»[232]

In 2016, Lovecraft was inducted into the Museum of Pop Culture’s Science Fiction and Fantasy Hall of Fame.[234] Three years later, Lovecraft and the other mythos authors were posthumously awarded the 1945 Retro-Hugo Award for Best Series for their contributions to the Cthulhu Mythos.[235]

Lovecraft studies

Joshi in 2002, facing right and looking forward

Starting in the early 1970s, a body of scholarly work began to emerge around Lovecraft’s life and works. Referred to as Lovecraft studies, its proponents sought to establish Lovecraft as a significant author in the American literary canon. This can be traced to Derleth’s preservation and dissemination of Lovecraft’s fiction, non-fiction, and letters through Arkham House. Joshi credits the development of the field to this process. However, it was marred by low quality editions and misinterpretations of Lovecraft’s worldview. After Derleth’s death in 1971, the scholarship entered a new phase. There was a push to create a book-length biography of Lovecraft. L. Sprague de Camp, a science fiction scholar, wrote the first major one in 1975. This biography was criticized by early Lovecraft scholars for its lack of scholarly merit and its lack of sympathy for its subject. Despite this, it played a significant role in Lovecraft’s literary rise. It exposed Lovecraft to the mainstream of American literary criticism. During the late 1970s and early 1980s, there was a division in the field between the «Derlethian traditionalists» who wished to interpret Lovecraft through the lens of fantasy literature and the newer scholars who wished to place greater attention on the entirety of his corpus.[236]

The 1980s and 1990s saw a further proliferation of the field. The 1990 H. P. Lovecraft Centennial Conference and the republishing of older essays in An Epicure in the Terrible represented the publishing of many basic studies that would be used as a base for then-future studies. The 1990 centennial also saw the installation of the «H. P. Lovecraft Memorial Plaque» in a garden adjoining John Hay Library, that features a portrait by silhouettist E. J. Perry.[237] Following this, in 1996, S. T. Joshi wrote his own biography of Lovecraft. This biography was met with positive reviews and became the main biography in the field. It has since been superseded by his expanded edition of the book, I am Providence in 2010.[238]

Lovecraft’s improving literary reputation has caused his works to receive increased attention by both classics publishers and scholarly fans.[239] His works have been published by several different series of literary classics. Penguin Classics published three volumes of Lovecraft’s works between 1999 and 2004. These volumes were edited by S. T. Joshi.[239] Barnes & Noble would publish their own volume of Lovecraft’s complete fiction in 2008. The Library of America published a volume of Lovecraft’s works in 2005. The publishing of these volumes represented a reversal of the traditional judgment that Lovecraft was not part of the Western canon.[240] Meanwhile, the biannual NecronomiCon Providence convention was first held in 2013. Its purpose is to serve as a fan and scholarly convention that discusses both Lovecraft and the wider field of weird fiction. It is organized by the Lovecraft Arts and Sciences organization and is held on the weekend of Lovecraft’s birth.[241] That July, the Providence City Council designated the «H. P. Lovecraft Memorial Square» and installed a commemorative sign at the intersection of Angell and Prospect streets, near the author’s former residences.[242]

Music

Lovecraft’s fictional Mythos has influenced a number of musicians, particularly in rock and heavy metal music.[243] This began in the 1960s with the formation of the psychedelic rock band H. P. Lovecraft, who released the albums H. P. Lovecraft and H. P. Lovecraft II in 1967 and 1968 respectively.[244] They broke up afterwards, but later songs were released. This included «The White Ship» and «At the Mountains of Madness», both titled after Lovecraft stories.[245] Extreme metal has also been influenced by Lovecraft.[246] This has expressed itself in both the names of bands and the contents of their albums. This began in 1970 with the release of Black Sabbath’s first album, Black Sabbath, which contained a song titled Behind the Wall of Sleep, deriving its name from the 1919 story «Beyond the Wall of Sleep.»[246] Heavy metal band Metallica was also inspired by Lovecraft. They recorded a song inspired by «The Call of Cthulhu», «The Call of Ktulu», and a song based on The Shadow over Innsmouth titled «The Thing That Should Not Be».[247] These songs contain direct quotations of Lovecraft’s works.[248] Joseph Norman, a speculative scholar, has argued that there are similarities between the music described in Lovecraft’s fiction and the aesthetics and atmosphere of black metal. He argues that this is evident through the «animalistic» qualities of black metal vocals. The usage of occult elements is also cited as a thematic commonality. In terms of atmosphere, he asserts that both Lovecraft’s works and extreme metal place heavy focus on creating a strong negative mood.[249]

Games

Lovecraft has also influenced gaming, despite having personally disliked games during his lifetime.[250] Chaosium’s tabletop role-playing game Call of Cthulhu, released in 1981 and currently in its seventh major edition, was one of the first games to draw heavily from Lovecraft.[251] It includes a Lovecraft-inspired insanity mechanic, which allowed for player characters to go insane from contact with cosmic horrors. This mechanic would go on to make appearance in subsequent tabletop and video games.[252] 1987 saw the release of another Lovecraftian board game, Arkham Horror, which was published by Fantasy Flight Games.[253] Though few subsequent Lovecraftian board games were released annually from 1987 to 2014, the years after 2014 saw a rapid increase in the number of Lovecraftian board games. According to Christina Silva, this revival may have been influenced by the entry of Lovecraft’s work into the public domain and a revival of interest in board games.[254] Few video games are direct adaptations of Lovecraft’s works, but many video games have been inspired or heavily influenced by Lovecraft.[252] Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth, a Lovecraftian first-person video game, was released in 2005.[252] It is a loose adaptation of The Shadow over Innsmouth, The Shadow Out of Time, and «The Thing on the Doorstep» that uses noir themes.[255] These adaptations focus more on Lovecraft’s monsters and gamification than they do on his themes, which represents a break from Lovecraft’s core theme of human insignificance.[256]

Religion and occultism

Several contemporary religions have been influenced by Lovecraft’s works. Kenneth Grant, the founder of the Typhonian Order, incorporated Lovecraft’s Mythos into his ritual and occult system. Grant combined his interest in Lovecraft’s fiction with his adherence to Aleister Crowley’s Thelema. The Typhonian Order considers Lovecraftian entities to be symbols through which people may interact with something inhuman.[257] Grant also argued that Crowley himself was influenced by Lovecraft’s writings, particularly in the naming of characters in The Book of the Law.[258] Similarly, The Satanic Rituals, co-written by Anton LaVey and Michael A. Aquino, includes the «Ceremony of the Nine Angles», which is a ritual that was influenced by the descriptions in «The Dreams in the Witch House». It contains invocations of several of Lovecraft’s fictional gods.[259]

There have been several books that have claimed to be an authentic edition of Lovecraft’s Necronomicon.[260] The Simon Necronomicon is one such example. It was written by an unknown figure who identified themselves as «Simon». Peter Levenda, an occult author who has written about the Necronomicon, claims that he and «Simon» came across a hidden Greek translation of the grimoire while looking through a collection of antiquities at a New York bookstore during the 1960s or 1970s.[261] This book was claimed to have borne the seal of the Necronomicon. Levenda went on to claim that Lovecraft had access to this purported scroll.[262] A textual analysis has determined that the contents of this book were derived from multiple documents that discuss Mesopotamian myth and magic. The finding of a magical text by monks is also a common theme in the history of grimoires.[263] It has been suggested that Levenda is the true author of the Simon Necronomicon.[264]

Correspondence

Although Lovecraft is known mostly for his works of weird fiction, the bulk of his writing consists of voluminous letters about a variety of topics, from weird fiction and art criticism to politics and history.[265] Lovecraft biographers L. Sprague de Camp and S. T. Joshi have estimated that Lovecraft wrote 100,000 letters in his lifetime, a fifth of which are believed to survive.[266] These letters were directed at fellow writers and members of the amateur press. His involvement in the latter was what caused him to begin writing them.[267] He included comedic elements in these letters. This included posing as an eighteenth-century gentleman and signing them with pseudonyms, most commonly «Grandpa Theobald» and «E’ch-Pi-El.»[g][269] According to Joshi, the most important sets of letters were those written to Frank Belknap Long, Clark Ashton Smith, and James F. Morton. He attributes this importance to the contents of these letters. With Long, Lovecraft argued in support and in opposition to many of Long’s viewpoints. The letters to Clark Ashton Smith are characterized by their focus on weird fiction. Lovecraft and Morton debated many scholarly subjects in their letters, resulting in what Joshi has called the «single greatest correspondence Lovecraft ever wrote.»[270]

Copyright and other legal issues

Derleth facing left in 1962

Despite several claims to the contrary, there is currently no evidence that any company or individual owns the copyright to any of Lovecraft’s works, and it is generally accepted that it has passed into the public domain.[271] Lovecraft had specified that R. H. Barlow would serve as the executor of his literary estate,[272] but these instructions were not incorporated into his will. Nevertheless, his surviving aunt carried out his expressed wishes, and Barlow was given control of Lovecraft’s literary estate upon his death. Barlow deposited the bulk of the papers, including the voluminous correspondence, in the John Hay Library, and attempted to organize and maintain Lovecraft’s other writings.[273] Lovecraft protégé August Derleth, an older and more established writer than Barlow, vied for control of the literary estate. He and Donald Wandrei, a fellow protégé and co-owner of Arkham House, falsely claimed that Derleth was the true literary executor.[274] Barlow capitulated, and later committed suicide in 1951.[275] This gave Derleth and Wandrei complete control over Lovecraft’s corpus.[276]

On October 9, 1947, Derleth purchased all rights to the stories that were published in Weird Tales. However, since April 1926 at the latest, Lovecraft had reserved all second printing rights to stories published in Weird Tales. Therefore, Weird Tales only owned the rights to at most six of Lovecraft’s tales. If Derleth had legally obtained the copyrights to these tales, there is no evidence that they were renewed before the rights expired.[277] Following Derleth’s death in 1971, Donald Wandrei sued his estate to challenge Derleth’s will, which stated that he only held the copyrights and royalties to Lovecraft’s works that were published under both his and Derleth’s names. Arkham House’s lawyer, Forrest D. Hartmann, argued that the rights to Lovecraft’s works were never renewed. Wandrei won the case, but Arkham House’s actions regarding copyright have damaged their ability to claim ownership of them.[278]

In H. P. Lovecraft: A Life, S. T. Joshi concludes that Derleth’s claims are «almost certainly fictitious» and argues that most of Lovecraft’s works that were published in the amateur press are likely in the public domain. The copyright for Lovecraft’s works would have been inherited by the only surviving heir named in his 1912 will, his aunt Annie Gamwell.[279] When she died in 1941, the copyrights passed to her remaining descendants, Ethel Phillips Morrish and Edna Lewis. They signed a document, sometimes referred to as the Morrish-Lewis gift, permitting Arkham House to republish Lovecraft’s works while retaining their ownership of the copyrights.[280] Searches of the Library of Congress have failed to find any evidence that these copyrights were renewed after the 28-year period, making it likely that these works are in the public domain.[281] However, the Lovecraft literary estate, reconstituted in 1998 under Robert C. Harrall, has claimed that they own the rights. They have been based in Providence since 2009 and have been granting the rights to Lovecraft’s works to several publishers. Their claims have been criticized by scholars, such as Chris J. Karr, who has argued that the rights had not been renewed.[282] Joshi has withdrawn his support for his conclusion, and now supports the estate’s copyright claims.[283]

Bibliography

See also

  • Category:H. P. Lovecraft scholars

Explanatory notes

  1. ^ Lovecraft did not coin the term «Cthulhu Mythos». Instead, this term was coined by later authors.[1]
  2. ^ The house was later moved to 65 Prospect Street to accommodate the building of Brown University’s Art Building.[101]
  3. ^ He wrote several travelogues, including one on Quebec that was the longest singular work that he wrote.[107]
  4. ^ This is the only one of Lovecraft’s stories that was published as a book during his lifetime.[118] W. Paul Cook had previously made an abortive attempt to publish «The Shunned House» as a small book between 1927 and 1930.[119]
  5. ^ «Grippe» is an archaic term for influenza.[123]
  6. ^ L. Sprague de Camp also stated that the two men began calling each other «Monstro». This is a direct reference to the nicknames that Lovecraft gave to some of his correspondents.[202]
  7. ^ Lewis Theobald, Jun., the full version of Grandpa Theobald, was derived from the name of Lewis Theobald, an eighteenth-century Shakespearian scholar who was fictionalized in Alexander Pope’s The Dunciad.[268]

Citations

  1. ^ a b Tierney 2001, p. 52; Joshi 2010b, p. 186; de Camp 1975, p. 270.
  2. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 16; de Camp 1975, p. 12; Cannon 1989, p. 1–2.
  3. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 8; de Camp 1975, p. 11; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
  4. ^ Joshi 2010a.
  5. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 26.
  6. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 22; de Camp 1975, pp. 15–16; Faig 1991, p. 49.
  7. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 26; de Camp 1975, p. 16; Cannon 1989, p. 1.
  8. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 28; de Camp 1975, p. 17; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
  9. ^ de Camp 1975, p. 2; Cannon 1989, pp. 3–4.
  10. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 28; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
  11. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 25; de Camp 1975, pp. 17–18.
  12. ^ a b Joshi 2010a, pp. 33, 36; de Camp 1975, pp. 17–18.
  13. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 34; de Camp 1975, pp. 30–31.
  14. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 38; de Camp 1975, pp. 32; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
  15. ^ a b Lovecraft 2006a, pp. 145–146; Joshi 2001, pp. 20–23; St. Armand 1975, pp. 140–141.
  16. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 42; St. Armand 1972, pp. 3–4; de Camp 1975, pp. 18.
  17. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 60; de Camp 1975, p. 32.
  18. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 84.
  19. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 90; Cannon 1989, p. 4.
  20. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 97; Faig 1991, p. 63.
  21. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 96; de Camp 1975, pp. 37–39; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
  22. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 98; Joshi 2001, pp. 47–48; Faig 1991, p. 4.
  23. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 99.
  24. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 102; de Camp 1975, p. 36.
  25. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 116; de Camp 1975, pp. 43–45; Cannon 1989, p. 15.
  26. ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 126; de Camp 1975, pp. 51–53; Cannon 1989, p. 3.
  27. ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 126.
  28. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 126–127; de Camp 1975, p. 27.
  29. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 127.
  30. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 128; de Camp 1975, pp. 51–52.
  31. ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 128.
  32. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 66; Faig 1991, p. 65.
  33. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 67–68; de Camp 1975, p. 66; St. Armand 1972, p. 3.
  34. ^ de Camp 1975, p. 64.
  35. ^ Bonner 2015, pp. 52–53.
  36. ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 154.
  37. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 129; de Camp 1975.
  38. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 137.
  39. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 138; de Camp 1975, p. 95.
  40. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 140; de Camp 1975, pp. 76–77.
  41. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 145; de Camp 1975, p. 76–77.
  42. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 145; de Camp 1975, pp. 78–79.
  43. ^ Joshi 2010a, pp. 145–155; de Camp 1975, p. 84.
  44. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 155; de Camp 1975, pp. 84–84.
  45. ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 159.
  46. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 164.
  47. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 165.
  48. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 168; de Camp 1975, p. 153; Cannon 1989, p. 5.
  49. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 169.
  50. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 180; de Camp 1975, p. 121.
  51. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 182; de Camp 1975, pp. 121–122.
  52. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 210; Cannon 1989, p. 6.
  53. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 273; de Camp 1975, p. 125.
  54. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 239; de Camp 1975, pp. 125–126.
  55. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 240; Cannon 1989, p. 16.
  56. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 251; de Camp 1975, pp. 125–126.
  57. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 260; de Camp 1975, p. 137.
  58. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 284; de Camp 1975, p. 122.
  59. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 303; Faig 1991, p. 66.
  60. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 300; Faig 1991, pp. 66–67.
  61. ^ Joshi 1996a, p. 23; Cannon 1989, p. 3; de Camp 1975, p. 118.
  62. ^ a b Joshi 2001, p. 125.
  63. ^ a b Hess 1971, p. 249; Joshi 2001, pp. 121–122; de Camp 1975, p. 65–66.
  64. ^ Hess 1971, p. 249; Joshi 2010a, p. 301; de Camp 1975, pp. 134–135.
  65. ^ Lovecraft 2000, p. 84.
  66. ^ Faig 1991, pp. 58–59; de Camp 1975, p. 135.
  67. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 306; de Camp 1975, pp. 139–141.
  68. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 308.
  69. ^ Joshi 1996a, p. 79; de Camp 1975, pp. 141–144.
  70. ^ Joshi 1996a, p. 79; de Camp 1975, pp. 141–144; Burleson 1990, pp. 39.
  71. ^ Tierney 2001, p. 52; Leavenworth 2014, pp. 333–334.
  72. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 369; de Camp 1975, pp. 138–139.
  73. ^ de Camp 1975, p. 149; Burleson 1990, pp. 49, 52–53.
  74. ^ Burleson 1990, p. 58; Joshi 2010a, pp. 140–142.
  75. ^ Mosig 2001, pp. 17–18, 33; Joshi 2010a, pp. 140–142.
  76. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 390; de Camp 1975, p. 154; Cannon 1989, pp. 4–5.
  77. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 390; de Camp 1975, p. 154–156.
  78. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 144–145; de Camp 1975, p. 154–156; Faig 1991, p. 67.
  79. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 400; de Camp 1975, p. 152–154; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
  80. ^ Greene & Scott 1948, p. 8; Fooy 2011; de Camp 1975, p. 184.
  81. ^ Everts 2012, p. 19; Joshi 2001, pp. 201–202.
  82. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 202–203; de Camp 1975, p. 202.
  83. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 291–292; de Camp 1975, pp. 177–179, 219; Cannon 1989, p. 55.
  84. ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 136; de Camp 1975, p. 219.
  85. ^ Fooy 2011; Cannon 1989, p. 55; Joshi 2001, p. 210.
  86. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 201–202.
  87. ^ Joshi 1996b, p. 11; de Camp 1975, pp. 109–111; Greene & Scott 1948, p. 8.
  88. ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 112.
  89. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 295–298; de Camp 1975, p. 224.
  90. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 295–298; de Camp 1975, pp. 207–213.
  91. ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001; St. Armand 1972, p. 10.
  92. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 225; de Camp 1975, p. 183.
  93. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 200–201; de Camp 1975, pp. 170–172.
  94. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 216–218; de Camp 1975, pp. 230–232.
  95. ^ Lovecraft 2009b.
  96. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 223–224; Norris 2020, p. 217; de Camp 1975, pp. 242–243.
  97. ^ Pedersen 2017, p. 23; de Camp 1975, p. 270; Burleson 1990, p. 77.
  98. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 227–228; Moreland 2018, pp. 1–3; Cannon 1989, pp. 61–62.
  99. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 214–215.
  100. ^ Rubinton 2016; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
  101. ^ a b Joshi 1996a, p. 26; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
  102. ^ Pedersen 2017, p. 23; de Camp 1975, p. 270; Joshi 2001, pp. 351–354.
  103. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 351–354; St. Armand 1972, pp. 10–14.
  104. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 351–353; Goodrich 2004, pp. 37–38.
  105. ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 117; Flood 2016.
  106. ^ Cannon 1989, pp. 7–8; Evans 2005, pp. 102–105.
  107. ^ Ransom 2015, pp. 451–452; Evans 2005, p. 104; Joshi 2001, pp. 272–273.
  108. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 272–273; Cannon 1989, pp. 7–8.
  109. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 307–309; Finn 2013, pp. 148–149, 184; Vick 2021, pp. 96–102.
  110. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 307–309; Finn 2013, pp. 148–149; Vick 2021, pp. 96–102.
  111. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 307–309; Finn 2013, pp. 150–151; Vick 2021, pp. 96–102.
  112. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 273.
  113. ^ Schultz 2018, pp. 52–53.
  114. ^ Schultz 2018, pp. 52–53; Joshi 2001, p. 255; de Camp 1975, pp. 192–194.
  115. ^ Greene & Scott 1948, p. 8; Joshi 1996b, p. 455.
  116. ^ Lovecraft 1976b; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–355; Cannon 1989, pp. 10–11.
  117. ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–12; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–355.
  118. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 382–383.
  119. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 262–263.
  120. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 383–384.
  121. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 375–376; Finn 2013, pp. 294–295; Vick 2021, pp. 130–137.
  122. ^ Lovecraft 2006c, pp. 216–218; Joshi 2001, pp. 375–376; Vick 2021, p. 143.
  123. ^ Lexico Dictionaries 2020.
  124. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 370, 384–385; Cannon 1989, p. 11; de Camp 1975, pp. 415–416.
  125. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 387–388; de Camp 1975, pp. 427–428.
  126. ^ The Boston Globe 1937, p. 2; Joshi 2001, pp. 387–388.
  127. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 389; de Camp 1975, p. 428.
  128. ^ Mosig 1997, p. 114; Lovecraft 1968, pp. 50–51.
  129. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 8–16; Cannon 1989, p. 10.
  130. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 183–184.
  131. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 9; Joshi 2016, p. 161.
  132. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 16; Joshi 2001, pp. 183–184.
  133. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 94–96.
  134. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 101–102; Pedersen 2019, pp. 119–120.
  135. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 351; Pedersen 2019, pp. 141–143.
  136. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 346.
  137. ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–4; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–348; Cannon 1989, pp. 10–11.
  138. ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–35; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–348.
  139. ^ Lovecraft 2006d, pp. 85–95; Joshi 2001, pp. 349–352.
  140. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 349–352.
  141. ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–12; Joshi 2001, p. 354; Cannon 1989, p. 10.
  142. ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–12; Joshi 2001, p. 354.
  143. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 360–361.
  144. ^ Lovecraft 2006a, p. 145; Hölzing 2011, pp. 182–183.
  145. ^ Lovecraft 2006a, pp. 145–146; Joshi 2001, pp. 20–23; Zeller 2019, p. 18.
  146. ^ Lubnow 2019, pp. 3–5; Livesey 2008, pp. 3–21; Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–174.
  147. ^ Lovecraft 2006a, pp. 147–148; Joshi 2001, pp. 40, 130–133.
  148. ^ Schweitzer 1998, pp. 94–95; Evans 2005, pp. 108–110; Joshi 2015, pp. 108–110.
  149. ^ Callaghan 2011, p. 103; Spencer 2021, p. 603.
  150. ^ Steiner 2005, pp. 54–55; Evans 2005, pp. 108–109; Lovett-Graff 1997, pp. 183–186.
  151. ^ Steiner 2005, pp. 54–55; Punter 1996, p. 40.
  152. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 162–163; Hambly 1996, p. viii; Klein 2012, pp. 183–184.
  153. ^ Lovett-Graff 1997, pp. 183–187; Evans 2005, pp. 123–125; Klein 2012, pp. 183–184.
  154. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 221–223; Steiner 2005, pp. 54–55.
  155. ^ Schweitzer 1998, pp. 94–95; Evans 2005, p. 125; Joshi 2015, pp. 108–110.
  156. ^ Joshi 2015, p. 109.
  157. ^ Ransom 2015, pp. 451–452; Evans 2005, pp. 109–110.
  158. ^ Joshi 2015, p. 108–109; Evans 2005, pp. 109–110.
  159. ^ Pedersen 2017, pp. 26–27; Joshi 2001, pp. 21–24.
  160. ^ a b c Pedersen 2017, pp. 26–27; Joshi 2001, pp. 47–48.
  161. ^ Pedersen 2018, pp. 172–173; Joshi 2013, p. 263; St. Armand 1975, p. 129.
  162. ^ Jamneck 2012, pp. 126–151; St. Armand 1975, pp. 129–130.
  163. ^ Joshi 2017, pp. x–xi.
  164. ^ Lovecraft 2009a; Jamneck 2012, pp. 126–151; Cannon 1989, pp. 101–103.
  165. ^ Jamneck 2012, pp. 126–151.
  166. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 135–137; Schweitzer 2018, pp. 139–143; Joshi 2013, pp. 260–261.
  167. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 253.
  168. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 168–169; Joshi 2001, pp. 228–229; St. Armand 1975, p. 142.
  169. ^ a b St. Armand 1975, pp. 127–128.
  170. ^ St. Armand 1975, p. 127.
  171. ^ St. Armand 1975, pp. 129–131.
  172. ^ St. Armand 1975, pp. 133–137.
  173. ^ St. Armand 1975, pp. 145–150.
  174. ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–173; Rottensteiner 1992, pp. 117–121.
  175. ^ Woodard 2011, p. 6; Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–173.
  176. ^ Lubnow 2019, pp. 3–5; Livesey 2008, pp. 3–21; Joshi 2010b, p. 174.
  177. ^ Lovecraft 2010, p. 97; Pedersen 2017, p. 23; de Camp 1975, p. 270.
  178. ^ Macrobert 2015, pp. 34–39; Burleson 1991–1992, pp. 7–12.
  179. ^ Burleson 1991–1992, pp. 7–12.
  180. ^ Lovecraft 2014, p. 7.
  181. ^ Touponce 2013, pp. 62–63; Matthews 2018, p. 177; Burleson 1990, pp. 156–160.
  182. ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 186–187; Burleson 1990, pp. 156–157.
  183. ^ Leiber 2001, p. 6; Lacy & Zani 2007, p. 70; Burleson 1990, pp. 158–159.
  184. ^ Burleson 1990, pp. 156–158; Joshi 1996a, p. 124; Pedersen 2017, pp. 28–33.
  185. ^ Burleson 1990, pp. 156–158.
  186. ^ Burleson 1990, pp. 156–158; Joshi 1996a, pp. 262–263.
  187. ^ St. Armand 1972, pp. 14–15; Joshi 1996a, p. 124; Cannon 1989, p. 73.
  188. ^ Joshi 2016, p. 320; St. Armand 1975, pp. 129–130.
  189. ^ Joshi 2016, p. 314–320; St. Armand 1975, pp. 131–132.
  190. ^ Joshi 2016, pp. 314–320.
  191. ^ Joshi 2016, p. 316.
  192. ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–172.
  193. ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 183–188; Martin 2012, p. 99; Burleson 1990, pp. 107–110.
  194. ^ Hull 2006, pp. 10–12.
  195. ^ Look 2016, pp. 101–103; Halpurn & Labossiere 2009, pp. 512–513.
  196. ^ Butler 2014, pp. 131–135; St. Armand 1975, p. 129.
  197. ^ Butler 2014, pp. 131–135.
  198. ^ Murray 1986, pp. 54–67.
  199. ^ Murray 1991–1992, pp. 19–29; Burleson 1990, pp. 106, 118.
  200. ^ Murray 1991–1992, pp. 19–29.
  201. ^ Wilson 1950, pp. 286–290.
  202. ^ de Camp 1979, p. 5.
  203. ^ de Camp 1979, p. 5; Cannon 1989, p. 126.
  204. ^ Scott 1943, p. 41.
  205. ^ Cuppy 1944, p. 10.
  206. ^ a b Gale 1960, pp. 100–103.
  207. ^ Wilson 1975, pp. 1–10.
  208. ^ Lovecraft 2013, pp. xiii–xiv.
  209. ^ Dirda 2012.
  210. ^ Mamatas 2014.
  211. ^ Lovecraft Annual 2007, p. 160; Eberhart 2005, p. 82; Grant 2005, p. 146.
  212. ^ Joshi 2015, pp. 105–116; Sperling 2016, p. 75; Hantke 2013, pp. 137–138.
  213. ^ Sederholm & Weinstock 2016, pp. 2, 8–9.
  214. ^ Gray 2014; Dirda 2005.
  215. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 91, 252.
  216. ^ Oates 1996.
  217. ^ a b Wohleber 1995.
  218. ^ King 1987, p. 63.
  219. ^ Peak 2020, pp. 169–172; Elfren 2016.
  220. ^ Harman 2012, pp. 3–4; Elfren 2016, pp. 88–89; Peak 2020, pp. 177–178.
  221. ^ Harman 2012, pp. 3–4; Powell 2019, p. 263; Peak 2020, pp. 177–178.
  222. ^ Harman 2012, pp. 3–4; Powell 2019, p. 263; Elfren 2016, pp. 88–89.
  223. ^ Sperling 2016, pp. 75–78.
  224. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 390; Dirda 2005; Cannon 1989, p. 1.
  225. ^ Schoell 2004, pp. 8–40.
  226. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 141–142.
  227. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 390–391; de Camp 1975, p. 132; Hantke 2013, p. 135–136.
  228. ^ Tierney 2001, p. 52–53; de Camp 1975, pp. 434–435; Joshi 1984, pp. 62–64.
  229. ^ Tierney 2001, p. 52; de Camp 1975, pp. 434–435; Joshi 1984, pp. 62–64.
  230. ^ Talbot 2014.
  231. ^ Janicker 2015, pp. 473; Norris 2018, pp. 158–159; Nelson 2012, pp. 221–222.
  232. ^ a b Cruz 2015.
  233. ^ Flood 2015.
  234. ^ Locus Online 2017.
  235. ^ The Hugo Awards 2020.
  236. ^ Joshi 1984, pp. 62–64; Joshi 1985a, pp. 19–25; Joshi 1985b, pp. 54–58.
  237. ^ Rubinton 2016; Joshi 2001, pp. 219.
  238. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 5–6; Oates 1996; Mariconda 2010, pp. 208–209.
  239. ^ a b Hantke 2013, p. 138; Peak 2020, p. 163; Dirda 2005.
  240. ^ Dziemianowicz 2010; Peak 2020, p. 163; Dirda 2005.
  241. ^ Siclen 2015; Smith 2017; Dirda 2019.
  242. ^ Bilow 2013.
  243. ^ Hill & Joshi 2006, p. 7; Sederholm 2016, pp. 266–267.
  244. ^ Hill & Joshi 2006, pp. 19–24; Sederholm 2016, p. 271.
  245. ^ Hill & Joshi 2006, pp. 19–24.
  246. ^ a b Norman 2013, pp. 193–194.
  247. ^ Griwkowsky 2008; Sederholm 2016, pp. 271–272; Norman 2013, pp. 193–194.
  248. ^ Sederholm 2016, pp. 271–272.
  249. ^ Norman 2013, pp. 197–202.
  250. ^ Lovecraft 1976a, p. 13; Carbonell 2019, p. 137.
  251. ^ Carbonell 2019, p. 160; Gollop 2017; Garrad 2021, p. 25.
  252. ^ a b c Gollop 2017.
  253. ^ Gollop 2017; Silva 2017; Garrad 2021, pp. 26–27.
  254. ^ Silva 2017.
  255. ^ Garrad 2021, pp. 27–28.
  256. ^ Garrad 2021, p. 28.
  257. ^ Engle 2014, pp. 89–90; Matthews 2018, pp. 178–179.
  258. ^ Engle 2014, p. 89–90.
  259. ^ Engle 2014, p. 91.
  260. ^ Clore 2001, pp. 61–69.
  261. ^ Levenda 2014.
  262. ^ Matthews 2018, pp. 178–179.
  263. ^ Davies 2009, p. 268.
  264. ^ Flatley 2013.
  265. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–242; Cannon 1989, p. 10; de Camp 1975, p. xii.
  266. ^ de Camp 1975, p. xii; Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–237.
  267. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–239.
  268. ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, pp. 217–218; Wetzel 1983, pp. 19–20.
  269. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 245–246; Joshi & Schultz 2001, pp. 217–218; de Camp 1975, pp. 113–114.
  270. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–242.
  271. ^ Karr 2018, Conclusion; Wetzel 1983, p. 12; Wallace 2023, p. 27–28.
  272. ^ Lovecraft 2006b, p. 237; Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights; Joshi 1996b.
  273. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 390; de Camp 1975, p. 430–432; Wetzel 1983, pp. 3–4.
  274. ^ Joshi 1996b, p. 640–641; de Camp 1975, p. 430–432; Wetzel 1983, pp. 4–6.
  275. ^ de Camp 1975, p. 432; Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights; Wetzel 1983, pp. 10–12.
  276. ^ Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights; Wetzel 1983, p. 11; Wallace 2023, p. 35.
  277. ^ Karr 2018, The Arkham House Copyright Hypothesis; Joshi 1996b, p. 640–641; Wallace 2023, p. 42.
  278. ^ Karr 2018, The «Donald Wandrei v. The Estate of August Derleth» Hypothesis; Wallace 2023, p. 38–39.
  279. ^ Joshi 1996b, p. 640; Lovecraft 2006b, p. 237; Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights.
  280. ^ Karr 2018, The Arkham House Copyright Hypothesis; Joshi 1996b, p. 641; Wetzel 1983, pp. 24–25.
  281. ^ Karr 2018, Conclusion; Wetzel 1983, p. 25.
  282. ^ Karr 2018, Coda; Wallace 2023, p. 41.
  283. ^ Karr 2018, Coda; Wallace 2023, p. 42.

General and cited sources

  • «1945 Retro-Hugo Awards». The Hugo Awards. 2020. Archived from the original on August 1, 2020.
  • «2016 SF&F Hall of Fame Inductees». Locus Online. January 17, 2017. Archived from the original on December 22, 2019.
  • Bilow, Michael (July 27, 2013). «We are Providence: The H.P. Lovecraft Community». Motif Magazine. Archived from the original on October 17, 2013.
  • Bonner, Marian F. (2015). «Miscellaneous Impressions of H.P.L.». Lovecraft Annual (9): 52–53. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868496.
  • «Briefly Noted». Lovecraft Annual (1): 160. 2007. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868367.
  • Burleson, Donald R. (1990). Lovecraft: Disturbing the Universe (First ed.). Lexington, Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 978-0-8131-9319-9. JSTOR j.ctt130jf9h. OCLC 895675279.
  • Burleson, Donald R. (1991–1992). «Lovecraft: Dreams and Reality». Books at Brown. 38–39: 7–12. ISSN 0147-0787. Archived from the original on April 20, 2021 – via Brown Digital Repository.
  • Butler, James O. (2014). «Terror and Terrain: The Environmental Semantics of Lovecraft County». Lovecraft Annual (8): 131–149. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868485.
  • Callaghan, Gavin (2011). «Blacks, Boxers, and Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual. 5 (1): 102–111. JSTOR 26868430.
  • Cannon, Peter (1989). H. P. Lovecraft. Twayne’s United States Authors Series. Vol. 549. Boston: Twayne. ISBN 0-8057-7539-0. OCLC 246440364.
  • Carbonell, Curtis D. (2019). «Lovecraft’s (Cthulhu) Mythos». Dread Trident: Tabletop Role-Playing Games and the Modern Fantastic. Liverpool University Press. pp. 137–165. doi:10.3828/liverpool/9781789620573.003.0005. ISBN 978-1-78962-468-7. JSTOR j.ctv12pntt4.8. OCLC 1155494616. S2CID 219891871.
  • Clore, Dan (n.d.) [first published Fall 2001]. «The Lurker on the Threshold of Interpretation: Hoax Necronomicons and Paratextual Noise». Lovecraft Studies (42–43): 61–69. ISSN 0899-8361. Archived from the original on October 26, 2009 – via Yahoo! GeoCities.
  • Cruz, Lenika (November 12, 2015). «‘Political Correctness’ Won’t Ruin H.P. Lovecraft’s Legacy». The Atlantic. Archived from the original on November 17, 2015.
  • Cuppy, Will (January 2, 1944). «Review of Beyond the Wall of Sleep». New York Herald Tribune. p. 10. ISSN 1941-0646.
  • Davies, Owen (2009). Grimoires: A History of Magic Books. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-150924-7. OCLC 434863058.
  • de Camp, L. Sprague (March 1979). «H. P. Lovecraft and Edmund Wilson». Fantasy Mongers. No. 1. ISSN 8755-7479.
  • de Camp, L. Sprague (1975). Lovecraft: A Biography (First ed.). Garden City, New York: Doubleday. ISBN 0-385-00578-4. OCLC 979196. S2CID 190754775.
  • Dirda, Michael (2012). «Cthulhu for President». The Times Literary Supplement. Archived from the original on June 30, 2020.
  • Dirda, Michael (September 4, 2019). «Dispatch from a ‘Horror’ Convention: It Began in a Dark, Candlelit Room . . «. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. ProQuest 2284363189. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
  • Dirda, Michael (March 7, 2005). «The Horror, the Horror!». The Weekly Standard. ISSN 1083-3013. Archived from the original on November 5, 2009.
  • Dziemianowicz, Stefan (July 12, 2010). «Terror Eternal: The Enduring Popularity of H. P. Lovecraft». Publishers Weekly. ISSN 0000-0019. ProQuest 609957378.
  • Eberhart, John Mark (February 13, 2005). «The Library of Lovecraft». The Kansas City Star. p. 82. ISSN 0745-1067. Archived from the original on December 16, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  • Elfren, Isabella van (2016). «Hyper-Cacophony: Lovecraft, Speculative Realism, and Sonic Materialism». In Sederholm, Carl H.; Weinstock, Jeffrey Andrew (eds.). The Age of Lovecraft. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 79–96. ISBN 978-0-8166-9925-4. JSTOR 10.5749/j.ctt1b9x1f3.8. OCLC 945632985. S2CID 194316992.
  • Engle, John (October 15, 2014). «Cults of Lovecraft: The Impact of H.P. Lovecraft’s Fiction on Contemporary Occult Practices». Mythlore. 33 (125): 85–98. JSTOR 26815942. S2CID 159074285 – via SWOSU Digital Commons.
  • Evans, Timothy H. (2005). «A Last Defense against the Dark: Folklore, Horror, and the Uses of Tradition in the Works of H. P. Lovecraft». Journal of Folklore Research. 42 (1): 99–135. doi:10.2979/JFR.2005.42.1.99. ISSN 0737-7037. JSTOR 3814792. S2CID 162356996.
  • Everts, R. Alain (June 22, 2012) [first published July 1974]. «Howard Phillips Lovecraft and Sex: or The Sex Life of a Gentleman». Nyctalops. Vol. 2, no. 2. p. 19. Archived from the original on October 25, 2019 – via The H. P. Lovecraft Archive.
  • Faig, Kenneth W. Jr. (1991). «The Parents of Howard Phillips Lovecraft». In Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (eds.). An Epicure in the Terrible: A Centennial Anthology of Essays in Honor of H. P. Lovecraft (First ed.). Madison, New Jersey: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. pp. 45–77. ISBN 0-8386-3415-X. OCLC 22766987.
  • Finn, Mark (2013). Blood and Thunder: The Life and Art of Robert E. Howard (Third ed.). Cross Plains, Texas: Robert E. Howard Foundation Press. ISBN 978-1-304-03152-5. OCLC 923870328.
  • Flatley, Joseph L. (November 12, 2013). «The Cult of Cthulhu: Real Prayer for a Fake Tentacle». The Verge. Archived from the original on October 29, 2019.
  • Flood, Alison (March 16, 2016). «Lost HP Lovecraft Work Commissioned by Houdini Escapes Shackles of History». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on October 8, 2016.
  • Flood, Alison (November 9, 2015). «World Fantasy Award Drops HP Lovecraft as Prize Image». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 18, 2015.
  • Fooy, Frederick (October 27, 2011). «Resident Horror Genius». South Brooklyn Post. Archived from the original on August 2, 2016.
  • Gale, Floyd C. (April 1960). «Galaxy’s 5 Star Shelf». Galaxy Science Fiction. pp. 100–103.
  • Garrad, Jonathan (November 15, 2021). «Gamifying Fictions of Defeat: Adaptations of Lovecraft to Games Media». Studies in Gothic Fiction. 7: 20–29. ISSN 2156-2407.
  • Gollop, Julian (November 16, 2017). «The Gollop Chamber: Where Are All the Lovecraftian Games?». PC Gamer. Archived from the original on March 7, 2018.
  • Goodrich, Peter (2004). «Mannerism and the Macabre in H. P. Lovecraft’s Dunsanian ‘Dream-Quest’«. Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 15 (1 (57)): 37–48. ISSN 0897-0521. JSTOR 43308683.
  • Grant, Gavin J. (April 17, 2005). «That Delicious Feeling of Dread». The Los Angeles Times. p. 146. ISSN 0458-3035. Archived from the original on December 16, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  • Gray, John (October 24, 2014). «Weird Realism: John Gray on the Moral Universe of H P Lovecraft». New Statesman. ISSN 1758-924X. Archived from the original on April 14, 2016.
  • Greene, Sonia; Scott, Winfield Townley (August 22, 1948). «Howard Phillips Lovecraft as His Wife Remembers Him». The Providence Journal. p. 8. ISSN 2574-3406. Archived from the original on May 12, 2022.
  • Griwkowsky, Fish (December 8, 2008). «Interview with James Hetfield». Jam.canoe.ca. Archived from the original on May 24, 2012.
  • «Grippe». Lexico Dictionaries. Archived from the original on January 23, 2020. Retrieved January 23, 2020.
  • Halpurn, Paul; Labossiere, Michael C. (2009). «Mind Out of Time: Identity, Perception, and the Fourth Dimension in H. P. Lovecraft’s ‘The Shadow Out of Time’ and ‘The Dreams in the Witch House’«. Extrapolation. 50 (3): 512–533, 375. doi:10.3828/extr.2009.50.3.8. ISSN 0014-5483. S2CID 162319821. ProQuest 2152642098.
  • Hambly, Barbara (1996). «Introduction: The Man Who Loved His Craft». The Transition of H. P. Lovecraft: The Road to Madness (First ed.). New York: Ballantine Books. pp. vii–x. ISBN 0-345-38422-9. OCLC 34669226.
  • Hantke, Steffen (2013). «From the Library of America to the Mountains of Madness: Recent Discourse on H. P. Lovecraft». In Simmons, David (ed.). New Critical Essays on H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 135–156. doi:10.1057/9781137320964_9. ISBN 978-1-137-32096-4. OCLC 5576363673. S2CID 163339940.
  • Harman, Graham (2012). Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy. Winchester: John Hunt Publishing. ISBN 978-1-78099-907-4. OCLC 1058277738.
  • Hess, Clara (1971). «Addenda to ‘H.P.L.: A Memoir’«. In Derleth, August (ed.). Something about Cats, and Other Pieces (First ed.). Books for Libraries Press. pp. 247–277. ISBN 0-8369-2410-X. OCLC 222440.
  • Hill, Gary; Joshi, S. T. (2006). The Strange Sound of Cthulhu: Music Inspired by the Writings of H. P. Lovecraft. United States: Music Street Journal. ISBN 978-1-84728-776-2. OCLC 128175889.
  • Hölzing, Roland (2011). «Lovecraft: A Gentleman without Five Senses». Lovecraft Annual (5): 181–187. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868439.
  • Hull, Thomas (2006). «H.P. Lovecraft: A Horror in Higher Dimensions». Math Horizons. Vol. 13, no. 3. pp. 10–12. doi:10.1080/10724117.2006.11974625. ISSN 1072-4117. JSTOR 25678597.
  • Jamneck, Lynne (2012). «Tekeli-li! Disturbing Language in Edgar Allan Poe and H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (6): 126–151. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868454.
  • Janicker, Rebecca (2015). «Visions of Monstrosity: Lovecraft, Adaptation and the Comics Arts». Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 26 (3 (94)): 469–488. ISSN 0897-0521. JSTOR 26321171.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2001). A Dreamer and a Visionary: H. P. Lovecraft in His Time. Liverpool Science Fiction Texts and Studies. Vol. 26 (First ed.). Liverpool University Press. doi:10.5949/upo9781846312991. ISBN 978-1-84631-299-1. JSTOR j.ctt5vjhg7. OCLC 276177497.
  • Joshi, S. T. (1996a). A Subtler Magick: The Writings and Philosophy of H.P. Lovecraft (Third ed.). Berkeley Heights, New Jersey: Wildside Press. ISBN 1-880448-61-0. OCLC 4566934. S2CID 169172551.
  • Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (2001). An H.P. Lovecraft Encyclopedia (First ed.). Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 0-313-01682-8. OCLC 608158798.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2015). «Charles Baxter on Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (9): 105–122. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868501.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2013). «Lovecraft’s ‘Dunsanian Studies’«. In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Critical Essays on Lord Dunsany. Scarecrow Press. pp. 241–264. ISBN 978-0-8108-9235-4. OCLC 1026953908.
  • Joshi, S. T. (1996b). H. P. Lovecraft: A Life (First ed.). West Warwick, Rhode Island: Necronomicon Press. ISBN 0-940884-89-5. OCLC 34906142.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2016). H. P. Lovecraft: The Decline of the West (First ed.). Wildside Press. ISBN 978-1-4794-2754-3. OCLC 988396691.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2010a). I Am Providence: The Life and Times of H. P. Lovecraft (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. ISBN 978-0-9824296-7-9. OCLC 650504348. S2CID 190428196.
  • Joshi, S. T. (1984). «The Development of Lovecraftian Studies 1971–1982 (Part I)». Lovecraft Studies. 3 (2): 62–71. ISSN 0899-8361.
  • Joshi, S. T. (1985a). «The Development of Lovecraftian Studies, 1971–1982 (Part II)». Lovecraft Studies. 4 (1): 18–28. ISSN 0899-8361.
  • Joshi, S. T. (1985b). «The Development of Lovecraftian Studies, 1971–1982 (Part III)». Lovecraft Studies. 4 (2): 54–65. ISSN 0899-8361.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2017). «Foreword». In Moreland, Sean (ed.). The Lovecraftian Poe: Essays on Influence, Reception, Interpretation, and Transformation. Bethlehem, Pennsylvania: Lehigh University Press. pp. ix–xiv. ISBN 978-1-61146-241-8. OCLC 973481779.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2010b). «Time, Space, and Natural Law: Science and Pseudo-Science in Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (4): 171–201. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868421.
  • Karr, Chris J. (July 10, 2018). «The Black Seas of Copyright». Aetherial. Archived from the original on April 25, 2020.
  • King, Stephen (1987). Danse Macabre. Berkley. ISBN 0-425-06462-X. OCLC 10242612. Archived from the original on October 4, 2013.
  • Klein, Anna (2012). «Misperceptions of Malignity: Narrative Form and the Threat to America’s Modernity in ‘The Shadow over Innsmouth’«. Lovecraft Annual (6): 182–198. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868459.
  • Lacy, Jeff; Zani, Steven J. (2007). «The Negative Mystics of the Mechanistic Sublime: Walter Benjamin and Lovecraft’s Cosmicism». Lovecraft Annual (1): 65–83. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868355. S2CID 11647892.
  • Leavenworth, Van (2014). «The Developing Storyworld of H. P. Lovecraft». In Ryan, Marie-Laure; Thon, Jan-Noël (eds.). Storyworlds Across Media: Toward a Media-Conscious Narratology. Frontiers of Narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. pp. 332–350. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1d9nkdg.20. ISBN 978-0-8032-5532-6. JSTOR j.ctt1d9nkdg.20. OCLC 880964681. S2CID 190258640.
  • Leiber, Fritz (2001) [first published 1949]. «A Literary Copernicus». In Schweitzer, Darrell (ed.). Discovering H. P. Lovecraft (Revised ed.). Holicong, Pennsylvania: Wildside Press. pp. 7–16. ISBN 1-58715-470-6. OCLC 48212283.
  • Levenda, Peter (November 30, 2014). «Finding the Simon Necronomicon». The Lip TV. Archived from the original on February 6, 2022 – via YouTube.
  • Livesey, T. R. (2008). «Dispatches from the Providence Observatory: Astronomical Motifs and Sources in the Writings of H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (2): 3–87. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868370.
  • Look, Daniel M. (2016). «Queer Geometry and Higher Dimensions: Mathematics in the Fiction of H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (10): 101–120. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868515.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2010) [written November 22, 1930]. «Religion and Indeterminacy». In Joshi, S. T.; Hitchens, Christopher (eds.). Against Religion: The Atheist Writings of H.P. Lovecraft. New York: Sporting Gentlemen. pp. 87–99. ISBN 978-0-578-05248-9. OCLC 665081122.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (August 20, 2009a). «At the Mountains of Madness». The H. P. Lovecraft Archive. Archived from the original on February 25, 2017.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2006a) [first published February 1922]. «A Confession of Unfaith». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 145–148. ISBN 978-0976159230. OCLC 54350507.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2006b). «Instructions in Case of Decease». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 237–240. ISBN 978-0-9721644-1-2. OCLC 875361303.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2006c) [first published 1936]. «In Memoriam: Robert Ervin Howard». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 216–218. ISBN 978-0976159230. OCLC 54350507.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2006d) [written February 22, 1933]. «Some Repetitions on the Times». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 85–95. ISBN 978-0976159230. OCLC 54350507.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (August 20, 2009b). «He». The H. P. Lovecraft Archive. Archived from the original on March 23, 2021.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2014). Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (eds.). «Letters to Farnsworth Wright». Lovecraft Annual (8): 5–59. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868482.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2000). «Amateur Journalism». In Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (eds.). Lord of a Visible World: An Autobiography in Letters. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press. pp. 39–86. ISBN 0-8214-1332-5. OCLC 43567292.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (1968) [sent May 16, 1926]. «To James F. Morton». In Derleth, August; Wandrei, Donald (eds.). Selected Letters. Vol. II. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. pp. 50–51. ISBN 0-87054-034-3. OCLC 1152654519.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (1976a). Derleth, August; Wandrei, Donald (eds.). Selected Letters. Vol. IV. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. ISBN 0-87054-035-1. OCLC 20590805.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (1976b) [sent February 7, 1937]. «To Catherine L. Moore». In Derleth, August; Wandrei, Donald (eds.). Selected Letters. Vol. V. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. pp. 407–408. ISBN 0-87054-036-X. OCLC 1000556488.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2013). Luckhurst, Roger (ed.). The Classic Horror Stories. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-164088-9. OCLC 958573276. S2CID 190969085.
  • Lovett-Graff, Bennett (1997). «Shadows over Lovecraft: Reactionary Fantasy and Immigrant Eugenics». Extrapolation. 38 (3): 175–192. doi:10.3828/extr.1997.38.3.175. ISSN 0014-5483. S2CID 164434496. ProQuest 234914041.
  • Lubnow, Fred S. (2019). «The Lovecraftian Solar System». Lovecraft Annual (13): 3–26. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868571.
  • Macrobert, Franch A. (2015). «Cosmic Dread: The Astronomy of H. P. Lovecraft». Sky & Telescope. Vol. 129, no. 2. pp. 34–39. ISSN 0037-6604.
  • Mamatas, Nick (November 24, 2014). «The Real Mr. Difficult, or Why Cthulhu Threatens to Destroy the Canon, Self-Interested Literary Essayists, and the Universe Itself. Finally». Los Angeles Review of Books. Archived from the original on June 15, 2016.
  • Mariconda, Steven J. (2010). «Review of I Am Providence: The Life and Times of H. P. Lovecraft«. Lovecraft Annual (4): 208–215. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868424.
  • Martin, Sean Elliot (2012). «Lovecraft, Absurdity, and the Modernist Grotesque». Lovecraft Annual (6): 82–112. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868452.
  • Matthews, Carol S. (April 15, 2018). «Letting Sleeping Abnormalities Lie: Lovecraft and the Futility of Divination». Mythlore. 36 (2): 165–184. JSTOR 26809310. S2CID 165217534. ProQuest 2036317509 – via SWOSU Digital Commons.
  • Moreland, Sean (2018). «Introduction: The Critical (After)Life of Supernatural Horror in Literature«. New Directions in Supernatural Horror Literature: The Critical Influence of H. P. Lovecraft. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 1–9. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95477-6_1. ISBN 978-3-319-95477-6.
  • Mosig, Yōzan Dirk W. (1997). «Life After Lovecraft: Reminiscences of a Non-Entity». Mosig at Last: A Psychologist Looks at H.P. Lovecraft. West Warwick, Rhode Island: Necronomicon Press. pp. 111–116. ISBN 978-0-940884-90-8. OCLC 681921217.
  • Mosig, Yōzan Dirk W. (2001) [first published 1974]. «The Four Faces of the Outsider». In Schweitzer, Darrell (ed.). Discovering H. P. Lovecraft. Holicog, Pennsylvania: Wildside Press. pp. 17–34. ISBN 978-1-4344-4912-2. OCLC 114786517.
  • Murray, Will (October 1, 1986). «In Search of Arkham Country». Lovecraft Studies. 5 (2): 54–67. ISSN 0899-8361.
  • Murray, Will (1991–1992). «Lovecraft’s Arkham Country». Books at Brown. 38–39: 19–29. ISSN 0147-0787. Archived from the original on April 20, 2021 – via Brown Digital Repository.
  • Nelson, Victoria (2012). «Cathedral Head: The Gothick Cosmos of Guillermo del Toro». Gothicka. Harvard University Press. pp. 219–237. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674065406.c10. ISBN 978-0-674-05014-3. JSTOR j.ctt24hj8c.13. S2CID 191845332.
  • Norman, Joseph (2013). «‘Sounds Which Filled Me with an Indefinable Dread’: The Cthulhu Mythopoeia of H. P. Lovecraft in ‘Extreme’ Metal». In Simmons, David (ed.). New Critical Essays on H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 193–208. doi:10.1057/9781137320964_11. ISBN 978-1-137-32096-4. OCLC 5576363673. S2CID 192763998.
  • Norris, Duncan (2018). «The Void: A Lovecraftian Analysis». Lovecraft Annual (12): 149–164. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868564.
  • Norris, Duncan (2020). «Zeitgeist and Untoten: Lovecraft and the Walking Dead». Lovecraft Annual (14): 189–240. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26939817.
  • «Notable Persons Interred at Swan Point Cemetery». Swan Point Cemetery. Archived from the original on January 22, 2016.
  • Oates, Joyce Carol (October 31, 1996). «The King of Weird». The New York Review of Books. Vol. 43, no. 17. ISSN 0028-7504. Archived from the original on September 10, 2009.
  • Peak, David (2020). «Horror of the Real: H.P. Lovecraft’s Old Ones and Contemporary Speculative Philosophy». In Rosen, Matt (ed.). Diseases of the Head: Essays on the Horrors of Speculative Philosophy. Santa Barbara, California: Punctum Books. pp. 163–180. doi:10.2307/j.ctv19cwdpb.7. ISBN 978-1-953035-10-3. JSTOR j.ctv19cwdpb.7. OCLC 1227264756. S2CID 229019856.
  • Pedersen, Jan B. W. (2018). «Howard Phillips Lovecraft: Romantic on the Nightside». Lovecraft Annual (12): 165–173. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868565.
  • Pedersen, Jan B. W. (2019). ««Now Will You Be Good?»: Lovecraft, Teetotalism, and Philosophy». Lovecraft Annual (13): 119–144. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868581.
  • Pedersen, Jan B. W. (2017). «On Lovecraft’s Lifelong Relationship with Wonder». Lovecraft Annual (11): 23–36. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868530.
  • Powell, Anna (2019). «Thinking the Thing: The Outer Reaches of Knowledge in Lovecraft and Deleuze». In Hogle, Jerrold E.; Miles, Robert (eds.). The Gothic and Theory: An Edinburgh Companion. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 260–278. doi:10.3366/edinburgh/9781474427777.003.0014. ISBN 978-1-4744-2777-7. JSTOR 10.3366/j.ctvggx38r.17. OCLC 1145928444. S2CID 213917604.
  • Punter, David (1996). The Literature of Terror: A History of Gothic Fictions from 1765 to the Present Day. Vol. II. New York: Longman. ISBN 0-582-23714-9. OCLC 1072397754.
  • Ransom, Amy J. (2015). «Lovecraft in Quebec: Transcultural Fertilization and Esther Rochon’s Reevaluation of the Powers of Horror». Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 26 (3 (94)): 450–468. ISSN 0897-0521. JSTOR 26321170. S2CID 165970090. ProQuest 1861072902.
  • Rottensteiner, Franz (1992). «Lovecraft as Philosopher». Science Fiction Studies. 19 (1): 117–121. ISSN 0091-7729. JSTOR 4240129.
  • Rubinton, Noel (August 10, 2016). «How to Find the Spirit of H.P. Lovecraft in Providence». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. ProQuest 1810306270. Archived from the original on October 13, 2018.
  • Sederholm, Carl H. (2016). «H. P. Lovecraft, Heavy Metal, and Cosmicism». Rock Music Studies. 3 (3): 266–280. doi:10.1080/19401159.2015.1121644. ISSN 1940-1159. S2CID 194537597.
  • Sederholm, Carl H.; Weinstock, Jeffrey Andrew (2016). «Introduction: Lovecraft Rising». The Age of Lovecraft. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 1–42. ISBN 978-1-4529-5023-5. JSTOR 10.5749/j.ctt1b9x1f3.5. OCLC 945632985.
  • Schoell, William (2004). H.P. Lovecraft: Master of Weird Fiction (First ed.). Greensboro, North Carolina: Morgan Reynolds. ISBN 1-931798-15-X. OCLC 903506614.
  • Schultz, David E. (2018). «‘Whaddya Make Them Eyes at Me For?’: Lovecraft and Book Publishers». Lovecraft Annual (12): 51–65. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868555.
  • Schweitzer, Darrell (2018). «Lovecraft, Aristeas, Dunsany, and the Dream Journey». Lovecraft Annual (12): 136–143. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868561.
  • Schweitzer, Darrell (1998). Windows of the Imagination: Essays on Fantastic Literature. Berkeley Heights, New Jersey: Wildside Press. ISBN 1-880448-60-2. OCLC 48566644. S2CID 190964524.
  • Scott, Winfield Townley (December 26, 1943). «The Case of Howard Phillips Lovecraft of Providence, R.I.» The Providence Journal. p. 41. ISSN 2574-3406. Retrieved August 23, 2021 – via GenealogyBank.com.
  • Siclen, Bill Van (August 16, 2015). «NecronomiCon Providence to celebrate life and work of H. P. Lovecraft». The Providence Journal. ISSN 2574-3406. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
  • Silva, Christianna (June 7, 2017). «H. P. Lovecraft’s Monster Is Wrapping Family Game Night Up In Tentacles». National Public Radio. Archived from the original on February 28, 2018.
  • Smith, Andy (August 16, 2017). «NecronomiCon, homage to H. P. Lovecraft, returns to Providence». The Providence Journal. ISSN 2574-3406. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
  • Spencer, E. Mariah (2021). «Aliens, Robots & Virtual Reality Idols in the Science Fiction of H.P Lovecraft, Isaac Asimov and William Gibson». Science Fiction Studies. 48 (3): 600–604. doi:10.1353/sfs.2021.0055. ISSN 0091-7729. JSTOR 10.5621/sciefictstud.48.3.0600. S2CID 245664184.
  • Sperling, Alison (2016). «H. P. Lovecraft’s Weird Body». Lovecraft Annual (10): 75–100. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868514.
  • St. Armand, Barton Levi (1972). «Facts in the Case of H. P. Lovecraft» (PDF). Rhode Island History. 31 (1): 3–20. ISSN 0035-4619 – via Rhode Island Historical Society.
  • St. Armand, Barton Levi (1975). «H. P. Lovecraft: New England Decadent». Caliban. 12 (1): 127–155. doi:10.3406/calib.1975.1046. eISSN 2431-1766. S2CID 220649713.
  • Steiner, Bernd (2005). H. P. Lovecraft and the Literature of the Fantastic: Explorations in a Literary Genre. Munich: GRIN Verlag. ISBN 978-3-638-84462-8. OCLC 724541939.
  • Talbot, Nick (August 31, 2014). «All About Alienation: Alan Moore On Lovecraft And Providence». The Quietus.
  • Tierney, Richard L. (2001) [first published 1972]. «The Derleth Mythos». In Schweitzer, Darrell (ed.). Discovering H. P. Lovecraft. Holicog, Pennsylvania: Wildside Press. pp. 52–53. ISBN 978-1-4344-4912-2. OCLC 114786517.
  • Touponce, William F. (2013). Lord Dunsany, H. P. Lovecraft, and Ray Bradbury: Spectral Journeys. Studies in Supernatural Literature. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-9220-0. OCLC 873404866.
  • Vick, Todd B. (2021). Renegades and Rogues: The Life and Legacy of Robert E. Howard. Austin: University of Texas Press. doi:10.7560/321959. ISBN 978-1-4773-2195-9. OCLC 1159658615. S2CID 241275357.
  • Wallace, Nathaniel R. (2023). «Disseminating Lovecraft: The Proliferation of Unsanctioned Derivative Works in the Absence of an Operable Copyright Monopoly». In Lanzendörfer, Tim; Dreysse Passos de Carvalho, Max José (eds.). The Medial Afterlives of H.P. Lovecraft. Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 27–44. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-13765-5_2. ISBN 978-3-031-13764-8.
  • Wetzel, George T. (1983). The Lovecraft Scholar (PDF). Darien, Connecticut: Hobgoblin Press.
  • Wilson, Colin (1975). The Strength to Dream: Literature and the Imagination (Second ed.). Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-8371-6819-7. OCLC 630646359.
  • Wilson, Edmund (1950) [first published November 24, 1945]. «Tales of the Marvellous and the Ridiculous». Classics and Commercials: A Literary Chronicle of the Forties. New York: Macmillan. pp. 286–290. ISBN 0-374-52667-2. OCLC 964373.
  • Wohleber, Curt (December 1995). «The Man Who Can Scare Stephen King». American Heritage. Vol. 46, no. 8. Archived from the original on October 4, 2013.
  • Wolanin, Tyler L. (2013). «New Deal Politics in the Correspondence of H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (7): 3–35. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868464.
  • Woodard, Ben (2011). «Mad Speculation and Absolute Inhumanism: Lovecraft, Ligotti, and the Weirding of Philosophy». Continent. 1 (1): 3–13. doi:10.22394/0869-5377-2019-5-203-225. ISSN 2159-9920. S2CID 170136177.
  • «Wrote of His Last Month Alive». The Boston Globe. March 15, 1937. p. 2. ISSN 0743-1791. Archived from the original on February 28, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  • Zeller, Benjamin E. (December 2019). «Altar Call of Cthulhu: Religion and Millennialism in H.P. Lovecraft’s Cthulhu Mythos». Religions. 11 (1): 18. doi:10.3390/rel11010018. ISSN 2077-1444. S2CID 213736759.

Further reading

  • Anderson, James Arthur; Joshi, S. T. (2011). Out of the Shadows: A Structuralist Approach to Understanding the Fiction of H. P. Lovecraft. Rockville, Maryland: Wildside Press. doi:10.23860/diss-anderson-james-1992. ISBN 978-1-4794-0384-4. OCLC 1127558354. S2CID 171675509.
  • Burleson, Donald R. (1983). H. P. Lovecraft: A Critical Study. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-313-23255-8. OCLC 299389026. S2CID 190394934.
  • Callaghan, Gavin (2013). H. P. Lovecraft’s Dark Arcadia: The Satire, Symbology and Contradiction. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company. ISBN 978-1-4766-0239-4. OCLC 856844361.
  • Cannon, Peter, ed. (1998). Lovecraft Remembered. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. ISBN 978-0-87054-173-5. OCLC 260088015.
  • Carter, Lin (1972). Lovecraft: A Look Behind the «Cthulhu Mythos». New York: Ballantine Books. ISBN 0-586-04166-4. OCLC 2213597. S2CID 190363598.
  • Frierson, Meade; Frierson, Penny (March 1972). HPL: A Tribute to Howard Phillips Lovecraft (PDF). Birmingham, Alabama: Meade and Penny Frierson. OCLC 315586.
  • González Grueso, Fernando Darío (2017). La ficción científica. Género, Poética y sus relaciones con la literatura oral tradicional: El papel de H. P. Lovecraft como mediador. Colección Estudios (in Spanish). Madrid: UAM Ediciones. doi:10.15366/ficcion.cientif2013. ISBN 978-84-8344-376-7. OCLC 1026295184. S2CID 183258592.
  • Hegyi, Pál (2019). Lovecraft Laughing: Uncanny Memes in the Weird. Department of American Studies, University of Szeged. doi:10.14232/americana.books.2019.hegyi.lovecraft. ISBN 978-615-5423-56-7. OCLC 8160851320. S2CID 192043054.
  • Houellebecq, Michel; King, Stephen (2005). H. P. Lovecraft: Against the World, Against Life. Translated by Khazeni, Dorna. Cernunnos. ISBN 1-932416-18-8. OCLC 1151841813. S2CID 190374730.
  • Joshi, S. T. (1980). H. P. Lovecraft, Four Decades of Criticism (First ed.). Athens: Ohio University Press. ISBN 0-8214-0442-3. OCLC 6085440.
  • Klinger, Leslie S. (2014). The New Annotated H. P. Lovecraft (First ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-87140-453-4. OCLC 884500241. S2CID 218735034.
  • Lévy, Maurice (1988) [first published 1972]. Lovecraft: A Study in the Fantastic. Translated by Joshi, S. T. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. ISBN 978-0-8143-1956-7. OCLC 491484555. S2CID 190967971.
  • Long, Frank Belknap (1975). Howard Phillips Lovecraft: Dreamer on the Nightside. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. ISBN 0-87054-068-8. OCLC 2034623. S2CID 160306366.
  • Ludueña, Fabián; de Acosta, Alejandro (2015). H. P. Lovecraft: The Disjunction in Being. Translated by de Acosta, Alejandro. United States: Schism. ISBN 978-1-5058-6600-1. OCLC 935704008.
  • Lovecraft, H. P.; Conover, Willis; Joshi, S. T. (2002). Lovecraft at Last: The Master of Horror in His Own Words (Revised ed.). New York: Cooper Square Press. ISBN 0-8154-1212-6. OCLC 50212624.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (1999). Joshi, S. T.; Cannon, Peter (eds.). More Annotated H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Dell. ISBN 0-440-50875-4. OCLC 41231274.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (1997). Joshi, S. T. (ed.). The Annotated H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Dell. ISBN 0-440-50660-3. OCLC 36165172.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2012). Joshi, S. T. (ed.). The Annotated Supernatural Horror in Literature (Second ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. ISBN 978-1-61498-028-5. OCLC 855115722.
  • Shapiro, Stephen; Philip, Barnard (2017). Pentecostal Modernism: Lovecraft, Los Angeles and World-Systems Culture. New Directions in Religion and Literature. Bloomsbury Publishing. doi:10.5040/9781474238762. ISBN 978-1-4742-3873-1. OCLC 1065524061. S2CID 148868506.
  • Martin, Sean Elliot (December 2008). H.P. Lovecraft and the Modernist Grotesque (PhD thesis). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Duquesne University. ISBN 9781448610167. OCLC 601419113. S2CID 191576874.
  • Migliore, Andrew; Strysik, John (2006). The Lurker in the Lobby: A Guide to the Cinema of H. P. Lovecraft. Portland, Oregon: Night Shade Books. ISBN 978-1-892389-35-0. OCLC 1023313647. S2CID 152612871.
  • Montaclair, Florent; Picot, Jean-Pierre (1997). Fantastique et événement : Étude comparée des œuvres de Jules Verne et Howard P. Lovecraft. Annales littéraires (in French). Vol. 621. Besançon: Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté. doi:10.4000/books.pufc.1726. ISBN 978-2-84867-692-0. OCLC 1286480358. S2CID 228019349.
  • Wilson, Eric (2016). The Republic of Cthulhu: Lovecraft, the Weird Tale, and Conspiracy Theory. Santa Barbara, California: Punctum Books. doi:10.21983/P3.0155.1.00. ISBN 978-0-9982375-6-5. OCLC 1135348793. S2CID 165947887.

External links

  • The H. P. Lovecraft Archive
  • The H. P. Lovecraft Historical Society
  • H. P. Lovecraft Collection in the Special Collections at the John Hay Library (Brown University)
  • Lovecraft Annual, a scholarly journal
  • The Lovecraft Arts & Sciences Council, a non-profit educational organization
  • H. P. Lovecraft at the Internet Speculative Fiction Database Edit this at Wikidata
  • H. P. Lovecraft at the Encyclopedia of Science Fiction
  • H. P. Lovecraft at the Encyclopedia of Fantasy
  • H. P. Lovecraft at IMDb
  • H. P. Lovecraft discography at Discogs

Online editions

  • Works by Howard Phillips Lovecraft at Project Gutenberg
  • Works by H. P. Lovecraft in eBook form at Standard Ebooks
  • Works by or about H. P. Lovecraft at Internet Archive
  • Works by H. P. Lovecraft at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks)

H. P. Lovecraft

Lovecraft in 1934, facing left and looking right

Lovecraft in 1934

Born Howard Phillips Lovecraft
August 20, 1890
Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.
Died March 15, 1937 (aged 46)
Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.
Resting place Swan Point Cemetery, Providence
41°51′14″N 71°22′52″W / 41.854021°N 71.381068°W
Pen name
  • Grandpa Theobald
  • E’ch-Pi-El
Occupation
  • Short story writer
  • editor
  • novelist
  • poet
Genre Lovecraftian horror, weird fiction, horror fiction, science fiction, gothic fiction, fantasy
Literary movement
  • Cosmicism
  • Aestheticism
  • Decadents
Years active 1917–1937
Notable works
  • «The Call of Cthulhu»
  • The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath
  • At the Mountains of Madness
  • The Shadow over Innsmouth
  • The Shadow Out of Time
Spouse

Sonia Greene

(m. )​

Signature
Lovecraft signature.svg

Howard Phillips Lovecraft (; August 20, 1890 – March 15, 1937) was an American writer of weird, science, fantasy, and horror fiction. He is best known for his creation of the Cthulhu Mythos.[a]

Born in Providence, Rhode Island, Lovecraft spent most of his life in New England. After his father’s institutionalization in 1893, he lived affluently until his family’s wealth dissipated after the death of his grandfather. Lovecraft then lived with his mother, in reduced financial security, until her institutionalization in 1919. He began to write essays for the United Amateur Press Association, and in 1913 wrote a critical letter to a pulp magazine that ultimately led to his involvement in pulp fiction. He became active in the speculative fiction community and was published in several pulp magazines. Lovecraft moved to New York City, marrying Sonia Greene in 1924, and later became the center of a wider group of authors known as the «Lovecraft Circle». They introduced him to Weird Tales, which would become his most prominent publisher. Lovecraft’s time in New York took a toll on his mental state and financial conditions. He returned to Providence in 1926 and produced some of his most popular works, including The Call of Cthulhu, At the Mountains of Madness, The Shadow over Innsmouth, and The Shadow Out of Time. He would remain active as a writer for 11 years until his death from intestinal cancer at the age of 46.

Lovecraft’s literary corpus is based around the idea of cosmicism, which was simultaneously his personal philosophy and the main theme of his fiction. Cosmicism posits that humanity is an insignificant part of the cosmos, and could be swept away at any moment. He incorporated fantasy and science fiction elements into his stories, representing the perceived fragility of anthropocentrism. This was tied to his ambivalent views on knowledge. His works were largely set in a fictionalized version of New England. Civilizational decline also plays a major role in his works, as he believed that the West was in decline during his lifetime. Lovecraft’s early political opinions were conservative and traditionalist; additionally, he held a number of racist views for much of his adult life. Following the Great Depression, Lovecraft became a socialist, no longer believing a just aristocracy would make the world more fair.

Throughout his adult life, Lovecraft was never able to support himself from earnings as an author and editor. He was virtually unknown during his lifetime and was almost exclusively published in pulp magazines before his death. A scholarly revival of Lovecraft’s work began in the 1970s, and he is now regarded as one of the most significant 20th-century authors of supernatural horror fiction. Many direct adaptations and spiritual successors followed. Works inspired by Lovecraft, adaptations or original works, began to form the basis of the Cthulhu Mythos, which utilizes Lovecraft’s characters, setting, and themes.

Biography

Early life and family tragedies

A family portrait of Sarah, Howard, and Winfield Lovecraft in 1892

Sarah, Howard, and Winfield Lovecraft in 1892

Lovecraft was born in his family home on August 20, 1890, in Providence, Rhode Island. He was the only child of Winfield Scott Lovecraft and Sarah Susan (née Phillips) Lovecraft.[2] Susie’s family was of substantial means at the time of their marriage, as her father, Whipple Van Buren Phillips, was involved in business ventures.[3] In April 1893, after a psychotic episode in a Chicago hotel, Winfield was committed to Butler Hospital in Providence. His medical records state that he had been «doing and saying strange things at times» for a year before his commitment.[4] The person who reported these symptoms is unknown.[5] Winfield spent five years in Butler before dying in 1898. His death certificate listed the cause of death as general paresis, a term synonymous with late-stage syphilis.[6] Throughout his life, Lovecraft maintained that his father fell into a paralytic state, due to insomnia and overwork, and remained that way until his death. It is not known whether Lovecraft was simply kept ignorant of his father’s illness or whether his later statements were intentionally misleading.[7]

After his father’s institutionalization, Lovecraft resided in the family home with his mother, his maternal aunts Lillian and Annie, and his maternal grandparents Whipple and Robie.[8] According to family friends, his mother, known as Susie, doted on the young Lovecraft excessively, pampering him and never letting him out of her sight.[9] Lovecraft later recollected that his mother was «permanently stricken with grief» after his father’s illness. Whipple became a father figure to Lovecraft in this time, Lovecraft noting that his grandfather became the «centre of my entire universe». Whipple, who often traveled to manage his business, maintained correspondence by letter with the young Lovecraft who, by the age of three, was already proficient at reading and writing.[10]

Whipple encouraged the young Lovecraft to have an appreciation of literature, especially classical literature and English poetry. In his old age, he helped raise the young H. P. Lovecraft and educated him not only in the classics, but also in original weird tales of «winged horrors» and «deep, low, moaning sounds» which he created for his grandchild’s entertainment. The original sources of Phillips’ weird tales are unidentified. Lovecraft himself guessed that they originated from Gothic novelists like Ann Radcliffe, Matthew Lewis, and Charles Maturin.[11] It was during this period that Lovecraft was introduced to some of his earliest literary influences, such as The Rime of the Ancient Mariner illustrated by Gustave Doré, One Thousand and One Nights, Thomas Bulfinch’s Age of Fable, and Ovid’s Metamorphoses.[12]

While there is no indication that Lovecraft was particularly close to his grandmother Robie, her death in 1896 had a profound effect on him. By his own account, it sent his family into «a gloom from which it never fully recovered». His mother and aunts wore black mourning dresses that «terrified» him. This is also the time that Lovecraft, approximately five-and-a-half years old, started having nightmares that later would inform his fictional writings. Specifically, he began to have recurring nightmares of beings he referred to as «night-gaunts». He credited their appearance to the influence of Doré’s illustrations, which would «whirl me through space at a sickening rate of speed, the while fretting & impelling me with their detestable tridents.» Thirty years later, night-gaunts would appear in Lovecraft’s fiction.[13]

Lovecraft’s earliest known literary works were written at the age of seven, and were poems restyling the Odyssey and other Greco-Roman mythological stories.[14] Lovecraft would later write that during his childhood he was fixated on the Greco-Roman pantheon, and briefly accepted them as genuine expressions of divinity, foregoing his Christian upbringing.[15] He recalled, at five years old, being told Santa Claus did not exist and retorted by asking why «God is not equally a myth?»[16] At the age of eight, he took a keen interest in the sciences, particularly astronomy and chemistry. He also examined the anatomical books that were held in the family library, which taught him the specifics of human reproduction that were not yet explained to him. As a result, he found that it «virtually killed my interest in the subject.»[17]

In 1902, according to Lovecraft’s later correspondence, astronomy became a guiding influence on his worldview. He began publishing the periodical Rhode Island Journal of Astronomy, using the hectograph printing method.[18] Lovecraft went in and out of elementary school repeatedly, oftentimes with home tutors making up for the lost years, missing time due to health concerns that have not been determined. The written recollections of his peers described him as withdrawn but welcoming to those who shared his then-current fascination with astronomy, inviting them to look through his prized telescope.[19]

Education and financial decline

By 1900, Whipple’s various business concerns were suffering a downturn, which resulted in the slow erosion of his family’s wealth. He was forced to let his family’s hired servants go, leaving Lovecraft, Whipple, and Susie, being the only unmarried sister, alone in the family home.[20] In the spring of 1904, Whipple’s largest business venture suffered a catastrophic failure. Within months, he died at age 70 due to a stroke. After Whipple’s death, Susie was unable to financially support the upkeep of the expansive family home on what remained of the Phillips’ estate. Later that year, she was forced to move to a small duplex with her son.[21]

Whipple Van Buren Phillips facing right

Whipple Van Buren Phillips

Lovecraft called this time one of the darkest of his life, remarking in a 1934 letter that he saw no point in living anymore; he considered the possibility of committing suicide. His scientific curiosity and desire to know more about the world prevented him from doing so.[22] In fall 1904, he entered high school. Much like his earlier school years, Lovecraft was periodically removed from school for long periods for what he termed «near breakdowns». He did say, though, that while having some conflicts with teachers, he enjoyed high school, becoming close with a small circle of friends. Lovecraft also performed well academically, excelling in particular at chemistry and physics.[23] Aside from a pause in 1904, he also resumed publishing the Rhode Island Journal of Astronomy as well as starting the Scientific Gazette, which dealt mostly with chemistry.[24] It was also during this period that Lovecraft produced the first of the fictional works that he would later be known for, namely «The Beast in the Cave» and «The Alchemist».[25]

It was in 1908, prior to what would have been his high school graduation, that Lovecraft suffered another unidentified health crisis, though this instance was more severe than his prior illnesses.[26] The exact circumstances and causes remain unknown. The only direct records are Lovecraft’s own correspondence wherein he retrospectively described it variously as a «nervous collapse» and «a sort of breakdown», in one letter blaming it on the stress of high school despite his enjoying it.[27] In another letter concerning the events of 1908, he notes, «I was and am prey to intense headaches, insomnia, and general nervous weakness which prevents my continuous application to any thing.»[26]

Though Lovecraft maintained that he was going to attend Brown University after high school, he never graduated and never attended school again. Whether Lovecraft suffered from a physical ailment, a mental one, or some combination thereof has never been determined. An account from a high school classmate described Lovecraft as exhibiting «terrible tics» and that at times «he’d be sitting in his seat and he’d suddenly up and jump». Harry Brobst, a psychology professor, examined the account and claimed that chorea minor was the probable cause of Lovecraft’s childhood symptoms, while noting that instances of chorea minor after adolescence are very rare.[27] In his letters, Lovecraft acknowledged that he suffered from bouts of chorea as a child.[28] Brobst further ventured that Lovecraft’s 1908 breakdown was attributed to a «hysteroid seizure», a term that has become synonymous with atypical depression.[29] In another letter concerning the events of 1908, Lovecraft stated that he «could hardly bear to see or speak to anyone, & liked to shut out the world by pulling down dark shades & using artificial light.»[30]

Earliest recognition

Few of Lovecraft and Susie’s activities between late 1908 and 1913 were recorded.[31] Lovecraft described the steady continuation of their financial decline highlighted by his uncle’s failed business that cost Susie a large portion of their already dwindling wealth.[32] One of Susie’s friends, Clara Hess, recalled a visit during which Susie spoke continuously about Lovecraft being «so hideous that he hid from everyone and did not like to walk upon the streets where people could gaze on him.» Despite Hess’ protests to the contrary, Susie maintained this stance.[33] For his part, Lovecraft said he found his mother to be «a positive marvel of consideration».[34] A next-door neighbor later pointed out that what others in the neighborhood often assumed were loud, nocturnal quarrels between mother and son, were actually recitations of Shakespeare, an activity that seemed to delight mother and son.[35]

During this period, Lovecraft revived his earlier scientific periodicals.[31] He endeavored to commit himself to the study of organic chemistry, Susie buying the expensive glass chemistry assemblage he wanted.[36] Lovecraft found his studies were stymied by the mathematics involved, which he found boring and would cause headaches that would incapacitate him for the remainder of the day.[37] Lovecraft’s first non-self-published poem appeared in a local newspaper in 1912. Called Providence in 2000 A.D., it envisioned a future where Americans of English descent were displaced by Irish, Italian, Portuguese, and Jewish immigrants.[38] In this period he also wrote racist poetry, including «New-England Fallen» and «On the Creation of Niggers», but there is no indication that either were published during his lifetime.[39]

In 1911, Lovecraft’s letters to editors began appearing in pulp and weird-fiction magazines, most notably Argosy.[40] A 1913 letter critical of Fred Jackson, one of Argosy’s more prominent writers, started Lovecraft down a path that would define the remainder of his career as a writer. In the following letters, Lovecraft described Jackson’s stories as being «trivial, effeminate, and, in places, coarse». Continuing, Lovecraft argued that Jackson’s characters exhibit the «delicate passions and emotions proper to negroes and anthropoid apes.»[41] This sparked a nearly year-long feud in the magazine’s letters section between the two writers and their respective supporters. Lovecraft’s most prominent opponent was John Russell, who often replied in verse, and to whom Lovecraft felt compelled to reply because he respected Russell’s writing skills.[42] The most immediate effect of this feud was the recognition garnered from Edward F. Daas, then head editor of the United Amateur Press Association (UAPA).[43] Daas invited Russell and Lovecraft to join the organization and both accepted, Lovecraft in April 1914.[44]

Rejuvenation and tragedy

With the advent of United I obtained a renewed will to live; a renewed sense of existence as other than a superfluous weight; and found a sphere in which I could feel that my efforts were not wholly futile. For the first time I could imagine that my clumsy gropings after art were a little more than faint cries lost in the unlistening void.

—Lovecraft in 1921.[45]

Lovecraft immersed himself in the world of amateur journalism for most of the following decade.[45] During this period, he advocated for amateurism’s superiority to commercialism.[46] Lovecraft defined commercialism as writing for what he considered low-brow publications for pay. This was contrasted with his view of «professional publication», which was what he called writing for what he considered respectable journals and publishers. He thought of amateur journalism as serving as practice for a professional career.[47]

Lovecraft was appointed chairman of the Department of Public Criticism of the UAPA in late 1914.[48] He used this position to advocate for what he saw as the superiority of archaic English language usage. Emblematic of the Anglophilic opinions he maintained throughout his life, he openly criticized other UAPA contributors for their «Americanisms» and «slang». Often, these criticisms were embedded in xenophobic and racist statements that the «national language» was being negatively changed by immigrants.[49] In mid-1915, Lovecraft was elected vice-president of the UAPA.[50] Two years later, he was elected president and appointed other board members who mostly shared his belief in the supremacy of British English over modern American English.[51] Another significant event of this time was the beginning of World War I. Lovecraft published multiple criticisms of the American government and public’s reluctance to join the war to protect England, which he viewed as America’s ancestral homeland.[52]

In 1916, Lovecraft published his first short story, «The Alchemist», in the main UAPA journal, which was a departure from his usual verse. Due to the encouragement of W. Paul Cook, another UAPA member and future lifelong friend, Lovecraft began writing and publishing more prose fiction.[53] Soon afterwards, he wrote «The Tomb» and «Dagon».[54] «The Tomb», by Lovecraft’s own admission, was greatly influenced by the style and structure of Edgar Allan Poe’s works.[55] Meanwhile, «Dagon» is considered Lovecraft’s first work that displays the concepts and themes that his writings would later become known for.[56] Lovecraft published another short story, «Beyond the Wall of Sleep» in 1919, which was his first science fiction story.[57]

Lovecraft in 1915, facing forward and looking right

Lovecraft’s term as president of the UAPA ended in 1918, and he returned to his former post as chairman of the Department of Public Criticism.[58] In 1917, as Lovecraft related to Kleiner, Lovecraft made an aborted attempt to enlist in the United States Army. Though he passed the physical exam,[59] he told Kleiner that his mother threatened to do anything, legal or otherwise, to prove that he was unfit for service.[60] After his failed attempt to serve in World War I, he attempted to enroll in the Rhode Island National Guard, but his mother used her family connections to prevent it.[61]

During the winter of 1918–1919, Susie, exhibiting the symptoms of a nervous breakdown, went to live with her elder sister, Lillian. The nature of Susie’s illness is unclear, as her medical papers were later destroyed in a fire at Butler Hospital.[62] Winfield Townley Scott, who was able to read the papers before the fire, described Susie as having suffered a psychological collapse.[62] Neighbour and friend Clara Hess, interviewed in 1948, recalled instances of Susie describing «weird and fantastic creatures that rushed out from behind buildings and from corners at dark.»[63] In the same account, Hess described a time when they crossed paths in downtown Providence and Susie was unaware of where she was.[63] In March 1919, she was committed to Butler Hospital, like her husband before her.[64] Lovecraft’s immediate reaction to Susie’s commitment was visceral, writing to Kleiner that «existence seems of little value», and that he wished «it might terminate».[65] During Susie’s time at Butler, Lovecraft periodically visited her and walked the large grounds with her.[66]

Late 1919 saw Lovecraft become more outgoing. After a period of isolation, he began joining friends in trips to writer gatherings; the first being a talk in Boston presented by Lord Dunsany, whom Lovecraft had recently discovered and idolized.[67] In early 1920, at an amateur writer convention, he met Frank Belknap Long, who would end up being Lovecraft’s most influential and closest confidant for the remainder of his life.[68] The influence of Dunsany is apparent in his 1919 output, which is part of what would be called Lovecraft’s Dream Cycle, including «The White Ship» and «The Doom That Came to Sarnath».[69] In early 1920, he wrote «The Cats of Ulthar» and «Celephaïs», which were also strongly influenced by Dunsany.[70]

It was later in 1920 that Lovecraft began publishing the earliest Cthulhu Mythos stories. The Cthulhu Mythos, a term coined by later authors, encompasses Lovecraft’s stories that share a commonality in the revelation of cosmic insignificance, initially realistic settings, and recurring entities and texts.[71] The prose poem «Nyarlathotep» and the short story «The Crawling Chaos», in collaboration with Winifred Virginia Jackson, were written in late 1920.[72] Following in early 1921 came «The Nameless City», the first story that falls definitively within the Cthulhu Mythos. In it is one of Lovecraft’s most enduring phrases, a couplet recited by Abdul Alhazred; «That is not dead which can eternal lie; And with strange aeons even death may die.»[73] In the same year, he also wrote «The Outsider», which has become one of Lovecraft’s most heavily analyzed, and differently interpreted, stories.[74] It has been variously interpreted as being autobiographical, an allegory of the psyche, a parody of the afterlife, a commentary on humanity’s place in the universe, and a critique of progress.[75]

On May 24, 1921, Susie died in Butler Hospital, due to complications from an operation on her gallbladder five days earlier.[76] Lovecraft’s initial reaction, expressed in a letter written nine days after Susie’s death, was a deep state of sadness that crippled him physically and emotionally. He again expressed a desire that his life might end.[77] Lovecraft’s later response was relief, as he had become able to live independently from his mother. His physical health also began to improve, although he was unaware of the exact cause.[78] Despite Lovecraft’s reaction, he continued to attend amateur journalist conventions. Lovecraft met his future wife, Sonia Greene, at one such convention in July.[79]

Marriage and New York

Sonia Green with her arm around Lovecraft in 1921

Lovecraft and Sonia Greene on July 5, 1921

Lovecraft’s aunts disapproved of his relationship with Sonia. Lovecraft and Greene married on March 3, 1924, and relocated to her Brooklyn apartment at 259 Parkside Avenue; she thought he needed to leave Providence to flourish and was willing to support him financially.[80] Greene, who had been married before, later said Lovecraft had performed satisfactorily as a lover, though she had to take the initiative in all aspects of the relationship. She attributed Lovecraft’s passive nature to a stultifying upbringing by his mother.[81] Lovecraft’s weight increased to 200 lb (91 kg) on his wife’s home cooking.[82]

He was enthralled by New York, and, in what was informally dubbed the Kalem Club, he acquired a group of encouraging intellectual and literary friends who urged him to submit stories to Weird Tales. Its editor, Edwin Baird, accepted many of Lovecraft’s stories for the ailing publication, including «Under the Pyramids», which was ghostwritten for Harry Houdini.[83] Established informally some years before Lovecraft arrived in New York, the core Kalem Club members were boys’ adventure novelist Henry Everett McNeil, the lawyer and anarchist writer James Ferdinand Morton Jr., and the poet Reinhardt Kleiner.[84]

On January 1, 1925, Sonia moved from Parkside to Cleveland in response to a job opportunity, and Lovecraft left for a small first-floor apartment on 169 Clinton Street «at the edge of Red Hook»—a location which came to discomfort him greatly.[85] Later that year, the Kalem Club’s four regular attendees were joined by Lovecraft along with his protégé Frank Belknap Long, bookseller George Willard Kirk, and Samuel Loveman.[86] Loveman was Jewish, but he and Lovecraft became close friends in spite of the latter’s antisemitic attitudes.[87] By the 1930s, writer and publisher Herman Charles Koenig would be one of the last to become involved with the Kalem Club.[88]

Not long after the marriage, Greene lost her business and her assets disappeared in a bank failure.[89] Lovecraft made efforts to support his wife through regular jobs, but his lack of previous work experience meant he lacked proven marketable skills.[90] The publisher of Weird Tales was attempting to make the loss-making magazine profitable and offered the job of editor to Lovecraft, who declined, citing his reluctance to relocate to Chicago on aesthetic grounds.[91] Baird was succeeded by Farnsworth Wright, whose writing Lovecraft had criticized. Lovecraft’s submissions were often rejected by Wright. This may have been partially due to censorship guidelines imposed in the aftermath of a Weird Tales story that hinted at necrophilia, although after Lovecraft’s death, Wright accepted many of the stories he had originally rejected.[92]

Sonia also became ill and immediately after recovering, relocated to Cincinnati, and then to Cleveland; her employment required constant travel.[93] Added to his feelings of failure in a city with a large immigrant population, Lovecraft’s single-room apartment was burgled, leaving him with only the clothes he was wearing.[94] In August 1925, he wrote «The Horror at Red Hook» and «He», in the latter of which the narrator says «My coming to New York had been a mistake; for whereas I had looked for poignant wonder and inspiration […] I had found instead only a sense of horror and oppression which threatened to master, paralyze, and annihilate me.»[95] This was an expression of his despair at being in New York.[96] It was at around this time he wrote the outline for «The Call of Cthulhu», with its theme of the insignificance of all humanity.[97] During this time, Lovecraft wrote «Supernatural Horror in Literature» on the eponymous subject. It later became one of the most influential essays on supernatural horror.[98] With a weekly allowance Greene sent, Lovecraft moved to a working-class area of Brooklyn Heights, where he resided in a tiny apartment. He had lost approximately 40 pounds (18 kg) of body weight by 1926, when he left for Providence.[99]

Return to Providence and death

The Samuel B. Mumford House, slightly obscured by trees

Lovecraft’s final home, May 1933 until March 10, 1937

Back in Providence, Lovecraft lived with his aunts in a «spacious brown Victorian wooden house» at 10 Barnes Street until 1933.[100] He then moved to 66 Prospect Street, which would become his final home.[b][101] The period beginning after his return to Providence contains some of his most prominent works, including The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath, The Case of Charles Dexter Ward, «The Call of Cthulhu» and The Shadow over Innsmouth.[102] The former two stories are partially autobiographical, as scholars have argued that The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath is about Lovecraft’s return to Providence and The Case of Charles Dexter Ward is, in part, about the city itself.[103] The former story also represents a partial repudiation of Dunsany’s influence, as Lovecraft had decided that his style did not come to him naturally.[104] At this time, he frequently revised work for other authors and did a large amount of ghostwriting, including The Mound, «Winged Death», and «The Diary of Alonzo Typer». Client Harry Houdini was laudatory, and attempted to help Lovecraft by introducing him to the head of a newspaper syndicate. Plans for a further project were ended by Houdini’s death in 1926.[105] After returning, he also began to engage in antiquarian travels across the eastern seaboard during the summer months.[106] During the spring–summer of 1930, Lovecraft visited, among other locations, New York City, Brattleboro, Vermont, Wilbraham, Massachusetts, Charleston, South Carolina, and Quebec City.[c][108]

Later, in August, Robert E. Howard wrote a letter to Weird Tales praising a then-recent reprint of H. P. Lovecraft’s «The Rats in the Walls» and discussing some of the Gaelic references used within.[109] Editor Farnsworth Wright forwarded the letter to Lovecraft, who responded positively to Howard, and soon the two writers were engaged in a vigorous correspondence that would last for the rest of Howard’s life.[110] Howard quickly became a member of the Lovecraft Circle, a group of writers and friends all linked through Lovecraft’s voluminous correspondence, as he introduced his many like-minded friends to one another and encouraged them to share their stories, utilize each other’s fictional creations, and help each other succeed in the field of pulp fiction.[111]

Meanwhile, Lovecraft was increasingly producing work that brought him no remuneration.[112] Affecting a calm indifference to the reception of his works, Lovecraft was in reality extremely sensitive to criticism and easily precipitated into withdrawal. He was known to give up trying to sell a story after it had been once rejected.[113] Sometimes, as with The Shadow over Innsmouth, he wrote a story that might have been commercially viable but did not try to sell it. Lovecraft even ignored interested publishers. He failed to reply when one inquired about any novel Lovecraft might have ready: although he had completed such a work, The Case of Charles Dexter Ward, it was never typed up.[114] A few years after Lovecraft had moved to Providence, he and his wife Sonia Greene, having lived separately for so long, agreed to an amicable divorce. Greene moved to California in 1933 and remarried in 1936, unaware that Lovecraft, despite his assurances to the contrary, had never officially signed the final decree.[115]

As a result of the Great Depression, he shifted towards socialism, decrying both his prior political beliefs and the rising tide of fascism.[116] He thought that socialism was a workable middle ground between what he saw as the destructive impulses of both the capitalists and the Marxists of his day. This was based in a general opposition to cultural upheaval, as well as support for an ordered society. Electorally, he supported Franklin D. Roosevelt, but he thought that the New Deal was not sufficiently leftist. Lovecraft’s support for it was based in his view that no other set of reforms were possible at that time.[117]

Lovecraft's personal grave, facing forward

H. P. Lovecraft’s gravestone

In late 1936, he witnessed the publication of The Shadow over Innsmouth as a paperback book.[d] 400 copies were printed, and the work was advertised in Weird Tales and several fan magazines. However, Lovecraft was displeased, as this book was riddled with errors that required extensive editing. It sold slowly and only approximately 200 copies were bound. The remaining 200 copies were destroyed after the publisher went out of business for the next seven years. By this point, Lovecraft’s literary career was reaching its end. Shortly after having written his last original short story, «The Haunter of the Dark», he stated that the hostile reception of At the Mountains of Madness had done «more than anything to end my effective fictional career». His declining psychological and physical states made it impossible for him to continue writing fiction.[120]

On June 11, Robert E. Howard was informed that his chronically ill mother would not awaken from her coma. He walked out to his car and committed suicide with a pistol that he had stored there. His mother died shortly thereafter.[121] This deeply affected Lovecraft, who consoled Howard’s father through correspondence. Almost immediately after hearing about Howard’s death, Lovecraft wrote a brief memoir titled «In Memoriam: Robert Ervin Howard», which he distributed to his correspondents.[122] Meanwhile, Lovecraft’s physical health was deteriorating. He was suffering from an affliction that he referred to as «grippe».[e][124]

Due to his fear of doctors, Lovecraft was not examined until a month before his death. After seeing a doctor, he was diagnosed with terminal cancer of the small intestine.[125] He remained hospitalized until he died. He lived in constant pain until his death on March 15, 1937, in Providence. In accordance with his lifelong scientific curiosity, he kept a diary of his illness until he was physically incapable of holding a pen.[126] Lovecraft was listed along with his parents on the Phillips family monument.[127] In 1977, fans erected a headstone in Swan Point Cemetery on which they inscribed his name, the dates of his birth and death, and the phrase «I AM PROVIDENCE»—a line from one of his personal letters.[128]

Personal views

Politics

An illustration by Virgil Finlay of Lovecraft as an eighteenth-century gentleman

H. P. Lovecraft as an eighteenth-century gentleman by Virgil Finlay

Lovecraft began his life as a Tory,[129] which was likely the result of his conservative upbringing. His family supported the Republican Party for the entirety of his life. While it is unclear how consistently he voted, he voted for Herbert Hoover in the 1928 presidential election.[130] Rhode Island as a whole remained politically conservative and Republican into the 1930s.[131] Lovecraft himself was an Anglophile who supported the British monarchy. He opposed democracy and thought that the United States should be governed by an aristocracy. This viewpoint emerged during his youth and lasted until the end of the 1920s.[132] During World War I, his Anglophilia caused him to strongly support the entente against the Central Powers. Many of his earlier poems were devoted to then-current political subjects, and he published several political essays in his amateur journal, The Conservative.[133] He was a teetotaler who supported the implementation of Prohibition, which was one of the few reforms that he supported during the early part of his life.[134] While remaining a teetotaller, he later became convinced that Prohibition was ineffectual in the 1930s.[135] His personal justification for his early political viewpoints was primarily based on tradition and aesthetics.[136]

As a result of the Great Depression, Lovecraft reexamined his political views.[137] Initially, he thought that affluent people would take on the characteristics of his ideal aristocracy and solve America’s problems. When this did not occur, he became a socialist. This shift was caused by his observation that the Depression was harming American society. It was also influenced by the increase in socialism’s political capital during the 1930s. One of the main points of Lovecraft’s socialism was its opposition to Soviet Marxism, as he thought that a Marxist revolution would bring about the destruction of American civilization. Lovecraft thought that an intellectual aristocracy needed to be formed to preserve America.[138] His ideal political system is outlined in his 1933 essay «Some Repetitions on the Times». Lovecraft used this essay to echo the political proposals that had been made over the course of the last few decades. In this essay, he advocates governmental control of resource distribution, fewer working hours and a higher wage, and unemployment insurance and old age pensions. He also outlines the need for an oligarchy of intellectuals. In his view, power must be restricted to those who are sufficiently intelligent and educated.[139] He frequently used the term «fascism» to describe this form of government, but, according to S. T. Joshi, it bears little resemblance to that ideology.[140]

Lovecraft had varied views on the political figures of his day. He was an ardent supporter of Franklin D. Roosevelt.[141] He saw that Roosevelt was trying to steer a middle course between the conservatives and the revolutionaries, which he approved of. While he thought that Roosevelt should have been enacting more progressive policies, he came to the conclusion that the New Deal was the only realistic option for reform. He thought that voting for his opponents on the political left would be a wasted effort.[142] Internationally, like many Americans, he initially expressed support for Adolf Hitler. More specifically, he thought that Hitler would preserve German culture. However, he thought that Hitler’s racial policies should be based on culture rather than descent. There is evidence that, at the end of his life, Lovecraft began to oppose Hitler. According to Harry K. Brobst, Lovecraft’s downstairs neighbor went to Germany and witnessed Jews being beaten. Lovecraft and his aunt were angered by this. His discussions of Hitler drop off after this point.[143]

Atheism

Lovecraft was an atheist. His viewpoints on religion are outlined in his 1922 essay «A Confession of Unfaith». In this essay, he describes his shift away from the Protestantism of his parents to the atheism of his adulthood. Lovecraft was raised by a conservative Protestant family. He was introduced to the Bible and the mythos of Saint Nicholas when he was two. He passively accepted both of them. Over the course of the next few years, he was introduced to Grimms’ Fairy Tales and One Thousand and One Nights, favoring the latter. In response, Lovecraft took on the identity of «Abdul Alhazred», a name he would later use for the author of the Necronomicon.[144] Lovecraft experienced a brief period as a Greco-Roman pagan shortly thereafter.[145] According to this account, his first moment of skepticism occurred before his fifth birthday, when he questioned if God is a myth after learning that Santa Claus is not real. In 1896, he was introduced to Greco-Roman myths and became «a genuine pagan».[15]

This came to an end in 1902, when Lovecraft was introduced to space. He later described this event as the most poignant in his life. In response to this discovery, Lovecraft took to studying astronomy and described his observations in the local newspaper.[146] Before his thirteenth birthday, he had become convinced of humanity’s impermanence. By the time he was seventeen, he had read detailed writings that agreed with his worldview. Lovecraft ceased writing positively about progress, instead developing his later cosmic philosophy. Despite his interests in science, he had an aversion to realistic literature, so he became interested in fantastical fiction. Lovecraft became pessimistic when he entered amateur journalism in 1914. The Great War seemed to confirm his viewpoints. He began to despise philosophical idealism. Lovecraft took to discussing and debating his pessimism with his peers, which allowed him to solidify his philosophy. His readings of Friedrich Nietzsche and H. L. Mencken, among other pessimistic writers, furthered this development. At the end of his essay, Lovecraft states that all he desired was oblivion. He was willing to cast aside any illusion that he may still have held.[147]

Race

Race is the most controversial aspect of Lovecraft’s legacy, expressed in many disparaging remarks against non-Anglo-Saxon races and cultures in his works. Scholars have argued that these racial attitudes were common in the American society of his day, particularly in New England.[148] As he grew older, his original racial worldview became a classism or elitism, which regarded the superior race to include all those self-ennobled through high culture. Lovecraft was a white supremacist.[149] Despite this, he did not hold all white people in uniform high regard, but rather esteemed English people and those of English descent.[150] In his early published essays, private letters, and personal utterances, he argued for a strong color line to preserve race and culture.[151] His arguments were supported using disparagements of various races in his journalism and letters, and allegorically in some of his fictional works that depict miscegenation between humans and non-human creatures.[152] This is evident in his portrayal of the Deep Ones in The Shadow over Innsmouth. Their interbreeding with humanity is framed as being a type of miscegenation that corrupts both the town of Innsmouth and the protagonist.[153]

Initially, Lovecraft showed sympathy to minorities who adopted Western culture, even to the extent of marrying a Jewish woman he viewed as being «well assimilated».[154] By the 1930s, Lovecraft’s views on ethnicity and race had moderated.[155] He supported ethnicities’ preserving their native cultures; for example, he thought that «a real friend of civilisation wishes merely to make the Germans more German, the French more French, the Spaniards more Spanish, & so on.»[156] This represented a shift from his previous support for cultural assimilation. His shift was partially the result of his exposure to different cultures through his travels and circle. The former resulted in him writing positively about Québécois and First Nations cultural traditions in his travelogue of Quebec.[157] However, this did not represent a complete elimination of his racial prejudices.[158]

Influences

Lovecraft was influenced by Edgar Allan Poe and Lord Dunsany.

His interest in weird fiction began in his childhood when his grandfather, who preferred Gothic stories, would tell him stories of his own design.[12] Lovecraft’s childhood home on Angell Street had a large library that contained classical literature, scientific works, and early weird fiction. At the age of five, Lovecraft enjoyed reading One Thousand and One Nights, and was reading Nathaniel Hawthorne a year later.[159] He was also influenced by the travel literature of John Mandeville and Marco Polo.[160] This led to his discovery of gaps in then-contemporary science, which prevented Lovecraft from committing suicide in response to the death of his grandfather and his family’s declining financial situation during his adolescence.[160] These travelogues may have also had an influence on how Lovecraft’s later works describe their characters and locations. For example, there is a resemblance between the powers of the Tibetan enchanters in The Travels of Marco Polo and the powers unleashed on Sentinel Hill in «The Dunwich Horror».[160]

One of Lovecraft’s most significant literary influences was Edgar Allan Poe, whom he described as his «God of Fiction».[161] Poe’s fiction was introduced to Lovecraft when the latter was eight years old. His earlier works were significantly influenced by Poe’s prose and writing style.[162] He also made extensive use of Poe’s unity of effect in his fiction.[163] Furthermore, At the Mountains of Madness directly quotes Poe and was influenced by The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket.[164] One of the main themes of the two stories is to discuss the unreliable nature of language as a method of expressing meaning.[165] In 1919, Lovecraft’s discovery of the stories of Lord Dunsany moved his writing in a new direction, resulting in a series of fantasies. Throughout his life, Lovecraft referred to Dunsany as the author who had the greatest impact on his literary career. The initial result of this influence was the Dream Cycle, a series of fantasies that originally take place in prehistory, but later shift to a dreamworld setting.[166] By 1930, Lovecraft decided that he would no longer write Dunsanian fantasies, arguing that the style did not come naturally to him.[167] Additionally, he also read and cited Arthur Machen and Algernon Blackwood as influences in the 1920s.[168]

Aside from horror authors, Lovecraft was significantly influenced by the Decadents, the Puritans, and the Aesthetic movement.[169] In «H. P. Lovecraft: New England Decadent», Barton Levi St. Armand, a professor emeritus of English and American studies at Brown University, has argued that these three influences combined to define Lovecraft as a writer.[170] He traces this influence to both Lovecraft’s stories and letters, noting that he actively cultivated the image of a New England gentleman in his letters.[169] Meanwhile, his influence from the Decadents and the Aesthetic Movement stems from his readings of Edgar Allan Poe. Lovecraft’s aesthetic worldview and fixation on decline stems from these readings. The idea of cosmic decline is described as having been Lovecraft’s response to both the Aesthetic Movement and the 19th century Decadents.[171] St. Armand describes it as being a combination of non-theological Puritan thought and the Decadent worldview.[172] This is used as a division in his stories, particularly in «The Horror at Red Hook», «Pickman’s Model», and «The Music of Erich Zann». The division between Puritanism and Decadence, St. Armand argues, represents a polarization between an artificial paradise and oneiriscopic visions of different worlds.[173]

A non-literary inspiration came from then-contemporary scientific advances in biology, astronomy, geology, and physics.[174] Lovecraft’s study of science contributed to his view of the human race as insignificant, powerless, and doomed in a materialistic and mechanistic universe.[175] Lovecraft was a keen amateur astronomer from his youth, often visiting the Ladd Observatory in Providence, and penning numerous astronomical articles for his personal journal and local newspapers.[176] Lovecraft’s materialist views led him to espouse his philosophical views through his fiction; these philosophical views came to be called cosmicism. Cosmicism took on a more pessimistic tone with his creation of what is now known as the Cthulhu Mythos, a fictional universe that contains alien deities and horrors. The term «Cthulhu Mythos» was likely coined by later writers after Lovecraft’s death.[1] In his letters, Lovecraft jokingly called his fictional mythology «Yog-Sothothery».[177]

Dreams had a major role in Lovecraft’s literary career.[178] In 1991, as a result of his rising place in American literature, it was popularly thought that Lovecraft extensively transcribed his dreams when writing fiction. However, the majority of his stories are not transcribed dreams. Instead, many of them are directly influenced by dreams and dreamlike phenomena. In his letters, Lovecraft frequently compared his characters to dreamers. They are described as being as helpless as a real dreamer who is experiencing a nightmare. His stories also have dreamlike qualities. The Randolph Carter stories deconstruct the division between dreams and reality. The dreamlands in The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath are a shared dreamworld that can be accessed by a sensitive dreamer. Meanwhile, in «The Silver Key», Lovecraft mentions the concept of «inward dreams», which implies the existence of outward dreams. Burleson compares this deconstruction to Carl Jung’s argument that dreams are the source of archetypal myths. Lovecraft’s way of writing fiction required both a level of realism and dreamlike elements. Citing Jung, Burleson argues that a writer may create realism by being inspired by dreams.[179]

Themes

Now all my tales are based on the fundamental premise that common human laws and interests and emotions have no validity or significance in the vast cosmos-at-large. To me there is nothing but puerility in a tale in which the human form—and the local human passions and conditions and standards—are depicted as native to other worlds or other universes. To achieve the essence of real externality, whether of time or space or dimension, one must forget that such things as organic life, good and evil, love and hate, and all such local attributes of a negligible and temporary race called mankind, have any existence at all. Only the human scenes and characters must have human qualities. These must be handled with unsparing realism, (not catch-penny romanticism) but when we cross the line to the boundless and hideous unknown—the shadow-haunted Outside—we must remember to leave our humanity and terrestrialism at the threshold.

— H. P. Lovecraft, in note to the editor of Weird Tales, on resubmission of «The Call of Cthulhu»[180]

Cosmicism

The central theme of Lovecraft’s corpus is cosmicism. Cosmicism is a literary philosophy that argues that humanity is an insignificant force in the universe. Despite appearing pessimistic, Lovecraft thought of himself being as being a cosmic indifferentist, which is expressed in his fiction. In it, human beings are often subject to powerful beings and other cosmic forces, but these forces are not so much malevolent as they are indifferent toward humanity. He believed in a meaningless, mechanical, and uncaring universe that human beings could never fully understand. There is no allowance for beliefs that could not be supported scientifically.[181] Lovecraft first articulated this philosophy in 1921, but he did not fully incorporate it into his fiction until five years later. «Dagon», «Beyond the Wall of Sleep», and «The Temple» contain early depictions of this concept, but the majority of his early tales do not analyze the concept. «Nyarlathotep» interprets the collapse of human civilization as being a corollary to the collapse of the universe. «The Call of Cthulhu» represents an intensification of this theme. In it, Lovecraft introduces the idea of alien influences on humanity, which would come to dominate all subsequent works.[182] In these works, Lovecraft expresses cosmicism through the usage of confirmation rather than revelation. Lovecraftian protagonists do not learn that they are insignificant. Instead, they already know it and have it confirmed to them through an event.[183]

Knowledge

Lovecraft’s fiction reflects his own ambivalent views regarding the nature of knowledge.[184] This expresses itself in the concept of forbidden knowledge. In Lovecraft’s stories, happiness is only achievable through blissful ignorance. Trying to know things that are not meant to be known leads to harm and psychological danger. This concept intersects with several other ideas. This includes the idea that the visible reality is an illusion masking the horrific true reality. Similarly, there are also intersections with the concepts of ancient civilizations that exert a malign influence on humanity and the general philosophy of cosmicism.[185] According to Lovecraft, self-knowledge can bring ruin to those who seek it. Those seekers would become aware of their own insignificance in the wider cosmos and would be unable to bear the weight of this knowledge. Lovecraftian horror is not achieved through external phenomenon. Instead, it is reached through the internalized psychological impact that knowledge has on its protagonists. «The Call of Cthulhu», The Shadow over Innsmouth, and The Shadow Out of Time feature protagonists who experience both external and internal horror through the acquisition of self-knowledge.[186] The Case of Charles Dexter Ward also reflects this. One of its central themes is the danger of knowing too much about one’s family history. Charles Dexter Ward, the protagonist, engages in historical and genealogical research that ultimately leads to both madness and his own self-destruction.[187]

Decline of civilization

For much of his life, Lovecraft was fixated on the concepts of decline and decadence. More specifically, he thought that the West was in a state of terminal decline.[188] Starting in the 1920s, Lovecraft became familiar with the work of the German conservative-revolutionary theorist Oswald Spengler, whose pessimistic thesis of the decadence of the modern West formed a crucial element in Lovecraft’s overall anti-modern worldview.[189] Spenglerian imagery of cyclical decay is a central theme in At the Mountains of Madness. S. T. Joshi, in H. P. Lovecraft: The Decline of the West, places Spengler at the center of his discussion of Lovecraft’s political and philosophical ideas. According to him, the idea of decline is the single idea that permeates and connects his personal philosophy. The main Spenglerian influence on Lovecraft would be his view that politics, economics, science, and art are all interdependent aspects of civilization. This realization led him to shed his personal ignorance of then-current political and economic developments after 1927.[190] Lovecraft had developed his idea of Western decline independently, but Spengler gave it a clear framework.[191]

Science

Lovecraft shifted supernatural horror away from its previous focus on human issues to a focus on cosmic ones. In this way, he merged the elements of supernatural fiction that he deemed to be scientifically viable with science fiction. This merge required an understanding of both supernatural horror and then-contemporary science.[192] Lovecraft used this combined knowledge to create stories that extensively reference trends in scientific development. Beginning with «The Shunned House», Lovecraft increasingly incorporated elements of both Einsteinian science and his own personal materialism into his stories. This intensified with the writing of «The Call of Cthulhu», where he depicted alien influences on humanity. This trend would continue throughout the remainder of his literary career. «The Colour Out of Space» represents what scholars have called the peak of this trend. It portrays an alien lifeform whose otherness prevents it from being defined by then-contemporary science.[193]

Another part of this effort was the repeated usage of mathematics in an effort to make his creatures and settings appear more alien. Tom Hull, a mathematician, regards this as enhancing his ability to invoke a sense of otherness and fear. He attributes this use of mathematics to Lovecraft’s childhood interest in astronomy and his adulthood awareness of non-Euclidean geometry.[194] Another reason for his use of mathematics was his reaction to the scientific developments of his day. These developments convinced him that humanity’s primary means of understanding the world was no longer trustable. Lovecraft’s usage of mathematics in his fiction serves to convert otherwise supernatural elements into things that have in-universe scientific explanations. «The Dreams in the Witch House» and The Shadow Out of Time both have elements of this. The former uses a witch and her familiar, while the latter uses the idea of mind transference. These elements are explained using scientific theories that were prevalent during Lovecraft’s lifetime.[195]

Lovecraft Country

Setting plays a major role in Lovecraft’s fiction. Lovecraft Country, a fictionalized version of New England, serves as the central hub for his mythos. It represents the history, culture, and folklore of the region, as interpreted by Lovecraft. These attributes are exaggerated and altered to provide a suitable setting for his stories. The names of the locations in the region were directly influenced by the names of real locations in the region, which was done to increase their realism.[196] Lovecraft’s stories use their connections with New England to imbue themselves with the ability to instill fear.[197] Lovecraft was primarily inspired by the cities and towns in Massachusetts. However, the specific location of Lovecraft Country is variable, as it moved according to Lovecraft’s literary needs. Starting with areas that he thought were evocative, Lovecraft redefined and exaggerated them under fictional names. For example, Lovecraft based Arkham on the town of Oakham and expanded it to include a nearby landmark.[198] Its location was moved, as Lovecraft decided that it would have been destroyed by the recently-built Quabbin Reservoir. This is alluded to in «The Colour Out of Space», as the «blasted heath» is submerged by the creation of a fictionalized version of the reservoir.[199] Similarly, Lovecraft’s other towns were based on other locations in Massachusetts. Innsmouth was based on Newburyport, and Dunwich was based on Greenwich. The vague locations of these towns also played into Lovecraft’s desire to create a mood in his stories. In his view, a mood can only be evoked through reading.[200]

Critical reception

Literary

Early efforts to revise an established literary view of Lovecraft as an author of ‘pulp’ were resisted by some eminent critics; in 1945, Edmund Wilson sneered: «the only real horror in most of these fictions is the horror of bad taste and bad art.» However, Wilson praised Lovecraft’s ability to write about his chosen field; he described him as having written about it «with much intelligence».[201] According to L. Sprague de Camp, Wilson later improved his opinion of Lovecraft, citing a report of David Chavchavadze that Wilson had included a Lovecraftian reference in Little Blue Light: A Play in Three Acts. After Chavchavadze met with him to discuss this, Wilson revealed that he had been reading a copy of Lovecraft’s correspondence.[f][203] Two years before Wilson’s critique, Lovecraft’s works were reviewed by Winfield Townley Scott, the literary editor of The Providence Journal. He argued that Lovecraft was one of the most significant Rhode Island authors and that it was regrettable that he had received little attention from mainstream critics at the time.[204] Mystery and Adventure columnist Will Cuppy of the New York Herald Tribune recommended to readers a volume of Lovecraft’s stories in 1944, asserting that «the literature of horror and macabre fantasy belongs with mystery in its broader sense.»[205]

By 1957, Floyd C. Gale of Galaxy Science Fiction said that Lovecraft was comparable to Robert E. Howard, stating that «they appear more prolific than ever,» noting L. Sprague de Camp, Björn Nyberg, and August Derleth’s usage of their creations.[206] Gale also said that «Lovecraft at his best could build a mood of horror unsurpassed; at his worst, he was laughable.»[206] In 1962, Colin Wilson, in his survey of anti-realist trends in fiction The Strength to Dream, cited Lovecraft as one of the pioneers of the «assault on rationality» and included him with M. R. James, H. G. Wells, Aldous Huxley, J. R. R. Tolkien and others as one of the builders of mythicised realities contending against what he considered the failing project of literary realism.[207] Subsequently, Lovecraft began to acquire the status of a cult writer in the counterculture of the 1960s, and reprints of his work proliferated.[208]

Michael Dirda, a reviewer for The Times Literary Supplement, has described Lovecraft as being a «visionary» who is «rightly regarded as second only to Edgar Allan Poe in the annals of American supernatural literature.» According to him, Lovecraft’s works prove that mankind cannot bear the weight of reality, as the true nature of reality cannot be understood by either science or history. In addition, Dirda praises Lovecraft’s ability to create an uncanny atmosphere. This atmosphere is created through the feeling of wrongness that pervades the objects, places, and people in Lovecraft’s works. He also comments favorably on Lovecraft’s correspondence, and compares him to Horace Walpole. Particular attention is given to his correspondence with August Derleth and Robert E. Howard. The Derleth letters are called «delightful», while the Howard letters are described as being an ideological debate. Overall, Dirda believes that Lovecraft’s letters are equal to, or better than, his fictional output.[209]

Los Angeles Review of Books reviewer Nick Mamatas has stated that Lovecraft was a particularly difficult author, rather than a bad one. He described Lovecraft as being «perfectly capable» in the fields of story logic, pacing, innovation, and generating quotable phrases. However, Lovecraft’s difficulty made him ill-suited to the pulps; he was unable to compete with the popular recurring protagonists and damsel-in-distress stories. Furthermore, he compared a paragraph from The Shadow Out of Time to a paragraph from the introduction to The Economic Consequences of the Peace. In Mamatas’ view, Lovecraft’s quality is obscured by his difficulty, and his skill is what has allowed his following to outlive the followings of other then-prominent authors, such as Seabury Quinn and Kenneth Patchen.[210]

In 2005, the Library of America published a volume of Lovecraft’s works. This volume was reviewed by many publications, including The New York Times Book Review and The Wall Street Journal, and sold 25,000 copies within a month of release. The overall critical reception of the volume was mixed.[211] Several scholars, including S. T. Joshi and Alison Sperling, have said that this confirms H. P. Lovecraft’s place in the western canon.[212] The editors of The Age of Lovecraft, Carl H. Sederholm and Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock, attributed the rise of mainstream popular and academic interest in Lovecraft to this volume, along with the Penguin Classics volumes and the Modern Library edition of At the Mountains of Madness. These volumes led to a proliferation of other volumes containing Lovecraft’s works. According to the two authors, these volumes are part of a trend in Lovecraft’s popular and academic reception: increased attention by one audience causes the other to also become more interested. Lovecraft’s success is, in part, the result of his success.[213]

Lovecraft’s style has often been subject to criticism,[214] but scholars such as S. T. Joshi have argued that Lovecraft consciously utilized a variety of literary devices to form a unique style of his own—these include prose-poetic rhythm, stream of consciousness, alliteration, and conscious archaism.[215] According to Joyce Carol Oates, Lovecraft and Edgar Allan Poe have exerted a significant influence on later writers in the horror genre.[216] Horror author Stephen King called Lovecraft «the twentieth century’s greatest practitioner of the classic horror tale.»[217] King stated in his semi-autobiographical non-fiction book Danse Macabre that Lovecraft was responsible for his own fascination with horror and the macabre and was the largest influence on his writing.[218]

Philosophical

H. P. Lovecraft’s writings have influenced the speculative realist philosophical movement during the early twentieth-first century. The four founders of the movement, Ray Brassier, Iain Hamilton Grant, Graham Harman, and Quentin Meillassoux, have cited Lovecraft as an inspiration for their worldviews.[219] Graham Harman wrote a monograph, Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy, about Lovecraft and philosophy. In it, he argues that Lovecraft was a «productionist» author. He describes Lovecraft as having been an author who was uniquely obsessed with gaps in human knowledge.[220] He goes further and asserts Lovecraft’s personal philosophy as being in opposition to both idealism and David Hume. In his view, Lovecraft resembles Georges Braque, Pablo Picasso, and Edmund Husserl in his division of objects into different parts that do not exhaust the potential meanings of the whole. The anti-idealism of Lovecraft is represented through his commentary on the inability of language to describe his horrors.[221] Harman also credits Lovecraft with inspiring parts of his own articulation of object-oriented ontology.[222] According to Lovecraft scholar Alison Sperling, this philosophical interpretation of Lovecraft’s fiction has caused other philosophers in Harmon’s tradition to write about Lovecraft. These philosophers seek to remove human perception and human life from the foundations of ethics. These scholars have used Lovecraft’s works as the central example of their worldview. They base this usage in Lovecraft’s arguments against anthropocentrism and the ability of the human mind to truly understand the universe. They have also played a role in Lovecraft’s improving literary reputation by focusing on his interpretation of ontology, which gives him a central position in Anthropocene studies.[223]

Legacy

Lovecraft memorial plaque with silhouette by Perry, slightly facing left

H. P. Lovecraft memorial plaque at 22 Prospect Street in Providence. Portrait by silhouettist E. J. Perry.

Lovecraft was relatively unknown during his lifetime. While his stories appeared in prominent pulp magazines such as Weird Tales, not many people knew his name.[224] He did, however, correspond regularly with other contemporary writers such as Clark Ashton Smith and August Derleth,[225] who became his friends, even though he never met them in person. This group became known as the «Lovecraft Circle», since their writings freely borrowed Lovecraft’s motifs, with his encouragement. He borrowed from them as well. For example, he made use of Clark Ashton Smith’s Tsathoggua in The Mound.[226]

After Lovecraft’s death, the Lovecraft Circle carried on. August Derleth founded Arkham House with Donald Wandrei to preserve Lovecraft’s works and keep them in print.[227] He added to and expanded on Lovecraft’s vision, not without controversy.[228] While Lovecraft considered his pantheon of alien gods a mere plot device, Derleth created an entire cosmology, complete with a war between the good Elder Gods and the evil Outer Gods, such as Cthulhu and his ilk. The forces of good were supposed to have won, locking Cthulhu and others beneath the earth, the ocean, and elsewhere. Derleth’s Cthulhu Mythos stories went on to associate different gods with the traditional four elements of fire, air, earth, and water, which did not line up with Lovecraft’s original vision of his mythos. However, Derleth’s ownership of Arkham House gave him a position of authority in Lovecraftiana that would not dissipate until his death, and through the efforts of Lovecraft scholars in the 1970s.[229]

Lovecraft’s works have influenced many writers and other creators. Stephen King has cited Lovecraft as a major influence on his works. As a child in the 1960s, he came across a volume of Lovecraft’s works which inspired him to write his fiction. He goes on to argue that all works in the horror genre that were written after Lovecraft were influenced by him.[217] In the field of comics, Alan Moore has described Lovecraft as having been a formative influence on his graphic novels.[230] Film director John Carpenter’s films include direct references and quotations of Lovecraft’s fiction, in addition to their use of a Lovecraftian aesthetic and themes. Guillermo del Toro has been similarly influenced by Lovecraft’s corpus.[231]

The first World Fantasy Awards were held in Providence in 1975. The theme was «The Lovecraft Circle». Until 2015, winners were presented with an elongated bust of Lovecraft that was designed by cartoonist Gahan Wilson, nicknamed the «Howard».[232] In November 2015 it was announced that the World Fantasy Award trophy would no longer be modeled on H. P. Lovecraft in response to the author’s views on race.[233] After the World Fantasy Award dropped their connection to Lovecraft, The Atlantic commented that «In the end, Lovecraft still wins—people who’ve never read a page of his work will still know who Cthulhu is for years to come, and his legacy lives on in the work of Stephen King, Guillermo del Toro, and Neil Gaiman.»[232]

In 2016, Lovecraft was inducted into the Museum of Pop Culture’s Science Fiction and Fantasy Hall of Fame.[234] Three years later, Lovecraft and the other mythos authors were posthumously awarded the 1945 Retro-Hugo Award for Best Series for their contributions to the Cthulhu Mythos.[235]

Lovecraft studies

Joshi in 2002, facing right and looking forward

Starting in the early 1970s, a body of scholarly work began to emerge around Lovecraft’s life and works. Referred to as Lovecraft studies, its proponents sought to establish Lovecraft as a significant author in the American literary canon. This can be traced to Derleth’s preservation and dissemination of Lovecraft’s fiction, non-fiction, and letters through Arkham House. Joshi credits the development of the field to this process. However, it was marred by low quality editions and misinterpretations of Lovecraft’s worldview. After Derleth’s death in 1971, the scholarship entered a new phase. There was a push to create a book-length biography of Lovecraft. L. Sprague de Camp, a science fiction scholar, wrote the first major one in 1975. This biography was criticized by early Lovecraft scholars for its lack of scholarly merit and its lack of sympathy for its subject. Despite this, it played a significant role in Lovecraft’s literary rise. It exposed Lovecraft to the mainstream of American literary criticism. During the late 1970s and early 1980s, there was a division in the field between the «Derlethian traditionalists» who wished to interpret Lovecraft through the lens of fantasy literature and the newer scholars who wished to place greater attention on the entirety of his corpus.[236]

The 1980s and 1990s saw a further proliferation of the field. The 1990 H. P. Lovecraft Centennial Conference and the republishing of older essays in An Epicure in the Terrible represented the publishing of many basic studies that would be used as a base for then-future studies. The 1990 centennial also saw the installation of the «H. P. Lovecraft Memorial Plaque» in a garden adjoining John Hay Library, that features a portrait by silhouettist E. J. Perry.[237] Following this, in 1996, S. T. Joshi wrote his own biography of Lovecraft. This biography was met with positive reviews and became the main biography in the field. It has since been superseded by his expanded edition of the book, I am Providence in 2010.[238]

Lovecraft’s improving literary reputation has caused his works to receive increased attention by both classics publishers and scholarly fans.[239] His works have been published by several different series of literary classics. Penguin Classics published three volumes of Lovecraft’s works between 1999 and 2004. These volumes were edited by S. T. Joshi.[239] Barnes & Noble would publish their own volume of Lovecraft’s complete fiction in 2008. The Library of America published a volume of Lovecraft’s works in 2005. The publishing of these volumes represented a reversal of the traditional judgment that Lovecraft was not part of the Western canon.[240] Meanwhile, the biannual NecronomiCon Providence convention was first held in 2013. Its purpose is to serve as a fan and scholarly convention that discusses both Lovecraft and the wider field of weird fiction. It is organized by the Lovecraft Arts and Sciences organization and is held on the weekend of Lovecraft’s birth.[241] That July, the Providence City Council designated the «H. P. Lovecraft Memorial Square» and installed a commemorative sign at the intersection of Angell and Prospect streets, near the author’s former residences.[242]

Music

Lovecraft’s fictional Mythos has influenced a number of musicians, particularly in rock and heavy metal music.[243] This began in the 1960s with the formation of the psychedelic rock band H. P. Lovecraft, who released the albums H. P. Lovecraft and H. P. Lovecraft II in 1967 and 1968 respectively.[244] They broke up afterwards, but later songs were released. This included «The White Ship» and «At the Mountains of Madness», both titled after Lovecraft stories.[245] Extreme metal has also been influenced by Lovecraft.[246] This has expressed itself in both the names of bands and the contents of their albums. This began in 1970 with the release of Black Sabbath’s first album, Black Sabbath, which contained a song titled Behind the Wall of Sleep, deriving its name from the 1919 story «Beyond the Wall of Sleep.»[246] Heavy metal band Metallica was also inspired by Lovecraft. They recorded a song inspired by «The Call of Cthulhu», «The Call of Ktulu», and a song based on The Shadow over Innsmouth titled «The Thing That Should Not Be».[247] These songs contain direct quotations of Lovecraft’s works.[248] Joseph Norman, a speculative scholar, has argued that there are similarities between the music described in Lovecraft’s fiction and the aesthetics and atmosphere of black metal. He argues that this is evident through the «animalistic» qualities of black metal vocals. The usage of occult elements is also cited as a thematic commonality. In terms of atmosphere, he asserts that both Lovecraft’s works and extreme metal place heavy focus on creating a strong negative mood.[249]

Games

Lovecraft has also influenced gaming, despite having personally disliked games during his lifetime.[250] Chaosium’s tabletop role-playing game Call of Cthulhu, released in 1981 and currently in its seventh major edition, was one of the first games to draw heavily from Lovecraft.[251] It includes a Lovecraft-inspired insanity mechanic, which allowed for player characters to go insane from contact with cosmic horrors. This mechanic would go on to make appearance in subsequent tabletop and video games.[252] 1987 saw the release of another Lovecraftian board game, Arkham Horror, which was published by Fantasy Flight Games.[253] Though few subsequent Lovecraftian board games were released annually from 1987 to 2014, the years after 2014 saw a rapid increase in the number of Lovecraftian board games. According to Christina Silva, this revival may have been influenced by the entry of Lovecraft’s work into the public domain and a revival of interest in board games.[254] Few video games are direct adaptations of Lovecraft’s works, but many video games have been inspired or heavily influenced by Lovecraft.[252] Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth, a Lovecraftian first-person video game, was released in 2005.[252] It is a loose adaptation of The Shadow over Innsmouth, The Shadow Out of Time, and «The Thing on the Doorstep» that uses noir themes.[255] These adaptations focus more on Lovecraft’s monsters and gamification than they do on his themes, which represents a break from Lovecraft’s core theme of human insignificance.[256]

Religion and occultism

Several contemporary religions have been influenced by Lovecraft’s works. Kenneth Grant, the founder of the Typhonian Order, incorporated Lovecraft’s Mythos into his ritual and occult system. Grant combined his interest in Lovecraft’s fiction with his adherence to Aleister Crowley’s Thelema. The Typhonian Order considers Lovecraftian entities to be symbols through which people may interact with something inhuman.[257] Grant also argued that Crowley himself was influenced by Lovecraft’s writings, particularly in the naming of characters in The Book of the Law.[258] Similarly, The Satanic Rituals, co-written by Anton LaVey and Michael A. Aquino, includes the «Ceremony of the Nine Angles», which is a ritual that was influenced by the descriptions in «The Dreams in the Witch House». It contains invocations of several of Lovecraft’s fictional gods.[259]

There have been several books that have claimed to be an authentic edition of Lovecraft’s Necronomicon.[260] The Simon Necronomicon is one such example. It was written by an unknown figure who identified themselves as «Simon». Peter Levenda, an occult author who has written about the Necronomicon, claims that he and «Simon» came across a hidden Greek translation of the grimoire while looking through a collection of antiquities at a New York bookstore during the 1960s or 1970s.[261] This book was claimed to have borne the seal of the Necronomicon. Levenda went on to claim that Lovecraft had access to this purported scroll.[262] A textual analysis has determined that the contents of this book were derived from multiple documents that discuss Mesopotamian myth and magic. The finding of a magical text by monks is also a common theme in the history of grimoires.[263] It has been suggested that Levenda is the true author of the Simon Necronomicon.[264]

Correspondence

Although Lovecraft is known mostly for his works of weird fiction, the bulk of his writing consists of voluminous letters about a variety of topics, from weird fiction and art criticism to politics and history.[265] Lovecraft biographers L. Sprague de Camp and S. T. Joshi have estimated that Lovecraft wrote 100,000 letters in his lifetime, a fifth of which are believed to survive.[266] These letters were directed at fellow writers and members of the amateur press. His involvement in the latter was what caused him to begin writing them.[267] He included comedic elements in these letters. This included posing as an eighteenth-century gentleman and signing them with pseudonyms, most commonly «Grandpa Theobald» and «E’ch-Pi-El.»[g][269] According to Joshi, the most important sets of letters were those written to Frank Belknap Long, Clark Ashton Smith, and James F. Morton. He attributes this importance to the contents of these letters. With Long, Lovecraft argued in support and in opposition to many of Long’s viewpoints. The letters to Clark Ashton Smith are characterized by their focus on weird fiction. Lovecraft and Morton debated many scholarly subjects in their letters, resulting in what Joshi has called the «single greatest correspondence Lovecraft ever wrote.»[270]

Copyright and other legal issues

Derleth facing left in 1962

Despite several claims to the contrary, there is currently no evidence that any company or individual owns the copyright to any of Lovecraft’s works, and it is generally accepted that it has passed into the public domain.[271] Lovecraft had specified that R. H. Barlow would serve as the executor of his literary estate,[272] but these instructions were not incorporated into his will. Nevertheless, his surviving aunt carried out his expressed wishes, and Barlow was given control of Lovecraft’s literary estate upon his death. Barlow deposited the bulk of the papers, including the voluminous correspondence, in the John Hay Library, and attempted to organize and maintain Lovecraft’s other writings.[273] Lovecraft protégé August Derleth, an older and more established writer than Barlow, vied for control of the literary estate. He and Donald Wandrei, a fellow protégé and co-owner of Arkham House, falsely claimed that Derleth was the true literary executor.[274] Barlow capitulated, and later committed suicide in 1951.[275] This gave Derleth and Wandrei complete control over Lovecraft’s corpus.[276]

On October 9, 1947, Derleth purchased all rights to the stories that were published in Weird Tales. However, since April 1926 at the latest, Lovecraft had reserved all second printing rights to stories published in Weird Tales. Therefore, Weird Tales only owned the rights to at most six of Lovecraft’s tales. If Derleth had legally obtained the copyrights to these tales, there is no evidence that they were renewed before the rights expired.[277] Following Derleth’s death in 1971, Donald Wandrei sued his estate to challenge Derleth’s will, which stated that he only held the copyrights and royalties to Lovecraft’s works that were published under both his and Derleth’s names. Arkham House’s lawyer, Forrest D. Hartmann, argued that the rights to Lovecraft’s works were never renewed. Wandrei won the case, but Arkham House’s actions regarding copyright have damaged their ability to claim ownership of them.[278]

In H. P. Lovecraft: A Life, S. T. Joshi concludes that Derleth’s claims are «almost certainly fictitious» and argues that most of Lovecraft’s works that were published in the amateur press are likely in the public domain. The copyright for Lovecraft’s works would have been inherited by the only surviving heir named in his 1912 will, his aunt Annie Gamwell.[279] When she died in 1941, the copyrights passed to her remaining descendants, Ethel Phillips Morrish and Edna Lewis. They signed a document, sometimes referred to as the Morrish-Lewis gift, permitting Arkham House to republish Lovecraft’s works while retaining their ownership of the copyrights.[280] Searches of the Library of Congress have failed to find any evidence that these copyrights were renewed after the 28-year period, making it likely that these works are in the public domain.[281] However, the Lovecraft literary estate, reconstituted in 1998 under Robert C. Harrall, has claimed that they own the rights. They have been based in Providence since 2009 and have been granting the rights to Lovecraft’s works to several publishers. Their claims have been criticized by scholars, such as Chris J. Karr, who has argued that the rights had not been renewed.[282] Joshi has withdrawn his support for his conclusion, and now supports the estate’s copyright claims.[283]

Bibliography

See also

  • Category:H. P. Lovecraft scholars

Explanatory notes

  1. ^ Lovecraft did not coin the term «Cthulhu Mythos». Instead, this term was coined by later authors.[1]
  2. ^ The house was later moved to 65 Prospect Street to accommodate the building of Brown University’s Art Building.[101]
  3. ^ He wrote several travelogues, including one on Quebec that was the longest singular work that he wrote.[107]
  4. ^ This is the only one of Lovecraft’s stories that was published as a book during his lifetime.[118] W. Paul Cook had previously made an abortive attempt to publish «The Shunned House» as a small book between 1927 and 1930.[119]
  5. ^ «Grippe» is an archaic term for influenza.[123]
  6. ^ L. Sprague de Camp also stated that the two men began calling each other «Monstro». This is a direct reference to the nicknames that Lovecraft gave to some of his correspondents.[202]
  7. ^ Lewis Theobald, Jun., the full version of Grandpa Theobald, was derived from the name of Lewis Theobald, an eighteenth-century Shakespearian scholar who was fictionalized in Alexander Pope’s The Dunciad.[268]

Citations

  1. ^ a b Tierney 2001, p. 52; Joshi 2010b, p. 186; de Camp 1975, p. 270.
  2. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 16; de Camp 1975, p. 12; Cannon 1989, p. 1–2.
  3. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 8; de Camp 1975, p. 11; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
  4. ^ Joshi 2010a.
  5. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 26.
  6. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 22; de Camp 1975, pp. 15–16; Faig 1991, p. 49.
  7. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 26; de Camp 1975, p. 16; Cannon 1989, p. 1.
  8. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 28; de Camp 1975, p. 17; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
  9. ^ de Camp 1975, p. 2; Cannon 1989, pp. 3–4.
  10. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 28; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
  11. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 25; de Camp 1975, pp. 17–18.
  12. ^ a b Joshi 2010a, pp. 33, 36; de Camp 1975, pp. 17–18.
  13. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 34; de Camp 1975, pp. 30–31.
  14. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 38; de Camp 1975, pp. 32; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
  15. ^ a b Lovecraft 2006a, pp. 145–146; Joshi 2001, pp. 20–23; St. Armand 1975, pp. 140–141.
  16. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 42; St. Armand 1972, pp. 3–4; de Camp 1975, pp. 18.
  17. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 60; de Camp 1975, p. 32.
  18. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 84.
  19. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 90; Cannon 1989, p. 4.
  20. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 97; Faig 1991, p. 63.
  21. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 96; de Camp 1975, pp. 37–39; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
  22. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 98; Joshi 2001, pp. 47–48; Faig 1991, p. 4.
  23. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 99.
  24. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 102; de Camp 1975, p. 36.
  25. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 116; de Camp 1975, pp. 43–45; Cannon 1989, p. 15.
  26. ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 126; de Camp 1975, pp. 51–53; Cannon 1989, p. 3.
  27. ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 126.
  28. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 126–127; de Camp 1975, p. 27.
  29. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 127.
  30. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 128; de Camp 1975, pp. 51–52.
  31. ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 128.
  32. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 66; Faig 1991, p. 65.
  33. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 67–68; de Camp 1975, p. 66; St. Armand 1972, p. 3.
  34. ^ de Camp 1975, p. 64.
  35. ^ Bonner 2015, pp. 52–53.
  36. ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 154.
  37. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 129; de Camp 1975.
  38. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 137.
  39. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 138; de Camp 1975, p. 95.
  40. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 140; de Camp 1975, pp. 76–77.
  41. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 145; de Camp 1975, p. 76–77.
  42. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 145; de Camp 1975, pp. 78–79.
  43. ^ Joshi 2010a, pp. 145–155; de Camp 1975, p. 84.
  44. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 155; de Camp 1975, pp. 84–84.
  45. ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 159.
  46. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 164.
  47. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 165.
  48. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 168; de Camp 1975, p. 153; Cannon 1989, p. 5.
  49. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 169.
  50. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 180; de Camp 1975, p. 121.
  51. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 182; de Camp 1975, pp. 121–122.
  52. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 210; Cannon 1989, p. 6.
  53. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 273; de Camp 1975, p. 125.
  54. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 239; de Camp 1975, pp. 125–126.
  55. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 240; Cannon 1989, p. 16.
  56. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 251; de Camp 1975, pp. 125–126.
  57. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 260; de Camp 1975, p. 137.
  58. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 284; de Camp 1975, p. 122.
  59. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 303; Faig 1991, p. 66.
  60. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 300; Faig 1991, pp. 66–67.
  61. ^ Joshi 1996a, p. 23; Cannon 1989, p. 3; de Camp 1975, p. 118.
  62. ^ a b Joshi 2001, p. 125.
  63. ^ a b Hess 1971, p. 249; Joshi 2001, pp. 121–122; de Camp 1975, p. 65–66.
  64. ^ Hess 1971, p. 249; Joshi 2010a, p. 301; de Camp 1975, pp. 134–135.
  65. ^ Lovecraft 2000, p. 84.
  66. ^ Faig 1991, pp. 58–59; de Camp 1975, p. 135.
  67. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 306; de Camp 1975, pp. 139–141.
  68. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 308.
  69. ^ Joshi 1996a, p. 79; de Camp 1975, pp. 141–144.
  70. ^ Joshi 1996a, p. 79; de Camp 1975, pp. 141–144; Burleson 1990, pp. 39.
  71. ^ Tierney 2001, p. 52; Leavenworth 2014, pp. 333–334.
  72. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 369; de Camp 1975, pp. 138–139.
  73. ^ de Camp 1975, p. 149; Burleson 1990, pp. 49, 52–53.
  74. ^ Burleson 1990, p. 58; Joshi 2010a, pp. 140–142.
  75. ^ Mosig 2001, pp. 17–18, 33; Joshi 2010a, pp. 140–142.
  76. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 390; de Camp 1975, p. 154; Cannon 1989, pp. 4–5.
  77. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 390; de Camp 1975, p. 154–156.
  78. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 144–145; de Camp 1975, p. 154–156; Faig 1991, p. 67.
  79. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 400; de Camp 1975, p. 152–154; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
  80. ^ Greene & Scott 1948, p. 8; Fooy 2011; de Camp 1975, p. 184.
  81. ^ Everts 2012, p. 19; Joshi 2001, pp. 201–202.
  82. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 202–203; de Camp 1975, p. 202.
  83. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 291–292; de Camp 1975, pp. 177–179, 219; Cannon 1989, p. 55.
  84. ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 136; de Camp 1975, p. 219.
  85. ^ Fooy 2011; Cannon 1989, p. 55; Joshi 2001, p. 210.
  86. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 201–202.
  87. ^ Joshi 1996b, p. 11; de Camp 1975, pp. 109–111; Greene & Scott 1948, p. 8.
  88. ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 112.
  89. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 295–298; de Camp 1975, p. 224.
  90. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 295–298; de Camp 1975, pp. 207–213.
  91. ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001; St. Armand 1972, p. 10.
  92. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 225; de Camp 1975, p. 183.
  93. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 200–201; de Camp 1975, pp. 170–172.
  94. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 216–218; de Camp 1975, pp. 230–232.
  95. ^ Lovecraft 2009b.
  96. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 223–224; Norris 2020, p. 217; de Camp 1975, pp. 242–243.
  97. ^ Pedersen 2017, p. 23; de Camp 1975, p. 270; Burleson 1990, p. 77.
  98. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 227–228; Moreland 2018, pp. 1–3; Cannon 1989, pp. 61–62.
  99. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 214–215.
  100. ^ Rubinton 2016; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
  101. ^ a b Joshi 1996a, p. 26; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
  102. ^ Pedersen 2017, p. 23; de Camp 1975, p. 270; Joshi 2001, pp. 351–354.
  103. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 351–354; St. Armand 1972, pp. 10–14.
  104. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 351–353; Goodrich 2004, pp. 37–38.
  105. ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 117; Flood 2016.
  106. ^ Cannon 1989, pp. 7–8; Evans 2005, pp. 102–105.
  107. ^ Ransom 2015, pp. 451–452; Evans 2005, p. 104; Joshi 2001, pp. 272–273.
  108. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 272–273; Cannon 1989, pp. 7–8.
  109. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 307–309; Finn 2013, pp. 148–149, 184; Vick 2021, pp. 96–102.
  110. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 307–309; Finn 2013, pp. 148–149; Vick 2021, pp. 96–102.
  111. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 307–309; Finn 2013, pp. 150–151; Vick 2021, pp. 96–102.
  112. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 273.
  113. ^ Schultz 2018, pp. 52–53.
  114. ^ Schultz 2018, pp. 52–53; Joshi 2001, p. 255; de Camp 1975, pp. 192–194.
  115. ^ Greene & Scott 1948, p. 8; Joshi 1996b, p. 455.
  116. ^ Lovecraft 1976b; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–355; Cannon 1989, pp. 10–11.
  117. ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–12; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–355.
  118. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 382–383.
  119. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 262–263.
  120. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 383–384.
  121. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 375–376; Finn 2013, pp. 294–295; Vick 2021, pp. 130–137.
  122. ^ Lovecraft 2006c, pp. 216–218; Joshi 2001, pp. 375–376; Vick 2021, p. 143.
  123. ^ Lexico Dictionaries 2020.
  124. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 370, 384–385; Cannon 1989, p. 11; de Camp 1975, pp. 415–416.
  125. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 387–388; de Camp 1975, pp. 427–428.
  126. ^ The Boston Globe 1937, p. 2; Joshi 2001, pp. 387–388.
  127. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 389; de Camp 1975, p. 428.
  128. ^ Mosig 1997, p. 114; Lovecraft 1968, pp. 50–51.
  129. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 8–16; Cannon 1989, p. 10.
  130. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 183–184.
  131. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 9; Joshi 2016, p. 161.
  132. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 16; Joshi 2001, pp. 183–184.
  133. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 94–96.
  134. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 101–102; Pedersen 2019, pp. 119–120.
  135. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 351; Pedersen 2019, pp. 141–143.
  136. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 346.
  137. ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–4; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–348; Cannon 1989, pp. 10–11.
  138. ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–35; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–348.
  139. ^ Lovecraft 2006d, pp. 85–95; Joshi 2001, pp. 349–352.
  140. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 349–352.
  141. ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–12; Joshi 2001, p. 354; Cannon 1989, p. 10.
  142. ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–12; Joshi 2001, p. 354.
  143. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 360–361.
  144. ^ Lovecraft 2006a, p. 145; Hölzing 2011, pp. 182–183.
  145. ^ Lovecraft 2006a, pp. 145–146; Joshi 2001, pp. 20–23; Zeller 2019, p. 18.
  146. ^ Lubnow 2019, pp. 3–5; Livesey 2008, pp. 3–21; Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–174.
  147. ^ Lovecraft 2006a, pp. 147–148; Joshi 2001, pp. 40, 130–133.
  148. ^ Schweitzer 1998, pp. 94–95; Evans 2005, pp. 108–110; Joshi 2015, pp. 108–110.
  149. ^ Callaghan 2011, p. 103; Spencer 2021, p. 603.
  150. ^ Steiner 2005, pp. 54–55; Evans 2005, pp. 108–109; Lovett-Graff 1997, pp. 183–186.
  151. ^ Steiner 2005, pp. 54–55; Punter 1996, p. 40.
  152. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 162–163; Hambly 1996, p. viii; Klein 2012, pp. 183–184.
  153. ^ Lovett-Graff 1997, pp. 183–187; Evans 2005, pp. 123–125; Klein 2012, pp. 183–184.
  154. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 221–223; Steiner 2005, pp. 54–55.
  155. ^ Schweitzer 1998, pp. 94–95; Evans 2005, p. 125; Joshi 2015, pp. 108–110.
  156. ^ Joshi 2015, p. 109.
  157. ^ Ransom 2015, pp. 451–452; Evans 2005, pp. 109–110.
  158. ^ Joshi 2015, p. 108–109; Evans 2005, pp. 109–110.
  159. ^ Pedersen 2017, pp. 26–27; Joshi 2001, pp. 21–24.
  160. ^ a b c Pedersen 2017, pp. 26–27; Joshi 2001, pp. 47–48.
  161. ^ Pedersen 2018, pp. 172–173; Joshi 2013, p. 263; St. Armand 1975, p. 129.
  162. ^ Jamneck 2012, pp. 126–151; St. Armand 1975, pp. 129–130.
  163. ^ Joshi 2017, pp. x–xi.
  164. ^ Lovecraft 2009a; Jamneck 2012, pp. 126–151; Cannon 1989, pp. 101–103.
  165. ^ Jamneck 2012, pp. 126–151.
  166. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 135–137; Schweitzer 2018, pp. 139–143; Joshi 2013, pp. 260–261.
  167. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 253.
  168. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 168–169; Joshi 2001, pp. 228–229; St. Armand 1975, p. 142.
  169. ^ a b St. Armand 1975, pp. 127–128.
  170. ^ St. Armand 1975, p. 127.
  171. ^ St. Armand 1975, pp. 129–131.
  172. ^ St. Armand 1975, pp. 133–137.
  173. ^ St. Armand 1975, pp. 145–150.
  174. ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–173; Rottensteiner 1992, pp. 117–121.
  175. ^ Woodard 2011, p. 6; Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–173.
  176. ^ Lubnow 2019, pp. 3–5; Livesey 2008, pp. 3–21; Joshi 2010b, p. 174.
  177. ^ Lovecraft 2010, p. 97; Pedersen 2017, p. 23; de Camp 1975, p. 270.
  178. ^ Macrobert 2015, pp. 34–39; Burleson 1991–1992, pp. 7–12.
  179. ^ Burleson 1991–1992, pp. 7–12.
  180. ^ Lovecraft 2014, p. 7.
  181. ^ Touponce 2013, pp. 62–63; Matthews 2018, p. 177; Burleson 1990, pp. 156–160.
  182. ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 186–187; Burleson 1990, pp. 156–157.
  183. ^ Leiber 2001, p. 6; Lacy & Zani 2007, p. 70; Burleson 1990, pp. 158–159.
  184. ^ Burleson 1990, pp. 156–158; Joshi 1996a, p. 124; Pedersen 2017, pp. 28–33.
  185. ^ Burleson 1990, pp. 156–158.
  186. ^ Burleson 1990, pp. 156–158; Joshi 1996a, pp. 262–263.
  187. ^ St. Armand 1972, pp. 14–15; Joshi 1996a, p. 124; Cannon 1989, p. 73.
  188. ^ Joshi 2016, p. 320; St. Armand 1975, pp. 129–130.
  189. ^ Joshi 2016, p. 314–320; St. Armand 1975, pp. 131–132.
  190. ^ Joshi 2016, pp. 314–320.
  191. ^ Joshi 2016, p. 316.
  192. ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–172.
  193. ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 183–188; Martin 2012, p. 99; Burleson 1990, pp. 107–110.
  194. ^ Hull 2006, pp. 10–12.
  195. ^ Look 2016, pp. 101–103; Halpurn & Labossiere 2009, pp. 512–513.
  196. ^ Butler 2014, pp. 131–135; St. Armand 1975, p. 129.
  197. ^ Butler 2014, pp. 131–135.
  198. ^ Murray 1986, pp. 54–67.
  199. ^ Murray 1991–1992, pp. 19–29; Burleson 1990, pp. 106, 118.
  200. ^ Murray 1991–1992, pp. 19–29.
  201. ^ Wilson 1950, pp. 286–290.
  202. ^ de Camp 1979, p. 5.
  203. ^ de Camp 1979, p. 5; Cannon 1989, p. 126.
  204. ^ Scott 1943, p. 41.
  205. ^ Cuppy 1944, p. 10.
  206. ^ a b Gale 1960, pp. 100–103.
  207. ^ Wilson 1975, pp. 1–10.
  208. ^ Lovecraft 2013, pp. xiii–xiv.
  209. ^ Dirda 2012.
  210. ^ Mamatas 2014.
  211. ^ Lovecraft Annual 2007, p. 160; Eberhart 2005, p. 82; Grant 2005, p. 146.
  212. ^ Joshi 2015, pp. 105–116; Sperling 2016, p. 75; Hantke 2013, pp. 137–138.
  213. ^ Sederholm & Weinstock 2016, pp. 2, 8–9.
  214. ^ Gray 2014; Dirda 2005.
  215. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 91, 252.
  216. ^ Oates 1996.
  217. ^ a b Wohleber 1995.
  218. ^ King 1987, p. 63.
  219. ^ Peak 2020, pp. 169–172; Elfren 2016.
  220. ^ Harman 2012, pp. 3–4; Elfren 2016, pp. 88–89; Peak 2020, pp. 177–178.
  221. ^ Harman 2012, pp. 3–4; Powell 2019, p. 263; Peak 2020, pp. 177–178.
  222. ^ Harman 2012, pp. 3–4; Powell 2019, p. 263; Elfren 2016, pp. 88–89.
  223. ^ Sperling 2016, pp. 75–78.
  224. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 390; Dirda 2005; Cannon 1989, p. 1.
  225. ^ Schoell 2004, pp. 8–40.
  226. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 141–142.
  227. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 390–391; de Camp 1975, p. 132; Hantke 2013, p. 135–136.
  228. ^ Tierney 2001, p. 52–53; de Camp 1975, pp. 434–435; Joshi 1984, pp. 62–64.
  229. ^ Tierney 2001, p. 52; de Camp 1975, pp. 434–435; Joshi 1984, pp. 62–64.
  230. ^ Talbot 2014.
  231. ^ Janicker 2015, pp. 473; Norris 2018, pp. 158–159; Nelson 2012, pp. 221–222.
  232. ^ a b Cruz 2015.
  233. ^ Flood 2015.
  234. ^ Locus Online 2017.
  235. ^ The Hugo Awards 2020.
  236. ^ Joshi 1984, pp. 62–64; Joshi 1985a, pp. 19–25; Joshi 1985b, pp. 54–58.
  237. ^ Rubinton 2016; Joshi 2001, pp. 219.
  238. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 5–6; Oates 1996; Mariconda 2010, pp. 208–209.
  239. ^ a b Hantke 2013, p. 138; Peak 2020, p. 163; Dirda 2005.
  240. ^ Dziemianowicz 2010; Peak 2020, p. 163; Dirda 2005.
  241. ^ Siclen 2015; Smith 2017; Dirda 2019.
  242. ^ Bilow 2013.
  243. ^ Hill & Joshi 2006, p. 7; Sederholm 2016, pp. 266–267.
  244. ^ Hill & Joshi 2006, pp. 19–24; Sederholm 2016, p. 271.
  245. ^ Hill & Joshi 2006, pp. 19–24.
  246. ^ a b Norman 2013, pp. 193–194.
  247. ^ Griwkowsky 2008; Sederholm 2016, pp. 271–272; Norman 2013, pp. 193–194.
  248. ^ Sederholm 2016, pp. 271–272.
  249. ^ Norman 2013, pp. 197–202.
  250. ^ Lovecraft 1976a, p. 13; Carbonell 2019, p. 137.
  251. ^ Carbonell 2019, p. 160; Gollop 2017; Garrad 2021, p. 25.
  252. ^ a b c Gollop 2017.
  253. ^ Gollop 2017; Silva 2017; Garrad 2021, pp. 26–27.
  254. ^ Silva 2017.
  255. ^ Garrad 2021, pp. 27–28.
  256. ^ Garrad 2021, p. 28.
  257. ^ Engle 2014, pp. 89–90; Matthews 2018, pp. 178–179.
  258. ^ Engle 2014, p. 89–90.
  259. ^ Engle 2014, p. 91.
  260. ^ Clore 2001, pp. 61–69.
  261. ^ Levenda 2014.
  262. ^ Matthews 2018, pp. 178–179.
  263. ^ Davies 2009, p. 268.
  264. ^ Flatley 2013.
  265. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–242; Cannon 1989, p. 10; de Camp 1975, p. xii.
  266. ^ de Camp 1975, p. xii; Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–237.
  267. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–239.
  268. ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, pp. 217–218; Wetzel 1983, pp. 19–20.
  269. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 245–246; Joshi & Schultz 2001, pp. 217–218; de Camp 1975, pp. 113–114.
  270. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–242.
  271. ^ Karr 2018, Conclusion; Wetzel 1983, p. 12; Wallace 2023, p. 27–28.
  272. ^ Lovecraft 2006b, p. 237; Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights; Joshi 1996b.
  273. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 390; de Camp 1975, p. 430–432; Wetzel 1983, pp. 3–4.
  274. ^ Joshi 1996b, p. 640–641; de Camp 1975, p. 430–432; Wetzel 1983, pp. 4–6.
  275. ^ de Camp 1975, p. 432; Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights; Wetzel 1983, pp. 10–12.
  276. ^ Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights; Wetzel 1983, p. 11; Wallace 2023, p. 35.
  277. ^ Karr 2018, The Arkham House Copyright Hypothesis; Joshi 1996b, p. 640–641; Wallace 2023, p. 42.
  278. ^ Karr 2018, The «Donald Wandrei v. The Estate of August Derleth» Hypothesis; Wallace 2023, p. 38–39.
  279. ^ Joshi 1996b, p. 640; Lovecraft 2006b, p. 237; Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights.
  280. ^ Karr 2018, The Arkham House Copyright Hypothesis; Joshi 1996b, p. 641; Wetzel 1983, pp. 24–25.
  281. ^ Karr 2018, Conclusion; Wetzel 1983, p. 25.
  282. ^ Karr 2018, Coda; Wallace 2023, p. 41.
  283. ^ Karr 2018, Coda; Wallace 2023, p. 42.

General and cited sources

  • «1945 Retro-Hugo Awards». The Hugo Awards. 2020. Archived from the original on August 1, 2020.
  • «2016 SF&F Hall of Fame Inductees». Locus Online. January 17, 2017. Archived from the original on December 22, 2019.
  • Bilow, Michael (July 27, 2013). «We are Providence: The H.P. Lovecraft Community». Motif Magazine. Archived from the original on October 17, 2013.
  • Bonner, Marian F. (2015). «Miscellaneous Impressions of H.P.L.». Lovecraft Annual (9): 52–53. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868496.
  • «Briefly Noted». Lovecraft Annual (1): 160. 2007. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868367.
  • Burleson, Donald R. (1990). Lovecraft: Disturbing the Universe (First ed.). Lexington, Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 978-0-8131-9319-9. JSTOR j.ctt130jf9h. OCLC 895675279.
  • Burleson, Donald R. (1991–1992). «Lovecraft: Dreams and Reality». Books at Brown. 38–39: 7–12. ISSN 0147-0787. Archived from the original on April 20, 2021 – via Brown Digital Repository.
  • Butler, James O. (2014). «Terror and Terrain: The Environmental Semantics of Lovecraft County». Lovecraft Annual (8): 131–149. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868485.
  • Callaghan, Gavin (2011). «Blacks, Boxers, and Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual. 5 (1): 102–111. JSTOR 26868430.
  • Cannon, Peter (1989). H. P. Lovecraft. Twayne’s United States Authors Series. Vol. 549. Boston: Twayne. ISBN 0-8057-7539-0. OCLC 246440364.
  • Carbonell, Curtis D. (2019). «Lovecraft’s (Cthulhu) Mythos». Dread Trident: Tabletop Role-Playing Games and the Modern Fantastic. Liverpool University Press. pp. 137–165. doi:10.3828/liverpool/9781789620573.003.0005. ISBN 978-1-78962-468-7. JSTOR j.ctv12pntt4.8. OCLC 1155494616. S2CID 219891871.
  • Clore, Dan (n.d.) [first published Fall 2001]. «The Lurker on the Threshold of Interpretation: Hoax Necronomicons and Paratextual Noise». Lovecraft Studies (42–43): 61–69. ISSN 0899-8361. Archived from the original on October 26, 2009 – via Yahoo! GeoCities.
  • Cruz, Lenika (November 12, 2015). «‘Political Correctness’ Won’t Ruin H.P. Lovecraft’s Legacy». The Atlantic. Archived from the original on November 17, 2015.
  • Cuppy, Will (January 2, 1944). «Review of Beyond the Wall of Sleep». New York Herald Tribune. p. 10. ISSN 1941-0646.
  • Davies, Owen (2009). Grimoires: A History of Magic Books. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-150924-7. OCLC 434863058.
  • de Camp, L. Sprague (March 1979). «H. P. Lovecraft and Edmund Wilson». Fantasy Mongers. No. 1. ISSN 8755-7479.
  • de Camp, L. Sprague (1975). Lovecraft: A Biography (First ed.). Garden City, New York: Doubleday. ISBN 0-385-00578-4. OCLC 979196. S2CID 190754775.
  • Dirda, Michael (2012). «Cthulhu for President». The Times Literary Supplement. Archived from the original on June 30, 2020.
  • Dirda, Michael (September 4, 2019). «Dispatch from a ‘Horror’ Convention: It Began in a Dark, Candlelit Room . . «. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. ProQuest 2284363189. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
  • Dirda, Michael (March 7, 2005). «The Horror, the Horror!». The Weekly Standard. ISSN 1083-3013. Archived from the original on November 5, 2009.
  • Dziemianowicz, Stefan (July 12, 2010). «Terror Eternal: The Enduring Popularity of H. P. Lovecraft». Publishers Weekly. ISSN 0000-0019. ProQuest 609957378.
  • Eberhart, John Mark (February 13, 2005). «The Library of Lovecraft». The Kansas City Star. p. 82. ISSN 0745-1067. Archived from the original on December 16, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  • Elfren, Isabella van (2016). «Hyper-Cacophony: Lovecraft, Speculative Realism, and Sonic Materialism». In Sederholm, Carl H.; Weinstock, Jeffrey Andrew (eds.). The Age of Lovecraft. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 79–96. ISBN 978-0-8166-9925-4. JSTOR 10.5749/j.ctt1b9x1f3.8. OCLC 945632985. S2CID 194316992.
  • Engle, John (October 15, 2014). «Cults of Lovecraft: The Impact of H.P. Lovecraft’s Fiction on Contemporary Occult Practices». Mythlore. 33 (125): 85–98. JSTOR 26815942. S2CID 159074285 – via SWOSU Digital Commons.
  • Evans, Timothy H. (2005). «A Last Defense against the Dark: Folklore, Horror, and the Uses of Tradition in the Works of H. P. Lovecraft». Journal of Folklore Research. 42 (1): 99–135. doi:10.2979/JFR.2005.42.1.99. ISSN 0737-7037. JSTOR 3814792. S2CID 162356996.
  • Everts, R. Alain (June 22, 2012) [first published July 1974]. «Howard Phillips Lovecraft and Sex: or The Sex Life of a Gentleman». Nyctalops. Vol. 2, no. 2. p. 19. Archived from the original on October 25, 2019 – via The H. P. Lovecraft Archive.
  • Faig, Kenneth W. Jr. (1991). «The Parents of Howard Phillips Lovecraft». In Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (eds.). An Epicure in the Terrible: A Centennial Anthology of Essays in Honor of H. P. Lovecraft (First ed.). Madison, New Jersey: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. pp. 45–77. ISBN 0-8386-3415-X. OCLC 22766987.
  • Finn, Mark (2013). Blood and Thunder: The Life and Art of Robert E. Howard (Third ed.). Cross Plains, Texas: Robert E. Howard Foundation Press. ISBN 978-1-304-03152-5. OCLC 923870328.
  • Flatley, Joseph L. (November 12, 2013). «The Cult of Cthulhu: Real Prayer for a Fake Tentacle». The Verge. Archived from the original on October 29, 2019.
  • Flood, Alison (March 16, 2016). «Lost HP Lovecraft Work Commissioned by Houdini Escapes Shackles of History». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on October 8, 2016.
  • Flood, Alison (November 9, 2015). «World Fantasy Award Drops HP Lovecraft as Prize Image». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 18, 2015.
  • Fooy, Frederick (October 27, 2011). «Resident Horror Genius». South Brooklyn Post. Archived from the original on August 2, 2016.
  • Gale, Floyd C. (April 1960). «Galaxy’s 5 Star Shelf». Galaxy Science Fiction. pp. 100–103.
  • Garrad, Jonathan (November 15, 2021). «Gamifying Fictions of Defeat: Adaptations of Lovecraft to Games Media». Studies in Gothic Fiction. 7: 20–29. ISSN 2156-2407.
  • Gollop, Julian (November 16, 2017). «The Gollop Chamber: Where Are All the Lovecraftian Games?». PC Gamer. Archived from the original on March 7, 2018.
  • Goodrich, Peter (2004). «Mannerism and the Macabre in H. P. Lovecraft’s Dunsanian ‘Dream-Quest’«. Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 15 (1 (57)): 37–48. ISSN 0897-0521. JSTOR 43308683.
  • Grant, Gavin J. (April 17, 2005). «That Delicious Feeling of Dread». The Los Angeles Times. p. 146. ISSN 0458-3035. Archived from the original on December 16, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  • Gray, John (October 24, 2014). «Weird Realism: John Gray on the Moral Universe of H P Lovecraft». New Statesman. ISSN 1758-924X. Archived from the original on April 14, 2016.
  • Greene, Sonia; Scott, Winfield Townley (August 22, 1948). «Howard Phillips Lovecraft as His Wife Remembers Him». The Providence Journal. p. 8. ISSN 2574-3406. Archived from the original on May 12, 2022.
  • Griwkowsky, Fish (December 8, 2008). «Interview with James Hetfield». Jam.canoe.ca. Archived from the original on May 24, 2012.
  • «Grippe». Lexico Dictionaries. Archived from the original on January 23, 2020. Retrieved January 23, 2020.
  • Halpurn, Paul; Labossiere, Michael C. (2009). «Mind Out of Time: Identity, Perception, and the Fourth Dimension in H. P. Lovecraft’s ‘The Shadow Out of Time’ and ‘The Dreams in the Witch House’«. Extrapolation. 50 (3): 512–533, 375. doi:10.3828/extr.2009.50.3.8. ISSN 0014-5483. S2CID 162319821. ProQuest 2152642098.
  • Hambly, Barbara (1996). «Introduction: The Man Who Loved His Craft». The Transition of H. P. Lovecraft: The Road to Madness (First ed.). New York: Ballantine Books. pp. vii–x. ISBN 0-345-38422-9. OCLC 34669226.
  • Hantke, Steffen (2013). «From the Library of America to the Mountains of Madness: Recent Discourse on H. P. Lovecraft». In Simmons, David (ed.). New Critical Essays on H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 135–156. doi:10.1057/9781137320964_9. ISBN 978-1-137-32096-4. OCLC 5576363673. S2CID 163339940.
  • Harman, Graham (2012). Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy. Winchester: John Hunt Publishing. ISBN 978-1-78099-907-4. OCLC 1058277738.
  • Hess, Clara (1971). «Addenda to ‘H.P.L.: A Memoir’«. In Derleth, August (ed.). Something about Cats, and Other Pieces (First ed.). Books for Libraries Press. pp. 247–277. ISBN 0-8369-2410-X. OCLC 222440.
  • Hill, Gary; Joshi, S. T. (2006). The Strange Sound of Cthulhu: Music Inspired by the Writings of H. P. Lovecraft. United States: Music Street Journal. ISBN 978-1-84728-776-2. OCLC 128175889.
  • Hölzing, Roland (2011). «Lovecraft: A Gentleman without Five Senses». Lovecraft Annual (5): 181–187. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868439.
  • Hull, Thomas (2006). «H.P. Lovecraft: A Horror in Higher Dimensions». Math Horizons. Vol. 13, no. 3. pp. 10–12. doi:10.1080/10724117.2006.11974625. ISSN 1072-4117. JSTOR 25678597.
  • Jamneck, Lynne (2012). «Tekeli-li! Disturbing Language in Edgar Allan Poe and H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (6): 126–151. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868454.
  • Janicker, Rebecca (2015). «Visions of Monstrosity: Lovecraft, Adaptation and the Comics Arts». Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 26 (3 (94)): 469–488. ISSN 0897-0521. JSTOR 26321171.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2001). A Dreamer and a Visionary: H. P. Lovecraft in His Time. Liverpool Science Fiction Texts and Studies. Vol. 26 (First ed.). Liverpool University Press. doi:10.5949/upo9781846312991. ISBN 978-1-84631-299-1. JSTOR j.ctt5vjhg7. OCLC 276177497.
  • Joshi, S. T. (1996a). A Subtler Magick: The Writings and Philosophy of H.P. Lovecraft (Third ed.). Berkeley Heights, New Jersey: Wildside Press. ISBN 1-880448-61-0. OCLC 4566934. S2CID 169172551.
  • Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (2001). An H.P. Lovecraft Encyclopedia (First ed.). Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 0-313-01682-8. OCLC 608158798.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2015). «Charles Baxter on Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (9): 105–122. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868501.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2013). «Lovecraft’s ‘Dunsanian Studies’«. In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Critical Essays on Lord Dunsany. Scarecrow Press. pp. 241–264. ISBN 978-0-8108-9235-4. OCLC 1026953908.
  • Joshi, S. T. (1996b). H. P. Lovecraft: A Life (First ed.). West Warwick, Rhode Island: Necronomicon Press. ISBN 0-940884-89-5. OCLC 34906142.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2016). H. P. Lovecraft: The Decline of the West (First ed.). Wildside Press. ISBN 978-1-4794-2754-3. OCLC 988396691.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2010a). I Am Providence: The Life and Times of H. P. Lovecraft (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. ISBN 978-0-9824296-7-9. OCLC 650504348. S2CID 190428196.
  • Joshi, S. T. (1984). «The Development of Lovecraftian Studies 1971–1982 (Part I)». Lovecraft Studies. 3 (2): 62–71. ISSN 0899-8361.
  • Joshi, S. T. (1985a). «The Development of Lovecraftian Studies, 1971–1982 (Part II)». Lovecraft Studies. 4 (1): 18–28. ISSN 0899-8361.
  • Joshi, S. T. (1985b). «The Development of Lovecraftian Studies, 1971–1982 (Part III)». Lovecraft Studies. 4 (2): 54–65. ISSN 0899-8361.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2017). «Foreword». In Moreland, Sean (ed.). The Lovecraftian Poe: Essays on Influence, Reception, Interpretation, and Transformation. Bethlehem, Pennsylvania: Lehigh University Press. pp. ix–xiv. ISBN 978-1-61146-241-8. OCLC 973481779.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2010b). «Time, Space, and Natural Law: Science and Pseudo-Science in Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (4): 171–201. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868421.
  • Karr, Chris J. (July 10, 2018). «The Black Seas of Copyright». Aetherial. Archived from the original on April 25, 2020.
  • King, Stephen (1987). Danse Macabre. Berkley. ISBN 0-425-06462-X. OCLC 10242612. Archived from the original on October 4, 2013.
  • Klein, Anna (2012). «Misperceptions of Malignity: Narrative Form and the Threat to America’s Modernity in ‘The Shadow over Innsmouth’«. Lovecraft Annual (6): 182–198. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868459.
  • Lacy, Jeff; Zani, Steven J. (2007). «The Negative Mystics of the Mechanistic Sublime: Walter Benjamin and Lovecraft’s Cosmicism». Lovecraft Annual (1): 65–83. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868355. S2CID 11647892.
  • Leavenworth, Van (2014). «The Developing Storyworld of H. P. Lovecraft». In Ryan, Marie-Laure; Thon, Jan-Noël (eds.). Storyworlds Across Media: Toward a Media-Conscious Narratology. Frontiers of Narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. pp. 332–350. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1d9nkdg.20. ISBN 978-0-8032-5532-6. JSTOR j.ctt1d9nkdg.20. OCLC 880964681. S2CID 190258640.
  • Leiber, Fritz (2001) [first published 1949]. «A Literary Copernicus». In Schweitzer, Darrell (ed.). Discovering H. P. Lovecraft (Revised ed.). Holicong, Pennsylvania: Wildside Press. pp. 7–16. ISBN 1-58715-470-6. OCLC 48212283.
  • Levenda, Peter (November 30, 2014). «Finding the Simon Necronomicon». The Lip TV. Archived from the original on February 6, 2022 – via YouTube.
  • Livesey, T. R. (2008). «Dispatches from the Providence Observatory: Astronomical Motifs and Sources in the Writings of H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (2): 3–87. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868370.
  • Look, Daniel M. (2016). «Queer Geometry and Higher Dimensions: Mathematics in the Fiction of H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (10): 101–120. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868515.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2010) [written November 22, 1930]. «Religion and Indeterminacy». In Joshi, S. T.; Hitchens, Christopher (eds.). Against Religion: The Atheist Writings of H.P. Lovecraft. New York: Sporting Gentlemen. pp. 87–99. ISBN 978-0-578-05248-9. OCLC 665081122.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (August 20, 2009a). «At the Mountains of Madness». The H. P. Lovecraft Archive. Archived from the original on February 25, 2017.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2006a) [first published February 1922]. «A Confession of Unfaith». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 145–148. ISBN 978-0976159230. OCLC 54350507.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2006b). «Instructions in Case of Decease». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 237–240. ISBN 978-0-9721644-1-2. OCLC 875361303.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2006c) [first published 1936]. «In Memoriam: Robert Ervin Howard». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 216–218. ISBN 978-0976159230. OCLC 54350507.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2006d) [written February 22, 1933]. «Some Repetitions on the Times». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 85–95. ISBN 978-0976159230. OCLC 54350507.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (August 20, 2009b). «He». The H. P. Lovecraft Archive. Archived from the original on March 23, 2021.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2014). Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (eds.). «Letters to Farnsworth Wright». Lovecraft Annual (8): 5–59. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868482.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2000). «Amateur Journalism». In Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (eds.). Lord of a Visible World: An Autobiography in Letters. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press. pp. 39–86. ISBN 0-8214-1332-5. OCLC 43567292.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (1968) [sent May 16, 1926]. «To James F. Morton». In Derleth, August; Wandrei, Donald (eds.). Selected Letters. Vol. II. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. pp. 50–51. ISBN 0-87054-034-3. OCLC 1152654519.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (1976a). Derleth, August; Wandrei, Donald (eds.). Selected Letters. Vol. IV. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. ISBN 0-87054-035-1. OCLC 20590805.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (1976b) [sent February 7, 1937]. «To Catherine L. Moore». In Derleth, August; Wandrei, Donald (eds.). Selected Letters. Vol. V. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. pp. 407–408. ISBN 0-87054-036-X. OCLC 1000556488.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2013). Luckhurst, Roger (ed.). The Classic Horror Stories. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-164088-9. OCLC 958573276. S2CID 190969085.
  • Lovett-Graff, Bennett (1997). «Shadows over Lovecraft: Reactionary Fantasy and Immigrant Eugenics». Extrapolation. 38 (3): 175–192. doi:10.3828/extr.1997.38.3.175. ISSN 0014-5483. S2CID 164434496. ProQuest 234914041.
  • Lubnow, Fred S. (2019). «The Lovecraftian Solar System». Lovecraft Annual (13): 3–26. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868571.
  • Macrobert, Franch A. (2015). «Cosmic Dread: The Astronomy of H. P. Lovecraft». Sky & Telescope. Vol. 129, no. 2. pp. 34–39. ISSN 0037-6604.
  • Mamatas, Nick (November 24, 2014). «The Real Mr. Difficult, or Why Cthulhu Threatens to Destroy the Canon, Self-Interested Literary Essayists, and the Universe Itself. Finally». Los Angeles Review of Books. Archived from the original on June 15, 2016.
  • Mariconda, Steven J. (2010). «Review of I Am Providence: The Life and Times of H. P. Lovecraft«. Lovecraft Annual (4): 208–215. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868424.
  • Martin, Sean Elliot (2012). «Lovecraft, Absurdity, and the Modernist Grotesque». Lovecraft Annual (6): 82–112. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868452.
  • Matthews, Carol S. (April 15, 2018). «Letting Sleeping Abnormalities Lie: Lovecraft and the Futility of Divination». Mythlore. 36 (2): 165–184. JSTOR 26809310. S2CID 165217534. ProQuest 2036317509 – via SWOSU Digital Commons.
  • Moreland, Sean (2018). «Introduction: The Critical (After)Life of Supernatural Horror in Literature«. New Directions in Supernatural Horror Literature: The Critical Influence of H. P. Lovecraft. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 1–9. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95477-6_1. ISBN 978-3-319-95477-6.
  • Mosig, Yōzan Dirk W. (1997). «Life After Lovecraft: Reminiscences of a Non-Entity». Mosig at Last: A Psychologist Looks at H.P. Lovecraft. West Warwick, Rhode Island: Necronomicon Press. pp. 111–116. ISBN 978-0-940884-90-8. OCLC 681921217.
  • Mosig, Yōzan Dirk W. (2001) [first published 1974]. «The Four Faces of the Outsider». In Schweitzer, Darrell (ed.). Discovering H. P. Lovecraft. Holicog, Pennsylvania: Wildside Press. pp. 17–34. ISBN 978-1-4344-4912-2. OCLC 114786517.
  • Murray, Will (October 1, 1986). «In Search of Arkham Country». Lovecraft Studies. 5 (2): 54–67. ISSN 0899-8361.
  • Murray, Will (1991–1992). «Lovecraft’s Arkham Country». Books at Brown. 38–39: 19–29. ISSN 0147-0787. Archived from the original on April 20, 2021 – via Brown Digital Repository.
  • Nelson, Victoria (2012). «Cathedral Head: The Gothick Cosmos of Guillermo del Toro». Gothicka. Harvard University Press. pp. 219–237. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674065406.c10. ISBN 978-0-674-05014-3. JSTOR j.ctt24hj8c.13. S2CID 191845332.
  • Norman, Joseph (2013). «‘Sounds Which Filled Me with an Indefinable Dread’: The Cthulhu Mythopoeia of H. P. Lovecraft in ‘Extreme’ Metal». In Simmons, David (ed.). New Critical Essays on H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 193–208. doi:10.1057/9781137320964_11. ISBN 978-1-137-32096-4. OCLC 5576363673. S2CID 192763998.
  • Norris, Duncan (2018). «The Void: A Lovecraftian Analysis». Lovecraft Annual (12): 149–164. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868564.
  • Norris, Duncan (2020). «Zeitgeist and Untoten: Lovecraft and the Walking Dead». Lovecraft Annual (14): 189–240. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26939817.
  • «Notable Persons Interred at Swan Point Cemetery». Swan Point Cemetery. Archived from the original on January 22, 2016.
  • Oates, Joyce Carol (October 31, 1996). «The King of Weird». The New York Review of Books. Vol. 43, no. 17. ISSN 0028-7504. Archived from the original on September 10, 2009.
  • Peak, David (2020). «Horror of the Real: H.P. Lovecraft’s Old Ones and Contemporary Speculative Philosophy». In Rosen, Matt (ed.). Diseases of the Head: Essays on the Horrors of Speculative Philosophy. Santa Barbara, California: Punctum Books. pp. 163–180. doi:10.2307/j.ctv19cwdpb.7. ISBN 978-1-953035-10-3. JSTOR j.ctv19cwdpb.7. OCLC 1227264756. S2CID 229019856.
  • Pedersen, Jan B. W. (2018). «Howard Phillips Lovecraft: Romantic on the Nightside». Lovecraft Annual (12): 165–173. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868565.
  • Pedersen, Jan B. W. (2019). ««Now Will You Be Good?»: Lovecraft, Teetotalism, and Philosophy». Lovecraft Annual (13): 119–144. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868581.
  • Pedersen, Jan B. W. (2017). «On Lovecraft’s Lifelong Relationship with Wonder». Lovecraft Annual (11): 23–36. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868530.
  • Powell, Anna (2019). «Thinking the Thing: The Outer Reaches of Knowledge in Lovecraft and Deleuze». In Hogle, Jerrold E.; Miles, Robert (eds.). The Gothic and Theory: An Edinburgh Companion. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 260–278. doi:10.3366/edinburgh/9781474427777.003.0014. ISBN 978-1-4744-2777-7. JSTOR 10.3366/j.ctvggx38r.17. OCLC 1145928444. S2CID 213917604.
  • Punter, David (1996). The Literature of Terror: A History of Gothic Fictions from 1765 to the Present Day. Vol. II. New York: Longman. ISBN 0-582-23714-9. OCLC 1072397754.
  • Ransom, Amy J. (2015). «Lovecraft in Quebec: Transcultural Fertilization and Esther Rochon’s Reevaluation of the Powers of Horror». Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 26 (3 (94)): 450–468. ISSN 0897-0521. JSTOR 26321170. S2CID 165970090. ProQuest 1861072902.
  • Rottensteiner, Franz (1992). «Lovecraft as Philosopher». Science Fiction Studies. 19 (1): 117–121. ISSN 0091-7729. JSTOR 4240129.
  • Rubinton, Noel (August 10, 2016). «How to Find the Spirit of H.P. Lovecraft in Providence». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. ProQuest 1810306270. Archived from the original on October 13, 2018.
  • Sederholm, Carl H. (2016). «H. P. Lovecraft, Heavy Metal, and Cosmicism». Rock Music Studies. 3 (3): 266–280. doi:10.1080/19401159.2015.1121644. ISSN 1940-1159. S2CID 194537597.
  • Sederholm, Carl H.; Weinstock, Jeffrey Andrew (2016). «Introduction: Lovecraft Rising». The Age of Lovecraft. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 1–42. ISBN 978-1-4529-5023-5. JSTOR 10.5749/j.ctt1b9x1f3.5. OCLC 945632985.
  • Schoell, William (2004). H.P. Lovecraft: Master of Weird Fiction (First ed.). Greensboro, North Carolina: Morgan Reynolds. ISBN 1-931798-15-X. OCLC 903506614.
  • Schultz, David E. (2018). «‘Whaddya Make Them Eyes at Me For?’: Lovecraft and Book Publishers». Lovecraft Annual (12): 51–65. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868555.
  • Schweitzer, Darrell (2018). «Lovecraft, Aristeas, Dunsany, and the Dream Journey». Lovecraft Annual (12): 136–143. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868561.
  • Schweitzer, Darrell (1998). Windows of the Imagination: Essays on Fantastic Literature. Berkeley Heights, New Jersey: Wildside Press. ISBN 1-880448-60-2. OCLC 48566644. S2CID 190964524.
  • Scott, Winfield Townley (December 26, 1943). «The Case of Howard Phillips Lovecraft of Providence, R.I.» The Providence Journal. p. 41. ISSN 2574-3406. Retrieved August 23, 2021 – via GenealogyBank.com.
  • Siclen, Bill Van (August 16, 2015). «NecronomiCon Providence to celebrate life and work of H. P. Lovecraft». The Providence Journal. ISSN 2574-3406. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
  • Silva, Christianna (June 7, 2017). «H. P. Lovecraft’s Monster Is Wrapping Family Game Night Up In Tentacles». National Public Radio. Archived from the original on February 28, 2018.
  • Smith, Andy (August 16, 2017). «NecronomiCon, homage to H. P. Lovecraft, returns to Providence». The Providence Journal. ISSN 2574-3406. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
  • Spencer, E. Mariah (2021). «Aliens, Robots & Virtual Reality Idols in the Science Fiction of H.P Lovecraft, Isaac Asimov and William Gibson». Science Fiction Studies. 48 (3): 600–604. doi:10.1353/sfs.2021.0055. ISSN 0091-7729. JSTOR 10.5621/sciefictstud.48.3.0600. S2CID 245664184.
  • Sperling, Alison (2016). «H. P. Lovecraft’s Weird Body». Lovecraft Annual (10): 75–100. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868514.
  • St. Armand, Barton Levi (1972). «Facts in the Case of H. P. Lovecraft» (PDF). Rhode Island History. 31 (1): 3–20. ISSN 0035-4619 – via Rhode Island Historical Society.
  • St. Armand, Barton Levi (1975). «H. P. Lovecraft: New England Decadent». Caliban. 12 (1): 127–155. doi:10.3406/calib.1975.1046. eISSN 2431-1766. S2CID 220649713.
  • Steiner, Bernd (2005). H. P. Lovecraft and the Literature of the Fantastic: Explorations in a Literary Genre. Munich: GRIN Verlag. ISBN 978-3-638-84462-8. OCLC 724541939.
  • Talbot, Nick (August 31, 2014). «All About Alienation: Alan Moore On Lovecraft And Providence». The Quietus.
  • Tierney, Richard L. (2001) [first published 1972]. «The Derleth Mythos». In Schweitzer, Darrell (ed.). Discovering H. P. Lovecraft. Holicog, Pennsylvania: Wildside Press. pp. 52–53. ISBN 978-1-4344-4912-2. OCLC 114786517.
  • Touponce, William F. (2013). Lord Dunsany, H. P. Lovecraft, and Ray Bradbury: Spectral Journeys. Studies in Supernatural Literature. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-9220-0. OCLC 873404866.
  • Vick, Todd B. (2021). Renegades and Rogues: The Life and Legacy of Robert E. Howard. Austin: University of Texas Press. doi:10.7560/321959. ISBN 978-1-4773-2195-9. OCLC 1159658615. S2CID 241275357.
  • Wallace, Nathaniel R. (2023). «Disseminating Lovecraft: The Proliferation of Unsanctioned Derivative Works in the Absence of an Operable Copyright Monopoly». In Lanzendörfer, Tim; Dreysse Passos de Carvalho, Max José (eds.). The Medial Afterlives of H.P. Lovecraft. Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 27–44. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-13765-5_2. ISBN 978-3-031-13764-8.
  • Wetzel, George T. (1983). The Lovecraft Scholar (PDF). Darien, Connecticut: Hobgoblin Press.
  • Wilson, Colin (1975). The Strength to Dream: Literature and the Imagination (Second ed.). Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-8371-6819-7. OCLC 630646359.
  • Wilson, Edmund (1950) [first published November 24, 1945]. «Tales of the Marvellous and the Ridiculous». Classics and Commercials: A Literary Chronicle of the Forties. New York: Macmillan. pp. 286–290. ISBN 0-374-52667-2. OCLC 964373.
  • Wohleber, Curt (December 1995). «The Man Who Can Scare Stephen King». American Heritage. Vol. 46, no. 8. Archived from the original on October 4, 2013.
  • Wolanin, Tyler L. (2013). «New Deal Politics in the Correspondence of H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (7): 3–35. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868464.
  • Woodard, Ben (2011). «Mad Speculation and Absolute Inhumanism: Lovecraft, Ligotti, and the Weirding of Philosophy». Continent. 1 (1): 3–13. doi:10.22394/0869-5377-2019-5-203-225. ISSN 2159-9920. S2CID 170136177.
  • «Wrote of His Last Month Alive». The Boston Globe. March 15, 1937. p. 2. ISSN 0743-1791. Archived from the original on February 28, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  • Zeller, Benjamin E. (December 2019). «Altar Call of Cthulhu: Religion and Millennialism in H.P. Lovecraft’s Cthulhu Mythos». Religions. 11 (1): 18. doi:10.3390/rel11010018. ISSN 2077-1444. S2CID 213736759.

Further reading

  • Anderson, James Arthur; Joshi, S. T. (2011). Out of the Shadows: A Structuralist Approach to Understanding the Fiction of H. P. Lovecraft. Rockville, Maryland: Wildside Press. doi:10.23860/diss-anderson-james-1992. ISBN 978-1-4794-0384-4. OCLC 1127558354. S2CID 171675509.
  • Burleson, Donald R. (1983). H. P. Lovecraft: A Critical Study. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-313-23255-8. OCLC 299389026. S2CID 190394934.
  • Callaghan, Gavin (2013). H. P. Lovecraft’s Dark Arcadia: The Satire, Symbology and Contradiction. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company. ISBN 978-1-4766-0239-4. OCLC 856844361.
  • Cannon, Peter, ed. (1998). Lovecraft Remembered. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. ISBN 978-0-87054-173-5. OCLC 260088015.
  • Carter, Lin (1972). Lovecraft: A Look Behind the «Cthulhu Mythos». New York: Ballantine Books. ISBN 0-586-04166-4. OCLC 2213597. S2CID 190363598.
  • Frierson, Meade; Frierson, Penny (March 1972). HPL: A Tribute to Howard Phillips Lovecraft (PDF). Birmingham, Alabama: Meade and Penny Frierson. OCLC 315586.
  • González Grueso, Fernando Darío (2017). La ficción científica. Género, Poética y sus relaciones con la literatura oral tradicional: El papel de H. P. Lovecraft como mediador. Colección Estudios (in Spanish). Madrid: UAM Ediciones. doi:10.15366/ficcion.cientif2013. ISBN 978-84-8344-376-7. OCLC 1026295184. S2CID 183258592.
  • Hegyi, Pál (2019). Lovecraft Laughing: Uncanny Memes in the Weird. Department of American Studies, University of Szeged. doi:10.14232/americana.books.2019.hegyi.lovecraft. ISBN 978-615-5423-56-7. OCLC 8160851320. S2CID 192043054.
  • Houellebecq, Michel; King, Stephen (2005). H. P. Lovecraft: Against the World, Against Life. Translated by Khazeni, Dorna. Cernunnos. ISBN 1-932416-18-8. OCLC 1151841813. S2CID 190374730.
  • Joshi, S. T. (1980). H. P. Lovecraft, Four Decades of Criticism (First ed.). Athens: Ohio University Press. ISBN 0-8214-0442-3. OCLC 6085440.
  • Klinger, Leslie S. (2014). The New Annotated H. P. Lovecraft (First ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-87140-453-4. OCLC 884500241. S2CID 218735034.
  • Lévy, Maurice (1988) [first published 1972]. Lovecraft: A Study in the Fantastic. Translated by Joshi, S. T. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. ISBN 978-0-8143-1956-7. OCLC 491484555. S2CID 190967971.
  • Long, Frank Belknap (1975). Howard Phillips Lovecraft: Dreamer on the Nightside. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. ISBN 0-87054-068-8. OCLC 2034623. S2CID 160306366.
  • Ludueña, Fabián; de Acosta, Alejandro (2015). H. P. Lovecraft: The Disjunction in Being. Translated by de Acosta, Alejandro. United States: Schism. ISBN 978-1-5058-6600-1. OCLC 935704008.
  • Lovecraft, H. P.; Conover, Willis; Joshi, S. T. (2002). Lovecraft at Last: The Master of Horror in His Own Words (Revised ed.). New York: Cooper Square Press. ISBN 0-8154-1212-6. OCLC 50212624.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (1999). Joshi, S. T.; Cannon, Peter (eds.). More Annotated H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Dell. ISBN 0-440-50875-4. OCLC 41231274.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (1997). Joshi, S. T. (ed.). The Annotated H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Dell. ISBN 0-440-50660-3. OCLC 36165172.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2012). Joshi, S. T. (ed.). The Annotated Supernatural Horror in Literature (Second ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. ISBN 978-1-61498-028-5. OCLC 855115722.
  • Shapiro, Stephen; Philip, Barnard (2017). Pentecostal Modernism: Lovecraft, Los Angeles and World-Systems Culture. New Directions in Religion and Literature. Bloomsbury Publishing. doi:10.5040/9781474238762. ISBN 978-1-4742-3873-1. OCLC 1065524061. S2CID 148868506.
  • Martin, Sean Elliot (December 2008). H.P. Lovecraft and the Modernist Grotesque (PhD thesis). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Duquesne University. ISBN 9781448610167. OCLC 601419113. S2CID 191576874.
  • Migliore, Andrew; Strysik, John (2006). The Lurker in the Lobby: A Guide to the Cinema of H. P. Lovecraft. Portland, Oregon: Night Shade Books. ISBN 978-1-892389-35-0. OCLC 1023313647. S2CID 152612871.
  • Montaclair, Florent; Picot, Jean-Pierre (1997). Fantastique et événement : Étude comparée des œuvres de Jules Verne et Howard P. Lovecraft. Annales littéraires (in French). Vol. 621. Besançon: Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté. doi:10.4000/books.pufc.1726. ISBN 978-2-84867-692-0. OCLC 1286480358. S2CID 228019349.
  • Wilson, Eric (2016). The Republic of Cthulhu: Lovecraft, the Weird Tale, and Conspiracy Theory. Santa Barbara, California: Punctum Books. doi:10.21983/P3.0155.1.00. ISBN 978-0-9982375-6-5. OCLC 1135348793. S2CID 165947887.

External links

  • The H. P. Lovecraft Archive
  • The H. P. Lovecraft Historical Society
  • H. P. Lovecraft Collection in the Special Collections at the John Hay Library (Brown University)
  • Lovecraft Annual, a scholarly journal
  • The Lovecraft Arts & Sciences Council, a non-profit educational organization
  • H. P. Lovecraft at the Internet Speculative Fiction Database Edit this at Wikidata
  • H. P. Lovecraft at the Encyclopedia of Science Fiction
  • H. P. Lovecraft at the Encyclopedia of Fantasy
  • H. P. Lovecraft at IMDb
  • H. P. Lovecraft discography at Discogs

Online editions

  • Works by Howard Phillips Lovecraft at Project Gutenberg
  • Works by H. P. Lovecraft in eBook form at Standard Ebooks
  • Works by or about H. P. Lovecraft at Internet Archive
  • Works by H. P. Lovecraft at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks)

H. P. Lovecraft

Lovecraft in 1934, facing left and looking right

Lovecraft in 1934

Born Howard Phillips Lovecraft
August 20, 1890
Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.
Died March 15, 1937 (aged 46)
Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.
Resting place Swan Point Cemetery, Providence
41°51′14″N 71°22′52″W / 41.854021°N 71.381068°W
Pen name
  • Grandpa Theobald
  • E’ch-Pi-El
Occupation
  • Short story writer
  • editor
  • novelist
  • poet
Genre Lovecraftian horror, weird fiction, horror fiction, science fiction, gothic fiction, fantasy
Literary movement
  • Cosmicism
  • Aestheticism
  • Decadents
Years active 1917–1937
Notable works
  • «The Call of Cthulhu»
  • The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath
  • At the Mountains of Madness
  • The Shadow over Innsmouth
  • The Shadow Out of Time
Spouse

Sonia Greene

(m. )​

Signature
Lovecraft signature.svg

Howard Phillips Lovecraft (; August 20, 1890 – March 15, 1937) was an American writer of weird, science, fantasy, and horror fiction. He is best known for his creation of the Cthulhu Mythos.[a]

Born in Providence, Rhode Island, Lovecraft spent most of his life in New England. After his father’s institutionalization in 1893, he lived affluently until his family’s wealth dissipated after the death of his grandfather. Lovecraft then lived with his mother, in reduced financial security, until her institutionalization in 1919. He began to write essays for the United Amateur Press Association, and in 1913 wrote a critical letter to a pulp magazine that ultimately led to his involvement in pulp fiction. He became active in the speculative fiction community and was published in several pulp magazines. Lovecraft moved to New York City, marrying Sonia Greene in 1924, and later became the center of a wider group of authors known as the «Lovecraft Circle». They introduced him to Weird Tales, which would become his most prominent publisher. Lovecraft’s time in New York took a toll on his mental state and financial conditions. He returned to Providence in 1926 and produced some of his most popular works, including The Call of Cthulhu, At the Mountains of Madness, The Shadow over Innsmouth, and The Shadow Out of Time. He would remain active as a writer for 11 years until his death from intestinal cancer at the age of 46.

Lovecraft’s literary corpus is based around the idea of cosmicism, which was simultaneously his personal philosophy and the main theme of his fiction. Cosmicism posits that humanity is an insignificant part of the cosmos, and could be swept away at any moment. He incorporated fantasy and science fiction elements into his stories, representing the perceived fragility of anthropocentrism. This was tied to his ambivalent views on knowledge. His works were largely set in a fictionalized version of New England. Civilizational decline also plays a major role in his works, as he believed that the West was in decline during his lifetime. Lovecraft’s early political opinions were conservative and traditionalist; additionally, he held a number of racist views for much of his adult life. Following the Great Depression, Lovecraft became a socialist, no longer believing a just aristocracy would make the world more fair.

Throughout his adult life, Lovecraft was never able to support himself from earnings as an author and editor. He was virtually unknown during his lifetime and was almost exclusively published in pulp magazines before his death. A scholarly revival of Lovecraft’s work began in the 1970s, and he is now regarded as one of the most significant 20th-century authors of supernatural horror fiction. Many direct adaptations and spiritual successors followed. Works inspired by Lovecraft, adaptations or original works, began to form the basis of the Cthulhu Mythos, which utilizes Lovecraft’s characters, setting, and themes.

Biography

Early life and family tragedies

A family portrait of Sarah, Howard, and Winfield Lovecraft in 1892

Sarah, Howard, and Winfield Lovecraft in 1892

Lovecraft was born in his family home on August 20, 1890, in Providence, Rhode Island. He was the only child of Winfield Scott Lovecraft and Sarah Susan (née Phillips) Lovecraft.[2] Susie’s family was of substantial means at the time of their marriage, as her father, Whipple Van Buren Phillips, was involved in business ventures.[3] In April 1893, after a psychotic episode in a Chicago hotel, Winfield was committed to Butler Hospital in Providence. His medical records state that he had been «doing and saying strange things at times» for a year before his commitment.[4] The person who reported these symptoms is unknown.[5] Winfield spent five years in Butler before dying in 1898. His death certificate listed the cause of death as general paresis, a term synonymous with late-stage syphilis.[6] Throughout his life, Lovecraft maintained that his father fell into a paralytic state, due to insomnia and overwork, and remained that way until his death. It is not known whether Lovecraft was simply kept ignorant of his father’s illness or whether his later statements were intentionally misleading.[7]

After his father’s institutionalization, Lovecraft resided in the family home with his mother, his maternal aunts Lillian and Annie, and his maternal grandparents Whipple and Robie.[8] According to family friends, his mother, known as Susie, doted on the young Lovecraft excessively, pampering him and never letting him out of her sight.[9] Lovecraft later recollected that his mother was «permanently stricken with grief» after his father’s illness. Whipple became a father figure to Lovecraft in this time, Lovecraft noting that his grandfather became the «centre of my entire universe». Whipple, who often traveled to manage his business, maintained correspondence by letter with the young Lovecraft who, by the age of three, was already proficient at reading and writing.[10]

Whipple encouraged the young Lovecraft to have an appreciation of literature, especially classical literature and English poetry. In his old age, he helped raise the young H. P. Lovecraft and educated him not only in the classics, but also in original weird tales of «winged horrors» and «deep, low, moaning sounds» which he created for his grandchild’s entertainment. The original sources of Phillips’ weird tales are unidentified. Lovecraft himself guessed that they originated from Gothic novelists like Ann Radcliffe, Matthew Lewis, and Charles Maturin.[11] It was during this period that Lovecraft was introduced to some of his earliest literary influences, such as The Rime of the Ancient Mariner illustrated by Gustave Doré, One Thousand and One Nights, Thomas Bulfinch’s Age of Fable, and Ovid’s Metamorphoses.[12]

While there is no indication that Lovecraft was particularly close to his grandmother Robie, her death in 1896 had a profound effect on him. By his own account, it sent his family into «a gloom from which it never fully recovered». His mother and aunts wore black mourning dresses that «terrified» him. This is also the time that Lovecraft, approximately five-and-a-half years old, started having nightmares that later would inform his fictional writings. Specifically, he began to have recurring nightmares of beings he referred to as «night-gaunts». He credited their appearance to the influence of Doré’s illustrations, which would «whirl me through space at a sickening rate of speed, the while fretting & impelling me with their detestable tridents.» Thirty years later, night-gaunts would appear in Lovecraft’s fiction.[13]

Lovecraft’s earliest known literary works were written at the age of seven, and were poems restyling the Odyssey and other Greco-Roman mythological stories.[14] Lovecraft would later write that during his childhood he was fixated on the Greco-Roman pantheon, and briefly accepted them as genuine expressions of divinity, foregoing his Christian upbringing.[15] He recalled, at five years old, being told Santa Claus did not exist and retorted by asking why «God is not equally a myth?»[16] At the age of eight, he took a keen interest in the sciences, particularly astronomy and chemistry. He also examined the anatomical books that were held in the family library, which taught him the specifics of human reproduction that were not yet explained to him. As a result, he found that it «virtually killed my interest in the subject.»[17]

In 1902, according to Lovecraft’s later correspondence, astronomy became a guiding influence on his worldview. He began publishing the periodical Rhode Island Journal of Astronomy, using the hectograph printing method.[18] Lovecraft went in and out of elementary school repeatedly, oftentimes with home tutors making up for the lost years, missing time due to health concerns that have not been determined. The written recollections of his peers described him as withdrawn but welcoming to those who shared his then-current fascination with astronomy, inviting them to look through his prized telescope.[19]

Education and financial decline

By 1900, Whipple’s various business concerns were suffering a downturn, which resulted in the slow erosion of his family’s wealth. He was forced to let his family’s hired servants go, leaving Lovecraft, Whipple, and Susie, being the only unmarried sister, alone in the family home.[20] In the spring of 1904, Whipple’s largest business venture suffered a catastrophic failure. Within months, he died at age 70 due to a stroke. After Whipple’s death, Susie was unable to financially support the upkeep of the expansive family home on what remained of the Phillips’ estate. Later that year, she was forced to move to a small duplex with her son.[21]

Whipple Van Buren Phillips facing right

Whipple Van Buren Phillips

Lovecraft called this time one of the darkest of his life, remarking in a 1934 letter that he saw no point in living anymore; he considered the possibility of committing suicide. His scientific curiosity and desire to know more about the world prevented him from doing so.[22] In fall 1904, he entered high school. Much like his earlier school years, Lovecraft was periodically removed from school for long periods for what he termed «near breakdowns». He did say, though, that while having some conflicts with teachers, he enjoyed high school, becoming close with a small circle of friends. Lovecraft also performed well academically, excelling in particular at chemistry and physics.[23] Aside from a pause in 1904, he also resumed publishing the Rhode Island Journal of Astronomy as well as starting the Scientific Gazette, which dealt mostly with chemistry.[24] It was also during this period that Lovecraft produced the first of the fictional works that he would later be known for, namely «The Beast in the Cave» and «The Alchemist».[25]

It was in 1908, prior to what would have been his high school graduation, that Lovecraft suffered another unidentified health crisis, though this instance was more severe than his prior illnesses.[26] The exact circumstances and causes remain unknown. The only direct records are Lovecraft’s own correspondence wherein he retrospectively described it variously as a «nervous collapse» and «a sort of breakdown», in one letter blaming it on the stress of high school despite his enjoying it.[27] In another letter concerning the events of 1908, he notes, «I was and am prey to intense headaches, insomnia, and general nervous weakness which prevents my continuous application to any thing.»[26]

Though Lovecraft maintained that he was going to attend Brown University after high school, he never graduated and never attended school again. Whether Lovecraft suffered from a physical ailment, a mental one, or some combination thereof has never been determined. An account from a high school classmate described Lovecraft as exhibiting «terrible tics» and that at times «he’d be sitting in his seat and he’d suddenly up and jump». Harry Brobst, a psychology professor, examined the account and claimed that chorea minor was the probable cause of Lovecraft’s childhood symptoms, while noting that instances of chorea minor after adolescence are very rare.[27] In his letters, Lovecraft acknowledged that he suffered from bouts of chorea as a child.[28] Brobst further ventured that Lovecraft’s 1908 breakdown was attributed to a «hysteroid seizure», a term that has become synonymous with atypical depression.[29] In another letter concerning the events of 1908, Lovecraft stated that he «could hardly bear to see or speak to anyone, & liked to shut out the world by pulling down dark shades & using artificial light.»[30]

Earliest recognition

Few of Lovecraft and Susie’s activities between late 1908 and 1913 were recorded.[31] Lovecraft described the steady continuation of their financial decline highlighted by his uncle’s failed business that cost Susie a large portion of their already dwindling wealth.[32] One of Susie’s friends, Clara Hess, recalled a visit during which Susie spoke continuously about Lovecraft being «so hideous that he hid from everyone and did not like to walk upon the streets where people could gaze on him.» Despite Hess’ protests to the contrary, Susie maintained this stance.[33] For his part, Lovecraft said he found his mother to be «a positive marvel of consideration».[34] A next-door neighbor later pointed out that what others in the neighborhood often assumed were loud, nocturnal quarrels between mother and son, were actually recitations of Shakespeare, an activity that seemed to delight mother and son.[35]

During this period, Lovecraft revived his earlier scientific periodicals.[31] He endeavored to commit himself to the study of organic chemistry, Susie buying the expensive glass chemistry assemblage he wanted.[36] Lovecraft found his studies were stymied by the mathematics involved, which he found boring and would cause headaches that would incapacitate him for the remainder of the day.[37] Lovecraft’s first non-self-published poem appeared in a local newspaper in 1912. Called Providence in 2000 A.D., it envisioned a future where Americans of English descent were displaced by Irish, Italian, Portuguese, and Jewish immigrants.[38] In this period he also wrote racist poetry, including «New-England Fallen» and «On the Creation of Niggers», but there is no indication that either were published during his lifetime.[39]

In 1911, Lovecraft’s letters to editors began appearing in pulp and weird-fiction magazines, most notably Argosy.[40] A 1913 letter critical of Fred Jackson, one of Argosy’s more prominent writers, started Lovecraft down a path that would define the remainder of his career as a writer. In the following letters, Lovecraft described Jackson’s stories as being «trivial, effeminate, and, in places, coarse». Continuing, Lovecraft argued that Jackson’s characters exhibit the «delicate passions and emotions proper to negroes and anthropoid apes.»[41] This sparked a nearly year-long feud in the magazine’s letters section between the two writers and their respective supporters. Lovecraft’s most prominent opponent was John Russell, who often replied in verse, and to whom Lovecraft felt compelled to reply because he respected Russell’s writing skills.[42] The most immediate effect of this feud was the recognition garnered from Edward F. Daas, then head editor of the United Amateur Press Association (UAPA).[43] Daas invited Russell and Lovecraft to join the organization and both accepted, Lovecraft in April 1914.[44]

Rejuvenation and tragedy

With the advent of United I obtained a renewed will to live; a renewed sense of existence as other than a superfluous weight; and found a sphere in which I could feel that my efforts were not wholly futile. For the first time I could imagine that my clumsy gropings after art were a little more than faint cries lost in the unlistening void.

—Lovecraft in 1921.[45]

Lovecraft immersed himself in the world of amateur journalism for most of the following decade.[45] During this period, he advocated for amateurism’s superiority to commercialism.[46] Lovecraft defined commercialism as writing for what he considered low-brow publications for pay. This was contrasted with his view of «professional publication», which was what he called writing for what he considered respectable journals and publishers. He thought of amateur journalism as serving as practice for a professional career.[47]

Lovecraft was appointed chairman of the Department of Public Criticism of the UAPA in late 1914.[48] He used this position to advocate for what he saw as the superiority of archaic English language usage. Emblematic of the Anglophilic opinions he maintained throughout his life, he openly criticized other UAPA contributors for their «Americanisms» and «slang». Often, these criticisms were embedded in xenophobic and racist statements that the «national language» was being negatively changed by immigrants.[49] In mid-1915, Lovecraft was elected vice-president of the UAPA.[50] Two years later, he was elected president and appointed other board members who mostly shared his belief in the supremacy of British English over modern American English.[51] Another significant event of this time was the beginning of World War I. Lovecraft published multiple criticisms of the American government and public’s reluctance to join the war to protect England, which he viewed as America’s ancestral homeland.[52]

In 1916, Lovecraft published his first short story, «The Alchemist», in the main UAPA journal, which was a departure from his usual verse. Due to the encouragement of W. Paul Cook, another UAPA member and future lifelong friend, Lovecraft began writing and publishing more prose fiction.[53] Soon afterwards, he wrote «The Tomb» and «Dagon».[54] «The Tomb», by Lovecraft’s own admission, was greatly influenced by the style and structure of Edgar Allan Poe’s works.[55] Meanwhile, «Dagon» is considered Lovecraft’s first work that displays the concepts and themes that his writings would later become known for.[56] Lovecraft published another short story, «Beyond the Wall of Sleep» in 1919, which was his first science fiction story.[57]

Lovecraft in 1915, facing forward and looking right

Lovecraft’s term as president of the UAPA ended in 1918, and he returned to his former post as chairman of the Department of Public Criticism.[58] In 1917, as Lovecraft related to Kleiner, Lovecraft made an aborted attempt to enlist in the United States Army. Though he passed the physical exam,[59] he told Kleiner that his mother threatened to do anything, legal or otherwise, to prove that he was unfit for service.[60] After his failed attempt to serve in World War I, he attempted to enroll in the Rhode Island National Guard, but his mother used her family connections to prevent it.[61]

During the winter of 1918–1919, Susie, exhibiting the symptoms of a nervous breakdown, went to live with her elder sister, Lillian. The nature of Susie’s illness is unclear, as her medical papers were later destroyed in a fire at Butler Hospital.[62] Winfield Townley Scott, who was able to read the papers before the fire, described Susie as having suffered a psychological collapse.[62] Neighbour and friend Clara Hess, interviewed in 1948, recalled instances of Susie describing «weird and fantastic creatures that rushed out from behind buildings and from corners at dark.»[63] In the same account, Hess described a time when they crossed paths in downtown Providence and Susie was unaware of where she was.[63] In March 1919, she was committed to Butler Hospital, like her husband before her.[64] Lovecraft’s immediate reaction to Susie’s commitment was visceral, writing to Kleiner that «existence seems of little value», and that he wished «it might terminate».[65] During Susie’s time at Butler, Lovecraft periodically visited her and walked the large grounds with her.[66]

Late 1919 saw Lovecraft become more outgoing. After a period of isolation, he began joining friends in trips to writer gatherings; the first being a talk in Boston presented by Lord Dunsany, whom Lovecraft had recently discovered and idolized.[67] In early 1920, at an amateur writer convention, he met Frank Belknap Long, who would end up being Lovecraft’s most influential and closest confidant for the remainder of his life.[68] The influence of Dunsany is apparent in his 1919 output, which is part of what would be called Lovecraft’s Dream Cycle, including «The White Ship» and «The Doom That Came to Sarnath».[69] In early 1920, he wrote «The Cats of Ulthar» and «Celephaïs», which were also strongly influenced by Dunsany.[70]

It was later in 1920 that Lovecraft began publishing the earliest Cthulhu Mythos stories. The Cthulhu Mythos, a term coined by later authors, encompasses Lovecraft’s stories that share a commonality in the revelation of cosmic insignificance, initially realistic settings, and recurring entities and texts.[71] The prose poem «Nyarlathotep» and the short story «The Crawling Chaos», in collaboration with Winifred Virginia Jackson, were written in late 1920.[72] Following in early 1921 came «The Nameless City», the first story that falls definitively within the Cthulhu Mythos. In it is one of Lovecraft’s most enduring phrases, a couplet recited by Abdul Alhazred; «That is not dead which can eternal lie; And with strange aeons even death may die.»[73] In the same year, he also wrote «The Outsider», which has become one of Lovecraft’s most heavily analyzed, and differently interpreted, stories.[74] It has been variously interpreted as being autobiographical, an allegory of the psyche, a parody of the afterlife, a commentary on humanity’s place in the universe, and a critique of progress.[75]

On May 24, 1921, Susie died in Butler Hospital, due to complications from an operation on her gallbladder five days earlier.[76] Lovecraft’s initial reaction, expressed in a letter written nine days after Susie’s death, was a deep state of sadness that crippled him physically and emotionally. He again expressed a desire that his life might end.[77] Lovecraft’s later response was relief, as he had become able to live independently from his mother. His physical health also began to improve, although he was unaware of the exact cause.[78] Despite Lovecraft’s reaction, he continued to attend amateur journalist conventions. Lovecraft met his future wife, Sonia Greene, at one such convention in July.[79]

Marriage and New York

Sonia Green with her arm around Lovecraft in 1921

Lovecraft and Sonia Greene on July 5, 1921

Lovecraft’s aunts disapproved of his relationship with Sonia. Lovecraft and Greene married on March 3, 1924, and relocated to her Brooklyn apartment at 259 Parkside Avenue; she thought he needed to leave Providence to flourish and was willing to support him financially.[80] Greene, who had been married before, later said Lovecraft had performed satisfactorily as a lover, though she had to take the initiative in all aspects of the relationship. She attributed Lovecraft’s passive nature to a stultifying upbringing by his mother.[81] Lovecraft’s weight increased to 200 lb (91 kg) on his wife’s home cooking.[82]

He was enthralled by New York, and, in what was informally dubbed the Kalem Club, he acquired a group of encouraging intellectual and literary friends who urged him to submit stories to Weird Tales. Its editor, Edwin Baird, accepted many of Lovecraft’s stories for the ailing publication, including «Under the Pyramids», which was ghostwritten for Harry Houdini.[83] Established informally some years before Lovecraft arrived in New York, the core Kalem Club members were boys’ adventure novelist Henry Everett McNeil, the lawyer and anarchist writer James Ferdinand Morton Jr., and the poet Reinhardt Kleiner.[84]

On January 1, 1925, Sonia moved from Parkside to Cleveland in response to a job opportunity, and Lovecraft left for a small first-floor apartment on 169 Clinton Street «at the edge of Red Hook»—a location which came to discomfort him greatly.[85] Later that year, the Kalem Club’s four regular attendees were joined by Lovecraft along with his protégé Frank Belknap Long, bookseller George Willard Kirk, and Samuel Loveman.[86] Loveman was Jewish, but he and Lovecraft became close friends in spite of the latter’s antisemitic attitudes.[87] By the 1930s, writer and publisher Herman Charles Koenig would be one of the last to become involved with the Kalem Club.[88]

Not long after the marriage, Greene lost her business and her assets disappeared in a bank failure.[89] Lovecraft made efforts to support his wife through regular jobs, but his lack of previous work experience meant he lacked proven marketable skills.[90] The publisher of Weird Tales was attempting to make the loss-making magazine profitable and offered the job of editor to Lovecraft, who declined, citing his reluctance to relocate to Chicago on aesthetic grounds.[91] Baird was succeeded by Farnsworth Wright, whose writing Lovecraft had criticized. Lovecraft’s submissions were often rejected by Wright. This may have been partially due to censorship guidelines imposed in the aftermath of a Weird Tales story that hinted at necrophilia, although after Lovecraft’s death, Wright accepted many of the stories he had originally rejected.[92]

Sonia also became ill and immediately after recovering, relocated to Cincinnati, and then to Cleveland; her employment required constant travel.[93] Added to his feelings of failure in a city with a large immigrant population, Lovecraft’s single-room apartment was burgled, leaving him with only the clothes he was wearing.[94] In August 1925, he wrote «The Horror at Red Hook» and «He», in the latter of which the narrator says «My coming to New York had been a mistake; for whereas I had looked for poignant wonder and inspiration […] I had found instead only a sense of horror and oppression which threatened to master, paralyze, and annihilate me.»[95] This was an expression of his despair at being in New York.[96] It was at around this time he wrote the outline for «The Call of Cthulhu», with its theme of the insignificance of all humanity.[97] During this time, Lovecraft wrote «Supernatural Horror in Literature» on the eponymous subject. It later became one of the most influential essays on supernatural horror.[98] With a weekly allowance Greene sent, Lovecraft moved to a working-class area of Brooklyn Heights, where he resided in a tiny apartment. He had lost approximately 40 pounds (18 kg) of body weight by 1926, when he left for Providence.[99]

Return to Providence and death

The Samuel B. Mumford House, slightly obscured by trees

Lovecraft’s final home, May 1933 until March 10, 1937

Back in Providence, Lovecraft lived with his aunts in a «spacious brown Victorian wooden house» at 10 Barnes Street until 1933.[100] He then moved to 66 Prospect Street, which would become his final home.[b][101] The period beginning after his return to Providence contains some of his most prominent works, including The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath, The Case of Charles Dexter Ward, «The Call of Cthulhu» and The Shadow over Innsmouth.[102] The former two stories are partially autobiographical, as scholars have argued that The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath is about Lovecraft’s return to Providence and The Case of Charles Dexter Ward is, in part, about the city itself.[103] The former story also represents a partial repudiation of Dunsany’s influence, as Lovecraft had decided that his style did not come to him naturally.[104] At this time, he frequently revised work for other authors and did a large amount of ghostwriting, including The Mound, «Winged Death», and «The Diary of Alonzo Typer». Client Harry Houdini was laudatory, and attempted to help Lovecraft by introducing him to the head of a newspaper syndicate. Plans for a further project were ended by Houdini’s death in 1926.[105] After returning, he also began to engage in antiquarian travels across the eastern seaboard during the summer months.[106] During the spring–summer of 1930, Lovecraft visited, among other locations, New York City, Brattleboro, Vermont, Wilbraham, Massachusetts, Charleston, South Carolina, and Quebec City.[c][108]

Later, in August, Robert E. Howard wrote a letter to Weird Tales praising a then-recent reprint of H. P. Lovecraft’s «The Rats in the Walls» and discussing some of the Gaelic references used within.[109] Editor Farnsworth Wright forwarded the letter to Lovecraft, who responded positively to Howard, and soon the two writers were engaged in a vigorous correspondence that would last for the rest of Howard’s life.[110] Howard quickly became a member of the Lovecraft Circle, a group of writers and friends all linked through Lovecraft’s voluminous correspondence, as he introduced his many like-minded friends to one another and encouraged them to share their stories, utilize each other’s fictional creations, and help each other succeed in the field of pulp fiction.[111]

Meanwhile, Lovecraft was increasingly producing work that brought him no remuneration.[112] Affecting a calm indifference to the reception of his works, Lovecraft was in reality extremely sensitive to criticism and easily precipitated into withdrawal. He was known to give up trying to sell a story after it had been once rejected.[113] Sometimes, as with The Shadow over Innsmouth, he wrote a story that might have been commercially viable but did not try to sell it. Lovecraft even ignored interested publishers. He failed to reply when one inquired about any novel Lovecraft might have ready: although he had completed such a work, The Case of Charles Dexter Ward, it was never typed up.[114] A few years after Lovecraft had moved to Providence, he and his wife Sonia Greene, having lived separately for so long, agreed to an amicable divorce. Greene moved to California in 1933 and remarried in 1936, unaware that Lovecraft, despite his assurances to the contrary, had never officially signed the final decree.[115]

As a result of the Great Depression, he shifted towards socialism, decrying both his prior political beliefs and the rising tide of fascism.[116] He thought that socialism was a workable middle ground between what he saw as the destructive impulses of both the capitalists and the Marxists of his day. This was based in a general opposition to cultural upheaval, as well as support for an ordered society. Electorally, he supported Franklin D. Roosevelt, but he thought that the New Deal was not sufficiently leftist. Lovecraft’s support for it was based in his view that no other set of reforms were possible at that time.[117]

Lovecraft's personal grave, facing forward

H. P. Lovecraft’s gravestone

In late 1936, he witnessed the publication of The Shadow over Innsmouth as a paperback book.[d] 400 copies were printed, and the work was advertised in Weird Tales and several fan magazines. However, Lovecraft was displeased, as this book was riddled with errors that required extensive editing. It sold slowly and only approximately 200 copies were bound. The remaining 200 copies were destroyed after the publisher went out of business for the next seven years. By this point, Lovecraft’s literary career was reaching its end. Shortly after having written his last original short story, «The Haunter of the Dark», he stated that the hostile reception of At the Mountains of Madness had done «more than anything to end my effective fictional career». His declining psychological and physical states made it impossible for him to continue writing fiction.[120]

On June 11, Robert E. Howard was informed that his chronically ill mother would not awaken from her coma. He walked out to his car and committed suicide with a pistol that he had stored there. His mother died shortly thereafter.[121] This deeply affected Lovecraft, who consoled Howard’s father through correspondence. Almost immediately after hearing about Howard’s death, Lovecraft wrote a brief memoir titled «In Memoriam: Robert Ervin Howard», which he distributed to his correspondents.[122] Meanwhile, Lovecraft’s physical health was deteriorating. He was suffering from an affliction that he referred to as «grippe».[e][124]

Due to his fear of doctors, Lovecraft was not examined until a month before his death. After seeing a doctor, he was diagnosed with terminal cancer of the small intestine.[125] He remained hospitalized until he died. He lived in constant pain until his death on March 15, 1937, in Providence. In accordance with his lifelong scientific curiosity, he kept a diary of his illness until he was physically incapable of holding a pen.[126] Lovecraft was listed along with his parents on the Phillips family monument.[127] In 1977, fans erected a headstone in Swan Point Cemetery on which they inscribed his name, the dates of his birth and death, and the phrase «I AM PROVIDENCE»—a line from one of his personal letters.[128]

Personal views

Politics

An illustration by Virgil Finlay of Lovecraft as an eighteenth-century gentleman

H. P. Lovecraft as an eighteenth-century gentleman by Virgil Finlay

Lovecraft began his life as a Tory,[129] which was likely the result of his conservative upbringing. His family supported the Republican Party for the entirety of his life. While it is unclear how consistently he voted, he voted for Herbert Hoover in the 1928 presidential election.[130] Rhode Island as a whole remained politically conservative and Republican into the 1930s.[131] Lovecraft himself was an Anglophile who supported the British monarchy. He opposed democracy and thought that the United States should be governed by an aristocracy. This viewpoint emerged during his youth and lasted until the end of the 1920s.[132] During World War I, his Anglophilia caused him to strongly support the entente against the Central Powers. Many of his earlier poems were devoted to then-current political subjects, and he published several political essays in his amateur journal, The Conservative.[133] He was a teetotaler who supported the implementation of Prohibition, which was one of the few reforms that he supported during the early part of his life.[134] While remaining a teetotaller, he later became convinced that Prohibition was ineffectual in the 1930s.[135] His personal justification for his early political viewpoints was primarily based on tradition and aesthetics.[136]

As a result of the Great Depression, Lovecraft reexamined his political views.[137] Initially, he thought that affluent people would take on the characteristics of his ideal aristocracy and solve America’s problems. When this did not occur, he became a socialist. This shift was caused by his observation that the Depression was harming American society. It was also influenced by the increase in socialism’s political capital during the 1930s. One of the main points of Lovecraft’s socialism was its opposition to Soviet Marxism, as he thought that a Marxist revolution would bring about the destruction of American civilization. Lovecraft thought that an intellectual aristocracy needed to be formed to preserve America.[138] His ideal political system is outlined in his 1933 essay «Some Repetitions on the Times». Lovecraft used this essay to echo the political proposals that had been made over the course of the last few decades. In this essay, he advocates governmental control of resource distribution, fewer working hours and a higher wage, and unemployment insurance and old age pensions. He also outlines the need for an oligarchy of intellectuals. In his view, power must be restricted to those who are sufficiently intelligent and educated.[139] He frequently used the term «fascism» to describe this form of government, but, according to S. T. Joshi, it bears little resemblance to that ideology.[140]

Lovecraft had varied views on the political figures of his day. He was an ardent supporter of Franklin D. Roosevelt.[141] He saw that Roosevelt was trying to steer a middle course between the conservatives and the revolutionaries, which he approved of. While he thought that Roosevelt should have been enacting more progressive policies, he came to the conclusion that the New Deal was the only realistic option for reform. He thought that voting for his opponents on the political left would be a wasted effort.[142] Internationally, like many Americans, he initially expressed support for Adolf Hitler. More specifically, he thought that Hitler would preserve German culture. However, he thought that Hitler’s racial policies should be based on culture rather than descent. There is evidence that, at the end of his life, Lovecraft began to oppose Hitler. According to Harry K. Brobst, Lovecraft’s downstairs neighbor went to Germany and witnessed Jews being beaten. Lovecraft and his aunt were angered by this. His discussions of Hitler drop off after this point.[143]

Atheism

Lovecraft was an atheist. His viewpoints on religion are outlined in his 1922 essay «A Confession of Unfaith». In this essay, he describes his shift away from the Protestantism of his parents to the atheism of his adulthood. Lovecraft was raised by a conservative Protestant family. He was introduced to the Bible and the mythos of Saint Nicholas when he was two. He passively accepted both of them. Over the course of the next few years, he was introduced to Grimms’ Fairy Tales and One Thousand and One Nights, favoring the latter. In response, Lovecraft took on the identity of «Abdul Alhazred», a name he would later use for the author of the Necronomicon.[144] Lovecraft experienced a brief period as a Greco-Roman pagan shortly thereafter.[145] According to this account, his first moment of skepticism occurred before his fifth birthday, when he questioned if God is a myth after learning that Santa Claus is not real. In 1896, he was introduced to Greco-Roman myths and became «a genuine pagan».[15]

This came to an end in 1902, when Lovecraft was introduced to space. He later described this event as the most poignant in his life. In response to this discovery, Lovecraft took to studying astronomy and described his observations in the local newspaper.[146] Before his thirteenth birthday, he had become convinced of humanity’s impermanence. By the time he was seventeen, he had read detailed writings that agreed with his worldview. Lovecraft ceased writing positively about progress, instead developing his later cosmic philosophy. Despite his interests in science, he had an aversion to realistic literature, so he became interested in fantastical fiction. Lovecraft became pessimistic when he entered amateur journalism in 1914. The Great War seemed to confirm his viewpoints. He began to despise philosophical idealism. Lovecraft took to discussing and debating his pessimism with his peers, which allowed him to solidify his philosophy. His readings of Friedrich Nietzsche and H. L. Mencken, among other pessimistic writers, furthered this development. At the end of his essay, Lovecraft states that all he desired was oblivion. He was willing to cast aside any illusion that he may still have held.[147]

Race

Race is the most controversial aspect of Lovecraft’s legacy, expressed in many disparaging remarks against non-Anglo-Saxon races and cultures in his works. Scholars have argued that these racial attitudes were common in the American society of his day, particularly in New England.[148] As he grew older, his original racial worldview became a classism or elitism, which regarded the superior race to include all those self-ennobled through high culture. Lovecraft was a white supremacist.[149] Despite this, he did not hold all white people in uniform high regard, but rather esteemed English people and those of English descent.[150] In his early published essays, private letters, and personal utterances, he argued for a strong color line to preserve race and culture.[151] His arguments were supported using disparagements of various races in his journalism and letters, and allegorically in some of his fictional works that depict miscegenation between humans and non-human creatures.[152] This is evident in his portrayal of the Deep Ones in The Shadow over Innsmouth. Their interbreeding with humanity is framed as being a type of miscegenation that corrupts both the town of Innsmouth and the protagonist.[153]

Initially, Lovecraft showed sympathy to minorities who adopted Western culture, even to the extent of marrying a Jewish woman he viewed as being «well assimilated».[154] By the 1930s, Lovecraft’s views on ethnicity and race had moderated.[155] He supported ethnicities’ preserving their native cultures; for example, he thought that «a real friend of civilisation wishes merely to make the Germans more German, the French more French, the Spaniards more Spanish, & so on.»[156] This represented a shift from his previous support for cultural assimilation. His shift was partially the result of his exposure to different cultures through his travels and circle. The former resulted in him writing positively about Québécois and First Nations cultural traditions in his travelogue of Quebec.[157] However, this did not represent a complete elimination of his racial prejudices.[158]

Influences

Lovecraft was influenced by Edgar Allan Poe and Lord Dunsany.

His interest in weird fiction began in his childhood when his grandfather, who preferred Gothic stories, would tell him stories of his own design.[12] Lovecraft’s childhood home on Angell Street had a large library that contained classical literature, scientific works, and early weird fiction. At the age of five, Lovecraft enjoyed reading One Thousand and One Nights, and was reading Nathaniel Hawthorne a year later.[159] He was also influenced by the travel literature of John Mandeville and Marco Polo.[160] This led to his discovery of gaps in then-contemporary science, which prevented Lovecraft from committing suicide in response to the death of his grandfather and his family’s declining financial situation during his adolescence.[160] These travelogues may have also had an influence on how Lovecraft’s later works describe their characters and locations. For example, there is a resemblance between the powers of the Tibetan enchanters in The Travels of Marco Polo and the powers unleashed on Sentinel Hill in «The Dunwich Horror».[160]

One of Lovecraft’s most significant literary influences was Edgar Allan Poe, whom he described as his «God of Fiction».[161] Poe’s fiction was introduced to Lovecraft when the latter was eight years old. His earlier works were significantly influenced by Poe’s prose and writing style.[162] He also made extensive use of Poe’s unity of effect in his fiction.[163] Furthermore, At the Mountains of Madness directly quotes Poe and was influenced by The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket.[164] One of the main themes of the two stories is to discuss the unreliable nature of language as a method of expressing meaning.[165] In 1919, Lovecraft’s discovery of the stories of Lord Dunsany moved his writing in a new direction, resulting in a series of fantasies. Throughout his life, Lovecraft referred to Dunsany as the author who had the greatest impact on his literary career. The initial result of this influence was the Dream Cycle, a series of fantasies that originally take place in prehistory, but later shift to a dreamworld setting.[166] By 1930, Lovecraft decided that he would no longer write Dunsanian fantasies, arguing that the style did not come naturally to him.[167] Additionally, he also read and cited Arthur Machen and Algernon Blackwood as influences in the 1920s.[168]

Aside from horror authors, Lovecraft was significantly influenced by the Decadents, the Puritans, and the Aesthetic movement.[169] In «H. P. Lovecraft: New England Decadent», Barton Levi St. Armand, a professor emeritus of English and American studies at Brown University, has argued that these three influences combined to define Lovecraft as a writer.[170] He traces this influence to both Lovecraft’s stories and letters, noting that he actively cultivated the image of a New England gentleman in his letters.[169] Meanwhile, his influence from the Decadents and the Aesthetic Movement stems from his readings of Edgar Allan Poe. Lovecraft’s aesthetic worldview and fixation on decline stems from these readings. The idea of cosmic decline is described as having been Lovecraft’s response to both the Aesthetic Movement and the 19th century Decadents.[171] St. Armand describes it as being a combination of non-theological Puritan thought and the Decadent worldview.[172] This is used as a division in his stories, particularly in «The Horror at Red Hook», «Pickman’s Model», and «The Music of Erich Zann». The division between Puritanism and Decadence, St. Armand argues, represents a polarization between an artificial paradise and oneiriscopic visions of different worlds.[173]

A non-literary inspiration came from then-contemporary scientific advances in biology, astronomy, geology, and physics.[174] Lovecraft’s study of science contributed to his view of the human race as insignificant, powerless, and doomed in a materialistic and mechanistic universe.[175] Lovecraft was a keen amateur astronomer from his youth, often visiting the Ladd Observatory in Providence, and penning numerous astronomical articles for his personal journal and local newspapers.[176] Lovecraft’s materialist views led him to espouse his philosophical views through his fiction; these philosophical views came to be called cosmicism. Cosmicism took on a more pessimistic tone with his creation of what is now known as the Cthulhu Mythos, a fictional universe that contains alien deities and horrors. The term «Cthulhu Mythos» was likely coined by later writers after Lovecraft’s death.[1] In his letters, Lovecraft jokingly called his fictional mythology «Yog-Sothothery».[177]

Dreams had a major role in Lovecraft’s literary career.[178] In 1991, as a result of his rising place in American literature, it was popularly thought that Lovecraft extensively transcribed his dreams when writing fiction. However, the majority of his stories are not transcribed dreams. Instead, many of them are directly influenced by dreams and dreamlike phenomena. In his letters, Lovecraft frequently compared his characters to dreamers. They are described as being as helpless as a real dreamer who is experiencing a nightmare. His stories also have dreamlike qualities. The Randolph Carter stories deconstruct the division between dreams and reality. The dreamlands in The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath are a shared dreamworld that can be accessed by a sensitive dreamer. Meanwhile, in «The Silver Key», Lovecraft mentions the concept of «inward dreams», which implies the existence of outward dreams. Burleson compares this deconstruction to Carl Jung’s argument that dreams are the source of archetypal myths. Lovecraft’s way of writing fiction required both a level of realism and dreamlike elements. Citing Jung, Burleson argues that a writer may create realism by being inspired by dreams.[179]

Themes

Now all my tales are based on the fundamental premise that common human laws and interests and emotions have no validity or significance in the vast cosmos-at-large. To me there is nothing but puerility in a tale in which the human form—and the local human passions and conditions and standards—are depicted as native to other worlds or other universes. To achieve the essence of real externality, whether of time or space or dimension, one must forget that such things as organic life, good and evil, love and hate, and all such local attributes of a negligible and temporary race called mankind, have any existence at all. Only the human scenes and characters must have human qualities. These must be handled with unsparing realism, (not catch-penny romanticism) but when we cross the line to the boundless and hideous unknown—the shadow-haunted Outside—we must remember to leave our humanity and terrestrialism at the threshold.

— H. P. Lovecraft, in note to the editor of Weird Tales, on resubmission of «The Call of Cthulhu»[180]

Cosmicism

The central theme of Lovecraft’s corpus is cosmicism. Cosmicism is a literary philosophy that argues that humanity is an insignificant force in the universe. Despite appearing pessimistic, Lovecraft thought of himself being as being a cosmic indifferentist, which is expressed in his fiction. In it, human beings are often subject to powerful beings and other cosmic forces, but these forces are not so much malevolent as they are indifferent toward humanity. He believed in a meaningless, mechanical, and uncaring universe that human beings could never fully understand. There is no allowance for beliefs that could not be supported scientifically.[181] Lovecraft first articulated this philosophy in 1921, but he did not fully incorporate it into his fiction until five years later. «Dagon», «Beyond the Wall of Sleep», and «The Temple» contain early depictions of this concept, but the majority of his early tales do not analyze the concept. «Nyarlathotep» interprets the collapse of human civilization as being a corollary to the collapse of the universe. «The Call of Cthulhu» represents an intensification of this theme. In it, Lovecraft introduces the idea of alien influences on humanity, which would come to dominate all subsequent works.[182] In these works, Lovecraft expresses cosmicism through the usage of confirmation rather than revelation. Lovecraftian protagonists do not learn that they are insignificant. Instead, they already know it and have it confirmed to them through an event.[183]

Knowledge

Lovecraft’s fiction reflects his own ambivalent views regarding the nature of knowledge.[184] This expresses itself in the concept of forbidden knowledge. In Lovecraft’s stories, happiness is only achievable through blissful ignorance. Trying to know things that are not meant to be known leads to harm and psychological danger. This concept intersects with several other ideas. This includes the idea that the visible reality is an illusion masking the horrific true reality. Similarly, there are also intersections with the concepts of ancient civilizations that exert a malign influence on humanity and the general philosophy of cosmicism.[185] According to Lovecraft, self-knowledge can bring ruin to those who seek it. Those seekers would become aware of their own insignificance in the wider cosmos and would be unable to bear the weight of this knowledge. Lovecraftian horror is not achieved through external phenomenon. Instead, it is reached through the internalized psychological impact that knowledge has on its protagonists. «The Call of Cthulhu», The Shadow over Innsmouth, and The Shadow Out of Time feature protagonists who experience both external and internal horror through the acquisition of self-knowledge.[186] The Case of Charles Dexter Ward also reflects this. One of its central themes is the danger of knowing too much about one’s family history. Charles Dexter Ward, the protagonist, engages in historical and genealogical research that ultimately leads to both madness and his own self-destruction.[187]

Decline of civilization

For much of his life, Lovecraft was fixated on the concepts of decline and decadence. More specifically, he thought that the West was in a state of terminal decline.[188] Starting in the 1920s, Lovecraft became familiar with the work of the German conservative-revolutionary theorist Oswald Spengler, whose pessimistic thesis of the decadence of the modern West formed a crucial element in Lovecraft’s overall anti-modern worldview.[189] Spenglerian imagery of cyclical decay is a central theme in At the Mountains of Madness. S. T. Joshi, in H. P. Lovecraft: The Decline of the West, places Spengler at the center of his discussion of Lovecraft’s political and philosophical ideas. According to him, the idea of decline is the single idea that permeates and connects his personal philosophy. The main Spenglerian influence on Lovecraft would be his view that politics, economics, science, and art are all interdependent aspects of civilization. This realization led him to shed his personal ignorance of then-current political and economic developments after 1927.[190] Lovecraft had developed his idea of Western decline independently, but Spengler gave it a clear framework.[191]

Science

Lovecraft shifted supernatural horror away from its previous focus on human issues to a focus on cosmic ones. In this way, he merged the elements of supernatural fiction that he deemed to be scientifically viable with science fiction. This merge required an understanding of both supernatural horror and then-contemporary science.[192] Lovecraft used this combined knowledge to create stories that extensively reference trends in scientific development. Beginning with «The Shunned House», Lovecraft increasingly incorporated elements of both Einsteinian science and his own personal materialism into his stories. This intensified with the writing of «The Call of Cthulhu», where he depicted alien influences on humanity. This trend would continue throughout the remainder of his literary career. «The Colour Out of Space» represents what scholars have called the peak of this trend. It portrays an alien lifeform whose otherness prevents it from being defined by then-contemporary science.[193]

Another part of this effort was the repeated usage of mathematics in an effort to make his creatures and settings appear more alien. Tom Hull, a mathematician, regards this as enhancing his ability to invoke a sense of otherness and fear. He attributes this use of mathematics to Lovecraft’s childhood interest in astronomy and his adulthood awareness of non-Euclidean geometry.[194] Another reason for his use of mathematics was his reaction to the scientific developments of his day. These developments convinced him that humanity’s primary means of understanding the world was no longer trustable. Lovecraft’s usage of mathematics in his fiction serves to convert otherwise supernatural elements into things that have in-universe scientific explanations. «The Dreams in the Witch House» and The Shadow Out of Time both have elements of this. The former uses a witch and her familiar, while the latter uses the idea of mind transference. These elements are explained using scientific theories that were prevalent during Lovecraft’s lifetime.[195]

Lovecraft Country

Setting plays a major role in Lovecraft’s fiction. Lovecraft Country, a fictionalized version of New England, serves as the central hub for his mythos. It represents the history, culture, and folklore of the region, as interpreted by Lovecraft. These attributes are exaggerated and altered to provide a suitable setting for his stories. The names of the locations in the region were directly influenced by the names of real locations in the region, which was done to increase their realism.[196] Lovecraft’s stories use their connections with New England to imbue themselves with the ability to instill fear.[197] Lovecraft was primarily inspired by the cities and towns in Massachusetts. However, the specific location of Lovecraft Country is variable, as it moved according to Lovecraft’s literary needs. Starting with areas that he thought were evocative, Lovecraft redefined and exaggerated them under fictional names. For example, Lovecraft based Arkham on the town of Oakham and expanded it to include a nearby landmark.[198] Its location was moved, as Lovecraft decided that it would have been destroyed by the recently-built Quabbin Reservoir. This is alluded to in «The Colour Out of Space», as the «blasted heath» is submerged by the creation of a fictionalized version of the reservoir.[199] Similarly, Lovecraft’s other towns were based on other locations in Massachusetts. Innsmouth was based on Newburyport, and Dunwich was based on Greenwich. The vague locations of these towns also played into Lovecraft’s desire to create a mood in his stories. In his view, a mood can only be evoked through reading.[200]

Critical reception

Literary

Early efforts to revise an established literary view of Lovecraft as an author of ‘pulp’ were resisted by some eminent critics; in 1945, Edmund Wilson sneered: «the only real horror in most of these fictions is the horror of bad taste and bad art.» However, Wilson praised Lovecraft’s ability to write about his chosen field; he described him as having written about it «with much intelligence».[201] According to L. Sprague de Camp, Wilson later improved his opinion of Lovecraft, citing a report of David Chavchavadze that Wilson had included a Lovecraftian reference in Little Blue Light: A Play in Three Acts. After Chavchavadze met with him to discuss this, Wilson revealed that he had been reading a copy of Lovecraft’s correspondence.[f][203] Two years before Wilson’s critique, Lovecraft’s works were reviewed by Winfield Townley Scott, the literary editor of The Providence Journal. He argued that Lovecraft was one of the most significant Rhode Island authors and that it was regrettable that he had received little attention from mainstream critics at the time.[204] Mystery and Adventure columnist Will Cuppy of the New York Herald Tribune recommended to readers a volume of Lovecraft’s stories in 1944, asserting that «the literature of horror and macabre fantasy belongs with mystery in its broader sense.»[205]

By 1957, Floyd C. Gale of Galaxy Science Fiction said that Lovecraft was comparable to Robert E. Howard, stating that «they appear more prolific than ever,» noting L. Sprague de Camp, Björn Nyberg, and August Derleth’s usage of their creations.[206] Gale also said that «Lovecraft at his best could build a mood of horror unsurpassed; at his worst, he was laughable.»[206] In 1962, Colin Wilson, in his survey of anti-realist trends in fiction The Strength to Dream, cited Lovecraft as one of the pioneers of the «assault on rationality» and included him with M. R. James, H. G. Wells, Aldous Huxley, J. R. R. Tolkien and others as one of the builders of mythicised realities contending against what he considered the failing project of literary realism.[207] Subsequently, Lovecraft began to acquire the status of a cult writer in the counterculture of the 1960s, and reprints of his work proliferated.[208]

Michael Dirda, a reviewer for The Times Literary Supplement, has described Lovecraft as being a «visionary» who is «rightly regarded as second only to Edgar Allan Poe in the annals of American supernatural literature.» According to him, Lovecraft’s works prove that mankind cannot bear the weight of reality, as the true nature of reality cannot be understood by either science or history. In addition, Dirda praises Lovecraft’s ability to create an uncanny atmosphere. This atmosphere is created through the feeling of wrongness that pervades the objects, places, and people in Lovecraft’s works. He also comments favorably on Lovecraft’s correspondence, and compares him to Horace Walpole. Particular attention is given to his correspondence with August Derleth and Robert E. Howard. The Derleth letters are called «delightful», while the Howard letters are described as being an ideological debate. Overall, Dirda believes that Lovecraft’s letters are equal to, or better than, his fictional output.[209]

Los Angeles Review of Books reviewer Nick Mamatas has stated that Lovecraft was a particularly difficult author, rather than a bad one. He described Lovecraft as being «perfectly capable» in the fields of story logic, pacing, innovation, and generating quotable phrases. However, Lovecraft’s difficulty made him ill-suited to the pulps; he was unable to compete with the popular recurring protagonists and damsel-in-distress stories. Furthermore, he compared a paragraph from The Shadow Out of Time to a paragraph from the introduction to The Economic Consequences of the Peace. In Mamatas’ view, Lovecraft’s quality is obscured by his difficulty, and his skill is what has allowed his following to outlive the followings of other then-prominent authors, such as Seabury Quinn and Kenneth Patchen.[210]

In 2005, the Library of America published a volume of Lovecraft’s works. This volume was reviewed by many publications, including The New York Times Book Review and The Wall Street Journal, and sold 25,000 copies within a month of release. The overall critical reception of the volume was mixed.[211] Several scholars, including S. T. Joshi and Alison Sperling, have said that this confirms H. P. Lovecraft’s place in the western canon.[212] The editors of The Age of Lovecraft, Carl H. Sederholm and Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock, attributed the rise of mainstream popular and academic interest in Lovecraft to this volume, along with the Penguin Classics volumes and the Modern Library edition of At the Mountains of Madness. These volumes led to a proliferation of other volumes containing Lovecraft’s works. According to the two authors, these volumes are part of a trend in Lovecraft’s popular and academic reception: increased attention by one audience causes the other to also become more interested. Lovecraft’s success is, in part, the result of his success.[213]

Lovecraft’s style has often been subject to criticism,[214] but scholars such as S. T. Joshi have argued that Lovecraft consciously utilized a variety of literary devices to form a unique style of his own—these include prose-poetic rhythm, stream of consciousness, alliteration, and conscious archaism.[215] According to Joyce Carol Oates, Lovecraft and Edgar Allan Poe have exerted a significant influence on later writers in the horror genre.[216] Horror author Stephen King called Lovecraft «the twentieth century’s greatest practitioner of the classic horror tale.»[217] King stated in his semi-autobiographical non-fiction book Danse Macabre that Lovecraft was responsible for his own fascination with horror and the macabre and was the largest influence on his writing.[218]

Philosophical

H. P. Lovecraft’s writings have influenced the speculative realist philosophical movement during the early twentieth-first century. The four founders of the movement, Ray Brassier, Iain Hamilton Grant, Graham Harman, and Quentin Meillassoux, have cited Lovecraft as an inspiration for their worldviews.[219] Graham Harman wrote a monograph, Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy, about Lovecraft and philosophy. In it, he argues that Lovecraft was a «productionist» author. He describes Lovecraft as having been an author who was uniquely obsessed with gaps in human knowledge.[220] He goes further and asserts Lovecraft’s personal philosophy as being in opposition to both idealism and David Hume. In his view, Lovecraft resembles Georges Braque, Pablo Picasso, and Edmund Husserl in his division of objects into different parts that do not exhaust the potential meanings of the whole. The anti-idealism of Lovecraft is represented through his commentary on the inability of language to describe his horrors.[221] Harman also credits Lovecraft with inspiring parts of his own articulation of object-oriented ontology.[222] According to Lovecraft scholar Alison Sperling, this philosophical interpretation of Lovecraft’s fiction has caused other philosophers in Harmon’s tradition to write about Lovecraft. These philosophers seek to remove human perception and human life from the foundations of ethics. These scholars have used Lovecraft’s works as the central example of their worldview. They base this usage in Lovecraft’s arguments against anthropocentrism and the ability of the human mind to truly understand the universe. They have also played a role in Lovecraft’s improving literary reputation by focusing on his interpretation of ontology, which gives him a central position in Anthropocene studies.[223]

Legacy

Lovecraft memorial plaque with silhouette by Perry, slightly facing left

H. P. Lovecraft memorial plaque at 22 Prospect Street in Providence. Portrait by silhouettist E. J. Perry.

Lovecraft was relatively unknown during his lifetime. While his stories appeared in prominent pulp magazines such as Weird Tales, not many people knew his name.[224] He did, however, correspond regularly with other contemporary writers such as Clark Ashton Smith and August Derleth,[225] who became his friends, even though he never met them in person. This group became known as the «Lovecraft Circle», since their writings freely borrowed Lovecraft’s motifs, with his encouragement. He borrowed from them as well. For example, he made use of Clark Ashton Smith’s Tsathoggua in The Mound.[226]

After Lovecraft’s death, the Lovecraft Circle carried on. August Derleth founded Arkham House with Donald Wandrei to preserve Lovecraft’s works and keep them in print.[227] He added to and expanded on Lovecraft’s vision, not without controversy.[228] While Lovecraft considered his pantheon of alien gods a mere plot device, Derleth created an entire cosmology, complete with a war between the good Elder Gods and the evil Outer Gods, such as Cthulhu and his ilk. The forces of good were supposed to have won, locking Cthulhu and others beneath the earth, the ocean, and elsewhere. Derleth’s Cthulhu Mythos stories went on to associate different gods with the traditional four elements of fire, air, earth, and water, which did not line up with Lovecraft’s original vision of his mythos. However, Derleth’s ownership of Arkham House gave him a position of authority in Lovecraftiana that would not dissipate until his death, and through the efforts of Lovecraft scholars in the 1970s.[229]

Lovecraft’s works have influenced many writers and other creators. Stephen King has cited Lovecraft as a major influence on his works. As a child in the 1960s, he came across a volume of Lovecraft’s works which inspired him to write his fiction. He goes on to argue that all works in the horror genre that were written after Lovecraft were influenced by him.[217] In the field of comics, Alan Moore has described Lovecraft as having been a formative influence on his graphic novels.[230] Film director John Carpenter’s films include direct references and quotations of Lovecraft’s fiction, in addition to their use of a Lovecraftian aesthetic and themes. Guillermo del Toro has been similarly influenced by Lovecraft’s corpus.[231]

The first World Fantasy Awards were held in Providence in 1975. The theme was «The Lovecraft Circle». Until 2015, winners were presented with an elongated bust of Lovecraft that was designed by cartoonist Gahan Wilson, nicknamed the «Howard».[232] In November 2015 it was announced that the World Fantasy Award trophy would no longer be modeled on H. P. Lovecraft in response to the author’s views on race.[233] After the World Fantasy Award dropped their connection to Lovecraft, The Atlantic commented that «In the end, Lovecraft still wins—people who’ve never read a page of his work will still know who Cthulhu is for years to come, and his legacy lives on in the work of Stephen King, Guillermo del Toro, and Neil Gaiman.»[232]

In 2016, Lovecraft was inducted into the Museum of Pop Culture’s Science Fiction and Fantasy Hall of Fame.[234] Three years later, Lovecraft and the other mythos authors were posthumously awarded the 1945 Retro-Hugo Award for Best Series for their contributions to the Cthulhu Mythos.[235]

Lovecraft studies

Joshi in 2002, facing right and looking forward

Starting in the early 1970s, a body of scholarly work began to emerge around Lovecraft’s life and works. Referred to as Lovecraft studies, its proponents sought to establish Lovecraft as a significant author in the American literary canon. This can be traced to Derleth’s preservation and dissemination of Lovecraft’s fiction, non-fiction, and letters through Arkham House. Joshi credits the development of the field to this process. However, it was marred by low quality editions and misinterpretations of Lovecraft’s worldview. After Derleth’s death in 1971, the scholarship entered a new phase. There was a push to create a book-length biography of Lovecraft. L. Sprague de Camp, a science fiction scholar, wrote the first major one in 1975. This biography was criticized by early Lovecraft scholars for its lack of scholarly merit and its lack of sympathy for its subject. Despite this, it played a significant role in Lovecraft’s literary rise. It exposed Lovecraft to the mainstream of American literary criticism. During the late 1970s and early 1980s, there was a division in the field between the «Derlethian traditionalists» who wished to interpret Lovecraft through the lens of fantasy literature and the newer scholars who wished to place greater attention on the entirety of his corpus.[236]

The 1980s and 1990s saw a further proliferation of the field. The 1990 H. P. Lovecraft Centennial Conference and the republishing of older essays in An Epicure in the Terrible represented the publishing of many basic studies that would be used as a base for then-future studies. The 1990 centennial also saw the installation of the «H. P. Lovecraft Memorial Plaque» in a garden adjoining John Hay Library, that features a portrait by silhouettist E. J. Perry.[237] Following this, in 1996, S. T. Joshi wrote his own biography of Lovecraft. This biography was met with positive reviews and became the main biography in the field. It has since been superseded by his expanded edition of the book, I am Providence in 2010.[238]

Lovecraft’s improving literary reputation has caused his works to receive increased attention by both classics publishers and scholarly fans.[239] His works have been published by several different series of literary classics. Penguin Classics published three volumes of Lovecraft’s works between 1999 and 2004. These volumes were edited by S. T. Joshi.[239] Barnes & Noble would publish their own volume of Lovecraft’s complete fiction in 2008. The Library of America published a volume of Lovecraft’s works in 2005. The publishing of these volumes represented a reversal of the traditional judgment that Lovecraft was not part of the Western canon.[240] Meanwhile, the biannual NecronomiCon Providence convention was first held in 2013. Its purpose is to serve as a fan and scholarly convention that discusses both Lovecraft and the wider field of weird fiction. It is organized by the Lovecraft Arts and Sciences organization and is held on the weekend of Lovecraft’s birth.[241] That July, the Providence City Council designated the «H. P. Lovecraft Memorial Square» and installed a commemorative sign at the intersection of Angell and Prospect streets, near the author’s former residences.[242]

Music

Lovecraft’s fictional Mythos has influenced a number of musicians, particularly in rock and heavy metal music.[243] This began in the 1960s with the formation of the psychedelic rock band H. P. Lovecraft, who released the albums H. P. Lovecraft and H. P. Lovecraft II in 1967 and 1968 respectively.[244] They broke up afterwards, but later songs were released. This included «The White Ship» and «At the Mountains of Madness», both titled after Lovecraft stories.[245] Extreme metal has also been influenced by Lovecraft.[246] This has expressed itself in both the names of bands and the contents of their albums. This began in 1970 with the release of Black Sabbath’s first album, Black Sabbath, which contained a song titled Behind the Wall of Sleep, deriving its name from the 1919 story «Beyond the Wall of Sleep.»[246] Heavy metal band Metallica was also inspired by Lovecraft. They recorded a song inspired by «The Call of Cthulhu», «The Call of Ktulu», and a song based on The Shadow over Innsmouth titled «The Thing That Should Not Be».[247] These songs contain direct quotations of Lovecraft’s works.[248] Joseph Norman, a speculative scholar, has argued that there are similarities between the music described in Lovecraft’s fiction and the aesthetics and atmosphere of black metal. He argues that this is evident through the «animalistic» qualities of black metal vocals. The usage of occult elements is also cited as a thematic commonality. In terms of atmosphere, he asserts that both Lovecraft’s works and extreme metal place heavy focus on creating a strong negative mood.[249]

Games

Lovecraft has also influenced gaming, despite having personally disliked games during his lifetime.[250] Chaosium’s tabletop role-playing game Call of Cthulhu, released in 1981 and currently in its seventh major edition, was one of the first games to draw heavily from Lovecraft.[251] It includes a Lovecraft-inspired insanity mechanic, which allowed for player characters to go insane from contact with cosmic horrors. This mechanic would go on to make appearance in subsequent tabletop and video games.[252] 1987 saw the release of another Lovecraftian board game, Arkham Horror, which was published by Fantasy Flight Games.[253] Though few subsequent Lovecraftian board games were released annually from 1987 to 2014, the years after 2014 saw a rapid increase in the number of Lovecraftian board games. According to Christina Silva, this revival may have been influenced by the entry of Lovecraft’s work into the public domain and a revival of interest in board games.[254] Few video games are direct adaptations of Lovecraft’s works, but many video games have been inspired or heavily influenced by Lovecraft.[252] Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth, a Lovecraftian first-person video game, was released in 2005.[252] It is a loose adaptation of The Shadow over Innsmouth, The Shadow Out of Time, and «The Thing on the Doorstep» that uses noir themes.[255] These adaptations focus more on Lovecraft’s monsters and gamification than they do on his themes, which represents a break from Lovecraft’s core theme of human insignificance.[256]

Religion and occultism

Several contemporary religions have been influenced by Lovecraft’s works. Kenneth Grant, the founder of the Typhonian Order, incorporated Lovecraft’s Mythos into his ritual and occult system. Grant combined his interest in Lovecraft’s fiction with his adherence to Aleister Crowley’s Thelema. The Typhonian Order considers Lovecraftian entities to be symbols through which people may interact with something inhuman.[257] Grant also argued that Crowley himself was influenced by Lovecraft’s writings, particularly in the naming of characters in The Book of the Law.[258] Similarly, The Satanic Rituals, co-written by Anton LaVey and Michael A. Aquino, includes the «Ceremony of the Nine Angles», which is a ritual that was influenced by the descriptions in «The Dreams in the Witch House». It contains invocations of several of Lovecraft’s fictional gods.[259]

There have been several books that have claimed to be an authentic edition of Lovecraft’s Necronomicon.[260] The Simon Necronomicon is one such example. It was written by an unknown figure who identified themselves as «Simon». Peter Levenda, an occult author who has written about the Necronomicon, claims that he and «Simon» came across a hidden Greek translation of the grimoire while looking through a collection of antiquities at a New York bookstore during the 1960s or 1970s.[261] This book was claimed to have borne the seal of the Necronomicon. Levenda went on to claim that Lovecraft had access to this purported scroll.[262] A textual analysis has determined that the contents of this book were derived from multiple documents that discuss Mesopotamian myth and magic. The finding of a magical text by monks is also a common theme in the history of grimoires.[263] It has been suggested that Levenda is the true author of the Simon Necronomicon.[264]

Correspondence

Although Lovecraft is known mostly for his works of weird fiction, the bulk of his writing consists of voluminous letters about a variety of topics, from weird fiction and art criticism to politics and history.[265] Lovecraft biographers L. Sprague de Camp and S. T. Joshi have estimated that Lovecraft wrote 100,000 letters in his lifetime, a fifth of which are believed to survive.[266] These letters were directed at fellow writers and members of the amateur press. His involvement in the latter was what caused him to begin writing them.[267] He included comedic elements in these letters. This included posing as an eighteenth-century gentleman and signing them with pseudonyms, most commonly «Grandpa Theobald» and «E’ch-Pi-El.»[g][269] According to Joshi, the most important sets of letters were those written to Frank Belknap Long, Clark Ashton Smith, and James F. Morton. He attributes this importance to the contents of these letters. With Long, Lovecraft argued in support and in opposition to many of Long’s viewpoints. The letters to Clark Ashton Smith are characterized by their focus on weird fiction. Lovecraft and Morton debated many scholarly subjects in their letters, resulting in what Joshi has called the «single greatest correspondence Lovecraft ever wrote.»[270]

Copyright and other legal issues

Derleth facing left in 1962

Despite several claims to the contrary, there is currently no evidence that any company or individual owns the copyright to any of Lovecraft’s works, and it is generally accepted that it has passed into the public domain.[271] Lovecraft had specified that R. H. Barlow would serve as the executor of his literary estate,[272] but these instructions were not incorporated into his will. Nevertheless, his surviving aunt carried out his expressed wishes, and Barlow was given control of Lovecraft’s literary estate upon his death. Barlow deposited the bulk of the papers, including the voluminous correspondence, in the John Hay Library, and attempted to organize and maintain Lovecraft’s other writings.[273] Lovecraft protégé August Derleth, an older and more established writer than Barlow, vied for control of the literary estate. He and Donald Wandrei, a fellow protégé and co-owner of Arkham House, falsely claimed that Derleth was the true literary executor.[274] Barlow capitulated, and later committed suicide in 1951.[275] This gave Derleth and Wandrei complete control over Lovecraft’s corpus.[276]

On October 9, 1947, Derleth purchased all rights to the stories that were published in Weird Tales. However, since April 1926 at the latest, Lovecraft had reserved all second printing rights to stories published in Weird Tales. Therefore, Weird Tales only owned the rights to at most six of Lovecraft’s tales. If Derleth had legally obtained the copyrights to these tales, there is no evidence that they were renewed before the rights expired.[277] Following Derleth’s death in 1971, Donald Wandrei sued his estate to challenge Derleth’s will, which stated that he only held the copyrights and royalties to Lovecraft’s works that were published under both his and Derleth’s names. Arkham House’s lawyer, Forrest D. Hartmann, argued that the rights to Lovecraft’s works were never renewed. Wandrei won the case, but Arkham House’s actions regarding copyright have damaged their ability to claim ownership of them.[278]

In H. P. Lovecraft: A Life, S. T. Joshi concludes that Derleth’s claims are «almost certainly fictitious» and argues that most of Lovecraft’s works that were published in the amateur press are likely in the public domain. The copyright for Lovecraft’s works would have been inherited by the only surviving heir named in his 1912 will, his aunt Annie Gamwell.[279] When she died in 1941, the copyrights passed to her remaining descendants, Ethel Phillips Morrish and Edna Lewis. They signed a document, sometimes referred to as the Morrish-Lewis gift, permitting Arkham House to republish Lovecraft’s works while retaining their ownership of the copyrights.[280] Searches of the Library of Congress have failed to find any evidence that these copyrights were renewed after the 28-year period, making it likely that these works are in the public domain.[281] However, the Lovecraft literary estate, reconstituted in 1998 under Robert C. Harrall, has claimed that they own the rights. They have been based in Providence since 2009 and have been granting the rights to Lovecraft’s works to several publishers. Their claims have been criticized by scholars, such as Chris J. Karr, who has argued that the rights had not been renewed.[282] Joshi has withdrawn his support for his conclusion, and now supports the estate’s copyright claims.[283]

Bibliography

See also

  • Category:H. P. Lovecraft scholars

Explanatory notes

  1. ^ Lovecraft did not coin the term «Cthulhu Mythos». Instead, this term was coined by later authors.[1]
  2. ^ The house was later moved to 65 Prospect Street to accommodate the building of Brown University’s Art Building.[101]
  3. ^ He wrote several travelogues, including one on Quebec that was the longest singular work that he wrote.[107]
  4. ^ This is the only one of Lovecraft’s stories that was published as a book during his lifetime.[118] W. Paul Cook had previously made an abortive attempt to publish «The Shunned House» as a small book between 1927 and 1930.[119]
  5. ^ «Grippe» is an archaic term for influenza.[123]
  6. ^ L. Sprague de Camp also stated that the two men began calling each other «Monstro». This is a direct reference to the nicknames that Lovecraft gave to some of his correspondents.[202]
  7. ^ Lewis Theobald, Jun., the full version of Grandpa Theobald, was derived from the name of Lewis Theobald, an eighteenth-century Shakespearian scholar who was fictionalized in Alexander Pope’s The Dunciad.[268]

Citations

  1. ^ a b Tierney 2001, p. 52; Joshi 2010b, p. 186; de Camp 1975, p. 270.
  2. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 16; de Camp 1975, p. 12; Cannon 1989, p. 1–2.
  3. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 8; de Camp 1975, p. 11; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
  4. ^ Joshi 2010a.
  5. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 26.
  6. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 22; de Camp 1975, pp. 15–16; Faig 1991, p. 49.
  7. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 26; de Camp 1975, p. 16; Cannon 1989, p. 1.
  8. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 28; de Camp 1975, p. 17; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
  9. ^ de Camp 1975, p. 2; Cannon 1989, pp. 3–4.
  10. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 28; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
  11. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 25; de Camp 1975, pp. 17–18.
  12. ^ a b Joshi 2010a, pp. 33, 36; de Camp 1975, pp. 17–18.
  13. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 34; de Camp 1975, pp. 30–31.
  14. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 38; de Camp 1975, pp. 32; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
  15. ^ a b Lovecraft 2006a, pp. 145–146; Joshi 2001, pp. 20–23; St. Armand 1975, pp. 140–141.
  16. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 42; St. Armand 1972, pp. 3–4; de Camp 1975, pp. 18.
  17. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 60; de Camp 1975, p. 32.
  18. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 84.
  19. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 90; Cannon 1989, p. 4.
  20. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 97; Faig 1991, p. 63.
  21. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 96; de Camp 1975, pp. 37–39; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
  22. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 98; Joshi 2001, pp. 47–48; Faig 1991, p. 4.
  23. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 99.
  24. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 102; de Camp 1975, p. 36.
  25. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 116; de Camp 1975, pp. 43–45; Cannon 1989, p. 15.
  26. ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 126; de Camp 1975, pp. 51–53; Cannon 1989, p. 3.
  27. ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 126.
  28. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 126–127; de Camp 1975, p. 27.
  29. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 127.
  30. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 128; de Camp 1975, pp. 51–52.
  31. ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 128.
  32. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 66; Faig 1991, p. 65.
  33. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 67–68; de Camp 1975, p. 66; St. Armand 1972, p. 3.
  34. ^ de Camp 1975, p. 64.
  35. ^ Bonner 2015, pp. 52–53.
  36. ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 154.
  37. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 129; de Camp 1975.
  38. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 137.
  39. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 138; de Camp 1975, p. 95.
  40. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 140; de Camp 1975, pp. 76–77.
  41. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 145; de Camp 1975, p. 76–77.
  42. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 145; de Camp 1975, pp. 78–79.
  43. ^ Joshi 2010a, pp. 145–155; de Camp 1975, p. 84.
  44. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 155; de Camp 1975, pp. 84–84.
  45. ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 159.
  46. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 164.
  47. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 165.
  48. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 168; de Camp 1975, p. 153; Cannon 1989, p. 5.
  49. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 169.
  50. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 180; de Camp 1975, p. 121.
  51. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 182; de Camp 1975, pp. 121–122.
  52. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 210; Cannon 1989, p. 6.
  53. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 273; de Camp 1975, p. 125.
  54. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 239; de Camp 1975, pp. 125–126.
  55. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 240; Cannon 1989, p. 16.
  56. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 251; de Camp 1975, pp. 125–126.
  57. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 260; de Camp 1975, p. 137.
  58. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 284; de Camp 1975, p. 122.
  59. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 303; Faig 1991, p. 66.
  60. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 300; Faig 1991, pp. 66–67.
  61. ^ Joshi 1996a, p. 23; Cannon 1989, p. 3; de Camp 1975, p. 118.
  62. ^ a b Joshi 2001, p. 125.
  63. ^ a b Hess 1971, p. 249; Joshi 2001, pp. 121–122; de Camp 1975, p. 65–66.
  64. ^ Hess 1971, p. 249; Joshi 2010a, p. 301; de Camp 1975, pp. 134–135.
  65. ^ Lovecraft 2000, p. 84.
  66. ^ Faig 1991, pp. 58–59; de Camp 1975, p. 135.
  67. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 306; de Camp 1975, pp. 139–141.
  68. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 308.
  69. ^ Joshi 1996a, p. 79; de Camp 1975, pp. 141–144.
  70. ^ Joshi 1996a, p. 79; de Camp 1975, pp. 141–144; Burleson 1990, pp. 39.
  71. ^ Tierney 2001, p. 52; Leavenworth 2014, pp. 333–334.
  72. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 369; de Camp 1975, pp. 138–139.
  73. ^ de Camp 1975, p. 149; Burleson 1990, pp. 49, 52–53.
  74. ^ Burleson 1990, p. 58; Joshi 2010a, pp. 140–142.
  75. ^ Mosig 2001, pp. 17–18, 33; Joshi 2010a, pp. 140–142.
  76. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 390; de Camp 1975, p. 154; Cannon 1989, pp. 4–5.
  77. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 390; de Camp 1975, p. 154–156.
  78. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 144–145; de Camp 1975, p. 154–156; Faig 1991, p. 67.
  79. ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 400; de Camp 1975, p. 152–154; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
  80. ^ Greene & Scott 1948, p. 8; Fooy 2011; de Camp 1975, p. 184.
  81. ^ Everts 2012, p. 19; Joshi 2001, pp. 201–202.
  82. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 202–203; de Camp 1975, p. 202.
  83. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 291–292; de Camp 1975, pp. 177–179, 219; Cannon 1989, p. 55.
  84. ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 136; de Camp 1975, p. 219.
  85. ^ Fooy 2011; Cannon 1989, p. 55; Joshi 2001, p. 210.
  86. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 201–202.
  87. ^ Joshi 1996b, p. 11; de Camp 1975, pp. 109–111; Greene & Scott 1948, p. 8.
  88. ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 112.
  89. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 295–298; de Camp 1975, p. 224.
  90. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 295–298; de Camp 1975, pp. 207–213.
  91. ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001; St. Armand 1972, p. 10.
  92. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 225; de Camp 1975, p. 183.
  93. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 200–201; de Camp 1975, pp. 170–172.
  94. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 216–218; de Camp 1975, pp. 230–232.
  95. ^ Lovecraft 2009b.
  96. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 223–224; Norris 2020, p. 217; de Camp 1975, pp. 242–243.
  97. ^ Pedersen 2017, p. 23; de Camp 1975, p. 270; Burleson 1990, p. 77.
  98. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 227–228; Moreland 2018, pp. 1–3; Cannon 1989, pp. 61–62.
  99. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 214–215.
  100. ^ Rubinton 2016; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
  101. ^ a b Joshi 1996a, p. 26; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
  102. ^ Pedersen 2017, p. 23; de Camp 1975, p. 270; Joshi 2001, pp. 351–354.
  103. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 351–354; St. Armand 1972, pp. 10–14.
  104. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 351–353; Goodrich 2004, pp. 37–38.
  105. ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 117; Flood 2016.
  106. ^ Cannon 1989, pp. 7–8; Evans 2005, pp. 102–105.
  107. ^ Ransom 2015, pp. 451–452; Evans 2005, p. 104; Joshi 2001, pp. 272–273.
  108. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 272–273; Cannon 1989, pp. 7–8.
  109. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 307–309; Finn 2013, pp. 148–149, 184; Vick 2021, pp. 96–102.
  110. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 307–309; Finn 2013, pp. 148–149; Vick 2021, pp. 96–102.
  111. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 307–309; Finn 2013, pp. 150–151; Vick 2021, pp. 96–102.
  112. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 273.
  113. ^ Schultz 2018, pp. 52–53.
  114. ^ Schultz 2018, pp. 52–53; Joshi 2001, p. 255; de Camp 1975, pp. 192–194.
  115. ^ Greene & Scott 1948, p. 8; Joshi 1996b, p. 455.
  116. ^ Lovecraft 1976b; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–355; Cannon 1989, pp. 10–11.
  117. ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–12; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–355.
  118. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 382–383.
  119. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 262–263.
  120. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 383–384.
  121. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 375–376; Finn 2013, pp. 294–295; Vick 2021, pp. 130–137.
  122. ^ Lovecraft 2006c, pp. 216–218; Joshi 2001, pp. 375–376; Vick 2021, p. 143.
  123. ^ Lexico Dictionaries 2020.
  124. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 370, 384–385; Cannon 1989, p. 11; de Camp 1975, pp. 415–416.
  125. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 387–388; de Camp 1975, pp. 427–428.
  126. ^ The Boston Globe 1937, p. 2; Joshi 2001, pp. 387–388.
  127. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 389; de Camp 1975, p. 428.
  128. ^ Mosig 1997, p. 114; Lovecraft 1968, pp. 50–51.
  129. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 8–16; Cannon 1989, p. 10.
  130. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 183–184.
  131. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 9; Joshi 2016, p. 161.
  132. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 16; Joshi 2001, pp. 183–184.
  133. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 94–96.
  134. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 101–102; Pedersen 2019, pp. 119–120.
  135. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 351; Pedersen 2019, pp. 141–143.
  136. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 346.
  137. ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–4; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–348; Cannon 1989, pp. 10–11.
  138. ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–35; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–348.
  139. ^ Lovecraft 2006d, pp. 85–95; Joshi 2001, pp. 349–352.
  140. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 349–352.
  141. ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–12; Joshi 2001, p. 354; Cannon 1989, p. 10.
  142. ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–12; Joshi 2001, p. 354.
  143. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 360–361.
  144. ^ Lovecraft 2006a, p. 145; Hölzing 2011, pp. 182–183.
  145. ^ Lovecraft 2006a, pp. 145–146; Joshi 2001, pp. 20–23; Zeller 2019, p. 18.
  146. ^ Lubnow 2019, pp. 3–5; Livesey 2008, pp. 3–21; Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–174.
  147. ^ Lovecraft 2006a, pp. 147–148; Joshi 2001, pp. 40, 130–133.
  148. ^ Schweitzer 1998, pp. 94–95; Evans 2005, pp. 108–110; Joshi 2015, pp. 108–110.
  149. ^ Callaghan 2011, p. 103; Spencer 2021, p. 603.
  150. ^ Steiner 2005, pp. 54–55; Evans 2005, pp. 108–109; Lovett-Graff 1997, pp. 183–186.
  151. ^ Steiner 2005, pp. 54–55; Punter 1996, p. 40.
  152. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 162–163; Hambly 1996, p. viii; Klein 2012, pp. 183–184.
  153. ^ Lovett-Graff 1997, pp. 183–187; Evans 2005, pp. 123–125; Klein 2012, pp. 183–184.
  154. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 221–223; Steiner 2005, pp. 54–55.
  155. ^ Schweitzer 1998, pp. 94–95; Evans 2005, p. 125; Joshi 2015, pp. 108–110.
  156. ^ Joshi 2015, p. 109.
  157. ^ Ransom 2015, pp. 451–452; Evans 2005, pp. 109–110.
  158. ^ Joshi 2015, p. 108–109; Evans 2005, pp. 109–110.
  159. ^ Pedersen 2017, pp. 26–27; Joshi 2001, pp. 21–24.
  160. ^ a b c Pedersen 2017, pp. 26–27; Joshi 2001, pp. 47–48.
  161. ^ Pedersen 2018, pp. 172–173; Joshi 2013, p. 263; St. Armand 1975, p. 129.
  162. ^ Jamneck 2012, pp. 126–151; St. Armand 1975, pp. 129–130.
  163. ^ Joshi 2017, pp. x–xi.
  164. ^ Lovecraft 2009a; Jamneck 2012, pp. 126–151; Cannon 1989, pp. 101–103.
  165. ^ Jamneck 2012, pp. 126–151.
  166. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 135–137; Schweitzer 2018, pp. 139–143; Joshi 2013, pp. 260–261.
  167. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 253.
  168. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 168–169; Joshi 2001, pp. 228–229; St. Armand 1975, p. 142.
  169. ^ a b St. Armand 1975, pp. 127–128.
  170. ^ St. Armand 1975, p. 127.
  171. ^ St. Armand 1975, pp. 129–131.
  172. ^ St. Armand 1975, pp. 133–137.
  173. ^ St. Armand 1975, pp. 145–150.
  174. ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–173; Rottensteiner 1992, pp. 117–121.
  175. ^ Woodard 2011, p. 6; Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–173.
  176. ^ Lubnow 2019, pp. 3–5; Livesey 2008, pp. 3–21; Joshi 2010b, p. 174.
  177. ^ Lovecraft 2010, p. 97; Pedersen 2017, p. 23; de Camp 1975, p. 270.
  178. ^ Macrobert 2015, pp. 34–39; Burleson 1991–1992, pp. 7–12.
  179. ^ Burleson 1991–1992, pp. 7–12.
  180. ^ Lovecraft 2014, p. 7.
  181. ^ Touponce 2013, pp. 62–63; Matthews 2018, p. 177; Burleson 1990, pp. 156–160.
  182. ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 186–187; Burleson 1990, pp. 156–157.
  183. ^ Leiber 2001, p. 6; Lacy & Zani 2007, p. 70; Burleson 1990, pp. 158–159.
  184. ^ Burleson 1990, pp. 156–158; Joshi 1996a, p. 124; Pedersen 2017, pp. 28–33.
  185. ^ Burleson 1990, pp. 156–158.
  186. ^ Burleson 1990, pp. 156–158; Joshi 1996a, pp. 262–263.
  187. ^ St. Armand 1972, pp. 14–15; Joshi 1996a, p. 124; Cannon 1989, p. 73.
  188. ^ Joshi 2016, p. 320; St. Armand 1975, pp. 129–130.
  189. ^ Joshi 2016, p. 314–320; St. Armand 1975, pp. 131–132.
  190. ^ Joshi 2016, pp. 314–320.
  191. ^ Joshi 2016, p. 316.
  192. ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–172.
  193. ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 183–188; Martin 2012, p. 99; Burleson 1990, pp. 107–110.
  194. ^ Hull 2006, pp. 10–12.
  195. ^ Look 2016, pp. 101–103; Halpurn & Labossiere 2009, pp. 512–513.
  196. ^ Butler 2014, pp. 131–135; St. Armand 1975, p. 129.
  197. ^ Butler 2014, pp. 131–135.
  198. ^ Murray 1986, pp. 54–67.
  199. ^ Murray 1991–1992, pp. 19–29; Burleson 1990, pp. 106, 118.
  200. ^ Murray 1991–1992, pp. 19–29.
  201. ^ Wilson 1950, pp. 286–290.
  202. ^ de Camp 1979, p. 5.
  203. ^ de Camp 1979, p. 5; Cannon 1989, p. 126.
  204. ^ Scott 1943, p. 41.
  205. ^ Cuppy 1944, p. 10.
  206. ^ a b Gale 1960, pp. 100–103.
  207. ^ Wilson 1975, pp. 1–10.
  208. ^ Lovecraft 2013, pp. xiii–xiv.
  209. ^ Dirda 2012.
  210. ^ Mamatas 2014.
  211. ^ Lovecraft Annual 2007, p. 160; Eberhart 2005, p. 82; Grant 2005, p. 146.
  212. ^ Joshi 2015, pp. 105–116; Sperling 2016, p. 75; Hantke 2013, pp. 137–138.
  213. ^ Sederholm & Weinstock 2016, pp. 2, 8–9.
  214. ^ Gray 2014; Dirda 2005.
  215. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 91, 252.
  216. ^ Oates 1996.
  217. ^ a b Wohleber 1995.
  218. ^ King 1987, p. 63.
  219. ^ Peak 2020, pp. 169–172; Elfren 2016.
  220. ^ Harman 2012, pp. 3–4; Elfren 2016, pp. 88–89; Peak 2020, pp. 177–178.
  221. ^ Harman 2012, pp. 3–4; Powell 2019, p. 263; Peak 2020, pp. 177–178.
  222. ^ Harman 2012, pp. 3–4; Powell 2019, p. 263; Elfren 2016, pp. 88–89.
  223. ^ Sperling 2016, pp. 75–78.
  224. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 390; Dirda 2005; Cannon 1989, p. 1.
  225. ^ Schoell 2004, pp. 8–40.
  226. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 141–142.
  227. ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 390–391; de Camp 1975, p. 132; Hantke 2013, p. 135–136.
  228. ^ Tierney 2001, p. 52–53; de Camp 1975, pp. 434–435; Joshi 1984, pp. 62–64.
  229. ^ Tierney 2001, p. 52; de Camp 1975, pp. 434–435; Joshi 1984, pp. 62–64.
  230. ^ Talbot 2014.
  231. ^ Janicker 2015, pp. 473; Norris 2018, pp. 158–159; Nelson 2012, pp. 221–222.
  232. ^ a b Cruz 2015.
  233. ^ Flood 2015.
  234. ^ Locus Online 2017.
  235. ^ The Hugo Awards 2020.
  236. ^ Joshi 1984, pp. 62–64; Joshi 1985a, pp. 19–25; Joshi 1985b, pp. 54–58.
  237. ^ Rubinton 2016; Joshi 2001, pp. 219.
  238. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 5–6; Oates 1996; Mariconda 2010, pp. 208–209.
  239. ^ a b Hantke 2013, p. 138; Peak 2020, p. 163; Dirda 2005.
  240. ^ Dziemianowicz 2010; Peak 2020, p. 163; Dirda 2005.
  241. ^ Siclen 2015; Smith 2017; Dirda 2019.
  242. ^ Bilow 2013.
  243. ^ Hill & Joshi 2006, p. 7; Sederholm 2016, pp. 266–267.
  244. ^ Hill & Joshi 2006, pp. 19–24; Sederholm 2016, p. 271.
  245. ^ Hill & Joshi 2006, pp. 19–24.
  246. ^ a b Norman 2013, pp. 193–194.
  247. ^ Griwkowsky 2008; Sederholm 2016, pp. 271–272; Norman 2013, pp. 193–194.
  248. ^ Sederholm 2016, pp. 271–272.
  249. ^ Norman 2013, pp. 197–202.
  250. ^ Lovecraft 1976a, p. 13; Carbonell 2019, p. 137.
  251. ^ Carbonell 2019, p. 160; Gollop 2017; Garrad 2021, p. 25.
  252. ^ a b c Gollop 2017.
  253. ^ Gollop 2017; Silva 2017; Garrad 2021, pp. 26–27.
  254. ^ Silva 2017.
  255. ^ Garrad 2021, pp. 27–28.
  256. ^ Garrad 2021, p. 28.
  257. ^ Engle 2014, pp. 89–90; Matthews 2018, pp. 178–179.
  258. ^ Engle 2014, p. 89–90.
  259. ^ Engle 2014, p. 91.
  260. ^ Clore 2001, pp. 61–69.
  261. ^ Levenda 2014.
  262. ^ Matthews 2018, pp. 178–179.
  263. ^ Davies 2009, p. 268.
  264. ^ Flatley 2013.
  265. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–242; Cannon 1989, p. 10; de Camp 1975, p. xii.
  266. ^ de Camp 1975, p. xii; Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–237.
  267. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–239.
  268. ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, pp. 217–218; Wetzel 1983, pp. 19–20.
  269. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 245–246; Joshi & Schultz 2001, pp. 217–218; de Camp 1975, pp. 113–114.
  270. ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–242.
  271. ^ Karr 2018, Conclusion; Wetzel 1983, p. 12; Wallace 2023, p. 27–28.
  272. ^ Lovecraft 2006b, p. 237; Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights; Joshi 1996b.
  273. ^ Joshi 2001, p. 390; de Camp 1975, p. 430–432; Wetzel 1983, pp. 3–4.
  274. ^ Joshi 1996b, p. 640–641; de Camp 1975, p. 430–432; Wetzel 1983, pp. 4–6.
  275. ^ de Camp 1975, p. 432; Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights; Wetzel 1983, pp. 10–12.
  276. ^ Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights; Wetzel 1983, p. 11; Wallace 2023, p. 35.
  277. ^ Karr 2018, The Arkham House Copyright Hypothesis; Joshi 1996b, p. 640–641; Wallace 2023, p. 42.
  278. ^ Karr 2018, The «Donald Wandrei v. The Estate of August Derleth» Hypothesis; Wallace 2023, p. 38–39.
  279. ^ Joshi 1996b, p. 640; Lovecraft 2006b, p. 237; Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights.
  280. ^ Karr 2018, The Arkham House Copyright Hypothesis; Joshi 1996b, p. 641; Wetzel 1983, pp. 24–25.
  281. ^ Karr 2018, Conclusion; Wetzel 1983, p. 25.
  282. ^ Karr 2018, Coda; Wallace 2023, p. 41.
  283. ^ Karr 2018, Coda; Wallace 2023, p. 42.

General and cited sources

  • «1945 Retro-Hugo Awards». The Hugo Awards. 2020. Archived from the original on August 1, 2020.
  • «2016 SF&F Hall of Fame Inductees». Locus Online. January 17, 2017. Archived from the original on December 22, 2019.
  • Bilow, Michael (July 27, 2013). «We are Providence: The H.P. Lovecraft Community». Motif Magazine. Archived from the original on October 17, 2013.
  • Bonner, Marian F. (2015). «Miscellaneous Impressions of H.P.L.». Lovecraft Annual (9): 52–53. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868496.
  • «Briefly Noted». Lovecraft Annual (1): 160. 2007. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868367.
  • Burleson, Donald R. (1990). Lovecraft: Disturbing the Universe (First ed.). Lexington, Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 978-0-8131-9319-9. JSTOR j.ctt130jf9h. OCLC 895675279.
  • Burleson, Donald R. (1991–1992). «Lovecraft: Dreams and Reality». Books at Brown. 38–39: 7–12. ISSN 0147-0787. Archived from the original on April 20, 2021 – via Brown Digital Repository.
  • Butler, James O. (2014). «Terror and Terrain: The Environmental Semantics of Lovecraft County». Lovecraft Annual (8): 131–149. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868485.
  • Callaghan, Gavin (2011). «Blacks, Boxers, and Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual. 5 (1): 102–111. JSTOR 26868430.
  • Cannon, Peter (1989). H. P. Lovecraft. Twayne’s United States Authors Series. Vol. 549. Boston: Twayne. ISBN 0-8057-7539-0. OCLC 246440364.
  • Carbonell, Curtis D. (2019). «Lovecraft’s (Cthulhu) Mythos». Dread Trident: Tabletop Role-Playing Games and the Modern Fantastic. Liverpool University Press. pp. 137–165. doi:10.3828/liverpool/9781789620573.003.0005. ISBN 978-1-78962-468-7. JSTOR j.ctv12pntt4.8. OCLC 1155494616. S2CID 219891871.
  • Clore, Dan (n.d.) [first published Fall 2001]. «The Lurker on the Threshold of Interpretation: Hoax Necronomicons and Paratextual Noise». Lovecraft Studies (42–43): 61–69. ISSN 0899-8361. Archived from the original on October 26, 2009 – via Yahoo! GeoCities.
  • Cruz, Lenika (November 12, 2015). «‘Political Correctness’ Won’t Ruin H.P. Lovecraft’s Legacy». The Atlantic. Archived from the original on November 17, 2015.
  • Cuppy, Will (January 2, 1944). «Review of Beyond the Wall of Sleep». New York Herald Tribune. p. 10. ISSN 1941-0646.
  • Davies, Owen (2009). Grimoires: A History of Magic Books. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-150924-7. OCLC 434863058.
  • de Camp, L. Sprague (March 1979). «H. P. Lovecraft and Edmund Wilson». Fantasy Mongers. No. 1. ISSN 8755-7479.
  • de Camp, L. Sprague (1975). Lovecraft: A Biography (First ed.). Garden City, New York: Doubleday. ISBN 0-385-00578-4. OCLC 979196. S2CID 190754775.
  • Dirda, Michael (2012). «Cthulhu for President». The Times Literary Supplement. Archived from the original on June 30, 2020.
  • Dirda, Michael (September 4, 2019). «Dispatch from a ‘Horror’ Convention: It Began in a Dark, Candlelit Room . . «. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. ProQuest 2284363189. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
  • Dirda, Michael (March 7, 2005). «The Horror, the Horror!». The Weekly Standard. ISSN 1083-3013. Archived from the original on November 5, 2009.
  • Dziemianowicz, Stefan (July 12, 2010). «Terror Eternal: The Enduring Popularity of H. P. Lovecraft». Publishers Weekly. ISSN 0000-0019. ProQuest 609957378.
  • Eberhart, John Mark (February 13, 2005). «The Library of Lovecraft». The Kansas City Star. p. 82. ISSN 0745-1067. Archived from the original on December 16, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  • Elfren, Isabella van (2016). «Hyper-Cacophony: Lovecraft, Speculative Realism, and Sonic Materialism». In Sederholm, Carl H.; Weinstock, Jeffrey Andrew (eds.). The Age of Lovecraft. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 79–96. ISBN 978-0-8166-9925-4. JSTOR 10.5749/j.ctt1b9x1f3.8. OCLC 945632985. S2CID 194316992.
  • Engle, John (October 15, 2014). «Cults of Lovecraft: The Impact of H.P. Lovecraft’s Fiction on Contemporary Occult Practices». Mythlore. 33 (125): 85–98. JSTOR 26815942. S2CID 159074285 – via SWOSU Digital Commons.
  • Evans, Timothy H. (2005). «A Last Defense against the Dark: Folklore, Horror, and the Uses of Tradition in the Works of H. P. Lovecraft». Journal of Folklore Research. 42 (1): 99–135. doi:10.2979/JFR.2005.42.1.99. ISSN 0737-7037. JSTOR 3814792. S2CID 162356996.
  • Everts, R. Alain (June 22, 2012) [first published July 1974]. «Howard Phillips Lovecraft and Sex: or The Sex Life of a Gentleman». Nyctalops. Vol. 2, no. 2. p. 19. Archived from the original on October 25, 2019 – via The H. P. Lovecraft Archive.
  • Faig, Kenneth W. Jr. (1991). «The Parents of Howard Phillips Lovecraft». In Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (eds.). An Epicure in the Terrible: A Centennial Anthology of Essays in Honor of H. P. Lovecraft (First ed.). Madison, New Jersey: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. pp. 45–77. ISBN 0-8386-3415-X. OCLC 22766987.
  • Finn, Mark (2013). Blood and Thunder: The Life and Art of Robert E. Howard (Third ed.). Cross Plains, Texas: Robert E. Howard Foundation Press. ISBN 978-1-304-03152-5. OCLC 923870328.
  • Flatley, Joseph L. (November 12, 2013). «The Cult of Cthulhu: Real Prayer for a Fake Tentacle». The Verge. Archived from the original on October 29, 2019.
  • Flood, Alison (March 16, 2016). «Lost HP Lovecraft Work Commissioned by Houdini Escapes Shackles of History». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on October 8, 2016.
  • Flood, Alison (November 9, 2015). «World Fantasy Award Drops HP Lovecraft as Prize Image». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 18, 2015.
  • Fooy, Frederick (October 27, 2011). «Resident Horror Genius». South Brooklyn Post. Archived from the original on August 2, 2016.
  • Gale, Floyd C. (April 1960). «Galaxy’s 5 Star Shelf». Galaxy Science Fiction. pp. 100–103.
  • Garrad, Jonathan (November 15, 2021). «Gamifying Fictions of Defeat: Adaptations of Lovecraft to Games Media». Studies in Gothic Fiction. 7: 20–29. ISSN 2156-2407.
  • Gollop, Julian (November 16, 2017). «The Gollop Chamber: Where Are All the Lovecraftian Games?». PC Gamer. Archived from the original on March 7, 2018.
  • Goodrich, Peter (2004). «Mannerism and the Macabre in H. P. Lovecraft’s Dunsanian ‘Dream-Quest’«. Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 15 (1 (57)): 37–48. ISSN 0897-0521. JSTOR 43308683.
  • Grant, Gavin J. (April 17, 2005). «That Delicious Feeling of Dread». The Los Angeles Times. p. 146. ISSN 0458-3035. Archived from the original on December 16, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  • Gray, John (October 24, 2014). «Weird Realism: John Gray on the Moral Universe of H P Lovecraft». New Statesman. ISSN 1758-924X. Archived from the original on April 14, 2016.
  • Greene, Sonia; Scott, Winfield Townley (August 22, 1948). «Howard Phillips Lovecraft as His Wife Remembers Him». The Providence Journal. p. 8. ISSN 2574-3406. Archived from the original on May 12, 2022.
  • Griwkowsky, Fish (December 8, 2008). «Interview with James Hetfield». Jam.canoe.ca. Archived from the original on May 24, 2012.
  • «Grippe». Lexico Dictionaries. Archived from the original on January 23, 2020. Retrieved January 23, 2020.
  • Halpurn, Paul; Labossiere, Michael C. (2009). «Mind Out of Time: Identity, Perception, and the Fourth Dimension in H. P. Lovecraft’s ‘The Shadow Out of Time’ and ‘The Dreams in the Witch House’«. Extrapolation. 50 (3): 512–533, 375. doi:10.3828/extr.2009.50.3.8. ISSN 0014-5483. S2CID 162319821. ProQuest 2152642098.
  • Hambly, Barbara (1996). «Introduction: The Man Who Loved His Craft». The Transition of H. P. Lovecraft: The Road to Madness (First ed.). New York: Ballantine Books. pp. vii–x. ISBN 0-345-38422-9. OCLC 34669226.
  • Hantke, Steffen (2013). «From the Library of America to the Mountains of Madness: Recent Discourse on H. P. Lovecraft». In Simmons, David (ed.). New Critical Essays on H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 135–156. doi:10.1057/9781137320964_9. ISBN 978-1-137-32096-4. OCLC 5576363673. S2CID 163339940.
  • Harman, Graham (2012). Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy. Winchester: John Hunt Publishing. ISBN 978-1-78099-907-4. OCLC 1058277738.
  • Hess, Clara (1971). «Addenda to ‘H.P.L.: A Memoir’«. In Derleth, August (ed.). Something about Cats, and Other Pieces (First ed.). Books for Libraries Press. pp. 247–277. ISBN 0-8369-2410-X. OCLC 222440.
  • Hill, Gary; Joshi, S. T. (2006). The Strange Sound of Cthulhu: Music Inspired by the Writings of H. P. Lovecraft. United States: Music Street Journal. ISBN 978-1-84728-776-2. OCLC 128175889.
  • Hölzing, Roland (2011). «Lovecraft: A Gentleman without Five Senses». Lovecraft Annual (5): 181–187. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868439.
  • Hull, Thomas (2006). «H.P. Lovecraft: A Horror in Higher Dimensions». Math Horizons. Vol. 13, no. 3. pp. 10–12. doi:10.1080/10724117.2006.11974625. ISSN 1072-4117. JSTOR 25678597.
  • Jamneck, Lynne (2012). «Tekeli-li! Disturbing Language in Edgar Allan Poe and H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (6): 126–151. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868454.
  • Janicker, Rebecca (2015). «Visions of Monstrosity: Lovecraft, Adaptation and the Comics Arts». Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 26 (3 (94)): 469–488. ISSN 0897-0521. JSTOR 26321171.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2001). A Dreamer and a Visionary: H. P. Lovecraft in His Time. Liverpool Science Fiction Texts and Studies. Vol. 26 (First ed.). Liverpool University Press. doi:10.5949/upo9781846312991. ISBN 978-1-84631-299-1. JSTOR j.ctt5vjhg7. OCLC 276177497.
  • Joshi, S. T. (1996a). A Subtler Magick: The Writings and Philosophy of H.P. Lovecraft (Third ed.). Berkeley Heights, New Jersey: Wildside Press. ISBN 1-880448-61-0. OCLC 4566934. S2CID 169172551.
  • Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (2001). An H.P. Lovecraft Encyclopedia (First ed.). Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 0-313-01682-8. OCLC 608158798.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2015). «Charles Baxter on Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (9): 105–122. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868501.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2013). «Lovecraft’s ‘Dunsanian Studies’«. In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Critical Essays on Lord Dunsany. Scarecrow Press. pp. 241–264. ISBN 978-0-8108-9235-4. OCLC 1026953908.
  • Joshi, S. T. (1996b). H. P. Lovecraft: A Life (First ed.). West Warwick, Rhode Island: Necronomicon Press. ISBN 0-940884-89-5. OCLC 34906142.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2016). H. P. Lovecraft: The Decline of the West (First ed.). Wildside Press. ISBN 978-1-4794-2754-3. OCLC 988396691.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2010a). I Am Providence: The Life and Times of H. P. Lovecraft (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. ISBN 978-0-9824296-7-9. OCLC 650504348. S2CID 190428196.
  • Joshi, S. T. (1984). «The Development of Lovecraftian Studies 1971–1982 (Part I)». Lovecraft Studies. 3 (2): 62–71. ISSN 0899-8361.
  • Joshi, S. T. (1985a). «The Development of Lovecraftian Studies, 1971–1982 (Part II)». Lovecraft Studies. 4 (1): 18–28. ISSN 0899-8361.
  • Joshi, S. T. (1985b). «The Development of Lovecraftian Studies, 1971–1982 (Part III)». Lovecraft Studies. 4 (2): 54–65. ISSN 0899-8361.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2017). «Foreword». In Moreland, Sean (ed.). The Lovecraftian Poe: Essays on Influence, Reception, Interpretation, and Transformation. Bethlehem, Pennsylvania: Lehigh University Press. pp. ix–xiv. ISBN 978-1-61146-241-8. OCLC 973481779.
  • Joshi, S. T. (2010b). «Time, Space, and Natural Law: Science and Pseudo-Science in Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (4): 171–201. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868421.
  • Karr, Chris J. (July 10, 2018). «The Black Seas of Copyright». Aetherial. Archived from the original on April 25, 2020.
  • King, Stephen (1987). Danse Macabre. Berkley. ISBN 0-425-06462-X. OCLC 10242612. Archived from the original on October 4, 2013.
  • Klein, Anna (2012). «Misperceptions of Malignity: Narrative Form and the Threat to America’s Modernity in ‘The Shadow over Innsmouth’«. Lovecraft Annual (6): 182–198. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868459.
  • Lacy, Jeff; Zani, Steven J. (2007). «The Negative Mystics of the Mechanistic Sublime: Walter Benjamin and Lovecraft’s Cosmicism». Lovecraft Annual (1): 65–83. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868355. S2CID 11647892.
  • Leavenworth, Van (2014). «The Developing Storyworld of H. P. Lovecraft». In Ryan, Marie-Laure; Thon, Jan-Noël (eds.). Storyworlds Across Media: Toward a Media-Conscious Narratology. Frontiers of Narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. pp. 332–350. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1d9nkdg.20. ISBN 978-0-8032-5532-6. JSTOR j.ctt1d9nkdg.20. OCLC 880964681. S2CID 190258640.
  • Leiber, Fritz (2001) [first published 1949]. «A Literary Copernicus». In Schweitzer, Darrell (ed.). Discovering H. P. Lovecraft (Revised ed.). Holicong, Pennsylvania: Wildside Press. pp. 7–16. ISBN 1-58715-470-6. OCLC 48212283.
  • Levenda, Peter (November 30, 2014). «Finding the Simon Necronomicon». The Lip TV. Archived from the original on February 6, 2022 – via YouTube.
  • Livesey, T. R. (2008). «Dispatches from the Providence Observatory: Astronomical Motifs and Sources in the Writings of H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (2): 3–87. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868370.
  • Look, Daniel M. (2016). «Queer Geometry and Higher Dimensions: Mathematics in the Fiction of H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (10): 101–120. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868515.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2010) [written November 22, 1930]. «Religion and Indeterminacy». In Joshi, S. T.; Hitchens, Christopher (eds.). Against Religion: The Atheist Writings of H.P. Lovecraft. New York: Sporting Gentlemen. pp. 87–99. ISBN 978-0-578-05248-9. OCLC 665081122.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (August 20, 2009a). «At the Mountains of Madness». The H. P. Lovecraft Archive. Archived from the original on February 25, 2017.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2006a) [first published February 1922]. «A Confession of Unfaith». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 145–148. ISBN 978-0976159230. OCLC 54350507.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2006b). «Instructions in Case of Decease». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 237–240. ISBN 978-0-9721644-1-2. OCLC 875361303.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2006c) [first published 1936]. «In Memoriam: Robert Ervin Howard». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 216–218. ISBN 978-0976159230. OCLC 54350507.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2006d) [written February 22, 1933]. «Some Repetitions on the Times». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 85–95. ISBN 978-0976159230. OCLC 54350507.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (August 20, 2009b). «He». The H. P. Lovecraft Archive. Archived from the original on March 23, 2021.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2014). Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (eds.). «Letters to Farnsworth Wright». Lovecraft Annual (8): 5–59. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868482.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2000). «Amateur Journalism». In Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (eds.). Lord of a Visible World: An Autobiography in Letters. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press. pp. 39–86. ISBN 0-8214-1332-5. OCLC 43567292.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (1968) [sent May 16, 1926]. «To James F. Morton». In Derleth, August; Wandrei, Donald (eds.). Selected Letters. Vol. II. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. pp. 50–51. ISBN 0-87054-034-3. OCLC 1152654519.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (1976a). Derleth, August; Wandrei, Donald (eds.). Selected Letters. Vol. IV. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. ISBN 0-87054-035-1. OCLC 20590805.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (1976b) [sent February 7, 1937]. «To Catherine L. Moore». In Derleth, August; Wandrei, Donald (eds.). Selected Letters. Vol. V. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. pp. 407–408. ISBN 0-87054-036-X. OCLC 1000556488.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2013). Luckhurst, Roger (ed.). The Classic Horror Stories. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-164088-9. OCLC 958573276. S2CID 190969085.
  • Lovett-Graff, Bennett (1997). «Shadows over Lovecraft: Reactionary Fantasy and Immigrant Eugenics». Extrapolation. 38 (3): 175–192. doi:10.3828/extr.1997.38.3.175. ISSN 0014-5483. S2CID 164434496. ProQuest 234914041.
  • Lubnow, Fred S. (2019). «The Lovecraftian Solar System». Lovecraft Annual (13): 3–26. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868571.
  • Macrobert, Franch A. (2015). «Cosmic Dread: The Astronomy of H. P. Lovecraft». Sky & Telescope. Vol. 129, no. 2. pp. 34–39. ISSN 0037-6604.
  • Mamatas, Nick (November 24, 2014). «The Real Mr. Difficult, or Why Cthulhu Threatens to Destroy the Canon, Self-Interested Literary Essayists, and the Universe Itself. Finally». Los Angeles Review of Books. Archived from the original on June 15, 2016.
  • Mariconda, Steven J. (2010). «Review of I Am Providence: The Life and Times of H. P. Lovecraft«. Lovecraft Annual (4): 208–215. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868424.
  • Martin, Sean Elliot (2012). «Lovecraft, Absurdity, and the Modernist Grotesque». Lovecraft Annual (6): 82–112. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868452.
  • Matthews, Carol S. (April 15, 2018). «Letting Sleeping Abnormalities Lie: Lovecraft and the Futility of Divination». Mythlore. 36 (2): 165–184. JSTOR 26809310. S2CID 165217534. ProQuest 2036317509 – via SWOSU Digital Commons.
  • Moreland, Sean (2018). «Introduction: The Critical (After)Life of Supernatural Horror in Literature«. New Directions in Supernatural Horror Literature: The Critical Influence of H. P. Lovecraft. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 1–9. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95477-6_1. ISBN 978-3-319-95477-6.
  • Mosig, Yōzan Dirk W. (1997). «Life After Lovecraft: Reminiscences of a Non-Entity». Mosig at Last: A Psychologist Looks at H.P. Lovecraft. West Warwick, Rhode Island: Necronomicon Press. pp. 111–116. ISBN 978-0-940884-90-8. OCLC 681921217.
  • Mosig, Yōzan Dirk W. (2001) [first published 1974]. «The Four Faces of the Outsider». In Schweitzer, Darrell (ed.). Discovering H. P. Lovecraft. Holicog, Pennsylvania: Wildside Press. pp. 17–34. ISBN 978-1-4344-4912-2. OCLC 114786517.
  • Murray, Will (October 1, 1986). «In Search of Arkham Country». Lovecraft Studies. 5 (2): 54–67. ISSN 0899-8361.
  • Murray, Will (1991–1992). «Lovecraft’s Arkham Country». Books at Brown. 38–39: 19–29. ISSN 0147-0787. Archived from the original on April 20, 2021 – via Brown Digital Repository.
  • Nelson, Victoria (2012). «Cathedral Head: The Gothick Cosmos of Guillermo del Toro». Gothicka. Harvard University Press. pp. 219–237. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674065406.c10. ISBN 978-0-674-05014-3. JSTOR j.ctt24hj8c.13. S2CID 191845332.
  • Norman, Joseph (2013). «‘Sounds Which Filled Me with an Indefinable Dread’: The Cthulhu Mythopoeia of H. P. Lovecraft in ‘Extreme’ Metal». In Simmons, David (ed.). New Critical Essays on H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 193–208. doi:10.1057/9781137320964_11. ISBN 978-1-137-32096-4. OCLC 5576363673. S2CID 192763998.
  • Norris, Duncan (2018). «The Void: A Lovecraftian Analysis». Lovecraft Annual (12): 149–164. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868564.
  • Norris, Duncan (2020). «Zeitgeist and Untoten: Lovecraft and the Walking Dead». Lovecraft Annual (14): 189–240. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26939817.
  • «Notable Persons Interred at Swan Point Cemetery». Swan Point Cemetery. Archived from the original on January 22, 2016.
  • Oates, Joyce Carol (October 31, 1996). «The King of Weird». The New York Review of Books. Vol. 43, no. 17. ISSN 0028-7504. Archived from the original on September 10, 2009.
  • Peak, David (2020). «Horror of the Real: H.P. Lovecraft’s Old Ones and Contemporary Speculative Philosophy». In Rosen, Matt (ed.). Diseases of the Head: Essays on the Horrors of Speculative Philosophy. Santa Barbara, California: Punctum Books. pp. 163–180. doi:10.2307/j.ctv19cwdpb.7. ISBN 978-1-953035-10-3. JSTOR j.ctv19cwdpb.7. OCLC 1227264756. S2CID 229019856.
  • Pedersen, Jan B. W. (2018). «Howard Phillips Lovecraft: Romantic on the Nightside». Lovecraft Annual (12): 165–173. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868565.
  • Pedersen, Jan B. W. (2019). ««Now Will You Be Good?»: Lovecraft, Teetotalism, and Philosophy». Lovecraft Annual (13): 119–144. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868581.
  • Pedersen, Jan B. W. (2017). «On Lovecraft’s Lifelong Relationship with Wonder». Lovecraft Annual (11): 23–36. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868530.
  • Powell, Anna (2019). «Thinking the Thing: The Outer Reaches of Knowledge in Lovecraft and Deleuze». In Hogle, Jerrold E.; Miles, Robert (eds.). The Gothic and Theory: An Edinburgh Companion. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 260–278. doi:10.3366/edinburgh/9781474427777.003.0014. ISBN 978-1-4744-2777-7. JSTOR 10.3366/j.ctvggx38r.17. OCLC 1145928444. S2CID 213917604.
  • Punter, David (1996). The Literature of Terror: A History of Gothic Fictions from 1765 to the Present Day. Vol. II. New York: Longman. ISBN 0-582-23714-9. OCLC 1072397754.
  • Ransom, Amy J. (2015). «Lovecraft in Quebec: Transcultural Fertilization and Esther Rochon’s Reevaluation of the Powers of Horror». Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 26 (3 (94)): 450–468. ISSN 0897-0521. JSTOR 26321170. S2CID 165970090. ProQuest 1861072902.
  • Rottensteiner, Franz (1992). «Lovecraft as Philosopher». Science Fiction Studies. 19 (1): 117–121. ISSN 0091-7729. JSTOR 4240129.
  • Rubinton, Noel (August 10, 2016). «How to Find the Spirit of H.P. Lovecraft in Providence». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. ProQuest 1810306270. Archived from the original on October 13, 2018.
  • Sederholm, Carl H. (2016). «H. P. Lovecraft, Heavy Metal, and Cosmicism». Rock Music Studies. 3 (3): 266–280. doi:10.1080/19401159.2015.1121644. ISSN 1940-1159. S2CID 194537597.
  • Sederholm, Carl H.; Weinstock, Jeffrey Andrew (2016). «Introduction: Lovecraft Rising». The Age of Lovecraft. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 1–42. ISBN 978-1-4529-5023-5. JSTOR 10.5749/j.ctt1b9x1f3.5. OCLC 945632985.
  • Schoell, William (2004). H.P. Lovecraft: Master of Weird Fiction (First ed.). Greensboro, North Carolina: Morgan Reynolds. ISBN 1-931798-15-X. OCLC 903506614.
  • Schultz, David E. (2018). «‘Whaddya Make Them Eyes at Me For?’: Lovecraft and Book Publishers». Lovecraft Annual (12): 51–65. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868555.
  • Schweitzer, Darrell (2018). «Lovecraft, Aristeas, Dunsany, and the Dream Journey». Lovecraft Annual (12): 136–143. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868561.
  • Schweitzer, Darrell (1998). Windows of the Imagination: Essays on Fantastic Literature. Berkeley Heights, New Jersey: Wildside Press. ISBN 1-880448-60-2. OCLC 48566644. S2CID 190964524.
  • Scott, Winfield Townley (December 26, 1943). «The Case of Howard Phillips Lovecraft of Providence, R.I.» The Providence Journal. p. 41. ISSN 2574-3406. Retrieved August 23, 2021 – via GenealogyBank.com.
  • Siclen, Bill Van (August 16, 2015). «NecronomiCon Providence to celebrate life and work of H. P. Lovecraft». The Providence Journal. ISSN 2574-3406. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
  • Silva, Christianna (June 7, 2017). «H. P. Lovecraft’s Monster Is Wrapping Family Game Night Up In Tentacles». National Public Radio. Archived from the original on February 28, 2018.
  • Smith, Andy (August 16, 2017). «NecronomiCon, homage to H. P. Lovecraft, returns to Providence». The Providence Journal. ISSN 2574-3406. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
  • Spencer, E. Mariah (2021). «Aliens, Robots & Virtual Reality Idols in the Science Fiction of H.P Lovecraft, Isaac Asimov and William Gibson». Science Fiction Studies. 48 (3): 600–604. doi:10.1353/sfs.2021.0055. ISSN 0091-7729. JSTOR 10.5621/sciefictstud.48.3.0600. S2CID 245664184.
  • Sperling, Alison (2016). «H. P. Lovecraft’s Weird Body». Lovecraft Annual (10): 75–100. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868514.
  • St. Armand, Barton Levi (1972). «Facts in the Case of H. P. Lovecraft» (PDF). Rhode Island History. 31 (1): 3–20. ISSN 0035-4619 – via Rhode Island Historical Society.
  • St. Armand, Barton Levi (1975). «H. P. Lovecraft: New England Decadent». Caliban. 12 (1): 127–155. doi:10.3406/calib.1975.1046. eISSN 2431-1766. S2CID 220649713.
  • Steiner, Bernd (2005). H. P. Lovecraft and the Literature of the Fantastic: Explorations in a Literary Genre. Munich: GRIN Verlag. ISBN 978-3-638-84462-8. OCLC 724541939.
  • Talbot, Nick (August 31, 2014). «All About Alienation: Alan Moore On Lovecraft And Providence». The Quietus.
  • Tierney, Richard L. (2001) [first published 1972]. «The Derleth Mythos». In Schweitzer, Darrell (ed.). Discovering H. P. Lovecraft. Holicog, Pennsylvania: Wildside Press. pp. 52–53. ISBN 978-1-4344-4912-2. OCLC 114786517.
  • Touponce, William F. (2013). Lord Dunsany, H. P. Lovecraft, and Ray Bradbury: Spectral Journeys. Studies in Supernatural Literature. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-9220-0. OCLC 873404866.
  • Vick, Todd B. (2021). Renegades and Rogues: The Life and Legacy of Robert E. Howard. Austin: University of Texas Press. doi:10.7560/321959. ISBN 978-1-4773-2195-9. OCLC 1159658615. S2CID 241275357.
  • Wallace, Nathaniel R. (2023). «Disseminating Lovecraft: The Proliferation of Unsanctioned Derivative Works in the Absence of an Operable Copyright Monopoly». In Lanzendörfer, Tim; Dreysse Passos de Carvalho, Max José (eds.). The Medial Afterlives of H.P. Lovecraft. Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 27–44. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-13765-5_2. ISBN 978-3-031-13764-8.
  • Wetzel, George T. (1983). The Lovecraft Scholar (PDF). Darien, Connecticut: Hobgoblin Press.
  • Wilson, Colin (1975). The Strength to Dream: Literature and the Imagination (Second ed.). Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-8371-6819-7. OCLC 630646359.
  • Wilson, Edmund (1950) [first published November 24, 1945]. «Tales of the Marvellous and the Ridiculous». Classics and Commercials: A Literary Chronicle of the Forties. New York: Macmillan. pp. 286–290. ISBN 0-374-52667-2. OCLC 964373.
  • Wohleber, Curt (December 1995). «The Man Who Can Scare Stephen King». American Heritage. Vol. 46, no. 8. Archived from the original on October 4, 2013.
  • Wolanin, Tyler L. (2013). «New Deal Politics in the Correspondence of H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (7): 3–35. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868464.
  • Woodard, Ben (2011). «Mad Speculation and Absolute Inhumanism: Lovecraft, Ligotti, and the Weirding of Philosophy». Continent. 1 (1): 3–13. doi:10.22394/0869-5377-2019-5-203-225. ISSN 2159-9920. S2CID 170136177.
  • «Wrote of His Last Month Alive». The Boston Globe. March 15, 1937. p. 2. ISSN 0743-1791. Archived from the original on February 28, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  • Zeller, Benjamin E. (December 2019). «Altar Call of Cthulhu: Religion and Millennialism in H.P. Lovecraft’s Cthulhu Mythos». Religions. 11 (1): 18. doi:10.3390/rel11010018. ISSN 2077-1444. S2CID 213736759.

Further reading

  • Anderson, James Arthur; Joshi, S. T. (2011). Out of the Shadows: A Structuralist Approach to Understanding the Fiction of H. P. Lovecraft. Rockville, Maryland: Wildside Press. doi:10.23860/diss-anderson-james-1992. ISBN 978-1-4794-0384-4. OCLC 1127558354. S2CID 171675509.
  • Burleson, Donald R. (1983). H. P. Lovecraft: A Critical Study. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-313-23255-8. OCLC 299389026. S2CID 190394934.
  • Callaghan, Gavin (2013). H. P. Lovecraft’s Dark Arcadia: The Satire, Symbology and Contradiction. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company. ISBN 978-1-4766-0239-4. OCLC 856844361.
  • Cannon, Peter, ed. (1998). Lovecraft Remembered. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. ISBN 978-0-87054-173-5. OCLC 260088015.
  • Carter, Lin (1972). Lovecraft: A Look Behind the «Cthulhu Mythos». New York: Ballantine Books. ISBN 0-586-04166-4. OCLC 2213597. S2CID 190363598.
  • Frierson, Meade; Frierson, Penny (March 1972). HPL: A Tribute to Howard Phillips Lovecraft (PDF). Birmingham, Alabama: Meade and Penny Frierson. OCLC 315586.
  • González Grueso, Fernando Darío (2017). La ficción científica. Género, Poética y sus relaciones con la literatura oral tradicional: El papel de H. P. Lovecraft como mediador. Colección Estudios (in Spanish). Madrid: UAM Ediciones. doi:10.15366/ficcion.cientif2013. ISBN 978-84-8344-376-7. OCLC 1026295184. S2CID 183258592.
  • Hegyi, Pál (2019). Lovecraft Laughing: Uncanny Memes in the Weird. Department of American Studies, University of Szeged. doi:10.14232/americana.books.2019.hegyi.lovecraft. ISBN 978-615-5423-56-7. OCLC 8160851320. S2CID 192043054.
  • Houellebecq, Michel; King, Stephen (2005). H. P. Lovecraft: Against the World, Against Life. Translated by Khazeni, Dorna. Cernunnos. ISBN 1-932416-18-8. OCLC 1151841813. S2CID 190374730.
  • Joshi, S. T. (1980). H. P. Lovecraft, Four Decades of Criticism (First ed.). Athens: Ohio University Press. ISBN 0-8214-0442-3. OCLC 6085440.
  • Klinger, Leslie S. (2014). The New Annotated H. P. Lovecraft (First ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-87140-453-4. OCLC 884500241. S2CID 218735034.
  • Lévy, Maurice (1988) [first published 1972]. Lovecraft: A Study in the Fantastic. Translated by Joshi, S. T. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. ISBN 978-0-8143-1956-7. OCLC 491484555. S2CID 190967971.
  • Long, Frank Belknap (1975). Howard Phillips Lovecraft: Dreamer on the Nightside. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. ISBN 0-87054-068-8. OCLC 2034623. S2CID 160306366.
  • Ludueña, Fabián; de Acosta, Alejandro (2015). H. P. Lovecraft: The Disjunction in Being. Translated by de Acosta, Alejandro. United States: Schism. ISBN 978-1-5058-6600-1. OCLC 935704008.
  • Lovecraft, H. P.; Conover, Willis; Joshi, S. T. (2002). Lovecraft at Last: The Master of Horror in His Own Words (Revised ed.). New York: Cooper Square Press. ISBN 0-8154-1212-6. OCLC 50212624.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (1999). Joshi, S. T.; Cannon, Peter (eds.). More Annotated H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Dell. ISBN 0-440-50875-4. OCLC 41231274.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (1997). Joshi, S. T. (ed.). The Annotated H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Dell. ISBN 0-440-50660-3. OCLC 36165172.
  • Lovecraft, H. P. (2012). Joshi, S. T. (ed.). The Annotated Supernatural Horror in Literature (Second ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. ISBN 978-1-61498-028-5. OCLC 855115722.
  • Shapiro, Stephen; Philip, Barnard (2017). Pentecostal Modernism: Lovecraft, Los Angeles and World-Systems Culture. New Directions in Religion and Literature. Bloomsbury Publishing. doi:10.5040/9781474238762. ISBN 978-1-4742-3873-1. OCLC 1065524061. S2CID 148868506.
  • Martin, Sean Elliot (December 2008). H.P. Lovecraft and the Modernist Grotesque (PhD thesis). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Duquesne University. ISBN 9781448610167. OCLC 601419113. S2CID 191576874.
  • Migliore, Andrew; Strysik, John (2006). The Lurker in the Lobby: A Guide to the Cinema of H. P. Lovecraft. Portland, Oregon: Night Shade Books. ISBN 978-1-892389-35-0. OCLC 1023313647. S2CID 152612871.
  • Montaclair, Florent; Picot, Jean-Pierre (1997). Fantastique et événement : Étude comparée des œuvres de Jules Verne et Howard P. Lovecraft. Annales littéraires (in French). Vol. 621. Besançon: Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté. doi:10.4000/books.pufc.1726. ISBN 978-2-84867-692-0. OCLC 1286480358. S2CID 228019349.
  • Wilson, Eric (2016). The Republic of Cthulhu: Lovecraft, the Weird Tale, and Conspiracy Theory. Santa Barbara, California: Punctum Books. doi:10.21983/P3.0155.1.00. ISBN 978-0-9982375-6-5. OCLC 1135348793. S2CID 165947887.

External links

  • The H. P. Lovecraft Archive
  • The H. P. Lovecraft Historical Society
  • H. P. Lovecraft Collection in the Special Collections at the John Hay Library (Brown University)
  • Lovecraft Annual, a scholarly journal
  • The Lovecraft Arts & Sciences Council, a non-profit educational organization
  • H. P. Lovecraft at the Internet Speculative Fiction Database Edit this at Wikidata
  • H. P. Lovecraft at the Encyclopedia of Science Fiction
  • H. P. Lovecraft at the Encyclopedia of Fantasy
  • H. P. Lovecraft at IMDb
  • H. P. Lovecraft discography at Discogs

Online editions

  • Works by Howard Phillips Lovecraft at Project Gutenberg
  • Works by H. P. Lovecraft in eBook form at Standard Ebooks
  • Works by or about H. P. Lovecraft at Internet Archive
  • Works by H. P. Lovecraft at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks)
🔀 This is an article about the real world person. For the ones who appear inside pieces of fiction, see Howard Phillips Lovecraft (fictional)
I am Providence, & Providence is myself—together, indissolubly as one, we stand thro’ the ages; a fixt monument set aeternally in the shadow of Durfee’s ice-clad peak!
~ HPL , Selected Letters 2.218

This subject is written on a topic in the real world and reflects factual information.
This subject contains information from the "Lovecraft Circle" Myth Cycles, and while guided by HPL are not based on his work alone.
Howard Phillips Lovecraft (August 20, 1890 – March 15, 1937), of Providence, Rhode Island, was an American author of fantasy, horror, and science fiction.

Lovecraft’s major inspiration and invention was cosmic horror, the basic premise of which is that the true workings of the universe are beyond human comprehension and that humanity’s place in the cosmos is terrifyingly insignificant. A key feature of many of his stories is the existence of powerful, extraterrestrial or supernatural entities that influence or threaten the human world in subtle ways, and whose mere perception by human observers often drives the latter to madness.

Lovecraft has become a cult figure for his Cthulhu Mythos, a series of loosely interconnected fictions featuring a pantheon of human-invalidating entities, as well as the famed Necronomicon, a grimoire of magical rites and forbidden lore. His works were deeply pessimistic, fabricating a mythos that challenged the values of the Enlightenment, Romanticism, and Christianity.

Although Lovecraft’s readership was limited during his life, his reputation has grown over the decades, and he is now commonly regarded as one of the most influential horror writers of the 20th Century, exerting widespread and indirect influence, and frequently compared to Edgar Allan Poe in the tone of his writing style.

He is sometime suspected of having used the pseudonym Paul H. Lovering, «author of When The Earth Grew Cold and The Colour Out of Space [sic], etc.»,[1] when publishing the story «The Inevitable Conflict?». However a word analysis of this story showed that it significantly deviates from Lovecraft’s known corpus of text.[2]

Biography

Early Life

A family portrait of a very young H.P. Lovecraft with his parents.

Susan, Howard and Winfield Lovecraft, c. 1891.

Lovecraft was born on the 20th of August 1890, at 9:00 a.m. in his family home at 194 (now 454) Angell Street in Providence, Rhode Island. The house would be torn down in 1961. He was the only child of Winfield Scott Lovecraft, a traveling salesman of jewelry and precious metals, and Sarah Susan Phillips Lovecraft, a woman who could trace her ancestry in America back to the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1630. His parents married, the first marriage for both, when they were in their thirties. This was unusually late in life given the time period.

In 1893, when Lovecraft was three, his father became acutely psychotic in a Chicago hotel room while on a business trip. He was brought back to Providence and placed in Butler Hospital, where he remained until his death in 1898. Lovecraft was informed that his father was comatose during this period but it is now almost certain that Winfield Scott Lovecraft died from tertiary syphilis.

Lovecraft thereafter was raised by his mother, his two aunts (Lillian Delora Phillips and Annie Emeline Phillips), and his maternal grandfather, Whipple Van Buren Phillips. All resided together in the family home. Lovecraft was a child prodigy, reciting poetry at age two and writing complete poems by six. His grandfather encouraged his reading, providing him with classics such as The Arabian Nights, Bulfinch’s Age of Fable, and children’s versions of The Iliad and The Odyssey. Indeed, his earliest surviving literary work, «The Poem of Ulysses» (1897), is a paraphrase of the Odyssey in 88 lines of internally rhyming verse.

But Lovecraft had by this time already discovered weird fiction, and his first story, the non-extant «The Noble Eavesdropper,» may date to as early as 1896. His grandfather also stirred young Howard’s interest in the weird by telling him his own original tales of Gothic horror. His mother, on the other hand, worried that these stories would upset him.

Lovecraft was frequently ill as a child, both physically and psychologically. Due to his sickly condition and his undisciplined, argumentative nature, he barely attended school until he was eight at the Slater Avenue School but was withdrawn after a year. He read voraciously during this period, and became especially enamored of chemistry and astronomy. He produced several hectographed publications with a limited circulation beginning in 1899 with The Scientific Gazette. Four years later he returned to public school at Hope Street High School.

Lovecraft house at 598 Angell Street.

598 Angell Street

Whipple Van Buren Phillips’ death in 1904 greatly affected Lovecraft’s life. Mismanagement of his grandfather’s estate left his family in such a poor financial situation they were forced to move into much smaller accommodations at 598 Angell Street (now a duplex at No. 598-600) . Lovecraft was so deeply affected by the loss of his home and birthplace he contemplated suicide for a time.

In 1908, prior to his high school graduation, he suffered a nervous breakdown and consequently never received his high school diploma. S. T. Joshi suggests in his biography of Lovecraft that a primary cause for this breakdown was his difficulty in higher mathematics, a subject he needed to master to become a professional astronomer. This failure to complete his education (he wished to study at Brown University) was a source of disappointment and shame even late into his life.

Lovecraft wrote some fiction as a youth, but from 1908 until 1913, his output was primarily poetry he wrote while living a hermit’s existence and having almost no contact with anyone but his mother. This changed when he wrote a letter to The Argosy, a pulp magazine, complaining about the insipidness of the love stories of one of the publication’s popular writers. The ensuing debate in the magazine’s letters column caught the eye of Edward F. Daas, president of the United Amateur Press Association (UAPA), who invited Lovecraft to join in 1914. The UAPA reinvigorated Lovecraft and incited him to contribute many poems and essays. In 1917, at the prodding of correspondents, he returned to fiction with more polished stories such as «The Tomb» and «Dagon». The latter was his first professionally published work, appearing in the pulp magazine Weird Tales in 1923.

Around this time he began to build up a huge network of correspondents. His lengthy and frequent missives would make him one of the great letter writers of the century. Among his correspondents were Robert Bloch, Clark Ashton Smith and Robert E. Howard (author of the Conan the Barbarian series).

In 1919, after suffering from hysteria and depression for a long period of time, Lovecraft’s mother had a nervous breakdown and was committed to Butler Hospital, like her husband before her. Nevertheless, she wrote frequent letters to Lovecraft, and they remained very close until her death, the result of complications from a gall bladder surgery, on May 21, 1921. Lovecraft was devastated by the loss.

Portrait of Sonia Greene

Sonia Greene

A few weeks after the death of his mother, Lovecraft attended an amateur journalist convention in Boston where he met Sonia Greene. Born in 1883, she was of Ukrainian Jewish ancestry and seven years older than Lovecraft. They married in 1924, and the couple moved to the borough of Brooklyn in New York City. Lovecraft’s aunts may have been unhappy with this arrangement, as they were not fond of Lovecraft being married to a tradeswoman. (Greene owned a hat shop.) Lovecraft was initially enthralled by New York, but soon the couple was facing financial difficulties. Greene lost her hat shop and suffered poor health. Lovecraft could not find work to support them both, so his wife moved to Cleveland for employment. Lovecraft lived by himself in the Red Hook neighborhood of Brooklyn and came to intensely dislike New York life.[3]

A few years later he and Greene, still living separately, agreed to an amicable divorce, which was never fully completed. He returned to Providence to live with his aunts during their remaining years. Due to the unhappiness of their marriage, some biographers have speculated that Lovecraft could have been asexual, though Greene is often quoted as referring to him as «an adequately excellent lover».

Back in Providence, Lovecraft lived in a «spacious brown Victorian wooden house» at 10 Barnes Street (the address given as the home of Dr. Willett in The Case of Charles Dexter Ward) until 1933. The period after his return to Providence—the last decade of his life—was Lovecraft’s most prolific. During this time period, he produced almost all of his best-known short stories for the leading pulp publications of the day (primarily Weird Tales), as well as longer efforts like The Case of Charles Dexter Ward and At the Mountains of Madness. He frequently revised work for other authors and did a large amount of ghost-writing, including «The Mound», «Winged Death», and «The Diary of Alonzo Typer».

Grave.png

Despite his best writing efforts, however, he grew ever poorer. He was forced to move to smaller and meaner lodgings with his surviving aunt. He was also deeply affected by Robert E. Howard’s suicide. In 1936 he was diagnosed with cancer of the intestine and he also suffered from malnutrition. He lived in constant pain until his death on March 15, 1937 in Providence.

Lovecraft is buried in Swan Point Cemetery in Providence. Lovecraft was listed along with his parents on the Phillips family monument. That was not enough for his fans, so in 1977 a group of individuals raised the money to buy him a headstone of his own, on which they had inscribed Lovecraft’s name, the dates of his birth and death, and the phrase, «I AM PROVIDENCE», a line from one of his personal letters. Lovecraft’s grave is occasionally marked with graffiti quoting his famous phrase from «The Call of Cthulhu» (originally from «The Nameless City»):

That is not dead which can eternal lie,
And with strange aeons even death may die.

Influence

H. P. Lovecraft’s name is synonymous with horror fiction; his writing, particularly the «Cthulhu Mythos», has influenced fiction authors worldwide, and Lovecraftian elements may be found in novels, movies, music, comic books and cartoons. For example, the insane villains of Gotham City in the Batman stories are incarcerated in Arkham Asylum — Arkham being an invention of Lovecraft’s. Many modern horror writers — such as Stephen King, Bentley Little, and Joe R. Lansdale, to name just a few — have cited Lovecraft as one of their primary influences.

Lovecraft himself, though, was relatively unknown during his own time. While his stories might have made it into the pages of prominent pulp magazines such as Weird Tales (often eliciting letters of outrage from regular readers of the magazines), not many people knew his name. He did correspond regularly with other contemporary writers, such as Clark Ashton Smith and August Derleth, people who became good friends of his, even if many of them never met in person. This group of correspondents became known as the «Lovecraft Circle», since they all freely borrowed, with Lovecraft’s blessing and encouragement, elements of Lovecraft’s stories — the mysterious books with disturbing names like the Necronomicon, the pantheon of ancient alien gods such as Cthulhu and Azathoth, and eldritch places such as Arkham and Miskatonic University— for use in their own stories. It’s been suggested that it was the efforts of the Lovecraft Circle — particularly Derleth, founder of Arkham House — that prevented Lovecraft’s name and fiction from disappearing completely into obscurity.

In 2017, Lovecraft was inducted into the Science Fiction and Fantasy Hall of Fame at the Museum of Pop Culture in Seattle.

Legacy

After Lovecraft’s death, the Lovecraft Circle carried on. August Derleth was probably the most prolific of these writers, and added to and expanded on Lovecraft’s vision. Derleth’s contributions have been controversial; while Lovecraft never considered his pantheon of alien gods more than a mere plot device, Derleth created an entire cosmology, complete with a war between the «Elder Gods» (such as Cthulhu and his ilk) and the «Outer Gods,» and went on to associate different gods with the traditional four elements. Not every fan of Lovecraft and Lovecraftian horror has approved of these additions, since they seem to contradict Lovecraft’s own vision of a universe without order or plan, with beings that weren’t so much malevolent as they were just uninterested in the goings on of humanity. Would Lovecraft have approved of Derleth’s expansions? It has been said that Lovecraft was a good sport about this sort of thing, so he probably would have welcomed Derleth’s own take, but he certainly wouldn’t have taken it on himself. If there can be said to be a «Lovecraft Circle», then Derleth’s version would be an interesting take on the circle, but not part of the circle itself.

Lovecraft’s fiction has been grouped into three categories by some critics. While Lovecraft did not refer to these categories himself, he did once write, «There are my ‘[Edgar Allan] Poe’ pieces and my ‘Dunsany pieces’ — but alas — where are my Lovecraft pieces?»

  • Macabre stories (approximately 1905–1920)
  • Dream Cycle stories (approximately 1920–1927)
  • Cthulhu Mythos / Lovecraft Mythos stories (approximately 1925–1935)

Some critics see little difference between the Dream Cycle and the Mythos, often pointing to connecting elements like the Necronomicon and invented gods. A frequently given explanation is that the Dream Cycle belongs more to the genre of fantasy, while the Mythos is science fiction. Also, much of the supernatural elements in the Dream Cycle takes place in its own sphere or mythological dimension, separated from our own level of existence. The Mythos on the other hand, is placed within the same reality and cosmos that humans live in.

Much of Lovecraft’s work was directly inspired by his nightmares, and it is perhaps this direct insight into the unconscious and its symbolism that helps to account for their continuing resonance and popularity. All these interests naturally led to his deep affection for the works of Edgar Allan Poe, who heavily influenced his earliest macabre stories and writing style known for its creepy atmosphere and lurking fears. Lovecraft’s discovery of the stories of Lord Dunsany, with their gallery of mighty gods existing in dreamlike outer realms, moved his writing in a new direction, resulting in a series of imitative fantasies in a «Dreamlands» setting.

Another inspiration came from a totally different kind of source; the scientific progresses at the time in such wide areas as biology, astronomy, geology and physics, all contributed to make the human race seem even more insignificant, powerless and doomed in a materialistic and mechanical universe, and was a major contributor to the ideas that later would be known as cosmicism, and which gave further support to his atheism.

Because of his love for his own heritage and because of the USA’s relatively young age as a nation, and therefore the need to create locations that would still give the feeling of something old and at the same time western, Lovecraft also added elements such as fictional New England towns and locations where the stories took place.

It was probably the influence of Arthur Machen, with his carefully constructed tales concerning the survival of ancient evil into modern times in an otherwise realistic world, and his mystic beliefs in hidden mysteries which lay behind reality, that added the last ingredient and finally helped inspire Lovecraft to find his own voice from 1923 onwards.

This took on a dark tone with the creation of what is today often called the Cthulhu Mythos, a pantheon of alien extra-dimensional deities and horrors which predate humanity, and which are hinted at in aeon-old myths and legends. The term «Cthulhu Mythos» was coined by Lovecraft’s correspondent and fellow author, August Derleth, after Lovecraft’s death; Lovecraft jocularly referred to his artificial mythology as «Yog-Sothothery»[2].

His stories created one of the most influential plot devices in all of horror: the Necronomicon, the secret grimoire written by the «mad Arab» Abdul Alhazred. The resonance and strength of the Mythos concept have led some to incorrectly conclude that Lovecraft had based it on pre-existing myths or occult beliefs. Faux editions of the Necronomicon have also been published over the years.

His prose is somewhat antiquarian. Often he employed archaic vocabulary or spelling which had already by his time been replaced by contemporary coinages; examples including «electric torch» (flashlight), «Esquimau», and «Comanchian». He was given to heavy use of an esoteric lexicon. including such words as «eldritch», «rugose», «noisome», «squamous», «ichor,, and «cyclopean». His attempts to transcribe dialect speech have been criticized as clumsy, imprecise, and condescending. His works also featured British English (he was an admitted Anglophile), and he sometimes made use of anachronistic spellings, such as «compleat/complete,» «lanthorn/lantern,» and «phantasy/fantasy» (the latter also appearing as «phantastic» and «phantabulous»).

Lovecraft was a prolific letter writer. During his lifetime he wrote thousands of these letters; an estimate of 100,000 seems to be the most likely figure, arrived at by L. Sprague de Camp. Lovecraft inscribed multiple pages to his group of correspondents in small longhand. He sometimes dated his letters 200 years before the current date, which would have put the writing back in U.S. colonial times, before the American Revolution that offended his Anglophilia. He explained that he thought that the 18th and 20th centuries were the «best»; the former being a period of noble grace, and the latter a century of science.

Themes

Forbidden knowledge

The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents… some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new Dark Age.
~ HPL , «The Call of Cthulhu»

Lovecraft’s protagonists are nevertheless always driven to this «piecing together,» delving into aspects of the universe which humanity has not — or should not — tried to understand. When such vistas are opened, the mind of the protagonist-investigator is often destroyed. Those who actually encounter «living» manifestations of the incomprehensible are particularly likely to go mad.

Those characters who attempt to make use of such knowledge are almost invariably doomed. Sometimes their work attracts the attention of malevolent beings; sometimes, in the spirit of Frankenstein, they are destroyed by monsters of their own creation.

Nonhuman influences on humanity

The beings of Lovecraft’s mythos often have human (or mostly human) servants; Cthulhu, for instance, is worshipped under various names by cults amongst both the Eskimos of Greenland and voodoo circles of Louisiana, and in many other parts of the world. Likewise, certain locales or groups of people owe their heritage or are influenced by nonhuman forces; Innsmouth, a town whose population has a history of interbreeding with Deep Ones and worshipping Dagon, is an example.

These worshippers served a useful narrative purpose for Lovecraft. Many beings of the Mythos are too powerful to be defeated by human opponents, and so horrific that direct knowledge of them means insanity for the victim. When dealing with such beings, Lovecraft needed a way to provide exposition and build tension without bringing the story to a premature end. Human followers gave him a way to reveal information about their «gods» in a diluted form, and also made it possible for his protagonists to win temporary victories. Lovecraft, like his contemporaries, envisioned «savages» as closer to the Earth, only in Lovecraft’s case, this meant, so to speak, closer to Cthulhu.

Atavistic guilt

Another recurring theme in Lovecraft’s stories is the idea that descendants in a bloodline can never escape the stain of atrocities committed by their forebears. Descendants may be very far removed, both in place and in time (and, indeed, in culpability), from the act itself, and yet blood will tell (HPL: «The Rats in the Walls,» «The Lurking Fear,» «Arthur Jermyn,» «The Alchemist,» «The Shadow Over Innsmouth», The Case of Charles Dexter Ward). An example of a crime that Lovecraft apparently considered heinous enough for this consequence is cannibalism (HPL: «The Picture in the House», «The Rats in the Walls»).

In some cases, this atavism manifests physically, with characters showing genetic traits that link them to nonhuman or inhuman ancestors, and thereby to the grotesqueries associated with them.

Inability to escape fate

Often in Lovecraft’s works the protagonist is not in control of his own actions, or finds it impossible to change course. Many of his characters would be free from danger if they simply managed to run away; however, this possibility either never arises or is somehow curtailed by some outside force, as in «The Colour Out of Space». Often his characters are subject to a compulsive influence from powerful malevolent or indifferent beings. As with the inevitability of one’s ancestry, eventually even running away, or death itself, provides no safety (The Thing on the Doorstep, The Outsider, The Case of Charles Dexter Ward, etc.). In some cases, this doom is manifest in the entirety of humanity, and no escape is possible (The Shadow Out of Time).

Civilization under threat

Lovecraft frequently dealt with the idea of civilization struggling against more barbaric, primitive elements. In some stories this struggle is at an individual level; many of his protagonists are cultured, highly-educated men who are gradually corrupted by some evil influence.

In such stories, the «curse» is often a hereditary one, either because of interbreeding with non-humans (e.g. «Facts Concerning the Late Arthur Jermyn and His Family» (1920), «The Shadow over Innsmouth» (1931)) or through direct magical influence (The Case of Charles Dexter Ward). Physical and mental degradation often come together; this theme of ‘tainted blood’ may represent concerns relating to Lovecraft’s own family history, particularly the death of his father due to what Lovecraft must have suspected to be a syphilitic disorder.

In other tales, an entire society is threatened by barbarism. Sometimes the barbarism comes as an external threat, with a civilized race destroyed in war (e.g. «Polaris»). Sometimes, an isolated pocket of humanity falls into decadence and atavism of its own accord (e.g. «The Lurking Fear»). But most often, such stories involve a civilized culture being gradually undermined by a malevolent underclass influenced by inhuman forces.

Racism

Main article: Racism in the Works of H.P. Lovecraft

Despite the unique and interesting nature of many of Lovecraft’s works, several are marred by a racist streak deeply ingrained in the author’s personality. A common dramatic device in Lovecraft’s work is to associate virtue, intellect, elevated class position, civilization, and rationality with white Anglo-Saxon ethnicity, which he often posed in contrast to the corrupt, intellectually inferior, uncivilized and irrational, which he associated with people he characterized as being of lower class, impure racial «stock» and/or non European ethnicity and dark skin complexion who were often the villains in his writings.

Some of his most hostile racist views can be found in his poetry, particularly in «On the Creation of *******,» and «New England Fallen» (both 1912). Lovecraft once took this to an extreme, explicitly characterizing black people as sub-human:

When, long ago, the gods created Earth;
In Jove’s fair image Man was shaped at birth.
The beasts for lesser parts were designed;
Yet were too remote from humankind.
To fill the gap, and join the rest of Man,
Th’Olympian host conceiv’d a clever plan.
A beast they wrought, in semi-human figure,
Filled it with vice, and called the thing a ******.
~ HPL , «On the Creation of *******»

In «The Call of Cthulhu» he writes of a captured group of «mongrel» worshippers of Cthulhu:

the prisoners all proved to be men of a very low, mixed-blooded, and mentally aberrant type. Most were seamen, and a sprinkling of negroes and mulattos, largely West Indians or Brava Portuguese from the Cape Verde Islands, gave a colouring of voodooism to the heterogeneous cult. But before many questions were asked it became manifest that something far deeper and older than negro fetishism was involved. Degraded and ignorant as they were, the creatures held with suprising consistency to the central idea of their loathsome faith.

The majority of the horror in The Shadow Over Innsmouth is the mixing of races and cultures in an old New England town. The residents of Innsmouth not only worship the Deep One gods of Dagon and Mother Hydra but intermarry with the creatures, resulting in hybrids whose features are frequently described as repulsive and seem to have no personal interests beyond swimming and drinking bootleg liquor. The elderly Zadok Allen, a remnant from before the Deep Ones completely took over the town, seems more horrified by the concept of interbreeding than by his neighbors’ habit of human sacrifices. The people outside of Innsmouth think this is the result of interracial matches and that the mysterious Innsmouth religion is also the result of mixing the beliefs of foreigners with Christianity but feel this is enough reason to hate them. The town itself is destitute and rotting, as though the hybrids have no desire to fight the decay of their home. The Elder Sign, which is used by islander to protect themselves from the Deep Ones, is described as looking like a Swastika.

Lovecraft also expressed racist and ethnocentric beliefs in his personal correspondence.[6]

For evolved man — the apex of organic progress on the Earth — what branch of reflection is more fitting than that which occupies only his higher and exclusively human faculties? The primal savage or ape merely looks about his native forest to find a mate; the exalted Aryan should lift his eyes to the worlds of space and consider his relation to infinity!!!!
~ HPL , Selected Letters 1.61

In «Herbert West—Reanimator,» Lovecraft gives an account of a newly deceased black male. He asserts:

He was a loathsome, gorilla-like thing, with abnormally long arms that I could not help calling fore legs, and a face that conjured up thoughts of unspeakable Congo secrets and tom-tom poundings under an eerie moon. The body must have looked even worse in life — but the world holds many ugly things.
~ HPL , «Herbert West—Reanimator»

In «The Horror at Red Hook», one character is described as «an Arab with a hatefully negroid mouth». In «Medusa’s Coil,» ghostwritten by Lovecraft for Zealia Bishop, the story’s final surprise—after the revelation that the story’s villain is a vampiric medusa—is that she «was faintly, subtly, yet to the eyes of genius unmistakably the scion of Zimbabwe’s most primal grovellers…. [T]hough in deceitfully slight proportion, Marceline was a negress.»

In «The Case of Charles Dexter Ward,» there is a somewhat more patronizing description of an African — New English couple: «The present negro inhabitants were known to him, and he was very courteously shewn about the interior by old Asa and his stout wife Hannah.» In contrast to their apparently alien landlord: «a small rodent-featured person with a guttural accent»

In the short story «The Rats in the Walls,» the narrator’s favourite cat has a name that incorporates a racial slur: «My eldest cat, «N*****-Man,» was seven years old and had come with me from my home in Bolton, Massachusetts.»

The narrators in «The Street,» «Herbert West: Reanimator,» «He,» «The Call of Cthulhu,» «The Shadow Over Innsmouth,» «The Horror at Red Hook,» and many other tales express sentiments which could be considered hostile towards Jews. Lovecraft married a woman of Ukrainian Jewish ancestry, Sonia Greene, who later said she had to repeatedly remind Lovecraft of her background when he made anti-Semitic remarks. «Whenever we found ourselves in the racially mixed crowds which characterize New York,» Greene wrote after her divorce from Lovecraft, «Howard would become livid with rage. He seemed almost to lose his mind.»[11]

To some extent, Lovecraft’s ideas regarding race reflect attitudes common in his era; racial segregation laws were enforced throughout much of the United States and many states had enacted eugenics laws and prohibitions against «miscegenation» which were also common in non-Roman Catholic areas of Europe. A popular movement during the 1920s succeeded in drastically restricting immigration to the United States, culminating in the Immigration Act of 1924, which featured expert testimony to the United States Congress on the threat to American society from the assimilation of more «inferior stock» from eastern and southern Europe.

Lovecraft was an avowed Anglophile, and held English culture to be the comparative pinnacle of civilization, with the descendants of the English in America as something of a second-class offshoot, and everyone else below them (see, for example, his poem «An American to Mother England»). His love for English history and culture is often repeated in his work (such as King Kuranes’ nostalgia for England in «The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath»).

Lovecraft’s ideas about eugenics often extended to his white characters. He showed greater sympathy for white and culturally European groups. The narrator of «Cool Air» speaks disparagingly of the poor Hispanics of his neighborhood, but respects the wealthy and aristocratic Spaniard Dr. Muñoz, for his Celtiberian origins, and because he is «a man of birth, cultivation, and discrimination.» The degenerate descendants of Dutch immigrants in the Catskill Mountains, «who correspond exactly to the decadent element of white trash in the South» («Beyond the Wall of Sleep», 1919), are common targets. In «The Temple,» Lovecraft’s narrator is a highly unsympathetic figure: a World War I U-boat captain whose faith in his «iron German will» and the superiority of the Fatherland lead him to machine-gun survivors in lifeboats and, later, kill his own crew, while blinding him to the curse he has brought upon himself. However, according to Lovecraft: A Biography, by L. Sprague de Camp, Lovecraft was horrified by reports of anti-Semitic violence in Germany (prior to World War II, which Lovecraft did not live to see), suggesting that Lovecraft was opposed to violent extermination of those he regarded as «inferiors».

Lovecraft’s racism has been a continued focus of scholarly and interpretive interest. S.T. Joshi, one of the foremost Lovecraft scholars, notes that «There is no denying the reality of Lovecraft’s racism, nor can it merely be passed off as ‘typical of his time,’ for it appears that Lovecraft expressed his views more pronouncedly (although usually not for publication) than many others of his era. It is also foolish to deny that racism enters into his fiction.»[3] In his book H.P. Lovecraft: Against The World, Against Life, Michel Houellebecq argues that «racial hatred» provided the emotional force and inspiration for much of Lovecraft’s greatest works.

Lovecraft racist antagonism is a corollary of his nihilistic notion of biological determinism: At the Mountains of Madness, in which explorers discover evidence of a completely alien race, the Elder Things, who created human beings through bioengineering but who were eventually destroyed by their brutish shoggoth slaves. Even after several members of the party are killed by revived Elder Things, Lovecraft’s narrator expresses sympathy for them: «They were the men of another age and another order of being… what had they done that we would not have done in their place? God, what intelligence and persistence! What a facing of the incredible… Radiates, vegetables, monstrosities, star spawn — whatever they had been, they were men!»

These lines of thought in Lovecraft’s worldview — racism and romantic reactionary defense of cultural order in the face of the degenerative modern world — have led some scholars to see a special affinity to the aristocratic, anti-modernism of Traditionalist Julius Evola:

Certainly «The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath» with its grandiose portrayal of the onyx city respires the cool and elegant spirit of Tradition, arraigned against which in several stories is the sink of decadence, Innsmouth, an inbred population made up of the offspring of lustful mariners and sea monsters, the negative force of counter-Tradition. The eternal struggle between the Uranian power of light and the telluric forces of chaos is reflected in Lovecraft’s work

Some have interpreted Lovecraft’s racial attitude as being more cultural than brutally biological: Lovecraft showed sympathy to others who were pacifically assimilated into Western culture, to the extent of even marrying a Jewish woman whom he viewed as «well assimilated».

Gender

Women in Lovecraft’s fiction are rare, and sympathetic women virtually non-existent; the few leading female characters in his stories — like Asenath Waite (though actually an evil male wizard who has taken over an innocent girl’s body) in «The Thing on the Doorstep» and Lavinia Whateley in «The Dunwich Horror» — are invariably servants of sinister forces. Romance is likewise almost absent from his stories; where he touches on love, it is usually a platonic love (e.g. «The Tree»). His characters live in a world where sexuality is negatively connotated — if it is productive at all, it gives birth to less-than-human beings («The Dunwich Horror» and «The Shadow Over Innsmouth»).

In this context, it might be helpful to draw attention to the scale of Lovecraft’s horror, which has often been described by critics as «cosmic horror.» Operating on a grand, cosmic scale as his stories are, they assign humanity a minor, insignificant role. Consequently, it is not female sexuality to which the stories categorically deny a vital and positive role — rather, it is human sexuality in general. Also, Lovecraft states in a private letter (to one of the several female intellectuals he befriended) that discrimination against women is an «oriental» superstition from which «aryans» ought to free themselves: evident racism aside, the letter seems to preclude at least conscious misogyny (as does, indeed, his private life otherwise).

Risks of a Scientific Era

At the turn of the 20th century, man’s increased reliance upon science was both opening new worlds and solidifying the manners by which he could understand them. Lovecraft portrays this potential for a growing gap of man’s understanding of the universe as a potential for horror. Most notably in «The Colour Out of Space,» the inability of science to comprehend a meteorite leads to horror.

In a letter to James F. Morton in 1923, Lovecraft specifically points to Einstein’s theory on relativity as throwing the world into chaos and making the cosmos a jest. And in a 1929 letter to Woodburn Harris, he speculates that technological comforts risk the collapse of science. Indeed, at a time when men viewed science as limitless and powerful, Lovecraft imagined alternative potential and fearful outcomes.

Influences

Lovecraft was influenced by such authors as Robert W. Chambers (The King in Yellow) (of whom H. P. Lovecraft wrote in a letter to Clark Ashton Smith: «Chambers is like Rupert Hughes and a few other fallen Titans — equipped with the right brains and education but wholly out of the habit of using them»), Arthur Machen («The Great God Pan»), Lord Dunsany (The Gods of Pegana and other Dunsany works), Edgar Allan Poe, A. Merritt («The Moon Pool«, later a great liking and admiration of the original of «The Metal Monster») and Lovecraft’s friends Robert E. Howard and Clark Ashton Smith.

He also cited Algernon Blackwood as an influence, quoting «Works The Centaur» in the head paragraph of «The Call of Cthulhu».

General Influence

Beyond direct adaptation, Lovecraft and his stories have had a profound impact on popular culture and have been praised by many modern writers. Some influence was direct, as he was a friend, inspiration, and correspondent to many of his contemporaries, such as Conan the Barbarian creator Robert E. Howard and Robert Bloch, author of Psycho. Many later figures were influenced by Lovecraft, including author and artist Clive Barker, prolific horror writer Stephen King, film directors John Carpenter and Stuart Gordon, game designers Sandy Petersen and Keichiro Toyama, and artist H. R. Giger. H. P. Lovecraft’s name is virtually synonymous with horror fiction; his writing, particularly his so-called «Cthulhu Mythos», has influenced fiction authors worldwide, and Lovecraftian elements can be seen in novels, movies, comic books, even cartoons. Batman’s nemesis «The Joker», for example, is said to be incarcerated at Arkham Asylum; Arkham being an invention of Lovecraft’s. Many modern horror writers — such as Stephen King, Neil Gaiman, F. Paul Wilson, Bentley Little, Thomas Ligotti, T. E. D. Klein, Caitlin R. Kiernan, Ramsey Campbell, Brian Lumley, and Joe R. Lansdale, to name just a few — have cited Lovecraft as one of their primary influences.

Argentine writer Jorge Luis Borges dedicated his pointedly Lovecraftian short story «There are More Things» — a reference to Hamlet’s «…in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy» — to the memory of Lovecraft. Contemporary French writer Michel Houellebecq wrote a literary biography of Lovecraft called H.P. Lovecraft: Against the World, Against Life. Shades of Lovecraft surface throughout Houellebecq’s work. Prolific American writer Joyce Carol Oates wrote an introduction for a collection of Lovecraft stories. In 2005 Lovecraft was somewhat controversially given a volume in the Library of America series, essentially declaring him a canonical great American writer. While he’s invoked as a godfather to fantastical genres, his thematics — surely some of the bleakest «realism» ever conveyed — have also sown strange offspring.

Other authors have written stories that are explicitly set in the same reality as Lovecraft’s original stories. Lovecraft pastiches are common. Lovecraft’s characteristic devices — like the object that drives one insane upon seeing it — are now eponymous.

He has also been held responsible for the invention of the philosophy «Cosmicism» which was reflected in many works beyond his own, including the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy series and movies like The Day the Earth Stood Still.

A number of heavy metal bands, including Behemoth, Symphony X, Blue Öyster Cult, Black Sabbath, Brown Jenkins, Electric Wizard, Dark Moor, Metallica, Morbid Angel, GWAR, Nile, Adagio, Philosopher, Aarni, Dragonland, Bal-Sagoth, Crypticus, 1349, Therion, Yyrkoon, Manticora, Azathoth, The Axis of Perditon and Vesania have been influenced lyrically by Lovecraft’s work. One band chose its name from a chapter title in The Case of Charles Dexter Ward, A Nightmare & A Cataclysm. British metal band Cradle of Filth released an album in 2002 entitled «Lovecraft and Witch Hearts.» On the inside cover is part of a poem by H. P. Lovecraft, and reads as follows:

For here, apart, dwells one whose hands have wrought
Strange eidola that chill the world with fear;
Whose graven runes in tomes of dread have taught
What things beyond the star-gulfs lurk and leer.
Dark Lord of Averoigne — whose windows stare
On pits of dream no other gaze could bear!

The British punk band Rudimentary Peni in 1987 released «Cacophony,» an album wholly structured around H. P. Lovecraft and his works. The songs are alternatively pseudo-biographical (e.g. «Better Not Born,» about the young Lovecraft’s contemplation of suicide) or directly inspired from his works (e.g. «Nightgaunts,» «Drinking Song from ‘The Tomb'»). The spoken-word track «Twitch» in particular is a curious tribute to Lovecraft’s work. It begins, «Howard Phillips Lovecraft, heaven knows, had a talent for writing which was of no means proportion: only what he did with this talent was a shame, and a caution and an eldritch horror,» and becomes progressively more sinister. He is accused, for instance, of «rewriting (for pennies) the crappy manuscripts of writers whose complete illiteracy would have been a boon to all mankind… and producing ghastly, grisly, ghoulish, and horrifying works of his own as well.» Parts of this was taken from Avram Davidsons 1963 review of «The Survivor or Others» in «Fantasy & Science Fiction».

The Live After Death album from Iron Maiden shows Eddie the Head on a stormy night rising from his grave. His gravestone has a quote from Lovecraft: «That is not dead, which can eternal lie. Yet with strange eons, even death may die», a quote also present in the lyrics of «The Thing That Should Not Be», by Metallica. The quote is also used in «Poet Laureate Infinity», a song by rapper Canibus.

A few non-metal bands have also used Lovecraftian sources, including The Fall, The Vaselines, Fields of the Nephilim, and The Darkest of the Hillside Thickets. Australian hiphop group Nick Sweepah & Aux One include references to Lovecraft and the Cthulhu mythos on their self-titled EP of 2005. And the band «Living Colour» derives its name from «The Colour Out of Space».

«Mountains Of Madness» is a visual / musical stage-production with Alexander Hacke (German musician, long-time member of Einstürzende Neubauten), UK band The Tiger Lillies and Danielle de Picciotto (drawings), which is entirely based on Lovecraft’s work. The Premiere took place in Berlin in 2005. A DVD also titled «Mountains Of Madness» was released in 2006. Tiger Lillies with Hacke & de Picciotto performed several live shows with this production in 2005 — 2007.[12]

Lovecraft’s style of horror has been implemented in Call of Cthulhu and other roleplaying games and many video games, including Clive Barker’s Undying, Eternal Darkness: Sanity’s Requiem, Bloodborne, Resident Evil 4, and more explicitly in Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth and the MMORPG Cthulhu Nation.

There have also been detailed references to the Cthulhu mythos in current and near current science fiction (for example, «Babylon 5 Thirdspace» and the Doctor Who new adventures novels.)

Lovecraft appears as himself in the television tie-in novel, «Stargate SG-1: Roswell», where he is credited for inspiring both Stargate: SG-1 and Stargate Atlantis.

Survey of the work

For most of the 20th century, the definitive editions of Lovecraft’s prose fiction (specifically At the Mountains of Madness and Other Novels, Dagon and Other Macabre Tales, The Dunwich Horror and Others, and The Horror in the Museum and Other Revisions) were published by Arkham House, a publisher originally started with the intent of publishing the work of Lovecraft, but which has since published a considerable amount of other literature as well. Penguin Classics has at present issued three volumes of Lovecraft’s works: The Call of Cthulhu and Other Weird Stories, The Thing on the Doorstep and Other Weird Stories, and most recently The Dreams in the Witch House and Other Weird Stories. They collect the standard texts as edited by S. T. Joshi, most of which were available in the Arkham House editions, with the exception of the restored text of «The Shadow Out of Time» from The Dreams in the Witch House, which had been previously released by small-press publisher Hippocampus Press. In 2005 the prestigious Library of America canonized Lovecraft with a volume of his stories edited by Peter Straub, and Random House’s Modern Library line just released the «definitive edition» of Lovecraft’s At the Mountains of Madness (also including «Supernatural Horror in Literature»).

Lovecraft’s poetry is collected in The Ancient Track: The Complete Poetical Works of H. P. Lovecraft, while much of his juvenilia, various essays on philosophical, political and literary topics, antiquarian travelogues, and other things, can be found in Miscellaneous Writings. Lovecraft’s essay «Supernatural Horror in Literature», first published in 1927, is a historical survey of horror literature available with endnotes as The Annotated Supernatural Horror in Literature.

Letters

Although Lovecraft is known mostly for his works of weird fiction, the bulk of his writing consists of voluminous letters about a variety of topics, from weird fiction and art criticism to politics and history. S. T. Joshi estimates that Lovecraft wrote about 87,500 letters from 1912 until his death in 1937, including one 70-page letter from November 9, 1929, to Woodburn Harris.

Lovecraft was not a very active letter-writer in youth. In 1931 he admitted: «In youth I scarcely did any letter-writing — thanking anybody for a present was so much of an ordeal that I would rather have written a two hundred fifty-line pastoral or a twenty-page treatise on the rings of Saturn.» (SL 3.369–70). The initial interest in letters stemmed from his correspondence with his cousin Phillips Gamwell, but even more important was his involvement in the amateur journalism movement, which was responsible for the enormous number of letters Lovecraft produced.

Lovecraft clearly states that his contact to numerous different people through letter-writing was one of the main factors in broadening his view of the world:

I found myself opened up to dozens of points of view which would otherwise never have occurred to me. My understanding and sympathies were enlarged, and many of my social, political, and economic views were modified as a consequence of increased knowledge.
~ HPL , Selected Letters 4.389

Today there are four publishing houses that have released letters from Lovecraft, most prominently Arkham House with its five-volume edition Selected Letters. Other publishers are Hippocampus Press (Letters to Alfred Galpin et al.), Night Shade Books (Mysteries of Time and Spirit: The Letters of H. P. Lovecraft and Donald Wandrei et al.) and Necronomicon Press (Letters to Samuel Loveman and Vincent Starrett et al).

There is controversy over the copyright status of many of Lovecraft’s works, especially his later works. For a detailed account, see H.P. Lovecraft copyright status.

Gallery

References

  1. H. P. Lovecraft’s Family Line
  2. H.P.Lovecraft in writing
  3. List of works by H.P.Lovecraft
  4. Lovecraft’s Inspirations
  1. Amazing Stories, January 1931
  2. Did Lovecraft write The Inevitable Conflict? essay
Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт
Howard Phillips Lovecraft
Дата рождения:

20 августа 1890

Место рождения:

Провиденс
(Род-Айленд, США)

Дата смерти:

15 марта 1937

Место смерти:

Провиденс
(Род-Айленд, США)

Гражданство:

Соединённые Штаты Америки США

Род деятельности:

писатель, поэт

Годы творчества:

1897—1908, 1917—1936

Жанр:

Мистика, Лавкрафтовские ужасы

Произведения на сайте Lib.ru

Го́вард Фи́ллипс Лавкра́фт (англ. Howard Phillips Lovecraft, 20 августа 1890, Провиденс, Род-Айленд, США — 15 марта 1937, там же) — американский писатель и поэт, писавший в жанрах ужасов, мистики, совмещая их в оригинальном стиле. Родоначальник Мифов Ктулху. При жизни Лавкрафта его произведения не пользовались большой популярностью, однако уже после его смерти они оказали заметное влияние на формирование современной нам массовой культуры. Его творчество настолько уникально, что произведения Лавкрафта выделяются в отдельный поджанр — так называемые Лавкрафтовские ужасы.

Содержание

  • 1 Биография
  • 2 Творчество
    • 2.1 Предшественники
    • 2.2 Последователи
      • 2.2.1 Август Дерлет
      • 2.2.2 Стивен Кинг
    • 2.3 «Некрономикон» и другие произведения, упоминаемые Лавкрафтом
      • 2.3.1 Реально существующие книги
    • 2.4 Г. Ф. Лавкрафт в России
    • 2.5 Библиография
  • 3 Фильмы
  • 4 Примечания
  • 5 Литература
  • 6 Ссылки
  • 7 См. также

Биография

Лавкрафт в раннем детстве, 1892.

Лавкрафт родился в Провиденсе (штат Род-Айленд, США). Он был единственным ребенком в семье коммивояжёра Уилфрида Скотта Лавкрафта и Сары Сьюзан Филлипс Лавкрафт. Известно, что его предки жили в Америке ещё со времён Колонии Массачусетского залива (1630). Когда Говарду было три года, Уилфрида поместили в психиатрическую больницу, где тот находился в течение пяти лет до самой смерти 19 июня 1898[1].

Лавкрафт в возрасте 9-10 лет.

Лавкрафт был воспитан матерью, двумя тётками и дедушкой (Уиппл Ван Бюрен Филлипс), который приютил семью будущего писателя. Говард был вундеркиндом — читал наизусть стихи ещё в возрасте двух лет, а с шести уже писал свои[1]. Благодаря дедушке, у которого была самая большая библиотека в штате[1], он познакомился с классической литературой. Помимо классики он увлёкся готической прозой и арабскими сказками Тысячи и одной ночи.

В возрасте 6—8 лет Лавкрафт написал несколько рассказов, большая часть которых к сегодняшнему дню не сохранилась. В возрасте 14 лет Лавкрафт пишет своё первое серьёзное произведение — «Зверь в пещере».

Ребёнком Лавкрафт часто болел, и в школу пошёл лишь в возрасте восьми лет, но через год его забрали оттуда. Он много читал, изучал между делом химию, написал несколько работ (размножал их на гектографе небольшим тиражом), начиная с 1899 года («Научная газета»). Через четыре года он вернулся в школу.

Уиппл Ван Бурен Филлипс умер в 1904 году, после чего семья сильно обеднела и была вынуждена переехать в меньший дом на той же улице. Говарда опечалил выезд, и он даже подумывал о самоубийстве. Из-за нервного срыва, случившегося с ним в 1908 году, он так и не окончил школу, чего сильно стыдился.

Лавкрафт писал фантастику ещё в детстве («Зверь в пещере» (1905), «Алхимик» (1908)), но позже предпочёл ей поэзию и эссе. Вернулся к этому «несерьёзному» жанру он лишь в 1917 году с рассказами «Дагон», затем «Гробница». «Дагон» стал его первым изданным творением, появившись в 1923 году в журнале «Таинственнные рассказы» (Weird Tales). В то же время Лавкрафт начал свою переписку, ставшую в итоге одной из самых объёмных в XX веке. Среди его корреспондентов были Форрест Аккерман, Роберт Блох и Роберт Говард.

Сара, мать Говарда, после долгой истерии и депрессии попала в ту же лечебницу, где умер её муж, и там же умерла 21 мая 1921 года. Она писала сыну до своих последних дней.

В 1919—1923 гг. Лавкрафт активно писал, создав за эти годы более 40 рассказов, в том числе в соавторстве.

Лавкрафт и его жена Соня Грин, 1924.

Вскоре на собрании журналистов-любителей Говард Лавкрафт встретил Соню Грин, имевшую украинско-еврейские корни, и бывшую на семь лет старше Лавкрафта. Они поженились в 1924 году и переехали в Бруклин, Нью-Йорк. После тихого Провиденса нью-йоркская жизнь не полюбилась Лавкрафту. Во многом автобиографичным был его рассказ «Он». Через несколько лет супруги расстались, хотя и не оформили развода. Лавкрафт вернулся в родной город. Из-за неудавшегося брака некоторые биографы гадали о его асексуальности, но Грин, напротив, называла его «прекрасным любовником»[2].

Вернувшись в Провиденс, Лавкрафт жил в «большом деревянном доме викторианской эпохи» по адресу Барнс-стрит, 10 вплоть до 1933 года (этот адрес является адресом дома Доктора Уиллета в повести «Случай Чарльза Декстера Варда»). В тот период он написал практически все свои короткие рассказы, напечатанные в журналах (в основном в «Таинственных рассказах»), а также многие крупные работы, такие как «Случай Чарльза Декстера Варда» и «Хребты Безумия».

Несмотря на писательские успехи, Лавкрафт всё больше нуждался. Он снова переехал, теперь уже в маленький домик. Сильное впечатление на него произвело самоубийство Роберта Говарда. В 1936 году у писателя обнаружили рак кишечника, следствие недоедания. Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт умер 15 марта 1937 года в Провиденсе (штат Род-Айленд, США).

Творчество

Предшественники

К писателям, чьё творчество оказало влияние на Лавкрафта, в первую очередь нужно отнести Эдгара Аллана По, Эдварда Дансейни, Артура Мейчена, Алджернона Блэквуда, Амброза Бирса, Лафкадио Хирна.

Последователи

Август Дерлет

Пожалуй, главным из последователей Лавкрафта как с точки зрения хронологии, так и с позиций преемственности, является Август Дерлет. Несмотря на то, что впоследствии многие авторы обращались к созданному Лавкрафтом пантеону космических богов, именно Дерлет стал создателем и руководителем издательства «Arkham House», в котором публиковались произведения самого Лавкрафта, Дерлета и всех, кто так или иначе соприкасался в своём творчестве с созданными Лавкрафтом мирами. Дерлет также был довольно успешен как писатель, хотя и не мог сравниться по силе воздействия со своим учителем. Однако он был гением издательского дела — книги издательства «Arkham House» того периода в настоящее время являются библиографическими редкостями. К тому же это был редкий случай, когда издательство создавалось под творчество конкретного человека.

Стивен Кинг

Творчество Лавкрафта, повлиявшее на массовую культуру Запада, оставило неизгладимый след на творчестве бесчисленного числа писателей, работавших и работающих в жанре мистики и ужасов. Одним из творческих наследников Лавкрафта является и знаменитый «Король Ужасов» Стивен Кинг. Наиболее ярким произведением, в котором Стивен Кинг не подражает манере повествования Говарда Лавкрафта, но отдаёт дань таланту последнего, является повесть «Крауч Энд», экранизированная кинокомпанией «TNT» в сборнике киноновелл «Кошмары и фантазии Стивена Кинга». В работах Кинга чётко просматриваются следы влияния творчества Лавкрафта. Так, Роман «Оно» непосредственно отсылает читателя к космическому ужасу, пришедшему из незапамятных времён. Следует однако отметить, что ужас Кинга может быть довольно чётко разграничен на три основные части: космический (Лавкрафт), загробный и научный (Мэри Шелли).

Помимо прочего, действие большинства книг Стивена Кинга происходит в небольших американских городках, что также характерно и для работ Лавкрафта, который считал, что самые страшные вещи творятся в тихих местах.

«Некрономикон» и другие произведения, упоминаемые Лавкрафтом

Обычно Лавкрафт ссылался на древние книги, содержащие секреты, которые не должен знать человек. Большей частью ссылки были вымышленными, но некоторые оккультные работы существовали в действительности. Сочетание выдуманных документов с реальными в одном контексте позволяло первым казаться настоящими. Лавкрафт давал только общие ссылки на такие книги (в основном для нагнетания атмосферы) и редко делал детальное описание. Наиболее известным из этих выдуманных манускриптов является его «Некрономикон», о котором писатель больше всего говорил. Его объяснения по поводу этого текста были так хорошо продуманы, что многие люди и по сей день верят в реальность этой книги, и это позволяет некоторым наживаться на неосведомлённости других.

The Book of Eibon, Livre d’Eibon, or Liber Ivonis

Придумана Кларком Эштоном Смитом. Лавкрафт лишь несколько раз ссылался на эту книгу в своих рассказах: «Сны в ведьмином доме», «Существо на пороге», и «Тень из безвременья». В последние два года жизни Лавкрафт давал ссылки на два «перевода» этой книги: «Livre d’Eibon» («Дневник Алонзо Тайпера») и «Liber Ivonis» («Обитающий во тьме»). В рассказе «Каменный человек» книга Эйбона служит в качестве основной книги семейной линии колдунов Ван Кауранов, тщательно скрываемой и передающейся по наследству.

Cultes des Goules by the Comte d’Erlette

Имя автора этой книги образовалось из имени Августа Дерлета, чьи предки перебрались из Франции и чья фамилия исторически правильно писалась как Д’Эрлетт. Как и во множестве подобных случаев, Лавкрафт ссылался на эту книгу всего несколько раз: в рассказах «Тень из безвременья», «Затаившийся у порога» и «Обитающий во тьме».

De Vermis Mysteriis by Ludvig Prinn

«Мистерии червя» (в некоторых переводах — «Таинственные Черви») и их автор Людвиг Принн были придуманы Робертом Блохом, а латинское название книги «De Vermis Mysteriis» придумал Лавкрафт. Он ссылался на неё в рассказах «Тень из безвременья», «Дневник Алонзо Тайпера», «Единственный наследник» и «Обитающий во тьме».

The Eltdown Shards

Этот труд есть создание воображения Ричарда Ф. Сирайта, одного из корреспондентов Лавкрафта. Лавркафт мельком упомянул его в своих произведениях: «Тень из безвременья» и «Дневник Алонзо Тайпера».

The Necronomicon or Al Azif of Abdul Alhazred

Пожалуй, самая известная из мистификаций Лавкрафта. Он давал ссылки на «Некрономикон», также известный как «Аль Азиф», в 18-ти своих рассказах. Настоящим арабским названием этого манускрипта было «Аль Азиф», что означало — «звук, производимый ночными насекомыми», который, как считали арабы, на самом деле издавали демоны. Абдул Альхазред, мифический автор этой книги, жил в Дамаске, где и был написан «Некрономикон». В 738 году н. э. он был прилюдно поглощён невидимым демоном. «Аль Азиф» был переведён на греческий Теодором Филетом из Константинополя, который и дал рукописи название «Некрономикон». Олаус Вормиус перевёл текст на латынь в 1228 году. В 1232 году, вскоре после перевода Вормиусом, папа Григорий IX запретил как греческую, так и латинскую версию книги. Вормиус отмечает, что оригинальный арабский текст к тому времени был уже утерян. Доктор Джон Ди перевёл его на английский, но только несколько фрагментов этого варианта сохранились до нашего времени. В настоящее время латинский перевод XV-го века находится в Британском Музее, редакции XVII-го века находятся в Национальной Библиотеке в Париже, Библиотеке Гарварда, Университете Буэнос-Ариеса, и Мискатоникском Университете Акхема. Естественно, все эти копии тщательно сохраняются.

Первый раз «Некрономикон» упоминается в рассказе «Пёс» (сентябрь 1922), хотя Абдул Альхазред, автор этого труда, упоминается раньше, в «Безымянном Городе» (январь 1921). Именно здесь известнейшее изречение из «Некрономикона» упоминается впервые:

That is not dead which can eternal lie,
And with strange aeons even death may die.

Пожалуй самая длинная выдержка из «Некрономикона» встречается в рассказе «Ужас в Данвиче»:

…не следует верить тому, что человек суть владыка мира единственный и последний. И его жизненная субстанция не единственная существующая на Земле. Древние были, Древние существуют, Древние будут всегда. Но не в известном нам мире, а между мирами. Изначальные, сильные и здоровые. Они невидимы для глаз наших. Один Йог-Сотот знает вход в этот мир. Йог-Сотот — и ключ, и страж этих врат. Прошлое, нынешнее и будущее едины в Йог-Сототе. Он ведает место, где Древние пробили дорогу себе в прошлые времена, ведает, где Они пройдут в будущее. Ведает их следы на Земле, которые они оставляют, невидимые. По одному только запаху люди узнают их присутствие, но образ их узнается в облике тех, кого они произвели среди смертных детей человеческих, от вида человека до формы без субстанции. Невидимыми Они кружат по Земле, ожидая нужных слов Ритуала. Их голос звучит в ветре, о Их присутствии шепчет трава. Они выкорчёвывают леса, уничтожают города, но никто не видит карающую Руку. В ледяных пустынях познал их Кадаф, а разве человек когда-либо познавал Кадаф? Льды на севере и затопленные острова в океанах скрывают камни, на которых начертаны Печати. Йог-Сотот откроет двери, пред которыми смыкаются сферы. Человек царит там, где когда-то властвовали Они. Но как после лета приходит зима, а зима сменяется весной, так и Они ждут своего Часа!!!

The People of the Monolith by Justin Geoffrey

Как книга, так и её автор были придуманы Робертом Ирвином Говардом, Лавкрафт же лишь один раз ссылается на них в рассказе «Тварь на пороге»:

Время шло, я увлёкся архитектурой и оставил свой замысел проиллюстрировать книгу демонических стихов Эдварда, впрочем, наша дружба оттого не пострадала и не стала слабее. Необычный гений молодого Дерби получил удивительное развитие, и на восемнадцатом году жизни он выпустил сборник макабрической лирики под заглавием «Азатот и прочие ужасы», произведший сенсацию. Он состоял в оживлённой переписке с печально известным поэтом-бодлеристом Джастином Джеффри, тем самым, кто написал «Людей монолита» и в 1926 году умер, крича накрик, в сумасшедшем доме, незадолго до того посетив какую-то зловещую и пользующуюся дурной славой деревушку в Венгрии.

Узнать о Джастине Джеффри можно в рассказе Роберта Говарда «Чёрный Камень» (1931).

The Pnakotic Manuscripts (or Fragments)

Ещё одна мистификация Лавкрафта. Его «Пнакотические манускрипты» или «Фрагменты» (ссылки в 11-ти произведениях) уступают по частоте обращения лишь «Некрономикону». Никаких деталей о происхождении или содержании этих текстов Лавкрафт не указывает. Скорее всего, эти тексты были написаны в дочеловеческий период.

Seven Cryptical Books of Hsan

Лавкрафт лишь упоминал о книгах Хсана в «Иных Богах» и «Сомнамбулическом поиске Кадафа Неведомого» оба раза вместе с «Пнакотическими манускриптами».

Unaussprechlichen Kulten, Black Book, or Nameless Cults by Friedrich von Junzt

Роберт Говард впервые представил «Неименуемые культы» в своём рассказе «Дети ночи» (1931). В следующем году Лавкрафт придумал немецкое название для этих трудов, так как фон Юнтц писал оригинал на немецком. Это название, «Ungenennte Heidenthume», не удовлетворило некоторых из корреспондентов Лавкрафта. Август Дерлет изменил его на «Unaussprechlichen Kulten», которое и утвердилось (хотя в переводе это означало — «Непроизносимые культы», то есть культы, название которых невозможно произнести. «Die Unaussprechlichen Kulten» или «Unaussprechliche Kulten» было бы правильнее).

Хотя Лавкрафт не ссылался на эту книгу чаще чем на другие, он дает её историю издания в рассказе «Вне времён»:

В сущности, любой читатель страшных «Безымянных Культов» фон Юнтца мог бы с первого взгляда установить бесспорную связь между ними и таинственными письменами на плёнке. Но в те времена мало кто знал эту кощунственную работу: первое её издание было уничтожено в Дюссельдорфе в 1839 году, в 1845-м появился перевод Бредуэла, а в 1909-м был опубликован сильно сокращённый вариант.

«Чёрная Книга» фон Юнтца встречается в нескольких рассказах Роберта Говарда: «Дети ночи» (1931), «Чёрный Камень» (1931), «Тварь на крыше» (1932). В последнем рассказе представлена история написания и публикации этой книги.

R’lyeh Text

Данный текст упоминается у Лавкрафта в рассказе «Затаившийся у порога». Кроме того в том же рассказе даётся вторичная косвенная ссылка на данный текст через другую вымышленную книгу профессора Шрусбери «Исследование мифотворчества у первобытных народов о Последнем дне с Особым упоминанием Текста Р’лайха».

Реально существующие книги

Как указано выше, многие из книг, на которые ссылался Лавкрафт в своих произведениях существуют на самом деле. Вот они:
Ars Magna et Ultima, Raymond Lully («Дело Чарльза Декстера Варда»)
The Story of Atlantis and The Lost Lemuria, W. Scott-Elliot («Зов Ктулху»)
The Book of Dzyan («Дневник Алонзо Тайпера» и «Обитающий во тьме»)
The Book of Thoth («Врата серебряного ключа»)
Clavis Alchemiae, Robert Fludd («Дело Чарльза Декстера Варда»)
Cryptomenysis Patefacta, John Falconer («Ужас в Данвиче»)
The Daemonolatreia, Remigius («Фестиваль» и «Ужас в Данвиче»)
De Furtivis Literarum Notis, Giovanni Battista della Porta («Ужас в Данвиче»)
The Golden Bough, Sir James George Frazer («Зов Ктулху»)
De Lapide Philosophico, Johannes Trithemius («Дело Чарльза Декстера Варда»)
Description du Royaume de Congo et des Contrees environnantes, Filippo Pigafetta & Duarte Lopez («Картинка в старой книге»)
Key of Wisdom, Artephius («Дело Чарльза Декстера Варда»)
Kryptographik, Johann Ludwig Kluber («Ужас в Данвиче»)
Liber Investigationis, Geber («Дело Чарльза Декстера Варда»)
Magnalia Christi Americana, Cotton Mather («Картина в доме» «Неименуемое» «Модель для Пикмана» и «Дело Чарльза Декстера Варда»)
Poligraphia, Johannes Trithemius («Ужас в Данвиче»)
Saducismus Triumphatus, Joseph Glanvil («Фестиваль»)
Thesaurus Chemicus, Roger Bacon («Дело Чарльза Декстера Варда»)
Traité des Chifferes ou Secretes d’Escrire, Blaise de Vigenere («Ужас в Данвиче»)
Turba Philosophorum, Guglielmo Grataroli («Дело Чарльза Декстера Варда»)
The Witch-Cult in Western Europe, Dr. Margaret Murray («Кошмар в Ред Хуке» и «Зов Ктулху»)
Wonders of the Invisible World, Cotton Mather («Модель для Пикмана»)
The Zohar («Дело Чарльза Декстера Варда»)

Г. Ф. Лавкрафт в России

Знакомство российского читателя с творчеством Лавкрафта произошло в 1991—1993 годах. Ключевую роль в этом сыграли 2 группы энтузиастов:

1. Петербургский публицист Евгений Головин и московская переводчица Валерия Бернацкая подготовили 256-страничное собрание рассказов писателя для издательства «Terra Incognita» (1991).

2. Коллектив переводчиков из Екатеринбурга, сформировавшийся вокруг литературного агентства Kubin Ltd, подготовил полное 4-томное собрание сочинений Лавкрафта для издательства «Форум» (1991—1993). В группу входили Игорь Богданов, Василий Дорогокупля, Фёдор Еремеев и Олег Мичковский. Всего ими было издано 12 книг Лавкрафта в издательствах Москвы, Киева, Екатеринбурга и Нижнего Новгорода. Эта же команда ответственна за издание 7-томной «Энциклопедии читателя» и создание издательства «Фабрика комиксов».

В настоящее время сборники Лавкрафта регулярно переиздаются в России по крайней мере тремя крупными издательствами — «Азбука», «АСТ», «Эксмо».

В 2006 году интерес к произведениям Лавкрафта в России был сильно подогрет после акции «Вопрос Путину», в ходе которой президенту России задавались вопросы, предварительно отобранные Интернет-голосованием. На голосовании неожиданно, в результате флешмоба, победил шуточный вопрос «Как Вы относитесь к пробуждению Ктулху?»[3]. После этого образ и имя Ктулху стали гораздо чаще использоваться в Рунете.

Библиография

Основная статья: Библиография Г.Ф. Лавкрафта

Наиболее известные и значимые произведения:

  • Зов Ктулху (1926)
  • Хребты Безумия (1931)

Фильмы

По мотивам произведений Лавкрафта снято несколько десятков фильмов. Наиболее известные из них созданы режиссёрами Стюартом Гордоном, Брайаном Юзной и др.:

  • Ужас в Данвиче / The Dunwich Horror (1970)
  • Зловещие мертвецы / The Evil Dead (1981)
  • Реаниматор / Re-Animator (1985)
  • Извне / From Beyond (1986)
  • Неименуемое / The Unnamable (1988)
  • Невеста реаниматора / Bride of Re-Animator (1990)
  • Поместье Ктулху / La Mansion de los Cthulhu (1990)
  • Воскресший / The Resurrected (1991)
  • Книга мёртвых / Necronomicon (1993)
  • Неименуемое 2 / The Unnamable II: The Statement of Randolph Carter (1993)
  • В пасти безумия / In the Mouth of Madness (1995)
  • Дагон / Dagon (2001)
  • Книга теней / Malefique (2002)
  • Возвращение реаниматора / Beyond Re-Animator (2003)
  • Заброшенный дом / Shunned House (2003)
  • Зов Ктулху / The Call of Cthulhu (2005)
  • Сны в доме Ведьм / H.P. Lovecraft’s Dreams in the Witch-House (2005)
  • Заявление / The Statement (2007)
  • Махани, ты не прав / ‘ (2009)
  • Ужас в Данвиче / The Dunwich Horror (2009)[4]
  • Дом реаниматора / House of Re-Animator (2010)

В настоящее время в России, во Владивостоке снимается фильм «Тень над Аркхэмом» (блог фильма — community.livejournal.com/hpl_movie_blog), также основанный на произведениях Лавкрафта.

Примечания

  1. 1 2 3 «По ту сторону сна…» — русский фэн-сайт, биография Лавкрафта
  2. H.P. Lovecraft Misconceptions(англ.)
  3. Ответы Путина
  4. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1226752/

Литература

  • Л. Спрэг Де Камп. Лавкрафт: Биография. — СПб.: Амфора, 2008. — С. 656. — ISBN 978-5-367-00815-9

Ссылки

В Викитеке есть оригинал текста по этой теме.

См. Howard Phillips Lovecraft

Encyclopedia Britannica

Encyclopedia Britannica

  • Entertainment & Pop Culture
  • Geography & Travel
  • Health & Medicine
  • Lifestyles & Social Issues
  • Literature
  • Philosophy & Religion
  • Politics, Law & Government
  • Science
  • Sports & Recreation
  • Technology
  • Visual Arts
  • World History
  • On This Day in History
  • Quizzes
  • Podcasts
  • Dictionary
  • Biographies
  • Summaries
  • Top Questions
  • Week In Review
  • Infographics
  • Demystified
  • Lists
  • #WTFact
  • Companions
  • Image Galleries
  • Spotlight
  • The Forum
  • One Good Fact
  • Entertainment & Pop Culture
  • Geography & Travel
  • Health & Medicine
  • Lifestyles & Social Issues
  • Literature
  • Philosophy & Religion
  • Politics, Law & Government
  • Science
  • Sports & Recreation
  • Technology
  • Visual Arts
  • World History
  • Britannica Explains
    In these videos, Britannica explains a variety of topics and answers frequently asked questions.
  • Britannica Classics
    Check out these retro videos from Encyclopedia Britannica’s archives.
  • #WTFact Videos
    In #WTFact Britannica shares some of the most bizarre facts we can find.
  • This Time in History
    In these videos, find out what happened this month (or any month!) in history.
  • Demystified Videos
    In Demystified, Britannica has all the answers to your burning questions.
  • Student Portal
    Britannica is the ultimate student resource for key school subjects like history, government, literature, and more.
  • COVID-19 Portal
    While this global health crisis continues to evolve, it can be useful to look to past pandemics to better understand how to respond today.
  • 100 Women
    Britannica celebrates the centennial of the Nineteenth Amendment, highlighting suffragists and history-making politicians.
  • Britannica Beyond
    We’ve created a new place where questions are at the center of learning. Go ahead. Ask. We won’t mind.
  • Saving Earth
    Britannica Presents Earth’s To-Do List for the 21st Century. Learn about the major environmental problems facing our planet and what can be done about them!
  • SpaceNext50
    Britannica presents SpaceNext50, From the race to the Moon to space stewardship, we explore a wide range of subjects that feed our curiosity about space!

Л. П. Лавкрафт [ h has ʊ ɝ d f ɪ l ɪ p s l ʌ v k ɹ æ f t ] , родился20 августа 1890 г.в Провиденсе ( Род-Айленд ) и умерла15 марта 1937 г.В этом же городе живет американский писатель, известный своими фантастическими рассказами , фильмами ужасов и научной фантастикой .

Источники его вдохновения, как и его творения, относятся к понятию космического ужаса , согласно которому человек ничтожен в масштабах космоса, который ему глубоко чужд. Те, кто действительно рассуждает, как и его главные герои, всегда рискуют своим рассудком . Мы часто читаем Лавкрафта о созданном им мифе, « Миф о Ктулху» , если использовать выражение Августа Дерлета  : все мифы вселенной Лавкрафта составляли для автора своего рода «  черный пантеон », « синтетическую мифологию » или «  синтетическую мифологию ». фольклорный цикл ». По сути, он хотел показать, что космос не антропоцентричен , что человеческое существо, одна из незначительных форм жизни среди других, далеко не занимает привилегированное место в бесконечной иерархии форм жизни. Его работы глубоко пессимистичны и циничны и ставят под сомнение эпоху Просвещения , романтизма и христианского гуманизма. Герои Лавкрафта обычно испытывают чувства, противоположные гнозису и мистицизму, в тот момент, когда они невольно видят ужас как реальность .

Хотя Лавкрафт читаемость была ограничена в течение его жизни, его репутация развивалась на протяжении многих десятилетий , и в настоящее время считается одним из самых влиятельных писателей ужасов в XX — го  века . Наряду с Эдгара По , он оказал «огромное влияние на последующие поколения писателей ужасов .
»

Стивен Кинг назвал его «величайшим создателем классической истории ужасов двадцатого века» .

биография

Молодость

Лавкрафту около девяти лет.

Лавкрафт родился 20 августа 1890 г.В 9 часов утра, в доме семьи , расположенный на 194 Энджелл Стрит в Провиденс в штате в Род — Айленд (дом был разрушен в 1961 году). Он единственный сын Уинфилда Скотта Лавкрафта, странствующего торговца, торгующего драгоценностями и драгоценными металлами, и Сары Сьюзан Филлипс Лавкрафт, чья генеалогия в Соединенных Штатах восходит к временам колонии Массачусетского залива в 1630 году. Его родители поженились, когда им было за тридцать, что было поздно для того времени. В 1893 году, когда маленькому Лавкрафту было всего три года, его отец в командировке заболел слабоумием в чикагском отеле . Вернувшись в Провиденс, он был помещен в больницу Батлера, где оставался до своей смерти в 1898 году. Лавкрафт всегда утверждал, что его отец умер от паралича, вызванного «нервным переутомлением» , но теперь он почти уверен, что причиной смерти был общий паралич. . Неизвестно, знал ли молодой Лавкрафт о болезни своего отца (предположительно сифилисе ), но вполне вероятно, что его мать знала , даже получив дозы мышьяка в качестве меры профилактики.

Филлипс Уиппл, дед по материнской линии Лавкрафта.

После госпитализации отца Лавкрафта воспитывала его мать, две его тети, Лилиан Делора Филлипс и Энни Эмелин Филлипс, и его дед по материнской линии, Уиппл Ван Бурен Филлипс . Все они живут в семейном доме. Лавкрафт одарен , читает стихи наизусть в три года, пишет свои первые слова в шесть. Его дедушка побуждал его читать и давал ему классические произведения, такие как «Тысяча и одна ночь» , « Эпоха басни » Томаса Булфинча и детские версии « Илиады» и « Одиссеи» . Тот же дедушка интригует молодого Лавкрафта, рассказывая ему свои собственные готические истории .

В детстве Лавкрафт часто болел, возможно, психосоматически , хотя приписывал свои страдания чисто физиологическим причинам. Представление о том, что он страдал врожденным сифилисом, опровергнуто. Кроме того, из-за его плохого физического состояния и дерзкого характера он никогда не ходил в школу до восьми лет и был отчислен почти через год. В то же время он прочитал много научных и астрономических сочинений, а четыре года спустя он поступил в среднюю школу на Хоуп-стрит. Также считается, что Лавкрафт очень быстро пострадал от Ночного террора , редкого пароксизмального расстройства, которое сильно повлияет на его дальнейшую работу.

Смерть его деда по материнской линии, 28 марта 1904 г., сильно влияет на него. Из-за плохого управления имением последнего семья оказалась почти без гроша и была вынуждена переехать на 598 Энджелл-стрит. Лавкрафт настолько сбит с толку этой потерей, что на мгновение задумался о самоубийстве. В 1908 году, до получения диплома, у него случился кризис, который позже он назвал «  нервным срывом  »  ; он никогда не получит диплом, даже если потом очень долго будет говорить обратное. С.Т. Джоши предполагает в своей биографии, что одной из основных причин этой депрессии была неспособность Лавкрафта понимать математику, предмет, который ему пришлось освоить, чтобы стать профессиональным астрономом. Этот провал (он не смог учиться в Брауновском университете ) долгое время был для него источником разочарования и стыда.

В юности Лавкрафт писал художественную литературу: весной 1904 года он написал первый черновик своей старейшей сохранившейся сказки «Чудовище в пещере» , прежде чем закончить ее.21 апреля 1905 г.. С 1908 по 1913 год он посвятил себя в основном поэзии. В этот период он живет как отшельник и контактирует только со своей матерью. Ситуация изменилась после того, как он обратился к «  Аргози» , «целому журналу  » , по поводу безвкусной природы любовных историй одного из популярных авторов журнала. В колонках журнала завязалась дискуссия, которая привлекла внимание Эдварда Ф. Дааса , президента Объединенной ассоциации любительской прессы (UAPA), который пригласил Лавкрафта присоединиться к нему: он присоединился к ассоциации6 апреля 1914 г. прежде чем стать его первым вице-президентом (избран в Июль 1915 г.), Главный редактор (Июль 1917 г.) то избранный президент опоздал Июль 1917 г.. UAPA возрождает Лавкрафта и вдохновляет его на публикацию стихов и эссе. В 1915 году он опубликовал свой собственный фан-журнал «Консерватор» , а в следующем году создал заочный клуб. В 1917 году, подталкиваемый корреспондентами, он вернулся к художественной литературе и написал «Ла Томбе» и «  Дагона  » . Это его первая статья, профессионально опубликованная в The Vagrant ,Ноябрь 1919 г.и в « Странных сказках» в 1923 году. В то же время он начал создавать солидную адресную книгу. Его длинная и частая переписка сделала его одним из самых продуктивных писателей века. Среди его контактов: Роберт Блох , Кларк Эштон Смит и Роберт Э. Ховард .

В 1919 году, после долгого страдания от истерии и депрессии, мать Лавкрафта поступила в больницу Батлера , как и ее муж до нее. Тем не менее она часто пишет своему сыну, и они остаются очень близки до его смерти.21 мая 1921 г., после осложнений после операции на желчном пузыре . Лавкрафт опустошен.

Свадьба и Нью-Йорк

Несколько недель спустя Лавкрафт посещает съезд журналистов-любителей в Бостоне, где знакомится с Соней Грин . Родилась в 1883 году, еврейка и украинка. Они женятся на3 марта 1924 г.В часовне Святого Павла находится на юге городке Манхэттен в городе Нью — Йорке , а затем переехал пару в Бруклин на п O  259 Парксайд авеню. Тети Лавкрафта не очень довольны этим союзом, потому что им не нравится, что их племянник женат на лавочнике (Грин владел магазином шляп ). Поначалу Лавкрафт очень любил Нью-Йорк , но вскоре паре пришлось столкнуться с финансовыми трудностями. Грин теряет бизнес, у нее слабое здоровье. У Лавкрафта не хватает денег на жизнь, и его жена переезжает в Кливленд в поисках работы. Затем автор живет один в районе Ред-Хук и начинает ненавидеть этот город (ситуация похожа на ситуацию с новым полуавтобиографическим Луи ). Писатель Мишель Уэльбек считает это обескураживающее чувство неспособности сохранить какую-либо работу среди столь плотного населения иммигрантов (что совершенно несовместимо с представлением Лавкрафта о себе как о привилегированном англосаксоне ) как фактор, который сделал его расизм абсолютным страхом. он выразится в новом « Ужасе на Ред-Хук» .

Несколько лет спустя Лавкрафт и Соня мирно разводятся, но процедура никогда не заканчивается. В17 апреля 1926 г., он возвращается жить в Провиденс.

Назад к провидению

Вернувшись в Провиденс, Лавкрафт переехал в «коричневый и просторный стиль дома викторианской  » на 10 Barnes — стрит , где он останется до 1933 г. также адрес D г  Виллетта в Случай Чарльза Декстера Варда . Этот период последних десяти лет жизни автора также является наиболее плодотворным: именно в этот период он опубликовал почти все свои самые известные произведения благодаря « Странным сказкам» , такие как « Дело Чарльза Декстера». Уорд и «Галлюцинированные горы». . Он также является литературным негром в фильмах «Тертр» , «Крылатая смерть» , « Узник фараонов» (для Гарри Гудини ) и «Журнале Алонзо Тайпера» .

Несмотря на все его усилия, он никогда не сможет заработать денег. Он должен переехать со своей последней тетей в еще меньшее и неудобное жилище. На него также очень повлияло самоубийство Роберта Э. Ховарда в 1936 году , с которым у него были эпистолярные отношения. В том же году у него обнаружили рак кишечника, при этом он страдал от недоедания . Он жил в постоянной боли до самой смерти,15 марта 1937 г..

Имя Лавкрафта указано среди имен его родителей и остальных членов его семьи на семейном памятнике. Но его поклонникам этого было недостаточно, и в 1977 году группа частных лиц собрала средства, чтобы подарить ему собственную стелу . Они написали ее имя, даты рождения и смерти, а также фразу «Я ЕСМЬ ПРОВИДЕНЦИЯ» ( «  Я ЕСМЬ ПРОВИДЕНЦИЯ  » ), афоризм, найденный в ее письмах.

Сочинения Лавкрафта

Кошмар
Иннсмута,иллюстрация Mushstone.

Имя Лавкрафта ассоциируется с ужасом  ; его сочинения, в частности, о Мифе о Ктулху (термин, который никогда не использовал Лавкрафт, но который будет использовать Август Дерлет ), оказали влияние на авторов во всем мире, и мы находим элементы Лавкрафта в романах, фильмах, музыке, комиксах. , мультфильмы и видеоигры. Многие современные писатели ( Стивен Кинг , Бентли Литтл , Джо Р. Лэнсдейл , Алан Мур , Нил Гейман и Чарльз Стросс и другие) назвали Лавкрафта главным источником вдохновения для своих работ.

Как бы то ни было, в своей жизни Лавкрафт так и не встретил славы: хотя его рассказы публиковались в крупных журналах, таких как Weird Tales , мало кто знает его имя. Однако он регулярно переписывается с другими писателями, такими как Кларк Эштон Смит и Август Дерлет, которые станут хорошими друзьями, даже если никогда не встречались. Эта группа корреспондентов известна под названием «  Круг Лавкрафта  », поскольку все они по своему желанию заимствуют элементы авторских рассказов (названия мест, богов, оккультные книги), что, тем более, не вызывает недовольства у последнего.

После смерти Лавкрафта Круг Лавкрафта не исчезает. Фактически, Август Дерлет, вероятно, самый плодовитый из этих писателей, но его вклад, мягко говоря, противоречив: хотя Лавкрафт никогда не считает свой пантеон богов чем-то иным, кроме литературного инструмента , Дерлет создает целую мифологию с войнами между различными сущностями, выигранными милосердными богами, которые запирают Ктулху и его слуг под землей, под океанами и т. д.

Некоторые критики говорят о трех фазах в трудах Лавкрафта. Даже если последний никогда не говорит об этом в тех же терминах: «У меня был период По, период моего лорда Дансени , но, увы, когда был мой период Лавкрафта? «

  • Жуткие истории (≈1905-1920);
  • Цикл сновидений (≈1920-1927);
  • Миф Ктулху (≈1927-1935).

Некоторые критики не видят разницы между циклом сновидений и Мифом и указывают на частое использование Некрономикона и богов. Одно из предложенных объяснений состоит в том, что цикл сновидений скорее относится к жанру фэнтези, а миф — к научной фантастике . С другой стороны, многие сверхъестественные элементы цикла сновидений проявляются больше в их собственной сфере существования, чем в нашей. Миф, в свою очередь, материализуется на том же уровне, что и человеческий.

Эти центры интереса, естественно, побуждают его проявлять интерес к творчеству По, который очень рано повлиял на него своей мрачной стороной и стилем письма (мрачная атмосфера и ползучие страхи). Однако раскрытие историй Дансени с богами, живущими в подобном сне плане, заставляет Лавкрафта изменить направление. Последним крупным источником вдохновения была наука и ее прогресс (биология, астрономия, геология, физика), которые создают у него впечатление, что Человек еще более незначителен, бессилен и обречен в материалистической вселенной, механической. Наука — краеугольный камень ее «космизма» и собственного атеизма . После 1923 года сочинения Артура Мэчена и его рассказы о выживании первобытного зла в наше время, реалистические и мистические, оказали последнее влияние.

Все становится очень мрачным во время создания того, что мы сегодня называем Мифом Ктулху и его пантеоном богов из других измерений. Идея Мифа была изобретена Дерлетом после смерти Лавкрафта; последний с юмором упомянул о своих «Йог-сототериях» .

Лавкрафт создает один из самых известных инструментов ужасов : Некрономикон , секретную книгу заклинаний безумного араба Абдул аль-Хазреда . Воздействие таково, что некоторые критики считают, что автор основывал все свои произведения на уже существующих мифах и оккультных верованиях. Были даже проданы фальшивые издания книги.

Его проза иногда архаична; он использовал термины и варианты написания, которые даже в его время были уже устаревшими: «  жуткий  » , «  морщинистый  » , «  зловонный  » , «  чешуйчатый  » , «  ихор  » и «  циклопический  »  ; он также пытается переписать диалекты, которые были названы неуклюжими, неточными и в то же время снисходительными. Он также использует британский английский, а также устаревшие варианты написания: «Complete» для «полного» , «shew» для «show» , «lanthorn» для «фонарь» и «phantasy» или «phantastic» для «fantasy» .

Его темы

Запрещенное знание

В начале «  Зова Ктулху — I. Глиняный ужас» Лавкрафт пишет:

«Что самое жалкое в мире, я считаю, неспособность человеческого разума соединить все в нем. Мы живем на тихом острове невежества, окруженном черными океанами бесконечности, которые нам не суждено было путешествовать далеко. Науки, каждая из которых стремится в своем направлении, пока что не причинили нам большого вреда. Однажды, однако, согласование разрозненных знаний откроет для нас такие ужасающие перспективы реального и ужасного положения, которое мы занимаем в нем, что нам придется только погрузиться в безумие от этого откровения или бежать от этого смертоносного света. найти убежище в мире и безопасности нового мракобесия. »

—  Лавкрафт, Зов Ктулху — I. Глиняный ужас; издание, представленное и учрежденное Фрэнсисом Лакассеном, Париж, Роберт Лаффон, 1991, стр. 60

Однако герои Лавкрафта вынуждены управлять этим «переплетением», и этот процесс становится одним из его главных литературных источников.

Когда такие окна открываются, разум исследующего главного героя часто разрушается. Те, кто действительно сталкивается с «живыми» проявлениями непонятного, часто сходят с ума, как в случае с одноименным персонажем в «Музыке» Эриха Занна . История повествует о сумасшедшем немом альтисте, который живет на шестом этаже небольшого здания. Окно его квартиры — единственное, достаточно высокое, чтобы можно было видеть через стену, за которой скрываются другие, имеющие необъяснимые и ужасные характеристики.

Персонажи, пытающиеся использовать это запретное знание, систематически осуждаются. Иногда их работы привлекают злых существ, а иногда они уничтожаются созданными ими самими монстрами (как в рассказе Герберт Уэст, реаниматор , где ученый возвращает мертвых людей к жизни, но последние, ужасно шокированные, становятся безумными и в конечном итоге отомстить своему спасителю).

У сущностей Мифа Лавкрафта есть слуги-люди / гуманоиды; Ктулху, например, поклоняются эскимосские культы в Гренландии и круги вуду в Луизиане . Эти преданные служат средством повествования автора. Многие сущности Мифа слишком сильны, чтобы их могли победить люди, и настолько ужасны, что столкновение с ними неизбежно порождает безумие. Когда дело доходит до этих существ, Лавкрафту необходимо уметь предоставлять информацию и создавать некоторую напряженность, не преждевременно заканчивая историю. Таким образом, персонажи, поклоняющиеся этим богам, позволяют раскрывать вещи рассеянно.

Унаследованная вина

Еще одна повторяющаяся идея Лавкрафта — это невозможность для потомков линии избежать следов, оставленных преступлениями их предков, независимо от их временного и географического расстояния ( Крысы в ​​стенах , Бродящий страх , Артур Джермин , Алхимик , Кошмар Иннсмута и Дело Чарльза Декстера Уорда ).

Судьба

Персонажи Лавкрафта часто не могут контролировать свои действия или им трудно изменить ход своих действий. Некоторых из них можно было бы легко освободить, сбежав, но либо такая возможность никогда не возникает, либо она скомпрометирована определенными силами ( «Цвет, упавший с неба» и «Дом ведьмы» ). На самом деле, бегство или смерть часто бесполезны ( Монстр на пороге , я где-то еще ), а в некоторых случаях фатальность касается всего человечества, и побег невозможен (время Into the Abyss ).

Цивилизация, находящаяся под угрозой

Лавкрафт был знаком с работами немецкого консервативного теоретика Освальда Шпенглера . Пессимистические тезисы последнего относительно упадка современного Запада заложили основы для в целом ретроспективного взгляда Лавкрафта; например, мы находим идею циклического распада в Les Montagnes hallucinées . В своей книге, Лавкрафт : Упадок Запада , ST Джоши подчеркивает ведущую роль , которую играет Шпенглер в формировании политической и философской мысли Лавкрафта. Более того, Лавкрафт писал в 1927 году Кларку Эштону Смиту: «Я убежден, и это было задолго до того, как Шпенглер поставил печать академического доказательства на этот счет, что наша механическая и индустриальная эпоха — это довольно упадочная эпоха. «

Лавкрафт часто борется с идеей, что цивилизация борется с элементами более варварскими и примитивными, чем она есть на самом деле . В некоторых историях эта борьба ведется на индивидуальном уровне, и большинство ее главных героев, даже если они культурные, испорчены каким-то темным и пугающим влиянием.

В таких историях «проклятие» часто передается по наследству либо из-за нечеловеческого происхождения ( Факты о покойном Артуре Джермине (1920), Кошмар Иннсмута (1931)) или из-за магического влияния ( Дело Чарльза Декстера Уорда (1927)). Физическая и умственная деградация часто идут рука об руку, и эта тема «испорченной крови», возможно, перекликается с семейной историей писателя, особенно со смертью его отца.

В других историях всему обществу угрожает варварская сущность. Иногда это внешняя угроза расе, уничтоженной войной ( Полярная звезда ); в других случаях только небольшая группа людей впадает в упадок и регресс ( La Peur qui prôde ). В большинстве случаев такие рассказы касаются цивилизованных миров, которые постепенно разрушаются злыми плебсами, которыми манипулируют нечеловеческие силы.

Раса, этническая принадлежность и класс

Потомки неанглосаксонских европейцев часто очерняются в его работах, в частности, голландские иммигранты, прибывающие в горы Катскилл, «которые полностью соответствуют декадентскому аспекту белого мусора Юга» .

С.Т. Джоши высказывает свою точку зрения на эти рассказы: «Нельзя отрицать реальность расизма в рассказах Лавкрафта, что делает его очень хорошим документальным фильмом времени, и квалифицировать его как типичный» для своего времени, потому что кажется, что Автор хотел, чтобы в его рассказах была очень сильная точка зрения. « . Как отмечает Уильям Шнабель , в личной жизни Лавкрафт всегда был антропологом-любителем; его обширная переписка свидетельствует о его исследованиях. Таким образом, он работал над несколькими слухами, которые позволили ему связать его с определенными верованиями: тевтонизмом, англосаксонизмом, нативизмом и фашизмом .

Примеры

В одном из своих писем Лавкрафт открыто и откровенно говорит о расизме. Он пишет о евреях:

«Масса современных евреев безнадежна, по крайней мере, в отношении Америки. Они — продукт чужой крови и наследники чужих идеалов, импульсов и эмоций, которые навсегда исключают их полную ассимиляцию … С нашей стороны, есть нежелание заставлять нас содрогаться, когда это большинство семитских рас. … Итак, где бы ни бродил странствующий еврей, ему придется довольствоваться своим собственным обществом, пока он либо не исчезнет, ​​либо не будет унесен внезапным взрывом из-за нашей ненависти к нему. Я уже чувствовал себя способным нарезать пару десятков в пробках в метро Нью-Йорка. »

В «Зове Ктулху» он рассказывает о группе заключенных-метисов, которые поклоняются Ктулху:

«… все заключенные продемонстрировали, что они принадлежат к ублюдочной, мерзкой и умственно отсталой расе. По большей части это были моряки, немногочисленные негры и мулаты из Карибского бассейна или Кабо-Верде, которые придали культу оттенок вуду. Однако прежде, чем было задано множество вопросов, стало очевидно, что существует нечто более глубокое и древнее, чем негритянский фетишизм. Какими бы низкими и невежественными они ни были, эти существа с удивительной стойкостью цеплялись за центральную идею своей отвратительной веры. »

В письме от 23 января 1920 г. :

«Для развитого человека (вершины органической эволюции на Земле) какой тип отражения более уместен, чем тот, который занимает только его высшие способности и который является наиболее эксклюзивным для него? Первичный дикарь или обезьяна довольствуются только тем, что ищут своих собратьев в их родном лесу; Возвышенный Ариец должен взглянуть на астральные миры и подумать о своих отношениях с бесконечным !!! »

В реаниматоре Герберте Уэсте «Шесть выстрелов в лунном свете» Лавкрафт описывает только что умершего одержимого афроамериканца:

«Он был отвратителен, что-то похожее на гориллу с необычно длинными руками, которые я не мог не назвать« передними ногами », и лицом, которое вызывало невыразимые секреты Конго и грохот барабанов под зловещей луной. Тело, должно быть, было еще хуже при жизни, но в мире так много уродливых вещей. »

Из Л. П. Лавкрафта, Избранные письма , изд. А. Дерлет и Д. Вандрей, он утверждает, что он:

«Тори, царизм, юнкер, патриций, фашист, олигархист, националист и милитарист. »

Риски эпохи науки

В начале XX — го  века, растущая уверенность человека в науке открывает двери в новые миры и дает глубину пути дизайну. Лавкрафт описывает возможность неспособности человека объяснить вселенную, чтобы воплотить в жизнь ужас, особенно в «Цвете, упавшем с неба» , где неспособность науки понять метеорит приводит к хаосу.

В письме Джеймсу Мортону от 1923 года автор уделяет особое внимание теории относительности Эйнштейна и приходит к выводу, что космос становится большой шуткой. В «Зове Ктулху» персонажи сталкиваются с «ненормальной, неевклидовой архитектурой с отталкивающими ароматами сфер и измерений, которые нам не принадлежат. «

Религия

Вера в грозных существ с непостижимыми способностями, иногда почитаемых как божества, часто повторяется в художественной литературе Лавкрафта. Во многих своих текстах он отвергает идею любящего и защищающего бога. В других, особенно в « Мифе о Ктулху» , он разоблачает множество мифов о происхождении человека, в отличие , например, от мифов из Книги Бытия . Герои Лавкрафта больше доверяют науке, чем писаниям.

В 1932 году он написал Роберту Э. Ховарду  : «Все, что я говорю, я считаю, что откровенно маловероятно, что есть что-то, что выглядит как центральная космическая воля, духовный мир или вечное существо. Это самые абсурдные и необоснованные идеи о Вселенной, которые у кого-либо могут быть, и я недостаточно придираюсь к мелочам, чтобы делать вид, что не вижу в них ничего, кроме глупой чепухи. По идее, я агностик , но поскольку я предпочитаю придерживаться вещественных доказательств, меня следует причислить к атеистам . «

Лавкрафтовская топография

Лавкрафт часто находил свои тексты в своей родной Новой Англии . Многие из упомянутых мест настоящие, другие — вымышленные.

Реальные места

  • Бингер , Оклахома
  • Коппс-Хилл , Бостон, Массачусетс
  • Красная линия
  • Потуксет (ныне часть Крэнстона, Род-Айленд )
  • Ньюберипорт , Массачусетс
  • Ипсвич , Массачусетс
  • Роули , Массачусетс
  • Болтон , Массачусетс
  • Салем, Массачусетс
  • Брэттлборо , Вермонт
  • Олбани, Нью-Йорк
  • Несколько мест в его родном городе Провиденс, штат Род-Айленд , включая дом с привидениями Холси, проспект Террас и библиотеки Джона Хэя и Джона Картера Брауна в Университете Брауна .
  • Государственная больница Danvers в Danvers , штат Массачусетс, который считается основным источником вдохновения психиатрической лечебницы Аркхого в Твари на пороге .
  • Горы Катскилл, Нью-Йорк

Фиктивные места

  • Университет Miskatonic в вымышленном городе Arkham , Массачусетс
  • Данвич , Массачусетс
  • Иннсмут , Массачусетс
  • Кингспорт, Массачусетс
  • Эйлсбери, Массачусетс
  • Пляж Мартина
  • Река Мискатоник

Литературные влияния Лавкрафта

Лавкрафт находится под влиянием таких авторов, как Артур Мэчен , лорд Дансани , Эдгар Аллан По и Авраам Мерритт . Ошибочно присвоив Лавкрафту псевдоним Свифт, некоторое время считалось, что на него, возможно, повлияли работы Гертруды Бэрроуз Беннетт , также известной под псевдонимом Фрэнсис Стивенс . Но эта информация была опровергнута. Лавкрафт видит себя человек в XVIII — го  века. Его стиль письма, особенно в письмах, перекликается со стилем английских писателей эпохи Просвещения, таких как Джозеф Аддисон и Джонатан Свифт . Он доходит до того, что заимствует отдельные выражения из этого литературного периода. Более того, даже если он противостоит идее Просвещения о возможности того, что человек должен понять вселенную, его письма показывают, что он согласен с современниками, такими как Бертран Рассел .

Он также ценит Алджернона Блэквуда  ; он цитирует Кентавра в первом абзаце «Зова Ктулху» .

Среди книг , которые имели свою библиотеку (см библиотеку Лавкрафта из ST Joshi ), был Семь повешенных ( Семь повешенных ) от Леонида Андреева и странная рукопись обнаружили в медном цилиндре  (в) от Джеймса Де Милля .

Лавкрафт, влияние

Помимо простой адаптации, Лавкрафт и его рассказы оказали глубокое влияние на популярную культуру и получили высокую оценку многих современных писателей. Некоторое влияние автор оказал прямым, поскольку он был другом и корреспондентом Августа Дерлета , Роберта Э. Ховарда , Роберта Блоха и Фрица Лейбера . На других авторов и художников оказал влияние Лавкрафт: Клайв Баркер , Стивен Кинг , Алан Мур , Нил Гейман , Джон Карпентер , Стюарт Гордон , Гильермо дель Торо , Джунджи Ито и Х.Р. Гигер . Аргентинский писатель Хорхе Луис Борхес написал свой рассказ. Имея в виду Лавкрафта, есть еще кое-что . Мишель Уэльбек пишет « Против мира, против жизни», очерк о Лавкрафте , литературную биографию. Джойс Кэрол Оутс написала введение к антологии рассказов Лавкрафта. В 2005 году Американская библиотека опубликовала том, посвященный Лавкрафту, назвав его каноническим американским писателем.

Миф Ктулху был источником вдохновения для писателей во всем мире, и Лавкрафта элементы могут быть найдены в романах, фильмах, музыке, бумаги ролевых игр и видеоигр , комиксов и книг. Мультфильмы. Кроме того, в нескольких художественных произведениях появляются «вымышленные версии Л. П. Лавкрафта, персонажи, основанные на Лавкрафте, а также явные ссылки на Лавкрафта как на автора рассказов о мифе о Ктулху  » .

Превью работы

Статуя Лавкрафта в Провиденсе (Род-Айленд) , скульптура художника Гейджа Прентисса. Фотография сделана Дэвидом Лепажем вскоре после того, как статуя была открыта в Интернете. Его постоянное местонахождение в Провиденсе еще не определено.

На протяжении большей части XX — го  века, окончательные издания его прозы (например , Хребты Безумия и других дилогии , Дагона и других Macabre сказки , Данвичский ужас и другим , и Ужас в музее и других пересмотров ) опубликованы Arkham House , издательство, основной целью которого было опубликовать свои работы. Сегодня Penguin Classics выпустила три тома: «Зов Ктулху и другие странные истории» , «Вещь на пороге» и «Другие странные истории», а совсем недавно — «Сны в ведьмовском доме» и «Другие странные истории» . Это сборники текстов, отредактированных С.Т. Джоши, которые в основном были доступны в изданиях Arkham, за исключением In the Abyss of Time, ранее выпущенного Hippocampus Press. В 2005 году престижная Библиотека Америки опубликовала сборник трудов под редакцией Питера Штрауба.

Поэзия Лавкрафта собрана в книге «Древний след: полное собрание поэтических произведений Лавкрафта», а его ранние сочинения, философские, политические и литературные эссе можно найти в « Разных произведениях» . Его эссе « Сверхъестественный ужас в литературе» , впервые опубликованное в 1927 году, представляет собой историческое исследование литературного жанра ужасов и доступно под названием «Сверхъестественный ужас с комментариями в литературе» .

Буквы

Хотя Лавкрафт наиболее известен своими художественными произведениями, большая часть его сочинений состоит из писем, касающихся различных предметов, таких как художественная литература, искусство, политика и история.

Иногда он опережает их на 200 лет , и создается впечатление, что он написал их до Американской революции , войны, оскорбляющей его англофильство. Он сказал , что XVIII — го и XX — го века является «лучшим»  ; первое, потому что оно самое благородное, второе, потому что это наука.

В молодости Лавкрафт писал мало писем. В 1931 году он признался: «В юности я почти никогда не писал писем — благодарить кого-то за подарок было настолько мучительно, что я предпочел бы написать пастораль из 250 стихов или 20-страничный трактат о кольцах Сатурна. ” (SL 3.369–70). Его первоначальный интерес к написанию писем восходит к его переписке со своим двоюродным братом Филлипсом Гэмвеллом и особенно его инвестициям в любительскую журналистику.

Лавкрафт ясно дал понять, что письмо людям было для него важным способом расширить свои взгляды на мир: «У меня есть доступ к десяткам разных точек зрения, которые в противном случае никогда бы мне не открылись. Мое понимание мира и склонности возросло, и многие из моих взглядов на общество, политику и экономику также эволюционировали на основе более глубоких знаний. « (SL 4.389).

Сегодня пять издательств опубликовали письма Лавкрафта, в первую очередь Arkham House с его пятью томами «  Избранных писем  » . Другими редакторами являются: Hippocampus Press ( Письма Альфреду Галпину и др. ), Night Shade Books ( Тайны времени и духа: Письма HP Лавкрафта и Дональда Вандрея и др .), Necronomicon Press ( Письма Сэмюэлю Лавману и Винсенту Старрету) и др.) и Университета ТампыО, счастливая жительница Флориды: Письма Лавкрафта к Р. Х. Барлоу» ).

Издательство Ohio University Press также опубликовало в 2000 году « Повелитель видимого мира: автобиография в письмах» (под редакцией С.Т. Джоши и Дэвида Э. Шульца ). В этой книге письма классифицируются по темам (подростковый возраст, путешествия).

Авторские права

Когда дело доходит до работ Лавкрафта, особенно более поздних, со статусом авторского права сложно. Лавкрафт уточнил, что его литературным душеприказчиком должен был стать молодой Р.Х. Барлоу, но в завещании об этом не упоминалось. Тем не менее его тетя позаботилась об этом, и Барлоу фактически взял на себя ответственность за массивное и сложное литературное наследие Лавкрафта после его смерти.

Барлоу депонировал большую часть работ Лавкрафта (включая его переписку) в Библиотеку Джона Хэя  (в) и пытался организовать, чтобы сохранить другие сочинения автора. Август Дерлет, писатель постарше и более авторитетный, чем он сам, бросил вызов самому себе, чтобы контролировать наследие Лавкрафта. В результате возникла юридическая путаница в отношении того, кто каким правом обладает.

Все работы , опубликованные до 1924 г. находятся в общественном достоянии в США . Однако по поводу людей существуют разногласия: кому принадлежат или какие права? Более того, вАпрель 2008 г.Существовали ли все еще авторские права на произведения, опубликованные после 1923 года ( Зов Ктулху , Галлюцинированные горы )?

Возникает вопрос, были ли продлены права на произведения Лавкрафта в соответствии с американским Законом об авторском праве 1976 года, который касается произведений, созданных до1 — го января 1978. Действительно, до этого закона количество лет, учитываемых для защиты авторских прав, исчислялось с даты публикации, а не в соответствии с жизнью художника. Оттуда нужно было что-то делать, иначе вся работа перешла в общественное достояние. Закон 1976 года задним числом продлил права на 47 лет, а Закон о продлении срока авторских прав Сонни Боно 1998 года добавил к этому сроку еще 20 лет, что составляет в общей сложности 95 лет с даты публикации. Если права были продлены, они все еще действуют в Соединенных Штатах.

Европейская Директива по гармонизации некоторых аспектов авторского права и смежных прав в информационном обществе (1993 г.) распространяется авторское право на 70 лет после смерти автора. Таким образом, работы Лавкрафта стали достоянием общественности в 27 странах Союза на1 — го января 2008.

Акционеры Arkham House, Август Дерлет и Дональд Вандрей  (in) , часто заявляли, что владеют правами на работы автора. В9 октября 1947 г., Дерлет приобрел все права на Weird Tales . Однако самое позднее с 1926 года Лавкрафт сохранил за собой права на все переиздания своих работ, опубликованных Weird Tales . Еще раз, хотя Дерлет действительно обладал правами, нет никаких доказательств того, что они были продлены.

Джоши заключает в своей биографии HP Lovecraft : A Life , что утверждения Дерлета были «определенно вымышленными» и что работа Лавкрафта, опубликованная домашней прессой, безусловно, стала достоянием общественности. Права могли быть предоставлены его единственному живому наследнику в 1912 году: его тете, Энни Гэмвелл, которая умерла в 1941 году. Таким образом, права перешли к Этель Филлипс Морриш и Эдне Льюис. Они подписали документ, разрешающий Arkham House повторно редактировать работу Лавкрафта, сохраняя при этом права. Ничего не говорится о возобновлении этих прав.

Chaosium , издатель Зов Ктулху ролевой игры , владеет торговой маркой под названием «Зов Ктулху» для своих игр. Другой издатель игры, TSR, Inc. , первоначальный издатель AD&D , включил в одно из ранних дополнений к игре раздел под названием « Божества и полубоги» (1980), посвященный мифу о Ктулху; позже этот раздел был удален.

Независимо от юридических вопросов, связанных с его написанием, Лавкрафт всегда поощрял других повторно использовать и обогащать его идеи. После его смерти многие писатели внесли свой вклад в развитие мифов.

Публикации

Авторские работы

Рассказы и романы

Дагон ,
иллюстрация Давида Гарсиа Фореса.

Храм ,
иллюстрация Михаила Билы.


Безымянный город ,иллюстрация leothefox.

Монстр на
пороге,иллюстрация Игоря Коротицкого.

  • Чудовище в пещере ( Зверь в подвале , 1905)
  • Дагон ( Дагон , 1917)
  • Могила ( The Tomb , 1917)
  • Свидетельство Рэндольфа Картера  (in) ( Заявление Рэндольфа Картера , 1919)
  • За стеной сна ( За стеной сна , 1919)
  • Храм ( Храм , 1920)
  • Ньярлатхотеп ( Ньярлатхотеп , 1920)
  • Из-за пределов ( From Beyond , 1920)
  • Город безымянный ( Безымянный город , 1921)
  • Музыка Эриха Занна ( The Music of Erich Zann , 1921)
  • Азатот ( Азатот , 1922)
  • Ле Молосс ( Пес , 1922)
  • Герберт Уэст, реаниматолог ( Герберт Уэст: Реаниматор , 1922)
  • Скрытый страх ( Скрытый страх , 1923)
  • L’Indicible ( Неописуемое , 1923)
  • Крысы в ​​стенах ( Крысы в ​​стенах , 1923)
  • Избегаемый дом ( The Shunned House , 1924)
  • Фестиваль ( Фестиваль , 1925)
  • Красный крючок ужаса ( Ужас на Красном крючке , 1925)
  • Серебряный ключ ( Silver Key , 1926)
  • Я откуда-то еще ( Посторонний , 1926)
  • Зов Ктулху ( Зов Ктулху , 1926)
  • Модель The Pickman в ( Модель для Пикмана 1926)
  • История Некрономикона ( History of the Necronomicon , 1927)
  • Цвет закатного неба ( Цвет из космоса , 1927)
  • Поиски во сне Неизвестного Кадата ( The Dream Quest of Unknown Kadath , 1927)
  • Данвичское мерзость ( Данвичский ужас , 1928)
  • Дело Чарльза Декстера Уорда ( Дело Чарльза Декстера Уорда , 1928 г.)
  • Холодный воздух ( Cool Air , 1928).
  • Шепчущий во тьме ( The Whisperer in Darkness , 1930)
  • Горы безумия ( В горах безумия , 1931)
  • Тень над Иннсмутом ( Тень над Иннсмутом , 1931)
  • Сны в ведьмовском доме ( The Dreams in the Witch-House , 1932)
  • Книга ( The Book , 1933)
  • Через дверь серебряного ключа ( Через ворота серебряного ключа , 1933)
  • Вещь на пороге ( The Thing on the Doorstep , 1933)
  • Эта преследующая тьма ( Призрак тьмы , 1935)
  • В бездне времени ( Тень вне времени , 1935)

Среди самых известных сказок Говарда Филлипса Лавкрафта, «Цвет, упавший с неба» , «Мерзость Данвича» , «Кошмар Иннсмута» , «Шепот во тьме» , « В бездну времени» , «Дом ведьмы» , «Аппель Ктулху» и «Галлюцины Ле Монтань» были первые тексты, опубликованные во Франции и составляющие резюме выпусков 4 и 5 коллекции Présence du futur . В 1991–1992 годах его художественное произведение, переведенное на французский язык, было опубликовано в трех томах в сборнике «Букены» издательства Роберта Лаффона  :

  • Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт и др. (издание, представленное и составленное Фрэнсисом Лакассеном ), Howard Phillips Lovecraft , vol.  1: Мифы о Ктулху. Легенды мифа о Ктулху. Первые сказки. Искусство письма по Лавкрафту , Пэрис, Роберту Лаффонту, сб.  «Книги»,1991 г., 1- е  изд. , XXXVI -1174  с. ( ISBN  2-221-05684-1 , онлайн-презентация на сайте NooSFere ).
  • Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт и др. (издание, представленное и составленное Фрэнсисом Лакассеном ), Howard Phillips Lovecraft , vol.  2: Рассказы и рассказы. Ужас в музее и других доработках. Грибы Юггота и другие фантастические стихи. Ужасы и сверхъестественное в литературе , Париж, Роберт Лаффон, сб.  «Книги»,1991 г., 1- е  изд. , VI -1341  с. ( ISBN  2-221-06460-7 , онлайн-презентация на сайте NooSFere ).
  • Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт и др. (издание, представленное и составленное Фрэнсисом Лакассеном ), Howard Phillips Lovecraft , vol.  3: мир грез. Пародии и стилизации. «Сотрудничество» Лавкрафта и Дерлета. Мечта и реальность. Документы , Париж, Роберт Лаффон, сб.  «Книги»,1992 г., 1- е  изд. , V -1341  с. ( ISBN  2-221-06461-5 , онлайн-презентация на сайте NooSFere ).

Переписка

  • (en) Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт (издание подготовлено Августом Дерлетом и Дональдом Вандреи), Избранные письма , Vol. 1: 1911-1924 , Саук Сити, Висконсин, Аркхэм Хаус, 1965.
  • (en) Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт (издание подготовлено Августом Дерлетом и Дональдом Вандреем), Избранные письма , Vol. 2: 1925-1929 , Саук Сити, Висконсин, Аркхэм Хаус, 1968.
  • (en) Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт (издание подготовлено Августом Дерлетом и Дональдом Вандреем), Избранные письма , Vol. 3: 1929-1931 , Саук Сити, Висконсин, Аркхэм Хаус, 1971.
  • (en) Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт (издание подготовлено Августом Дерлетом и Джеймсом Тернером), Избранные письма , Vol. 4: 1932-1934 , Саук Сити, Висконсин, Аркхэм Хаус, 1976.
  • (en) Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт (издание подготовлено Августом Дерлетом и Джеймсом Тернером), Избранные письма , Vol. 5: 1934-1937 , Саук Сити, Висконсин, Аркхэм Хаус, 1976.
  • Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт ( пер.  Жак Парсонс, преф.  Фрэнсис Лакассен ), Lettres , t.  I  : 1914-1926 , Париж, Кристиан Бургуа,1978 г., 416  с. ( онлайн-презентация на сайте NooSFere )

    Краткий перевод. Вышел только первый том.

  • Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт, Письма из Иннсмута  ; за ней последовали «Защита Дагона» Л. П. Лавкрафта и «Муж по имени HPL » Сони Х. Дэвис; тексты, собранные и переведенные Джозефом Алтайраком  ; просмотрено Альфу и Симоном Лекё, Амьен, Энкрейдж, колл. «Cahier д’этюд lovecraftiennes», п о  1, 1989, 174 стр., ( ISBN  2-906389-14-5 )

Поэзия

  • (en) Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт (под редакцией С.Т. Джоши ), Древний след: Полное собрание поэтических произведений Л.П. Лавкрафта , Нью-Йорк, Hippocampus Press,2013, 604  с. ( ISBN  978-1-61498-070-4 , онлайн-презентация ).

Тестирование

  • (en) Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт (издание подготовлено С.Т. Джоши ), Сборник эссе , т.  1. Любительская журналистика , Нью-Йорк, Hippocampus Press,2004 г., 440  с. ( ISBN  0-9721644-1-3 и 0-9721644-2-1 , онлайн-презентация ).
  • (en) Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт (издание подготовлено С.Т. Джоши ), Сборник эссе , т.  2: Литературная критика , Нью-Йорк, Hippocampus Press,2004 г., 248  с. ( ISBN  0-9721644-4-8 и 0-9721644-9-9 , онлайн-презентация ).
  • (en) Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт (издание подготовлено С.Т. Джоши ), Сборник эссе , т.  3: Наука , Нью-Йорк, Hippocampus Press,2005 г., 357  с. ( ISBN  0-9748789-7-9 и 0-9748789-8-7 , онлайн-презентация ).
  • (en) Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт (издание подготовлено С.Т. Джоши ), Сборник эссе , т.  4: Путешествие , Нью-Йорк, Hippocampus Press,2005 г., 300  с. ( ISBN  0-9761592-0-1 и 0-9761592-1-X , онлайн-презентация ).
  • (en) Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт (издание подготовлено С.Т. Джоши ), Сборник эссе , т.  5: Философия, автобиография и сборник , Нью-Йорк, Hippocampus Press,2006 г., 382  с. ( ISBN  0-9761592-2-8 и 0-9761592-3-6 , онлайн-презентация ).
  • (en) Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт ( преф.  Кристофер Хитченс , под редакцией С.Т. Джоши ), « Против религии: атеистические сочинения Г.П. Лавкрафта» , Нью-Йорк, Sporting Gentlemen,2010 г., 222  с. ( ISBN  978-0-578-05248-9 , онлайн-презентация ).

Дань уважения

С 2013 года кратер на планете Меркурий был назван Лавкрафтом в его честь.

В книге «Журнал Гравити Фолз» Алекс Хирш (создатель серии « Воспоминания о Гравити Фолз » ) обращается к Лавкрафту, говоря о морском существе.

Музыка

  • Клод Балиф  : 1964, Музыка Эриха Зана, для оркестра; после Лавкрафта
  • Univers Zéro  : 1981, Музыка Эрика Зана; в альбоме The Du Dehors (однако вся мрачная музыка группы остается под сильным влиянием Лавкрафта)

Примечания и ссылки

Заметки

  1. В 1895-1896 годах нумерация была изменена. П о  194 Энджелл улице становится п о  454 Энджелл Стрит.

Рекомендации

  1. Произношение на американском английском транскрибируется в соответствии со стандартом API .
  2. Статья Арно Фабра «Глубина полей» , «  Сомнение и безумие в произведениях Лавкрафта от первого лица  » , о глубине полей ,18 марта 2013 г.(по состоянию на 11 февраля 2017 г. )
  3. ^ Уильям Шнабель , Маски в зеркале: Двойник Лавкрафта , La Clef d’Argent , 2002, стр.  13 .
  4. (in) Колин Уилсон , Сила мечтать: литература и воображение ( ISBN  978-1-60025-020-0 и 1-60025-020-3 ) , стр.  8

    «  Он ненавидел современную цивилизацию, особенно ее уверенную веру в прогресс и науку . »

  5. HP Lovecraft in Popular Culture , Дон Г. Смит , 2005, ( ISBN  0-7864-2091-X ) , стр. 85, «  Лавкрафт никогда не говорил много хорошего о семьях  »
  6. (in) Джойс Кэрол Оутс, «  Король странностей  » , The New York Review of Books , Vol.  43, п о  17, 31 октября 1996 г.( читать онлайн , консультация 15 февраля 2009 г. )
  7. ↑ Цитата Кинга на обложке издания 1982 года в мягкой обложке книги «Лучшее из Л.С. Лавкрафта: леденящие кровь рассказы об ужасах и ужасах», опубликованной издательством Del Rey Books, с предисловием Роберта Блоха. Другие источники цитируют Кинга, который назвал это суждение Лавкрафта «неоспоримым» [1] или «вне всяких сомнений» «  http://ebooks.ebookmall.com/ebook/102153-ebook.htm  » ( Архив • Wikiwix • Archive.is • Google • Что делать? )
  8. (in) Вохлебер, Курт, «  Человек, который может напугать Стивена Кинга  » , American Heritage Magazine , т.  46, п о  8,Декабрь 1995 г.( читать онлайн )
  9. а и б Джоши: Я — провидение , стр.  16.
  10. Люк Санте , «  Героический ботаник  », в The New York Review of Books , 10 октября 2006 г.
  11. Джоши: Я провидение , стр.  96.
  12. Джоши и Шульц 2004 , стр.  18.
  13. Джоши: Я провидение , стр.  155.
  14. Джоши: Я провидение , стр.  180.
  15. Джоши: Я провидение , стр.  181.
  16. Джоши: Я провидение , стр.  182.
  17. Джоши: Я провидение , стр.  177.
  18. Джоши: Я провидение , стр.  489.
  19. Джоши: Я провидение , стр.  492.
  20. Houellebecq 1999 , стр.  124; 126-127.
  21. Houellebecq 1999 , стр.  131-134.
  22. Джоши: Я провидение , стр.  633.
  23. «  Mushstone — Professional, Digital Artist / DeviantArt  » , на сайте deviantart.com (по состоянию на 7 августа 2020 г. ) .
  24. Письмо Элизабет Толдридж, 8 марта 1929 г., цитируется в Лавкрафте: взгляд за мифы о Ктулху
  25. Сайт Борха Пиндадо, смотрите онлайн .
  26. (in) «  Из космоса, вне времени: влияние По  » ( Архив • Wikiwix • Archive.is • Google • Что делать? )
  27. (in) »  http://www.sff.net/people/timpratt/611.html  » ( Архив • Wikiwix • Archive.is • Google • Что делать? )
  28. «  GWABRYEL  » , на blogspot.fr (по состоянию на 7 августа 2020 г. ) .
  29. За стеной сна , 1919
  30. (in) Интервью С.Т. Джоши — электронный журнал Acid Logic
  31. Уильям Шнабель , Лавкрафт: История расистского джентльмена , Доул, Ла Клеф д’Аржан ,2003 г., 123  с. ( ISBN  2-906389-49-8 , онлайн- презентация на сайте NooSFere ) , стр.  32.
  32. См. Письмо Лилиан Д. Кларк, 6 января 1926 г., № 60, HP Lovecraft Letters From New York , ST Joshi , ed. Сан-Франциско: Ночная тень.
  33. См. Письмо Дж. Вернону Ши от 25 сентября 1933 г., № 648, Избранные письма IV , Arkham House .
  34. Морис Леви , «  Фашизм и Фантастическая, или случай Лавкрафт  », Калибан , п о  VII ,1970 г., стр.  67.
  35. ^ Письмо от Лавкрафта до Роберта Говарда (16 августа 1932), в Избранные письма 1932-1934 (Sauk City, WI: Arkham House, 1976), с.57.
  36. (in) С.Т. Джоши , Лавкрафт и мир в переходный период: Сборник статей о Л.П. Лавкрафте , Нью-Йорк, Hippocampus Press,2014 г., 645  с. ( ISBN  978-1-61498-079-7 , онлайн-презентация ) , «Признание Л. П. Лавкрафта, 1937-2013» , стр.  619.
  37. (in) Дон Г. Смит , Л. П. Лавкрафт в популярной культуре: произведения и их адаптации в кино, телевидении, комиксах, музыке и играх , Джефферсон (Северная Каролина) / London McFarland & Company, Inc.2006 г., IX -168  с. ( ISBN  978-0-7864-2091-9 , онлайн-презентация ).
  38. (in) Чарльз П. Митчелл , Полная фильмография HP Лавкрафта , Вестпорт (Коннектикут) / Лондон, Greenwood Press,2001 г., 284  с. ( ISBN  0-313-31641-4 , читать онлайн )
  39. (in) Эндрю Мильоре и Джон Стрисик , Скрытый в вестибюле: Путеводитель по кинотеатру Л. П. Лавкрафта , Night Shade Books2006 г.( 1- е  изд., 2000, Armitage Press), 352  с. ( ISBN  978-1-892389-35-0 ).
  40. (in) Гэри Хилл ( преф.  С.Т. Джоши ), Странный звук Ктулху: Музыка, вдохновленная сочинениями Л.П. Лавкрафта , Music Street Journal,2006 г., 264  с. ( ISBN  978-1-84728-776-2 , онлайн-презентация ).
  41. (in) Джозеф Норман , «Звуки, наполнившие меня неизмеримым ужасом года»: Мифопея Ктулху о Лавкрафте в «Экстремальном металле» Дэвида Симмонса (ред.), Новые критические эссе о Х.П. Макмиллан,2013, XVI -259  с. ( ISBN  978-1-137-33224-0 , онлайн-презентация ) , стр.  193-208.
  42. Лоран Ди Филиппо , «  Игра с ужасом: Прием и игривой адаптации„Миф Ктулху“  » Ревю де социальных наук , Прессы Universitaires де Страсбург , п о  58, 2017 г., стр.  110-119 ( читать онлайн ).
  43. (in) Таня Кшивинска , «Реанимация Лавкрафта: нелепый парадокс Зова Ктулху: Темные уголки Земли  » (реж.), Бернард Перрон, Видеоигры ужасов: Очерки слияния страха и игры , Джефферсон (Северная Каролина Север) / Лондон, McFarland & Company, Inc.,2009 г., 310  с. ( ISBN  978-0-7864-4197-6 ) , стр.  267-287.
  44. Карлос Гомес Гурпеги ( перевод  с испанского), HP Lovecraft и видеоигра [«  El soñador de Providence: El legado literario de HP Lovecraft y su presencia en los videojuegos  »], Париж, Ynnis Éditions,2021 г., 363  с. ( ISBN  978-2-37697-104-7 , онлайн-презентация ).
  45. (in) Крис Мюррей и Кевин Корсторфин , «Co (s) mic Horror» в книге Дэвида Симмонса (ред.), Новые критические эссе о Л. П. Лавкрафте , Нью-Йорк, Пэлгрейв Макмиллан,2013, XVI -259  с. ( ISBN  978-1-137-33224-0 , онлайн-презентация ) , стр.  157–191.
  46. (в) Том Миллер , «  Мышь в стенах: Disney, Лавкрафт и гравитация Falls  » , Лавкрафт Годовых , Нью — Йорк, гиппокамп Пресс, п о  10,2016 г., стр.  158-190 ( JSTOR  26868517 ).
  47. (в) Дункан Норрис , «  Поп — культурная Ассимиляция Лавкрафт мировидения через призму Рика и Мортите  » , Лавкрафт ежегодный , Нью — Йорк, гиппокамп Press, п о  10,2016 г., стр.  205-209 ( JSTOR  26868521 ).
  48. (in) Бобби Дери , Секс и мифы Ктулху , Нью-Йорк, Hippocampus Press,2014 г., 314  с. ( ISBN  978-1-61498-088-9 , онлайн-презентация ) , стр.  157.
  49. (in) Роберт М. Прайс , «  Лавкрафт Лавкрафт как персонаж художественной литературы  » , Crypt of Cthulhu , vol.  7, п о  2, святки 1987, стр.  35-37, 33 ( читать онлайн ).
  50. ^ Питер Кэннон, Джейсон К. Экхардт (иллюстрации), Хроники Лавкрафта , Mythos Books, 2004, 192 стр. ( ISBN  978-0972854535 ) .
  51. Роланд К. Вагнер , HPL (1890-1991) , Париж, Nestiveqnen — Actusf, колл. «Три желания», 2006, 57 с.
  52. Ханс Родионофф, Кейт Гриффен (сценарий), Энрике Брекчиа (рисунки), Лавкрафт , Солей, колл. «Широты», 2004, ( ISBN  978-2-8456-5695-6 ) .
  53. (in) «  Как исследовать статус авторских прав на произведение — Бюро регистрации авторских прав США  » ( Архив • Wikiwix • Archive.is • Google • Что делать? )
  54. (in) Основы авторского права Терри Кэрролл (1994)
  55. (in) Уильям Джонс, «Авторские права Лавкрафта», заархивировано на «  http://phantasmal.sourceforge.net/Innsmouth/LovecraftCopyright.html  » ( Архив • Wikiwix • Archive.is • Google • Что делать? )
  56. (in) Лоуренс Шик , Heroic Worlds: A History and Guide to Role-Playing Games , Buffalo (New York), Prometheus Books,1991 г., 448  с. ( ISBN  0-87975-653-5 ) , стр.  94; 104.
  57. «  Резюме первого издания п O  4 коллекции Presence будущего  » на сайте Mailinator .
  58. «  Резюме первого издания п O  5 сбора Присутствие будущего  » на сайте Mailinator .
  59. «  Planetary Names: Crater, craters: Lovecraft on Mercury  » , на planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov (по состоянию на 4 июля 2020 г. )

Приложения

Библиография

Библиографические справочники

  • (en) С.Т. Джоши , HP Lovecraft and Lovecraft Criticism: Annotated Bibliography , Holicong (Пенсильвания), Wildside Press,2002 г.( 1- е  изд., 1981 Kent State University Press), 508  p. ( ISBN  978-1-59224-012-8 , читать онлайн ).
  • (ru) С. Т. Джоши , Л. П. Лавкрафт: Полная библиография , Тампа, Университет Тампы, Пресс,2009 г., 702  с. ( ISBN  978-1-59732-068-9 и 978-1-59732-069-6 , онлайн-презентация ).

Биографии и мемуары

  • (ru) Лион Спраг де Камп , Л. П. Лавкрафт: биография , Нью-Йорк, Barnes & Noble,1996 г.( 1- е  изд., 1975, Doubleday Publishing), 510  с. ( ISBN  978-1-5661-9994-0 )
  • Фрэнк Белнап Лонг ( переведенный  Стефан Бургуан , преф.  Роберт Блох ), Л. П. Лавкрафт, рассказчик тьмы [«Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт: Мечтатель на темной стороне»], Амьен, Энкрейдж , колл.  «Портреты» ( п о  2),1987 г., 155  с. ( ISBN  2-906389-06-4 , онлайн- презентация ).
  • (ru) Кеннет В. Фэйг, младший , Родители Говарда Филлипса Лавкрафта , Вест Уорик, Necronomicon Press,1990 г., 47  с.
  • (ru) С. Т. Джоши , Л. П. Лавкрафт: Жизнь , Вест Уорик, издательство Necronomicon Press,1996 г., XII -704  с. ( ISBN  0-940884-89-5 , онлайн-презентация ).

    Расширенное переиздание: (en) ST Joshi , I Am Providence: The Life and Times of HP Lovecraft , vol.  1 и 2, Нью-Йорк, Hippocampus Press,2010 г., 1200  с. ( ISBN  978-1-61498-053-7 , онлайн-презентация ).

    • С. Т. Джоши ( пер.  С англ.) Лавкрафт: Провидение , т.  1, Шамбери, ActuSF ,2019 г., 704  с. ( ISBN  978-2-36629-968-7 ).
    • С. Т. Джоши , Лавкрафт: Я провидение , т.  2, Шамбери, ActuSF,2019 г., 670  с. ( ISBN  978-2-36629-975-5 ).
  • (in) Питер Кэннонредактор ), Вспомнил Лавкрафта , Саук Сити (Висконсин), Дом Аркхема ,1999 г., XIV -486  с. ( ISBN  0-87054-173-0 , онлайн-презентация ).
  • (ru) Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт и Уиллис Коновер ( преф.  С.Т. Джоши ), Lovecraft at Last , Нью-Йорк, Cooper Square Press,2002 г., 312  с. ( ISBN  0-8154-1212-6 , онлайн-презентация ).
  • Соня Х. Дэвис ( ил.  Джейсон Экхардт), «Муж по имени HPL» , в « Джозеф Алтайрак» (  изд. И перевод  ), Lettres d’Innsmouth , Амьен, Энкрейдж , колл.  «Тетрадь Lovecraftian исследований» ( п о  1),1989 г., 174  с. ( ISBN  2-906389-14-5 ).

Исследования и испытания

  • (en) Дональд Р. Берлесон , Л. П. Лавкрафт: критическое исследование , Вестпорт (Коннектикут), Greenwood Press ,1983 г., 243  с. ( ISBN  0-313-23255-5 , онлайн-презентация ).
  • (ru) Дональд Р. Берлесон , Лавкрафт: нарушение Вселенной , Лексингтон (Кентукки), Университетское издательство Кентукки,1990 г., 170  с. ( ISBN  0-8131-1728-3 , онлайн-презентация ).
  • (en) Дональд Р. Берлесон , Лавкрафт: американская аллегория , Нью-Йорк, Hippocampus Press,2015 г., 260  с. ( ISBN  978-1-61498-138-1 , онлайн-презентация ).
  • (in) Питер Х. Кэннон , HP Lovecraft , Boston, Twayne Publishers, сб.  «Twayne в США Авторы серии» ( п о  549),1989 г., 153  с. ( ISBN  978-0-8057-7539-6 ).
  • Международный культурный центр (Cerisy-la-Salle, Manche), HP Lovecraft, Fantastic, Myth and Modernity , Paris, Dervy, coll.  «Cahiers de l’hermétisme»,2002 г., 464  с. ( ISBN  2-84454-108-9 , онлайн-презентация на сайте NooSFere ).
  • Коллектив, Лавкрафт: au coeur du cauchemar , Париж, ActuSF , колл.  «Три желания»,2017 г., 464  с. ( ISBN  978-2-36629-834-5 , онлайн-презентация ).
  • (ru) Скотт Коннорс ( редактор ), A Century Less a Dream: Selected Criticism on HP Lovecraft , Holicong (Пенсильвания), Wildside Press,2002 г., 272  с. ( ISBN  1-58715-215-0 , онлайн-презентация ).
  • (ru) Кеннет В. Фэйг младший , Неизвестный Лавкрафт , Нью-Йорк, Hippocampus Press,2008 г., 255  с. ( ISBN  978-0-9814888-7-5 , онлайн-презентация ).
  • Кристоф Желли ( реж. ) И Жиль Менегальдо ( реж. ), Лавкрафт сквозь призму образа: литература, кино и графика , Cadillon, Le Visage vert, колл.  «Тесты»,2017 г., 354  с. ( ISBN  978-2-918061-77-9 , онлайн-презентация на сайте NooSFere ).
  • Мишель Уэльбек , Л. П. Лавкрафт  : против мира, против жизни , Монако, Издания дю Роше, колл.  «Les Infréquentables»,1991 г., 135  с.
  • Сунанд Трямбак Джоши ( переведенный  Джозеф Алтайрак , преф.  Джозеф Алтайрак ), Ключи для Лавкрафта: сопровождаемый библиографией критических текстов Жана-Люка Буара , Амьен, Энкрейдж , колл.  «Cahier д’этюд lovecraftiennes / Travaux» ( п о  2/7),1990 г., 158  с. ( ISBN  2-906389-23-4 ).
  • ST Joshi ( реж. ) ( Перевод  с английского Филиппа Жиндре), Что такое миф о Ктулху? [«Что такое Мифы Ктулху? »], Dôle, La Clef d’Argent, колл.  «KhThOn» ( п о  1),2007 г., 4- е  изд. ( 1- е  изд. 1990 г.), 60  с. ( ISBN  978-2-908254-50-1 , онлайн-презентация ).
  • (ru) С.Т. Джоши ( редактор ) и Дэвид Шульц ( редактор ), Эпикюр в ужасном: столетняя антология эссе в честь Л.П. Лавкрафта , Нью-Йорк, Hippocampus Press,2011 г.( 1- е  изд. 1991), 380  с. ( ISBN  978-0-9846386-1-1 , онлайн-презентация ).
  • (en) С.Т. Джоши и Дэвид Шульц , Энциклопедия Лавкрафта , Нью-Йорк, Hippocampus Press,2004 г.( 1- е  изд. 2001 г.), 362  с. ( ISBN  0-9748789-1-X , онлайн-презентация ).
  • (ru) С.Т. Джоши , Взлет и падение мифов Ктулху , Поплар Блафф, Mythos Books LLC,2008 г., 324  с. ( ISBN  978-0-9789911-8-0 )
  • (en) С.Т. Джоши ( редактор ), Dissecting Cthulhu: Essays on the Cthulhu Mythos , Лейкленд (Флорида), Miskatonic River Press,2011 г., 278  с. ( онлайн-презентация ).
  • (ru) С.Т. Джоши , Лавкрафт и мир в переходный период: сборник статей о Л.П. Лавкрафте , Нью-Йорк, Hippocampus Press,2014 г., 645  с. ( ISBN  978-1-61498-105-3 , онлайн-презентация ).
  • (ru) С.Т. Джоши , Л.П. Лавкрафт: Закат Запада , Беркли-Хайтс, Wildside Press,1990 г., 172  с. ( ISBN  1-58715-068-9 , онлайн-презентация ), [ онлайн-презентация ] .
  • (ru) С.Т. Джоши , Тонкая магия: сочинения и философия Лавкрафта , Gillette (Нью-Джерси), Wildside Press,1996 г., 3 е  изд. , 316  с. ( ISBN  1-880448-61-0 , онлайн- презентация ).
  • Морис Леви , Lovecraft ou du Fantastique , Париж, Union générale d’éditions, колл.  «10-18» ( п о  675)1972 г., 191  с. ( онлайн-презентация )

    Новое дополненное издание неопубликованного предисловия автора: Мориса Леви , Lovecraft ou du Fantastique , Paris, Christian Bourgois,1985 г., 190  с. ( ISBN  2-267-00419-4 ) , стр.  119–120.

  • (en) Джеймс Мачин , «Лавкрафт, декаданс и эстетизм» , в Клайв Блум (ред.), «Пэлгрейвский справочник современной готики» , Бейзингсток, Пэлгрейв Макмиллан ,2020 г., XVIII -1253  с. ( ISBN  978-3-030-33135-1 ) , стр.  1223–1237.
  • (ru) Стивен Дж. Мариконда , HP Lovecraft: Art, Artifact, and Reality , New York, Hippocampus Press,2013, 308  с. ( ISBN  978-1-61498-064-3 , онлайн-презентация ).
  • Мишель Меургер , Лавкрафт и С.-Ф. , Амьен, Энкрейдж , колл.  «Работа» ( п о  11)1991 г., 190  с. ( ISBN  2-906389-31-5 , онлайн- презентация ).
  • Мишель Меургер , Лавкрафт и С.-Ф. , т.  2, Амьен, Энкрейдж , колл.  «Работа» ( п о  21)1994 г., 190  с. ( ISBN  2-906389-49-8 , онлайн- презентация ).
  • Франсуа Truchaud ( реж. ), Лавкрафт , Париж, Éditions де l’Херн, Coll.  «Cahiers де l’Херн» ( п о  12),1969 г., 379  с.

    Перепечатка: Франсуа Трюшо ( реж. ), Л. П. Лавкрафт , Париж, Éditions de l’Herne, колл.  «Cahiers де l’Херн» ( п о  12),1984 г., 2- е  изд. , 383  с. ( ISBN  2-85197-051-8 , онлайн-презентация ).

  • (ru) Роберт Х. Во , Монстр в зеркале: в поисках Л. П. Лавкрафта , Нью-Йорк, Hippocampus Press,2006 г., 302  с. ( ISBN  0-9761592-7-9 , онлайн-презентация ).
  • (ru) Роберт Х. Во , Монстр голосов: выступление от имени Л. П. Лавкрафта , Нью-Йорк, Hippocampus Press,2011 г., 386  с. ( ISBN  978-0-9844802-2-7 , онлайн-презентация ).
  • Лавкрафт: Последний пуританин , Седрик МОНЖЕ, Иллюстрация GOOMI, La Clef D’Argent, колл. ХТОН №2, сентябрь 2011 г., 84 с. — ( ISBN  978-2-908254-92-1 )
  • Лавкрафт: Под знаком кошки , Борис МАЙНАДЬЕР — La Clef D’Argent, колл. KhThOn n ° 4, февраль 2017, 66 с. — ( ISBN  979-10-90662-37-7 ) , формат: 13,0 x 20,0 см
  • Лавкрафт, араб, ужас. Восток и ислам в джентльмене из провидения , Седрик МОНЖЕ — La Clef D’Argent, колл. KhThOn n ° 5, апрель 2021 г., 90 с. — ( ISBN  979-10-90662-61-2 ) , формат: 13,0 x 20,0 см

Статьи по Теме

  • ST Joshi
  • Литература воображения

Внешние ссылки

  • Литературные ресурсыПросмотр и редактирование данных в Викиданных  :
    • NooSFere
    • (en)  Энциклопедия научной фантастики
    • (ru)  База данных Интернет-спекулятивной фантастики
    • (ru)  Tor.com

  • Авторитетные записиПросмотр и редактирование данных в Викиданных  :

    • Виртуальный международный авторитетный файл
    • Международный стандартный идентификатор имени
    • CiNii
    • Национальная библиотека Франции ( данные )
    • Система документации университета
    • Библиотека Конгресса
    • Gemeinsame Normdatei
    • Национальная библиотечная служба
    • Национальная диетическая библиотека
    • Национальная библиотека Испании
    • Королевская библиотека Нидерландов
    • Национальная библиотека Польши
    • Национальная библиотека Израиля
    • Университетская библиотека Польши
    • Национальная библиотека Каталонии
    • Национальная библиотека Швеции
    • Сеть библиотек Западной Швейцарии
    • Национальная библиотека Австралии
    • WorldCat

На английском

  • (fr) The HP Lovecraft Archive — основной сайт на английском языке, вся художественная литература в оригинальном тексте.
  • (ru) Историческое общество Лавкрафта

На французском

  • Лавкрафт, писатель, его работа, его влияние — сайт и форум для авторов
  • Франсуа Бона работа по Лавкрафта , французский переводчик: Лавкрафта на Tiers Livre, полное резюме .
  • Terres Lovecraftiennes Веб-сайт, предлагающий неопубликованные переводы эссе (партнерство с американским издателем Hippocampus Press)
  • Ночные шепоты (аудио: 57 минут) Лавкрафта, перевод и адаптация Франсуа Бона , режиссер Этьен Валлес в шоу «Художественная литература» Самеди нуар о французской культуре (10.08.2016)
  • Тени в Инсмуте (аудио: 59 минут) Лавкрафта, адаптация Лорана Мартина , постановка Этьена Валлеса в шоу «Художественная литература Самеди нуар о французской культуре» (24.02.2018)
  • Цвет, упавший с неба (аудио: 58 минут) Лавкрафта, адаптация Лорана Мартина, постановка Этьена Валлеса в шоу «Художественная литература Самеди нуар о французской культуре» (03.03.2018)
  • «Вещь на пороге» (аудио: 59 минут) Лавкрафта, перевод и адаптация Франсуа Бона, режиссер Этьен Валлес, в шоу «Художественная литература Самеди нуар о французской культуре» (15.10.2016)
  • Чтения произведений Лавкрафта по литературе и аудио — аудиокниги
  • Чтения работ Лавкрафта о тиндало — аудиокниги

в  · м

HP Лавкрафт

Длинные новости
  • Квест во сне Кадата Неизвестного
  • Дело Чарльза Декстера Уорда
  • Тот, кто шептал в темноте
  • Галлюцинированные горы
  • Кошмар Иннсмута
  • В бездне времени
Новый
  • Могила  (ru)
  • Дагон
  • Некоторые воспоминания о докторе Джонсоне  ( фр )
  • Полярная звезда
  • За стеной сна
  • Сувенир  (в)
  • Переход Хуана Ромеро  ( фр )
  • Белая лодка  (ru)
  • Проклятие Сарната  (ru)
  • Отзыв Рэндольфа Картера  ( фр )
  • Улица
  • Ужасный старик  (in)
  • Кошки Ултара  (ru)
  • Дерево  (ru)
  • Celephais  (en)
  • Вне  (в)
  • Храм
  • Ньярлатхотеп  (ru)
  • Картина в заброшенном доме  (ru)
  • Артур Джермин  (ru)
  • Ex Oblivione  (en)
  • Безымянный город
  • В поисках Ирана
  • Призрачное болото
  • Другие боги  (ru)
  • Я из другого места
  • Музыка Эриха Занна
  • Sweet Ermengarde  (en)
  • Гипнос  (ru)
  • Что означает луна  (в)
  • Азатот  (ru)
  • Герберт Вест, реаниматолог
  • Молоссы
  • Страх, который таится
  • Крысы в ​​стенах
  • Нерассказанное  (en)
  • Фестиваль
  • Проклятый дом
  • Ужас на Красном крючке
  • Это  (в)
  • В хранилище  (ru)
  • Холодный воздух  (в)
  • Зов Ктулху
  • Модель Пикмана
  • История Некрономикона
  • Странный дом высоко в тумане
  • Серебряный Ключ
  • Цвет упал с неба
  • Потомок  (in)
  • Старики  (в)
  • Мерзость Данвича
  • Там же  (en)
  • Дом Ведьмы
  • Монстр на пороге
  • Священник проклят  (in)
  • Книга  (в)
  • Тот, кто преследовал тьму
«Редакции» и коллаборации
  • Зеленый луг  (ru)
  • Некрофил  (ru)
  • Ползать в хаос  (в)
  • Ужас на Мартин-Бич  (ru)
  • Узник фараона  (ru)
  • Проклятие Йига  (ru)
  • Le Tertre
  • Кома Медуза  (ru)
  • Ужас в музее
  • Через дверь серебряного ключа  (в)
  • Вне времени  (в)
  • Дерево на холме  (в)
  • До всех морей  (в)
  • В стенах Эрикса
  • Существо в лунном свете  (ru)
Поэзия Грибы Юггота  (ru)
Тестирование
  • Ужасы и сверхъестественное в литературе
  • Описание Quebec City  (en)
  • Некоторые примечания о не-юридическом лице  (ru)
Книги о Лавкрафте
  • Лавкрафт: взгляд за мифы о Ктулху
  • Лавкрафт: биография
  • Лавкрафт. Против мира, против жизни
  • Лавкрафт: Жизнь
  • Энциклопедия Лавкрафта
Статьи по Теме
  • Миф о Ктулху
  • Миф о Ктулху в массовой культуре
  • Цикл сновидений
  • Террор Лавкрафта  (ru)
  • Космизм
  • Историческое общество Л. П. Лавкрафта  (ru)
  • Некрономикон
  • Лавкрафт: Страх неизвестного  (ru)
  • Соня Грин (жена)
  • Лавкрафт (кратер)
  • Ктулху (пятно)

в  · м

Миф о Ктулху

Писатели
  • HP Лавкрафт
  • Кларк Эштон Смит
  • Роберт Э. Ховард
  • Август дерлет
  • Роберт Блох
  • Фриц Лейбер
  • Лин Картер
  • Генри каттнер
  • Фрэнк Белкнап Лонг
  • Брайан Ламли
  • Колин Уилсон
  • Рэмси Кэмпбелл
  • Стивен Кинг
  • Карл Эдвард Вагнер
  • ТЕД Кляйн
  • Фред Чаппелл
  • Чарльз Стросс
  • China Miéville
  • WH Pugmire
  • Джефф Вандермер
  • Кейтлин Р. Кирнан
  • Томас лиготти
  • Нил Гейман
  • Андерс Фагер
Сущности
  • Великие Древние
  • Абхот
  • Атлач-Нача
  • Азатот
  • Чаугнар Фаугн
  • Ктулху
  • Дагон
  • Хастур
  • Итакуа
  • Nodens
  • Ньярлатхотеп
  • Шуб-Ниггурат
  • Tsathoggua
  • Йог-Сотот
  • Старые боги
Типы существ
  • Бьяхи
  • Те из глубин
  • Собаки тиндалос
  • Великая раса Йит
  • Худые звери ночи
  • Шантак
  • Шоггот
  • Чо-Чо
Города и места
  • Страна Лавкрафта
  • Аркхэм
  • Данвич
  • Innsmouth
  • Мискатоник
  • Р’льех
  • Мискатонический университет
Символы
  • Абдул аль-Хазред
  • Граф Эрлетт
Фиктивные работы
  • Художественные произведения Мифа о Ктулху
  • Некрономикон
  • Unaussprechlichen Kulten
  • Культ вурдалаков
Фильмы, вдохновленные мифом
  • Один в темноте
  • Логово безумия
  • У ворот запредельного
  • Помимо реаниматора
  • Дагон
  • зловещие мертвецы
  • Зловещие мертвецы 2: Мертвые на рассвете
  • Зловещие мертвецы 3: Армия тьмы
  • Проклятие Аркхема
  • Малефисента
  • Реаниматор
  • Re-Animator 2, невеста Re-Animator
  • Вещь
  • В лесу
Ролевые и настольные игры
  • Зов Ктулху (ролевая игра)
  • Ужас Аркхема
  • Дельта Грин
  • Ктулху (Кеды)
  • Зов Ктулху (карточная игра)
  • Манчкин
Видеоигры, вдохновленные мифом
  • Один в темноте
  • Зов Ктулху: Темные уголки Земли
  • Вечная тьма: Реквием здравомыслия
  • Приключения Шерлока Холмса: Ночь жертвоприношений
  • Пленник льда
  • Тень кометы
  • Некрономикон: Рассвет тьмы
  • Царапины
  • Тьма внутри: погоня за ненавистью Нолдер
Связанные компании
  • Дом Аркхема
  • Хаосиум

Понравилась статья? Поделить с друзьями:
  • Лавировать как пишется правильно
  • Лавинная опасность как пишется
  • Лавина как правильно пишется
  • Лавина или ловина как пишется
  • Лави или лови как пишется