Минские соглашения как пишется

Поиск ответа:
введите номер вопроса или поисковую фразу

Всего найдено: 1

  Вопрос № 299796  

Здравствуйте. Как пишутся _минские соглашения_ (мирное соглашение по урегулированию конфликта на востоке Украины) — с большой или мал. М?

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Корректно: Минские соглашения (как собственное наименование).

Источник

Как правильно пишется словосочетание «минские соглашения»

  • Как правильно пишется слово «минский»
  • Как правильно пишется слово «соглашение»

Делаем Карту слов лучше вместе

Привет! Меня зовут Лампобот, я компьютерная программа, которая помогает делать
Карту слов. Я отлично
умею считать, но пока плохо понимаю, как устроен ваш мир. Помоги мне разобраться!

Спасибо! Я стал чуточку лучше понимать мир эмоций.

Вопрос: трахеотомия — это что-то нейтральное, положительное или отрицательное?

Ассоциации к слову «соглашение»

Синонимы к словосочетанию «минские соглашения»

Предложения со словосочетанием «минские соглашения»

  • Кто выполняет минские соглашения?
  • Есть какой-то специальный закон о выборах на этой территории, ещё способ надо придумать, как освободить от ответственности бандитов, как предусмотрено минскими соглашениями.
  • Транслировались украинские «Горячие новости», «перемирие» шло полным ходом – террористы за день свыше пятидесяти раз обстреляли из тяжёлого вооружения мирные украинские города и позиции украинских войск, которые настолько миролюбивы и привержены минским соглашениям, что ни разу не ответили на провокацию!
  • (все предложения)

Значение слова «соглашение»

  • СОГЛАШЕ́НИЕ, -я, ср. 1. Взаимное согласие, взаимная договоренность. Привести стороны к соглашению. (Малый академический словарь, МАС)

    Все значения слова СОГЛАШЕНИЕ

Значение слова «минский»

  • Ми́нский — притяжательное прилагательное, указывающее на принадлежность к городу Минску. (Википедия)

    Все значения слова МИНСКИЙ

Отправить комментарий

Дополнительно

Смотрите также

СОГЛАШЕ́НИЕ, -я, ср. 1. Взаимное согласие, взаимная договоренность. Привести стороны к соглашению.

Все значения слова «соглашение»

Ми́нский — притяжательное прилагательное, указывающее на принадлежность к городу Минску.

Все значения слова «минский»

  • Кто выполняет минские соглашения?

  • Есть какой-то специальный закон о выборах на этой территории, ещё способ надо придумать, как освободить от ответственности бандитов, как предусмотрено минскими соглашениями.

  • Транслировались украинские «Горячие новости», «перемирие» шло полным ходом – террористы за день свыше пятидесяти раз обстреляли из тяжёлого вооружения мирные украинские города и позиции украинских войск, которые настолько миролюбивы и привержены минским соглашениям, что ни разу не ответили на провокацию!

  • (все предложения)
  • подписание соглашения
  • режим прекращения огня
  • мирное решение
  • дипломатические методы
  • международные наблюдатели
  • (ещё синонимы…)
  • уговор
  • договор
  • согласие
  • мировой
  • подтверждение
  • (ещё ассоциации…)
  • минская губерния
  • минские соглашения
  • минская область
  • (полная таблица сочетаемости…)
  • мировое соглашение
  • соглашение сторон
  • заключение соглашения
  • соглашение предусматривало
  • заключить соглашение
  • (полная таблица сочетаемости…)
  • Разбор по составу слова «соглашение»
  • Как правильно пишется слово «минский»
  • Как правильно пишется слово «соглашение»

Источник

Русский[править]

Данное написание не соответствует ныне действующей норме.
Нормативное написание: Минские соглашения.

Тип и синтаксические свойства сочетания[править]

ми́н—ски·е со—гла—ше́—ни·я

Устойчивое сочетание (термин). Используется в качестве именной группы.

Произношение[править]

  • МФА: [ˈmʲinskʲɪɪ səɡɫɐˈʂɛnʲɪɪ̯ə]

Семантические свойства[править]

Значение[править]

  1. истор. комплекс документов, оформивший правовые отношения между бывшими союзными республиками СССР, принятый 22 января 1993 года в Минске на встрече в верхах СНГ ◆ Отсутствует пример употребления (см. рекомендации).
  2. истор., собир. Минский протокол и Второе минское соглашение ◆ После встречи с Макроном журналисты стали выяснять у Пескова, почему Путин цитировал группу «Красная плесень» на пресс-конференции с президентом Франции. Речь идёт о путинской фразе «нравится не нравится – терпи моя красавица», адресованной Украине в связи с минскими соглашениями. Игорь Яковенко, Протест в условиях диктатуры, Политическим протестом становится любое живое действие, не согласованное с властью // «blogspot.com», 09 февраля 2022 г.

Синонимы[править]

  1. —
  2. разг.: Минск, Минск-2

Антонимы[править]

  1. —
  2. —

Гиперонимы[править]

  1. ?
  2. ?

Гипонимы[править]

  1. ?
  2. ?

Этимология[править]

??

Перевод[править]

комплекс документов, оформивший правовые отношения между бывшими союзными республиками СССР, принятый 22 января 1993 года в Минске на встрече в верхах СНГ
Минский протокол и Второе минское соглашение

Библиография[править]

Источник

Всего найдено: 46

Здравствуйте. Помогите, пожалуйста, правильно расставить запятые: Между УП «Ж» и ООО «С» 28.04.2018 заключен договор № 4 аренды капитальных строений (зданий, сооружений), изолированных помещений, их частей, находящихся в коммунальной собственности г. Минска(,) (далее – Договор)(,) в отношении изолированного нежилого помещения….(до слов…г. Минска — название договора).

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Запятая ставится после скобок.

Здравствуйте! Помогите, пожалуйста, разобраться! Есть в Минске улица Окрестина. Какого рода это название? Склоняется оно или нет со словом «улица» и без него? В Интернете встречается больше сочетание «на Окрестина», хотя в одном месте увидел «на Окрестине». Спасибо!

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Улица Окрестина в Минске — это улица, названная в честь Героя Советского Союза Бориса Окрестина. Поэтому верно: на улице Окрестина, на Окрестина.

Добрый день, дорогая «грамота»! Уточните, пожалуйста, верна ли пунктуация: «Почему(,) если жить в Минске, то именно в Лошице?» — нужна ли запятая после «почему»?

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Указанная запятая не требуется.

В ответе 298132 вы пишете: «Правильнее будет считать родовым словом только первое (храм, поселок, набережная, улица и т. д.), а второе слово, которое пишется со строчной буквы, следует считать частью собственного наименования (не путать с именем собственным!)» Ответ непонятен и противоречит Правилам (§ 169. «В географических и административно-территориальных названиях — названиях материков, морей, озер, рек, возвышенностей, гор, стран, краев, областей, населенных пунктов, улиц и т. п. — с прописной буквы пишутся все слова, кроме родовых понятий (остров, море, гора, область, провинция, улица, площадь и т. п.), служебных слов, а также слов года, лет»). Откуда в географических и административно-территориальных названиях — названиях населенных пунктов — могут появиться слова со строчной, не являющиеся служебными или родовыми? Пример: имя собственное «посёлок подсобного хозяйства санатория «Поречье»», где «Поречье» заключено в кавычки и является названием только самого санатория. Почему в этом географическом названии слова «подсобного хозяйства» пишутся со строчной?

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Вы затронули большую и сложную проблему – употребление прописной буквы в географических названиях. По общему правилу с прописной буквы должны начинаться все слова составного географического наименования, кроме слов года, лет и служебных внутри названия (как русских и, на, так и заимствованных в составе названия ан, дель, дер и др.). Слова, указывающие на тип географического объекта (их в правиле называют родовыми понятиями), в состав названия не входят.

Это правило легко применить к большинству географических названий, и их написание не вызывает трудностей, напр.: мыс Доброй Надежды, урочище Лосиная Гарь, ключ Булаг-Добо, гора Лысая Баба, сопка Лысый Дед, ручей Людмилы Левый, гора Май-Борода, река Малая Алмазинка, увал Молдованский Куст, село Новая Сила. В состав названий могут входить географические термины, утратившие свое терминологическое значение, т. е. не указывающие на тип географического объекта. Они пишутся с прописной, напр.: деревня Моленый Мыс, ручей Молчанов Ключ, урочище Моховище Бурного Озера, ручей Ободная Падь, река Общая Балка.

Однако некоторые сочетания названий и терминов не так просто соотнести с правилом. Например, есть особый класс возвышенностей – сопки. Одно из значений этого слова, зафиксированное толковыми словарями, – ‘вулкан’. Но примерно с 70–80-х годов прошлого века географы стали включать слово сопка в название вулканов. На картах, и в каталогах географических названий стали писать: Ключевская Сопка, Авачинская Сопка (на картах середины ХХ века можно встретить написания Ключевская сопка, Авачинская сопка). Но слово Сопка входит и в названия множества гор, напр.: Березовая Сопка, Боркова Сопка, Бурнистая Сопка. Видимо, географы, уточняя номенклатуру географических терминов, стремились к их однозначности и определили сопку как особый тип возвышенностей. Все горы и вулканы, не соответствующие определению термина сопка, с этого времени строго по правилу стали Сопками. 

Рассмотрим еще один пример. В названии площади слово спуск нужно писать с прописной: Васильевский Спуск (см. Словарь улиц Москвы). В названии улицы, по которой спускаются вниз, например к реке, слово спуск сохраняет свое прямое значение ‘наклонная поверхность; место, по которому спускаются вниз’. Однако (в отличие от сопки в названии гор и вулканов) в названии улиц слово спуск закрепилось в написании со строчной: Боровецкий спуск, Владимирский спуск, Ерофеевский спуск – улицы во Владимире. Также со строчной пишутся в названиях улиц слова аллея, кольцо, линия, просек. Вероятно, можно говорить о формировании у всех этих слов значения с компонентом ‘улица’.

Есть трудность иного рода. Это необычные названия населенных пунктов типа поселок подсобного хозяйства санатория «Поречье». По правилу можно было бы написать: посёлок Подсобного Хозяйства Санатория «Поречье» (ср.: мыс Доброй Надежды). Некоторые поселки не имеют условных названий традиционного типа, таких как Листвянка, Большая Речка, Дальний, Усть-Камчатск, Лесной Городок, Куйтун, Черемхово. Функцию имени собственного берет на себя сочетание слов, указывающее на принадлежность поселка (в прошлом и/или настоящем) какой-либо организации. Правилами орфографии подобные названия никогда не описывались, видимо, потому, что правила создавались примерно в то же время, что и эти названия. В документах, на географических картах писали, руководствуясь самыми общими принципами употребления прописной буквы, но применяли их по-разному. И теперь мы вынуждены писать подобные названия не единообразно, а так, как они закреплены в Государственном каталоге географических названий. Вот несколько примеров: поселок База Куглая, поселок 16-й км, поселок лесхоза Юрлово, поселок лесхоза, поселок Москворецкого леспаркхоза, поселок леспаркхоза Клязьминский, поселок шлюза «Северка», поселок совхоза им. Ленина, поселок отделения совхоза «Дединово», поселок центральной усадьбы совхоза Уваровский-2, поселок медико-инструментального завода, поселок государственного племенного завода «Константиново», поселок фабрики Первое Мая. 

Надо сказать, что имена нарицательные могут постепенно приобретать статус топонима. Эта переходность отражена на дорожных указателях автомобильной дороги от Хабаровска до Иркутска: здесь встречается более 20 ручьев, обозначаемых как ручей, Ручей или РУЧЕЙ.

Здравствуйте. Как пишутся _минские соглашения_ (мирное соглашение по урегулированию конфликта на востоке Украины) — с большой или мал. М?

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Корректно: Минские соглашения (как собственное наименование).

Подскажите, пожалуйста, в предложениях вроде «Такой-то выступил в Концертном зале «Россия», в Концертном зале «Минск» — слово «концертный» пишется с прописной или со строчной? Спасибо!

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Пишется со строчной: в концертном зале «Россия».

Как правильно МИнская улица или МинскАя?

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Улица в Москве – Минская.

Добрый вечер, как правильно сказать: — родился в имении Ясная Поляна или в имении Ясной Поляне? — в городе Минске или в городе Минск? — она танцевала с книзем Андреем Болконским или с князем Андрей Болконский?

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Верно: родился в имении Ясная Поляна; в городе Минске; она танцевала с князем Андреем Болконским.

Добрый день! Подскажите, пожалуйста, корректно ли написание с большой буквы слов «Государственного Флага» в названии площади: «площадь Государственного Флага» (г. Минск)? Благодарю за ответ!

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Такое написание правильно. В названиях улиц, площадей, переулков, проспектов и пр. с большой буквы пишутся все слова, кроме родовых терминов (т. е. самих слов улица, площадь и т. п.), служебных слов, а также слов года, лет.

Какое прилагательное образуется от Мальмё и почему?

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Общеупотребительного прилагательного от этого непростого топонима нет. Словарь Е. А. Левашова «Географические названия» (СПб., 2000) фиксирует варианты мальмёский и мальмозский, в то время как «Словарь географических названий» А. В. Суперанской (М., 2013) предлагает мальмёвский и мальминский.

Здравствуйте. Река Осьма. Как правильно назвать её пойму: Осьминская (по примеру Клязьминского водохранилища — от Клязьма) или Осьмянская (по примеру Касплянского озера — от Каспля)? Помогите, запуталась. И еще не совсем понятно с названием Вязьма. Если говорить о чем-то, имеющем отношение к городу, то будет — Вяземская, а если о реке, о той же пойме, то будет — Вязьминская или тоже Вяземская? Спасибо. С уважением.

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Извините за задержку с ответом: мы обсуждали Ваш вопрос с нашими смоленскими коллегами, специалистами по топонимике. Словарной фиксации нет. Пойму реки Осьмы (смоляне произносят название этой реки с ударением на первом слоге) корректно называть Осьминской, пойму реки Вязьмы – Вяземской.

Уважаемая Грамота!
Подскажите очень срочно, стоит ли писать словосочетание «минские договоренности» с заглавной буквы? Каково его правильное написание?

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Корректно со строчной буквы без кавычек: минские договоренности.

Здравствуйте!
В городе Минске есть район Зеленый луг. Как правильно сказать: «я живу в Зеленом луге» или «я живу в Зеленом лугу»? С одной стороны, если задавать вопрос «в чем?», то нужно исползовать предложный падеж (в Зеленом луге). А с другой стороны, если задавать вопрос «где?», то нужно использовать местный (как «на лугу») и говорить «в Зеленом лугу». Обясните правильный вариант.
Спасибо!

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Корректно: Я живу в Зеленом Луге (ср.: в далеком краю – в Краснодарском крае).

Здравствуйте! У меня такой вопрос: есть мнение, что перед «Санкт-Петербургом» не следует указывать букву «г», т.е. пишем не г. Санкт-Петербург, в просто — Санкт-Петербург. Верно ли это, а если верно, то как это можно обосновать? Спасибо заранее!

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

Строго говоря, употребление сокращения г. (равно как и полного слова город) перед названиями любых городов (кроме малоизвестных наименований или образованных от фамилий – г. Киров) – примета канцелярско-бюрократического языка. Вполне можно обойтись без слова город и писать в Санкт-Петербурге, в Москве, в Минске, а не в г. Санкт-Петербурге, в г. Москве, в г. Минске.

Это подтверждают и справочники. В «Справочнике издателя и автора» А. Э. Мильчина, Л. К. Чельцовой указано, что «сокращение г. (город), как и полное слово, рекомендуется употреблять ограниченно, главным образом перед названиями городов, образованными от фамилий (г. Киров)».

Добрый день! Подскажите, как правильно пишется — Варминско-Мазурское воеводство или Варминьско-Мазурское? Спасибо.

Ответ справочной службы русского языка

В энциклопедических источниках и на картах встречаются оба варианта.

Источник

A map of the buffer zone established by the Minsk Protocol follow-up memorandum

The Minsk agreements were a series of international agreements which sought to end the Donbas war fought between armed Russian separatist groups and Armed Forces of Ukraine, with Russian regular forces playing a central part.[1] The first, known as the Minsk Protocol, was drafted in 2014 by the Trilateral Contact Group on Ukraine, consisting of Ukraine, Russia, and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE),[2][3][4] with mediation by the leaders of France and Germany in the so-called Normandy Format. After extensive talks in Minsk, Belarus, the agreement was signed on 5 September 2014 by representatives of the Trilateral Contact Group and, without recognition of their status, by the then-leaders of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) and Luhansk People’s Republic (LPR). This agreement followed multiple previous attempts to stop the fighting in the region and aimed to implement an immediate ceasefire.

The agreement failed to stop fighting,[5] and was thus followed with a revised and updated agreement, Minsk II, which was signed on 12 February 2015.[6] This agreement consisted of a package of measures, including a ceasefire, withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line, release of prisoners of war, constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas and restoring control of the state border to the Ukrainian government. While fighting subsided following the agreement’s signing, it never ended completely, and the agreement’s provisions were never fully implemented.[7]

Amid rising tensions between Russia and Ukraine in early 2022, Russia officially recognised the DPR and LPR on 21 February 2022.[8] Following that decision, on 22 February 2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin declared that the Minsk agreements «no longer existed», and that Ukraine, not Russia, was to blame for their collapse.[9] Russia then invaded Ukraine on 24 February 2022.[10]

Minsk Protocol

Minsk Protocol

Protocol on the results of consultations of the Trilateral Contact Group with respect to the joint steps aimed at the implementation of the Peace Plan of the President of Ukraine, P. Poroshenko, and the initiatives of the President of Russia, V. Putin
Context War in Donbas
Signed 5 September 2014
Location Minsk, Belarus
Expiry 21 February 2022
Mediators
  • France François Hollande
  • Germany Angela Merkel
Original
signatories
  • Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Heidi Tagliavini
  • Ukraine Leonid Kuchma
  • Russia Mikhail Zurabov
  • Donetsk People's Republic Aleksandr Zakharchenko
  • Luhansk People's Republic Igor Plotnitskiy
Language Russian

The Minsk Protocol was drawn up by the Trilateral Contact Group on Ukraine, which consisted of representatives from Ukraine, Russia, and the OSCE.[11] The group was established in June 2014 as a way to facilitate dialogue and resolution of the strife across eastern and southern Ukraine. Meetings of the group, along with informal representatives of the breakaway Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics, took place on 31 July, 26 August, 1 September, and 5 September 2014. The details of the agreement, signed on 5 September 2014, largely resembled Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko’s 20 June «fifteen-point peace plan».

Text of the protocol

The text of the protocol consists of twelve points:[12]

  1. To ensure an immediate bilateral ceasefire.
  2. To ensure the monitoring and verification of the ceasefire by the OSCE.
  3. Decentralisation of power, including through the adoption of the Ukrainian law «On temporary Order of Local Self-Governance in Particular Districts of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts».
  4. To ensure the permanent monitoring of the Ukrainian-Russian border and verification by the OSCE with the creation of security zones in the border regions of Ukraine and the Russian Federation.
  5. Immediate release of all hostages and illegally detained persons.
  6. A law preventing the prosecution and punishment of people in connection with the events that have taken place in some areas of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts.
  7. To continue the inclusive national dialogue.
  8. To take measures to improve the humanitarian situation in Donbas.
  9. To ensure early local elections in accordance with the Ukrainian law «On temporary Order of Local Self-Governance in Particular Districts of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts».
  10. To withdraw illegal armed groups and military equipment as well as fighters and mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine.
  11. To adopt a programme of economic recovery and reconstruction for the Donbas region.
  12. To provide personal security for participants in the consultations.

Signatories

The following representatives signed the document:[12]

  • Swiss diplomat and OSCE representative Heidi Tagliavini
  • Former president of Ukraine (July 1994 to January 2005) and Ukrainian representative Leonid Kuchma
  • Russian Ambassador to Ukraine and Russian representative Mikhail Zurabov
  • Rebel heads Alexander Zakharchenko and Igor Plotnitsky[13]

Follow-up memorandum

Wikisource has original text related to this article:

In the two weeks after the Minsk Protocol was signed, there were frequent violations of the ceasefire by both parties to the conflict.[14][15] Talks continued in Minsk, and a follow-up to the Minsk Protocol was agreed to on 19 September 2014. This memorandum clarified the implementation of the Protocol. Amongst some of the peacemaking measures agreed to were:[14][16][17]

  • To ban flights by combat aircraft over the security zone
  • To withdraw all foreign mercenaries from the conflict zone
  • To ban offensive operations
  • To pull heavy weaponry 15 kilometres (9.3 mi) back on each side of the line of contact, creating a 30-kilometre (19 mi) buffer zone
  • To task the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine with monitoring implementation of Minsk Protocol

Efficacy

After the follow-up memorandum, the Second Battle of Donetsk Airport broke out, and both parties continued to accuse each other of ceasefire violations.[5] In late October, DPR prime minister and Minsk Protocol signatory Alexander Zakharchenko said that his forces would retake the territory they had lost to Ukrainian forces during a July 2014 offensive, and that DPR forces would be willing to wage «heavy battles» to do so.[5][18] Subsequently, Zakharchenko said that he had been misquoted, and that he had meant to say that these areas would be taken through «peaceful means».[19]

While campaigning in the lead-up to the 2 November elections held by the DPR and LPR in violation of the Protocol, Zakharchenko said «These are historical times. We are creating a new country! It’s an insane goal».[20] OSCE chairman Didier Burkhalter confirmed that the elections ran «counter to the letter and spirit of the Minsk Protocol», and said that they would «further complicate its implementation».[21]

Speaking on 5 December, Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov said that the 2 November DPR and LPR elections were «exactly within the range in which they had been negotiated in Minsk», and that the Ukrainian parliament was supposed to pass an amnesty bill for DPR and LPR leaders after the Ukrainian parliamentary election in late October.[22] According to Lavrov, closer monitoring of the Russo-Ukrainian border, as specified by the Minsk Protocol, could only take place after such an amnesty law was approved.[22] He noted that he thought that a Ukrainian presidential decree banning prosecution of Donbas separatist combatants was issued on 16 September, but said that «a bill has now been filed proposing to overturn» the decree.[22]

Collapse

By January 2015, the Minsk Protocol ceasefire had completely collapsed.[23] Following the separatist victory at Donetsk International Airport in defiance of the Protocol, DPR spokesman Eduard Basurin said that «the Minsk Memorandum will not be considered in the form it was adopted».[24] Later in the day, DPR leader Alexander Zakharchenko said that the DPR «will not make any attempts at ceasefire talks any more», and that his forces were going to «attack right up to the borders of Donetsk region».[25] The New York Times said that the ceasefire had «all but vanished».[26]

Amidst increasing violence in the combat zone, another round of Minsk talks was scheduled for 31 January.[27] Members of the Trilateral Contact Group travelled to Minsk to meet representatives of the DPR and LPR. The DPR and LPR signatories of the Protocol did not attend, and those representatives that did attend were not able to discuss the implementation of the Protocol or memorandum. These representatives asked for the revision of the Protocol and the memorandum. The meeting was adjourned with no result.[27]

Minsk II, February 2015

The leaders of Belarus, Russia, Germany, France, and Ukraine at the 11–12 February 2015 summit in Minsk, Belarus

Successive attempts to resolve the ongoing war in the Donbas region of Ukraine had seen no result by the start of February 2015.[28] While the Minsk Protocol of 5 September 2014 did significantly reduce fighting in the conflict zone for many months, minor skirmishes continued. At the start of January 2015, the separatist forces of the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) and Luhansk People’s Republic (LPR) began a new offensive on Ukrainian-controlled areas, resulting in the complete collapse of the Minsk Protocol ceasefire.[23]

After heavy fighting, DPR forces captured the symbolically important Donetsk International Airport on 21 January, the last part of the city of Donetsk that had been under Ukrainian control. Following this victory, separatist forces pressed their offensive on the important railway and road junction of Debaltseve in late January. This renewed heavy fighting caused significant concern in the international community. French president François Hollande and German chancellor Angela Merkel put forth a new peace plan on 7 February.[29][30]

The Franco-German plan, drawn up after talks with Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko and Russian president Vladimir Putin, was seen as a revival of the Minsk Protocol. President Hollande said that the plan was the «last chance» for resolution of the conflict.[29][30] The plan was put forth in response to American proposals to send armaments to the Ukrainian government, something that Chancellor Merkel said would only result in a worsening of the crisis.[29][31]

A summit to discuss the implementation of the Franco-German diplomatic plan was scheduled for 11 February at the Independence Palace in Minsk, the capital of Belarus. It was attended by Russian president Vladimir Putin, Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko, German chancellor Angela Merkel, French president François Hollande, DPR leader Alexander Zakharchenko, and LPR leader Igor Plotnitsky. Negotiations went on overnight for sixteen hours, and were said to have been «very difficult» by the German foreign minister.[32][33]

Following the talks, it was announced on 12 February 2015 that the parties to the conflict had agreed to a new package of peacemaking measures, the Package of Measures for the Implementation of the Minsk Agreements, which is commonly called Minsk II.[6][34][35][36] Some of the measures agreed to were an OSCE-observed unconditional ceasefire from 15 February, withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line, release of prisoners of war, and constitutional reform in Ukraine.[37]

Text of the agreement

The full text of the agreement is as follows:[38][39]

  1. Immediate and full ceasefire in particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine and its strict fulfilment as of 00:00 midnight EET on 15 February 2015.
  2. Pull-out of all heavy weapons by both sides to equal distance with the aim of creation of a security zone on minimum 50 kilometres (31 mi) apart for artillery of 100mm calibre or more, and a security zone of 70 kilometres (43 mi) for multiple rocket launchers (MRLS) and 140 kilometres (87 mi) for MLRS Tornado-S, Uragan, Smerch, and Tochka U tactical missile systems:
    • for Ukrainian troops, from actual line of contact;
    • for armed formations of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine, from the contact line in accordance with the Minsk Memorandum as of 19 September 2014The pullout of the above-mentioned heavy weapons must start no later than the second day after the start of the ceasefire and finish within 14 days.This process will be assisted by OSCE with the support of the Trilateral Contact Group.
  3. Effective monitoring and verification of ceasefire regime and pullout of heavy weapons by OSCE will be provided from the first day of pullout, using all necessary technical means such as satellites, drones, radio-location systems etc.
  4. On the first day after the pullout a dialogue is to start on modalities of conducting local elections in accordance with the Ukrainian legislation and the Law of Ukraine «On temporary Order of Local Self-Governance in Particular Districts of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts,» and also about the future of these districts based on the above-mentioned law.Without delays, but no later than 30 days from the date of signing of this document, a resolution has to be approved by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, indicating the territory which falls under the special regime in accordance with the law «On temporary Order of Local Self-Governance in Particular Districts of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts,» based in the line set up by the Minsk Memorandum as of 19 September 2014.
  5. Provide pardon and amnesty by way of enacting a law that forbids persecution and punishment of persons in relation to events that took place in particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine.
  6. Provide release and exchange of all hostages and illegally held persons, based on the principle of «all for all». This process has to end – at the latest – on the fifth day after the pullout (of weapons).
  7. Provide safe access, delivery, storage and distribution of humanitarian aid to the needy, based on an international mechanism.
  8. Define the modalities of a full restoration of social and economic connections, including social transfers, such as payments of pensions and other payments (income and revenue, timely payment of communal bills, restoration of tax payments within the framework of Ukrainian legal field).With this aim, Ukraine will restore management over the segment of its banking system in the districts affected by the conflict, and possibly, an international mechanism will be established to ease such transactions.
  9. Restore control of the state border to the Ukrainian government in the whole conflict zone, which has to start on the first day after the local election and end after the full political regulation (local elections in particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts based on the law of Ukraine and Constitutional reform) by the end of 2015, on the condition of fulfilment of Point 11 – in consultations and in agreement with representatives of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts within the framework of the Trilateral Contact Group.
  10. Pullout of all foreign armed formations, military equipment, and also mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under OSCE supervision. Disarmament of all illegal groups.
  11. Constitutional reform in Ukraine, with a new constitution to come into effect by the end of 2015, the key element of which is decentralisation (taking into account peculiarities of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, agreed with representatives of these districts), and also approval of permanent legislation on the special status of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts in accordance with the measures spelt out in the attached footnote,[note 1] by the end of 2015.
  12. Based on the Law of Ukraine «On temporary Order of Local Self-Governance in Particular Districts of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts», questions related to local elections will be discussed and agreed upon with representatives of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts in the framework of the Trilateral Contact Group. Elections will be held in accordance with relevant OSCE standards and monitored by OSCE/ODIHR.
  13. Intensify the work of the Trilateral Contact Group including through the establishment of working groups on the implementation of relevant aspects of the Minsk agreements. They will reflect the composition of the Trilateral Contact Group.

Signatories

The document was signed by:[38]

  • Separatist’s leaders Alexander Zakharchenko and Igor Plotnitsky
  • Swiss diplomat and OSCE representative Heidi Tagliavini
  • Former president of Ukraine and Ukrainian representative Leonid Kuchma
  • Russian Ambassador to Ukraine and Russian representative Mikhail Zurabov

Reactions

The new package, commonly referred to as «Minsk II», was criticised for being «highly complicated» and «extremely fragile», and for being very similar to the failed Minsk Protocol.[6][40][41] The New York Times reported that the plan had «included some tripwires», such as not demarcating control over the city of Debaltseve, which was the site of the most fierce fighting at the time of the plan’s drafting.[6][42] Following the Minsk talks, Chancellor Merkel, President Hollande, and President Poroshenko attended a European Union (EU) summit in Brussels.[43]

At the summit, the Minsk participants briefed EU leaders about the talks. During the briefing, they said that President Putin had tried to delay the implementation of a ceasefire by ten days, so as to force Ukrainian troops in Debaltseve to surrender their positions. For his part, President Putin said that the Debaltseve defenders were encircled, and that the separatists expected them «to lay down their arms and cease resistance».[43]

Kommersant reporter Andrey Kolesnikov wrote that implementation of the ceasefire in Debaltseve hinged upon whether or not Ukrainian forces were truly encircled, «Above all, does it exist or not? Vladimir Putin insisted that it [the encirclement] exists and that if a cease-fire agreement is reached, it will be odd if it isn’t violated: Those in the kettle will certainly try to get out of there; those who have boiled that kettle will try to collect the foam».[44]

US State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said on 13 February that the Russian Armed Forces had actively deployed around Debaltseve to assist the separatists in forcing out Ukrainian troops prior to the start of the ceasefire, the 15 February. Russia denied this, and Russian government spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that Russia could not assist in the implementation of Minsk II because it was «not a participant» in the conflict.[45]

Right Sector leader Dmytro Yarosh said that he reserved the right to continue fighting, and that Minsk II was unconstitutional. He said that his Ukrainian Volunteer Corps would continue fighting «until complete liberation of Ukrainian lands from Russian occupants», and promised «death to Russian terrorist-occupiers».[46][47][48] DPR leader Alexander Zakharchenko said that the ceasefire did not apply to Debaltseve, and that fighting would continue there.[49]

Efficacy

Though the fighting generally subsided after the ceasefire came into effect at 0:00 EET on 15 February, skirmishes and shelling continued in several parts of the conflict zone.[50] Shelling and fighting at Debaltseve continued, as DPR leader Alexander Zakharchenko said that the ceasefire did not apply to that area.[51] In the south of Donetsk Oblast, fighting between DPR forces and members of the Azov Battalion continued in villages near Mariupol.[51][52] By 16 February, Minsk II seemed on the verge of collapse.[53][54] Separatists continued a heavy assault on Debaltseve. Both sides said that they would not withdraw heavy weaponry as specified by the agreement whilst fighting in Debaltseve was ongoing.[55] Reuters described the ceasefire as «stillborn» in Debaltseve.[56] Ukrainian forces were forced to retreat from Debaltseve on 18 February, leaving separatist forces in control of the city.[57]

In the week after the fall of Debaltseve to pro-Russian forces, fighting in the conflict zone abated.[58] DPR and LPR forces began to withdraw artillery from the front lines as specified by Minsk II on 24 February, and Ukraine did so on 26 February. Ukraine reported that it had suffered no casualties during 24–26 February, something that had not occurred since early January 2015.[58][59]

The parliament of Ukraine approved a law on «special status» for Donbas on 17 March, as specified by Minsk II.[60] Later, in 2019, Ukraine’s parliament voted to extend regulations giving limited self-rule to separatist-controlled eastern regions, a prerequisite for a deal to settle the five-year conflict there.[61] The law was immediately criticised by Ukrainian politicians, separatist leaders, and the Russian government. Radical Party leader Oleh Lyashko said that the law was «a vote for de facto recognition of the Russian occupation in Donbas». Vice-parliamentary speaker Andriy Parubiy said that law was «not for Putin or the occupiers», but to show Europe that Ukraine was willing to adhere to Minsk II. Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov said that the law was a «sharp departure from the Minsk agreements» because it demanded local elections under Ukrainian jurisdiction.[60]

Representatives of the LPR and DPR said that the law was a «one-sided» modification of Minsk II, and that the agreement had been rendered void by this modification.[62] DPR leader Alexander Zakharchenko said that any change to Minsk II that had not been mutually agreed upon was «legally void», and that «nothing that had been agreed upon in Minsk has been carried out». He added that the DPR «must occupy all of the cities in which the referendum took place, and then politically cooperate [with Ukraine] as equal partners».[63] Despite this, representatives of the DPR and LPR continued to forward peace proposals to the Trilateral Contact Group on Ukraine.[64]

Ukrainian defence minister Stepan Poltorak said on 8 June 2015 that over 100 soldiers and at least 50 civilians had been killed since Minsk II came into effect. According to him, pro-Russian forces had violated the truce more than 4,000 times.[65] Contrary to the agreement, DPR representative Denis Pushilin and LPR representative Vladislav Deinego said on 10 June 2015 that their republics «would like to join the Russian Federation». In addition, they said that they consider Crimea, which was annexed by Russia in March 2014, to be part of Russia.[66]

American Defense Department official Michael Carpenter said on 2 March 2016 that at least 430 Ukrainian soldiers had died since the signing of Minsk II, that Russia maintained «command-and-control links» over the DPR and LPR, and that Russia was «pouring heavy weapons» into the Donbas.[67] Deputy head of the OSCE mission in Ukraine Alexander Hug said on 25 March 2016 that the OSCE had observed «armed people with Russian insignia» fighting in Donbas from the beginning of the conflict, that they had talked to prisoners who said they were Russian soldiers, and that they had seen «tire tracks, not the vehicles themselves, but the tracks of vehicles crossing the [Russo-Ukrainian] border».[68]

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said on 27 March 2016 that Russia was «not a party to the Minsk agreements», and that the agreements were «devoted to two conflicting sides».[69] The Parliamentary Assembly of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe however claims that the Minsk Protocol also includes the liberation of those hostages who have been abducted from the Ukrainian territory and are illegally detained in Russia, e.g. Nadiya Savchenko and Oleg Sentsov.[70]

On 27 December 2018, Ukrainian news agency UNIAN reported that not a single provision of the Minsk deal had been fully implemented.[7]

In July 2020, Office of The President of Ukraine announced Leonid Kuchma will no longer take part in the work of the Trilateral Contact Group (TCG) on resolving the situation in Ukraine’s east. Leonid Kuchma met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on 28 July.[71]

In June 2021, U.S. President Joe Biden and Russian President Vladimir Putin «agreed to pursue diplomacy related to the Minsk agreement.»[72]

A Normandy Format meeting was planned between Russia, Ukraine, Germany and France in Paris on 26 January 2022.[73][74] Ukraine fulfilled Russia’s condition for a meeting in Paris and decided to withdraw from Parliament the controversial draft law on the reintegration of the Crimea and Donbas region, because the law was contrary to the Minsk II.[75][76]

Elections in the DPR and LPR

While the 2015 Ukrainian local elections had been scheduled for 25 October, DPR leader Alexander Zakharchenko issued a decree on 2 July that ordered local DPR elections to be held on 18 October.[77] He said that this action was «in accordance with the Minsk agreements».[78] According to Zakharchenko, this move meant that the DPR had «independently started to implement the Minsk agreements».[78] Zakharchenko said that the elections would «take place ‘on the basis of Ukraine’s law on temporary self-rule status of individual districts of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions’, in so far as they are not at variance with the constitution and laws of the DPR».[78]

On the same day, President Petro Poroshenko responded that if DPR elections went forward in this unilateral manner, it would be «extremely irresponsible and will have devastating consequences for the process of deescalation of tension in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions».[78] In addition, the OSCE said that it would only send observers to elections in the conflict zone if Ukraine invited it to do so.[79] As specified in Minsk II, local elections in DPR and LPR-held territories must be observed by the OSCE to be deemed legitimate.[39] LPR leader Igor Plotnitsky followed the DPR by scheduling elections in the territory that he controlled for 1 November 2015.[citation needed]

Amidst a great reduction in violence, following an agreement to restart the implementation of Minsk II that was agreed to on 1 September, the Normandy four held a meeting on 2 October. At the meeting, it was agreed that elections in the conflict zone would be held in accordance with Minsk II.[80] In order to do this, French President François Hollande said that the elections would need to be postponed until 2016, as three months were required to prepare for them.[80] Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed to use his influence to prevent the DPR and LPR from holding early elections.[80]

Accordingly, the DPR and LPR announced on 6 October that their planned elections had been postponed until 21 February 2016.[81] Local elections in the rest of Ukraine went ahead on 25 October 2015. Following the postponement, German foreign minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said that if OSCE observers verified that the planned elections to be held in the separatist areas were in accordance with Ukrainian law and Minsk II, the «law on special status» for these areas would come into immediate effect.[82]

On 18 April 2016 the planned (organised by the DPR and LPR) local elections were postponed from 20 April to 24 July 2016.[83] On 22 July 2016 these DPR and LPR elections were again postponed to 6 November 2016.[84] On 2 October 2016 the DPR and LPR held «primaries» in which voters nominated candidates for the 6 November 2016 elections.[85] Ukraine denounced these «primaries» as illegal.[85] On 4 November 2016 both DPR and LPR postponed their local elections «until further notice»; head of the DPR Zakharchenko added that «In 2017, we will hold elections under the Minsk agreements, or we will hold them independently.»[citation needed]

Elections for the People’s Council of the Donetsk People’s Republic and the People’s Council of the Luhansk People’s Republic were organised and held by the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics on 11 November 2018.[86]

Evaluation and abandonment

Following the fall of Debaltseve in February 2015, about one-third of the Donbas region remained in separatist control.[87] A few days before the 2022 Russian invasion, French president Emmanuel Macron and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken opined that the Minsk agreements were «the way forward» to end the conflict in Donbas. Blinken added that it was an incomplete step as there were other outstanding issues.[88] The aim of the Russian intervention in Donbas was to establish pro-Russian governments that, upon reincorporation into Ukraine, would facilitate Russian inference in Ukrainian politics.[89] The agreements were thus highly favourable to the Russian side, as their implementation would accomplish these goals.[90]

In May and June 2021, Mark Galeotti proposed «it is time to recognize that the Minsk process has run its course — and may if anything be blocking any more meaningful dialogue»,[91] and suggested that as an external party, the United Kingdom might move diplomacy forward.[92] In a June 2021 interview, Vladislav Surkov, Putin’s aide for Ukraine policy from 2013 to 2020, who was removed from his role in February 2020, said that Ukraine «can be reformed as a confederation, with a lot of freedom for the regions to decide things by themselves». He said the country would be severed by the «geopolitical gravity» between Russia and the West, describing the Minsk agreements as an act that «legitimized the first division of Ukraine» in a «reconquest», «the first open geopolitical counter-attack by Russia [against the West]».[93] In October 2021, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said that «if the Americans are genuinely prepared to support the implementation of the Minsk Agreements, this issue can be settled very quickly.»[94]

A dispute emerged over the role of the Russian Federation, with the parties understanding Minsk as an agreement between Ukraine and Russia,[95][96][97][98] but Russian officials claiming the role of mediator, insisted that Ukraine negotiate directly with representatives of the self-proclaimed separatist republics in parts of Donetsk and Luhansk.[99] Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said he has «no intention of talking to terrorists».[100] The Russian side refused high-level talks, and the Kremlin endorsed an October 2021 Kommersant article by former Russian president Dmitri Medvedev entitled «Why It Is Senseless to Deal with the Current Ukrainian Leadership»,[101][102] which some have criticized.[103]

In November 2021, the Russian foreign ministry breached diplomatic protocol by releasing confidential correspondence with negotiators Germany and France.[104][105]

In December 2021, Chief of General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces Valery Gerasimov said that «Kyiv is not fulfilling the Minsk Agreements. The Ukrainian armed forces are touting that they have started to employ US-supplied Javelin anti-tank missile systems in Donbas and are also using Turkish reconnaissance/strike drones. As a result, the already tense situation in the east of that country is further deteriorating.»[106]

In January 2022, Oleksiy Danilov, the secretary of Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council, said that «The fulfillment of the Minsk agreement means the country’s destruction. When they were signed under the Russian gun barrel — and the German and the French watched — it was already clear for all rational people that it’s impossible to implement those documents.»[107]

In February 2022, Finnish President Sauli Niinistö said «the most possible solution (to the current situation) could be the Minsk agreement to be fulfilled or that there would be significant progress in its implementation.»[108]

On 15 February 2022, the Russian Duma voted to appeal to President Putin to recognise the self-proclaimed LPR and DPR.[109] The next day, a Russian government spokesman acknowledged that officially recognising the Donbas republics would not be in keeping with the Minsk agreements.[110] However, he also told journalists that Putin’s priority in regulating the situation in Donbas is the implementation of mechanisms adopted under those agreements.[111] Russia went on to officially recognise the self-proclaimed Luhansk and Donetsk people’s republics on 21 February 2022.[8] Following that decision, on 22 February 2022, President Putin said that the Minsk agreements «no longer existed», and that Ukraine, not Russia, was to blame for their collapse, accusing Ukraine of genocide in Donbas in his comments[112][113][9] – a statement largely seen as baseless and factually wrong by the wider world, academics studying genocide, and the United Nations.[114][115][116][117] Russia then invaded Ukraine on 24 February 2022.[10]

On 24 August 2022, after a meeting of the Crimea Platform, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy stated that current front lines in the war would not be frozen. «At the point where we are, we are not ready for a ceasefire. We explained that there will be no Minsk-3, Minsk-5, or Minsk-7. We will not play these games, we have lost part of our territories this way … it is a trap».[118]

Angela Merkel said in 2022 that the agreement had been «an attempt to give Ukraine time» and that Ukraine used it to strengthen its armed forces.[119]

See also

  • Normandy Format
  • OSCE Minsk Group, for resolving the Armenia–Azerbaijan conflict[120]
  • 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis
  • Outline of the Russo-Ukrainian War

Notes

  1. ^ The following measures are to be included in the Ukrainian law «On temporary Order of Local Self-Governance in Particular Districts of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts»:
    • Freedom from punishment, harassment, and discrimination of persons connected with the events that took place in particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts
    • Right of language self-determination
    • Participation of local self-government in the appointment of the heads of prosecutors’ offices and courts in the particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts
    • The possibility for central executive bodies to conclude agreements with relevant local authorities on economic, social, and cultural development of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts
    • The state will provide support for the socio-economic development of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts
    • Assistance from central executive bodies for cross-border cooperation by particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts with regions of the Russian Federation
    • The freedom to create people’s militia units by decision of local councils to maintain public order in particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts
    • The powers of local council deputies and officials, elected in early elections, appointed by the Verkhovna Rada according to this law, cannot be prematurely terminated

References

  1. ^ Galeotti, Mark (2019). Armies of Russia’s War in Ukraine. Elite 228. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. p. 31. ISBN 9781472833440.
  2. ^ «Ukraine ceasefire agreement signed in Minsk». CCTV America. 30 November 2001. Retrieved 1 October 2014.
  3. ^ «Chairperson-in-Office welcomes Minsk agreement, assures President Poroshenko of OSCE support» (Press release). Bern: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 5 September 2014. Retrieved 1 October 2014.
  4. ^ «OSCE Chief Monitor in Ukraine urges all sides to allow monitors to carry out duties safely» (Press release). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 15 September 2014. Retrieved 15 September 2014.
  5. ^ a b c Ukraine rebels vow to take back cities Archived 23 October 2014 at the Wayback Machine, Sky News Australia (23 October 2014)
  6. ^ a b c d «Ukraine crisis: Leaders agree peace roadmap». BBC News. 12 February 2015. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  7. ^ a b «Almost entire ‘gray’ zone in Donbas liberated by Ukraine without Minsk deal breach – adviser». UNIAN. 27 December 2018. Retrieved 22 April 2019.
  8. ^ a b Roth, Andrew; Borger, Julian (21 February 2022). «Putin orders troops into eastern Ukraine on ‘peacekeeping duties’«. The Guardian. Retrieved 22 February 2022.
  9. ^ a b «Ukraine conflict: Biden sanctions Russia over ‘beginning of invasion’«. BBC News. 23 February 2022. Retrieved 23 February 2022.
  10. ^ a b Sarkar, Alisha Rahaman; Marcus, Josh; Giordano, Chiara (24 February 2022). «Dozens dead and airports bombarded after Putin invades Ukraine — live». The Independent. Archived from the original on 15 May 2022. Retrieved 24 February 2022.
  11. ^ «Press statement by the Trilateral Contact Group» (Press release). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 2 September 2014. Retrieved 9 September 2014.
  12. ^ a b «Minsk Protocol» (Press release) (in Russian). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 5 September 2014. Retrieved 9 September 2014.
  13. ^ Welle (www.dw.com), Deutsche. «Ukraine to ‘re-examine’ strategy for dealing with the rebels | DW | 3 November 2014». DW.COM. Retrieved 29 July 2020.
  14. ^ a b «Ukraine deal with pro-Russian rebels at Minsk talks». BBC News. 19 September 2014. Retrieved 19 September 2014.
  15. ^ «Ukrainian peace talks lead to buffer zone deal». CBC News. 19 September 2014. Retrieved 19 September 2014.
  16. ^ «Nato top general says truce ‘in name only’«. BBC News. 20 September 2014. Retrieved 20 September 2014.
  17. ^ «Memorandum of 19 September 2014 outlining the parameters for the implementation of commitments of the Minsk Protocol» (Press release) (in Russian). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 19 September 2014. Retrieved 23 September 2014.
  18. ^ Poroshenko vows Kyiv will recapture militants-controlled areas, Interfax-Ukraine (23 October 2014)
  19. ^ «Ukraine vote could push the country into chaos». BBC News. 24 October 2014. Retrieved 25 October 2014.
  20. ^ Donetsk People’s Republic campaign reveals shambolic tendencies, Financial Times (23 October 2014)
  21. ^ «So-called elections not in line with Minsk Protocol, says OSCE Chair, calling for enhanced efforts and dialogue to implement all commitments» (Press release). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 31 October 2014. Retrieved 1 November 2014.
  22. ^ a b c Too early to discuss broader monitoring of Ukraine-Russia border — Lavrov, Interfax-Ukraine (5 December 2014)
  23. ^ a b «Ukraine forces admit loss of Donetsk airport to rebels». The Guardian. 21 January 2015. Retrieved 23 January 2015.
  24. ^ «Ukraine suffers considerable losses – DPR Defense Ministry». Tass Russian News Agency. 23 January 2015. Retrieved 23 January 2015.
  25. ^ «Ukraine rebel Zakharchenko ‘rejects truce talks’«. BBC News. 23 January 2015. Retrieved 23 January 2015.
  26. ^ «War Is Exploding Anew in Ukraine; Rebels Vow More». The New York Times. 23 January 2015. Retrieved 24 January 2015.
  27. ^ a b «Statement by the Chairmanship on the Trilateral Contact Group consultations in Minsk on 31 January 2015» (Press release). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 1 February 2015. Retrieved 1 February 2015.
  28. ^ «EU Stands by Sanctions Against Russia After Ukraine Truce Sealed». Bloomberg News. 12 February 2015. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  29. ^ a b c «Ukraine crisis: ‘Last chance’ for peace says Hollande». BBC News. 7 February 2015. Retrieved 7 February 2015.
  30. ^ a b «Putin Rejects Attempts to Contain Russia After Peace Talks Fail». Bloomberg News. 7 February 2015. Retrieved 7 February 2015.
  31. ^ «Western Nations Split on Arming Kiev». The New York Times. 7 February 2015. Retrieved 7 February 2015.
  32. ^ «‘Glimmer of hope’ for Ukraine after deal at Minsk peace summit». Reuters. 12 February 2015. Retrieved 13 September 2020.
  33. ^ Hudson, Alexandra; Madeline Chambers (12 February 2015). «German foreign minister: Minsk deal not all we would have wished for». Yahoo News. Reuters. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  34. ^ «Ukraine ceasefire deal agreed at Belarus talks». The Guardian. 12 February 2015. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  35. ^ «Breakthrough in Minsk as leaders agree to ceasefire deal on Ukraine». Euronews. 12 February 2015. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  36. ^ «OSCE Chairperson-in-Office gives full backing to Minsk package» (Press release). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 12 February 2015. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  37. ^ Ostroukh, Andrey; Gregory L. White; Julian E. Barnes (12 February 2015). «Ukraine Peace Talks Yield Cease-Fire Deal». The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  38. ^ a b «Package of Measures for the Implementation of the Minsk Agreements» (Press release) (in Russian). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 12 February 2015. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  39. ^ a b «Minsk agreement on Ukraine crisis: text in full». The Daily Telegraph. 12 February 2015. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  40. ^ Tisdall, Simon (12 February 2015). «Ukraine peace deal looks fragile in the extreme». The Guardian. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  41. ^ Mannteufel, Ingo (12 February 2015). «Minsk II leaves many questions unanswered». Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  42. ^ MacFarquhar, Neil (12 February 2015). «Leaders in Ukraine Talks Announce Cease-Fire Agreement». The New York Times. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  43. ^ a b Traynor, Ian (13 February 2015). «Putin tried to delay Ukraine ceasefire deal, EU summit told». The Guardian. Brussels. Retrieved 13 February 2015.
  44. ^ Kramer, Andrew E. (15 February 2014). «Despite Truce, Shelling Continues in Parts of Ukraine». The New York Times. Retrieved 16 February 2015.
  45. ^ Kramer, Andrew E.; Michael R. Gordon (13 February 2015). «U.S. Faults Russia as Combat Spikes in East Ukraine». The New York Times. Retrieved 14 February 2015.
  46. ^ «Mińsk-2 będzie nieważny? Kreml: Ukraińcy złamią rozejm w Donbasie. Prawy Sektor: Zachowujemy prawo do walki» [Minsk-2 will be unimportant? Kremlin: Ukrainians will break the truce in Donbas. Right Sector: We will reserve the right to fight]. Gazeta Wyborcza (in Polish). 13 February 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  47. ^ Luhn, Alec (13 February 2015). «Minsk ceasefire in balance as fighting escalates in eastern Ukraine». The Guardian. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
  48. ^ Yatsyshyn, Yuriy (14 February 2015). «Dmytro Yarosh: ‘Right Sector’ to fight until complete liberation of Ukraine from Russian occupants». Euromaidan Press. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
  49. ^ Huijboom, Stefan (15 February 2015). «Quieter, but guns of war still not silent, on first day of cease-fire in Donetsk». Kyiv Post. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
  50. ^ «Except for Debaltseve, Ukraine’s officials say fighting subsides in shaky truce». The Kyiv Post. 15 February 2015. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
  51. ^ a b «Fears for Ukraine’s ceasefire as clashes with Russia-backed rebels intensify». The Guardian. 15 February 2015. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
  52. ^ «Fighting Rages in Eastern Ukraine as Cease-Fire Deadline Approaches». The Wall Street Journal. 13 February 2015. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
  53. ^ «Ukraine truce fades as sides refuse to withdraw big guns». Reuters. 17 February 2015. Retrieved 17 February 2015.
  54. ^ «Ukraine Truce Hangs by Thread as Fighting Rages Near Eastern City of Debaltseve». Time. 17 February 2015. Retrieved 17 February 2015.
  55. ^ «Ukraine crisis: Army and rebels stall heavy arms pullout». BBC News. 17 February 2015. Retrieved 17 February 2015.
  56. ^ «Battle rages for town where Ukraine rebels reject ceasefire». Reuters. 16 February 2015. Retrieved 16 February 2015.
  57. ^ «Ukrainian soldiers share horrors of Debaltseve battle after stinging defeat». The Guardian. 18 February 2015. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  58. ^ a b «Ukraine begins artillery withdrawal, recognising truce is holding». Reuters. 26 February 2015. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
  59. ^ «Ukraine Heavy Arms Withdrawal: Situation in country’s east stabilizes, says military spokesperson». Ukraine Today. 26 February 2015. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
  60. ^ a b «Ukraine parliament offers special status for rebel east, Russia criticizes». Reuters. Kiev. 17 March 2015. Retrieved 17 March 2015.
  61. ^ «Ukraine extends ‘special status’ for conflict-hit regions». Reuters. 12 December 2019. Retrieved 29 July 2020.
  62. ^ ДНР И ЛНР отказались признать не согласованные с ними изменения закона об особом статусе [DPR and LPR refuse to recognise undiscussed changes to law on special status]. Interfax News Agency (in Russian). 17 March 2015. Retrieved 18 March 2015.
  63. ^ Захарченко призвал взять под контроль все города-участники референдума о независимости ДНР [Zaharchenko says the DPR must take control of all cities that participated in the independence referendum]. Interfax News Agency (in Russian). 17 March 2015. Retrieved 18 March 2015.
  64. ^ «Donetsk, Luhansk republics say election proposals forwarded to Contact Group on Ukraine». Russian News Agency «TASS». 12 May 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  65. ^ «Over 100 Ukrainian troops, 50 civilians killed during ceasefire: DM». Xinhua News Agency. 8 June 2015. Archived from the original on 14 June 2015. Retrieved 22 July 2015.
  66. ^ ‘ДНР’ та ‘ЛНР’ передумали й визнали Крим російським [‘DPR’ and ‘LPR’ changed their minds and recognized Crimea as Russian]. BBC Ukrainian Service (in Ukrainian). 10 June 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  67. ^ «Pentagon: Despite Minsk II, More Than 400 Ukraine Troops Killed». Voice of America. 2 March 2016. Retrieved 29 March 2016.
  68. ^ «OSCE ‘sees Russian soldiers, weapons in Ukraine for two years’«. Kyiv Post. 26 March 2016. Retrieved 29 March 2016.
  69. ^ «Russia accepts no claims on Savchenko in context of Minsk accords — Foreign Ministry». TASS. 27 March 2016. Retrieved 29 March 2016.
  70. ^ «RESOLUTION ON ABDUCTED AND ILLEGALLY DETAINED UKRAINIAN CITIZENS IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION». oscepa.org. 9 July 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 July 2015. Retrieved 8 April 2016. p. 47
  71. ^ «Kuchma leaves Trilateral Contact Group on Ukraine». eng.belta.by. 28 July 2020. Retrieved 29 July 2020.
  72. ^ «Biden’s support of Minsk accords during Geneva summit seen as Russia’s success — expert». TASS. 17 June 2021.
  73. ^ «Political advisers to hold four-way talks on Ukraine in Paris». Thomson Reuters. 22 January 2022. Archived from the original on 24 January 2022.
  74. ^ «Scholz, Macron say diplomacy can fix Ukraine-Russia standoff». Deutsche Welle. 25 January 2022. Archived from the original on 25 January 2022.
  75. ^ «At Russia’s request, Kiev withdrew the law on Crimea and Donbas from parliament». News Fox24. 25 January 2022.
  76. ^ «Macron plans diplomatic phone call with Putin to calm Ukrainian crisis». The Irish Times. 26 January 2022.
  77. ^ «Poroshenko says local elections in Ukraine will be held on 25 Oct, date on which they will be held in Donbas is hard to predict». Kyiv Post. Interfax. 11 June 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  78. ^ a b c d «Local elections in DPR to take place on 18 October – Zakharchenko». Interfax-Ukraine. 2 July 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
    «DPR, LPR attempts to hold separate elections in Donbas on 18 Oct to have destructive consequences – Poroshenko». Interfax-Ukraine. 2 July 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  79. ^ ОБСЄ направить спостерігачів на вибори на Донбасі лише за згоди України [OSCE will send observers to the elections in Donbas only with the consent of Ukraine] (in Ukrainian). Ukrayinska Pravda. 3 July 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  80. ^ a b c «Ukraine crisis: Pro-Russian rebels ‘delay disputed elections’«. BBC News. 6 October 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
    «Hollande: Elections In Eastern Ukraine Likely To Be Delayed». Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 2 October 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
    Bershidsky, Leonid (5 October 2015). «Ukraine Is Being Told to Live With Putin». Bloomberg News. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  81. ^ Zinets, Natalia; Pavel Polityuk (6 October 2015). «West, Ukraine, hail rebel decision to postpone disputed elections». Reuters. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
    «Ukraine rebels to delay elections». Associated Press. 6 October 2015. Archived from the original on 7 October 2015 – via Washington Post.
  82. ^ «Steinmeier: Law on Donbas special status should enter into force on election day». Ukraine Today. 10 November 2015. Retrieved 10 November 2015.
  83. ^ Захарченко відклав ‘вибори’ [Zakharchenko put off the ‘election’] (in Ukrainian). Ukrayinska Pravda. 19 April 2016. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  84. ^ Захарченко переніс вибори в ‘ДНР’ на листопад [Zakharchenko postponed the elections in ‘DPR’ to November] (in Ukrainian). Ukrayinska Pravda. 23 July 2016. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
    Бойовики ‘ЛНР’ також вирішили перенести свої ‘вибори’ [‘DPR’ militants also decided to postpone their ‘elections’] (in Ukrainian). Ukrayinska Pravda. 24 July 2016. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  85. ^ a b Trach, Nataliya (2 October 2016). «Defying Minsk process, Russian-backed separatists hold illegal elections». Kyiv Post. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
    «Donbass militia leader announces autumn primaries in Donetsk]». TASS news agency. 23 May 2016. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  86. ^ «Separatists win vote in Ukraine rebel regions by big margins». The Washington Post. 12 November 2018. Archived from the original on 14 December 2018. Retrieved 17 November 2018.
  87. ^ «War in Europe: Responding to Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine». www.crisisgroup.org. 24 February 2022.
  88. ^ Lister, Tim (9 February 2022). «What is the Minsk agreement and is it a way out of Ukraine crisis?». Retrieved 15 November 2022.
  89. ^ «Conclusions». Chatham House – International Affairs Think Tank. 22 May 2020. Retrieved 3 March 2022.
  90. ^ Kofman, Michael; Migacheva, Katya; Nichiporuk, Brian; Radin, Andrew; Tkacheva, Olesya; Oberholtzer, Jenny (2017). Lessons from Russia’s Operations in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine (PDF) (Report). Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. pp. 45–46.
  91. ^ Galeotti, Mark (1 June 2021). «Are the Minsk II Peace Accords Worth Preserving?». The Moscow Times. Retrieved 21 June 2021.
  92. ^ «The Minsk Accords: Should Britain declare them dead?». Council on Geostrategy. 24 May 2021. Retrieved 21 June 2021.
  93. ^ Foy, Henry (20 June 2021). «Interview: ‘An overdose of freedom is lethal to a state,’ says former key Putin adviser». The Irish Times. Retrieved 21 June 2021.
  94. ^ «Lavrov: U.S. could significantly accelerate implementation of Minsk Agreements on Donbas if it wanted». Interfax News Agency. 19 October 2021.
  95. ^ «Sajdik: Russia is party to conflict in Donbas». Ukrinform. n.d. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  96. ^ «The future of Minsk agreements: pressing for implementation or withdrawing?». Ukraine Crisis Media Center. 26 February 2021. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  97. ^ «France says Russia refused to hold ministerial meeting on Ukraine». Reuters. 9 November 2021. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  98. ^ AFP (18 March 2021). «G7 Says It Will Not Recognize Russia’s ‘Occupation’ of Crimea». The Moscow Times. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  99. ^ «Article by Vladimir Putin ‘On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians’«. President of Russia. 12 July 2021. Retrieved 26 January 2022. the outcome of both Minsk‑1 and Minsk‑2 which give a real chance to peacefully restore the territorial integrity of Ukraine by coming to an agreement directly with the DPR and LPR with Russia, Germany and France as mediators, contradicts the entire logic of the anti-Russia project.
  100. ^ «Ukrainian leader calls for revamp of peace process to end Donbas war». Financial Times. 26 April 2021.
  101. ^ «Russia to wait for responsible leaders in Ukraine, says Medvedev». TASS. 11 October 2021.
  102. ^ «Russia Shouldn’t Negotiate With ‘Vassal’ Ukraine, Ex-President Medvedev Says». The Moscow Times. 11 October 2021. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  103. ^ Vladimir, Socor (13 October 2021). «Putin’s Brutal Letter to Ukraine under Medvedev’s Byline». Jamestown. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  104. ^ «Germany decries Russia’s publication of diplomatic notes on Ukraine». DW. 18 November 2021. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  105. ^ Irish, John (19 November 2021). «France, Germany say Russia’s publication of notes breaks diplomatic rules». Reuters. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  106. ^ «Moscow to thwart any provocations by Kiev in Donbass, Russian military chief warns». Tass. 9 December 2021.
  107. ^ «Ukraine security chief: Minsk peace deal may create chaos». Associated Press. 31 January 2022.
  108. ^ «Finland’s president says Minsk agreement should be looked at again». Reuters. 4 February 2022.
  109. ^ «Russian Parliament Votes To Give Sovereign Recognition To Donbas». Russia Briefing. Dezan Shira & Associates. 15 February 2022. Retrieved 22 February 2022.
  110. ^ «U.S. Blinken warns Russia against declaring Ukraine breakaway regions independent». Reuters. Thomson Reuters. 16 February 2022. Retrieved 22 February 2022.
  111. ^ «Russia aware of Minsk Agreements breach by recognising Donetsk, Luhansk». 16 February 2022.
  112. ^ «Putin says Ukraine’s Minsk peace process is finished, blames Kyiv». The National Post. Reuters. 22 February 2022. Retrieved 22 February 2022.
  113. ^ «Minsk agreements cease to exist — Putin». TASS. 22 February 2022. Retrieved 22 February 2022.
  114. ^ «Ukraine crisis: Vladimir Putin address fact-checked». BBC News. 22 February 2022. Archived from the original on 23 February 2022. Retrieved 24 February 2022.
  115. ^ Hinton, Alexander (24 February 2022). «Putin’s claims that Ukraine is committing genocide are baseless, but not unprecedented». The Conversation. Archived from the original on 26 February 2022. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  116. ^ «Disinformation About the Current Russia-Ukraine Conflict – Seven Myths Debunked». Directorate-General for European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations (Press release). 24 January 2022. Archived from the original on 18 February 2022. Retrieved 22 February 2022.
  117. ^ Tabarovsky, Izabella; Finkel, Evgeny (27 February 2022). «Statement on the War in Ukraine by Scholars of Genocide, Nazism and World War II». The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles. Retrieved 6 April 2022.
  118. ^ «Russia-Ukraine war latest: What we know on day 182 of the invasion». TheGuardian.com. 24 August 2022.
  119. ^ «Putin says loss of trust in West will make future Ukraine talks harder». Reuters. 9 December 2022. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
  120. ^ «Press Statement by the Co-Chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group». www.osce.org. Retrieved 29 July 2020.

External links

  • Map: Plan for stabilization of the situation in south-eastern Ukraine (Ru.).
  • Text of the agreements, including English translations, at the United Nations:
    1. Protocol on the results of consultations of the Trilateral Contact Group (Minsk Agreement)
    2. Memorandum on the Implementation of the Provisions of the Protocol on the Outcome of Consultations of the Trilateral Contact Group on Joint Steps Aimed at the Implementation of the Peace Plan (Implementation of the Minsk Agreement)
    3. Package of Measures for the Implementation of the Minsk Agreements
  • Scanned original Russian-language source documents, at the OSCE:
    1. Minsk protocol: Протокол по итогам консультаций Трехсторонней контактной группы относительно совместных шагов, направленных на имплементацию Мирного плана Президента Украины П. Порошенко и инициатив Президента России В. Путина
    2. Memorandum on the implementation: Меморандум об исполнении положений Протокола по итогам консультаций Трехсторонней контактной группы относительно шагов, направленных на имплементацию Мирного плана Президента Украины П. Порошенко и инициатив Президента России В. Путина
    3. Package of measures: Комплекс мер по выполнению Минских соглашений
Источник

A map of the buffer zone established by the Minsk Protocol follow-up memorandum

The Minsk agreements were a series of international agreements which sought to end the Donbas war fought between armed Russian separatist groups and Armed Forces of Ukraine, with Russian regular forces playing a central part.[1] The first, known as the Minsk Protocol, was drafted in 2014 by the Trilateral Contact Group on Ukraine, consisting of Ukraine, Russia, and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE),[2][3][4] with mediation by the leaders of France and Germany in the so-called Normandy Format. After extensive talks in Minsk, Belarus, the agreement was signed on 5 September 2014 by representatives of the Trilateral Contact Group and, without recognition of their status, by the then-leaders of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) and Luhansk People’s Republic (LPR). This agreement followed multiple previous attempts to stop the fighting in the region and aimed to implement an immediate ceasefire.

The agreement failed to stop fighting,[5] and was thus followed with a revised and updated agreement, Minsk II, which was signed on 12 February 2015.[6] This agreement consisted of a package of measures, including a ceasefire, withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line, release of prisoners of war, constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas and restoring control of the state border to the Ukrainian government. While fighting subsided following the agreement’s signing, it never ended completely, and the agreement’s provisions were never fully implemented.[7]

Amid rising tensions between Russia and Ukraine in early 2022, Russia officially recognised the DPR and LPR on 21 February 2022.[8] Following that decision, on 22 February 2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin declared that the Minsk agreements «no longer existed», and that Ukraine, not Russia, was to blame for their collapse.[9] Russia then invaded Ukraine on 24 February 2022.[10]

Minsk Protocol

Minsk Protocol

Protocol on the results of consultations of the Trilateral Contact Group with respect to the joint steps aimed at the implementation of the Peace Plan of the President of Ukraine, P. Poroshenko, and the initiatives of the President of Russia, V. Putin
Context War in Donbas
Signed 5 September 2014
Location Minsk, Belarus
Expiry 21 February 2022
Mediators
  • France François Hollande
  • Germany Angela Merkel
Original
signatories
  • Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Heidi Tagliavini
  • Ukraine Leonid Kuchma
  • Russia Mikhail Zurabov
  • Donetsk People's Republic Aleksandr Zakharchenko
  • Luhansk People's Republic Igor Plotnitskiy
Language Russian

The Minsk Protocol was drawn up by the Trilateral Contact Group on Ukraine, which consisted of representatives from Ukraine, Russia, and the OSCE.[11] The group was established in June 2014 as a way to facilitate dialogue and resolution of the strife across eastern and southern Ukraine. Meetings of the group, along with informal representatives of the breakaway Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics, took place on 31 July, 26 August, 1 September, and 5 September 2014. The details of the agreement, signed on 5 September 2014, largely resembled Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko’s 20 June «fifteen-point peace plan».

Text of the protocol

The text of the protocol consists of twelve points:[12]

  1. To ensure an immediate bilateral ceasefire.
  2. To ensure the monitoring and verification of the ceasefire by the OSCE.
  3. Decentralisation of power, including through the adoption of the Ukrainian law «On temporary Order of Local Self-Governance in Particular Districts of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts».
  4. To ensure the permanent monitoring of the Ukrainian-Russian border and verification by the OSCE with the creation of security zones in the border regions of Ukraine and the Russian Federation.
  5. Immediate release of all hostages and illegally detained persons.
  6. A law preventing the prosecution and punishment of people in connection with the events that have taken place in some areas of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts.
  7. To continue the inclusive national dialogue.
  8. To take measures to improve the humanitarian situation in Donbas.
  9. To ensure early local elections in accordance with the Ukrainian law «On temporary Order of Local Self-Governance in Particular Districts of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts».
  10. To withdraw illegal armed groups and military equipment as well as fighters and mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine.
  11. To adopt a programme of economic recovery and reconstruction for the Donbas region.
  12. To provide personal security for participants in the consultations.

Signatories

The following representatives signed the document:[12]

  • Swiss diplomat and OSCE representative Heidi Tagliavini
  • Former president of Ukraine (July 1994 to January 2005) and Ukrainian representative Leonid Kuchma
  • Russian Ambassador to Ukraine and Russian representative Mikhail Zurabov
  • Rebel heads Alexander Zakharchenko and Igor Plotnitsky[13]

Follow-up memorandum

Wikisource has original text related to this article:

In the two weeks after the Minsk Protocol was signed, there were frequent violations of the ceasefire by both parties to the conflict.[14][15] Talks continued in Minsk, and a follow-up to the Minsk Protocol was agreed to on 19 September 2014. This memorandum clarified the implementation of the Protocol. Amongst some of the peacemaking measures agreed to were:[14][16][17]

  • To ban flights by combat aircraft over the security zone
  • To withdraw all foreign mercenaries from the conflict zone
  • To ban offensive operations
  • To pull heavy weaponry 15 kilometres (9.3 mi) back on each side of the line of contact, creating a 30-kilometre (19 mi) buffer zone
  • To task the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine with monitoring implementation of Minsk Protocol

Efficacy

After the follow-up memorandum, the Second Battle of Donetsk Airport broke out, and both parties continued to accuse each other of ceasefire violations.[5] In late October, DPR prime minister and Minsk Protocol signatory Alexander Zakharchenko said that his forces would retake the territory they had lost to Ukrainian forces during a July 2014 offensive, and that DPR forces would be willing to wage «heavy battles» to do so.[5][18] Subsequently, Zakharchenko said that he had been misquoted, and that he had meant to say that these areas would be taken through «peaceful means».[19]

While campaigning in the lead-up to the 2 November elections held by the DPR and LPR in violation of the Protocol, Zakharchenko said «These are historical times. We are creating a new country! It’s an insane goal».[20] OSCE chairman Didier Burkhalter confirmed that the elections ran «counter to the letter and spirit of the Minsk Protocol», and said that they would «further complicate its implementation».[21]

Speaking on 5 December, Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov said that the 2 November DPR and LPR elections were «exactly within the range in which they had been negotiated in Minsk», and that the Ukrainian parliament was supposed to pass an amnesty bill for DPR and LPR leaders after the Ukrainian parliamentary election in late October.[22] According to Lavrov, closer monitoring of the Russo-Ukrainian border, as specified by the Minsk Protocol, could only take place after such an amnesty law was approved.[22] He noted that he thought that a Ukrainian presidential decree banning prosecution of Donbas separatist combatants was issued on 16 September, but said that «a bill has now been filed proposing to overturn» the decree.[22]

Collapse

By January 2015, the Minsk Protocol ceasefire had completely collapsed.[23] Following the separatist victory at Donetsk International Airport in defiance of the Protocol, DPR spokesman Eduard Basurin said that «the Minsk Memorandum will not be considered in the form it was adopted».[24] Later in the day, DPR leader Alexander Zakharchenko said that the DPR «will not make any attempts at ceasefire talks any more», and that his forces were going to «attack right up to the borders of Donetsk region».[25] The New York Times said that the ceasefire had «all but vanished».[26]

Amidst increasing violence in the combat zone, another round of Minsk talks was scheduled for 31 January.[27] Members of the Trilateral Contact Group travelled to Minsk to meet representatives of the DPR and LPR. The DPR and LPR signatories of the Protocol did not attend, and those representatives that did attend were not able to discuss the implementation of the Protocol or memorandum. These representatives asked for the revision of the Protocol and the memorandum. The meeting was adjourned with no result.[27]

Minsk II, February 2015

The leaders of Belarus, Russia, Germany, France, and Ukraine at the 11–12 February 2015 summit in Minsk, Belarus

Successive attempts to resolve the ongoing war in the Donbas region of Ukraine had seen no result by the start of February 2015.[28] While the Minsk Protocol of 5 September 2014 did significantly reduce fighting in the conflict zone for many months, minor skirmishes continued. At the start of January 2015, the separatist forces of the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) and Luhansk People’s Republic (LPR) began a new offensive on Ukrainian-controlled areas, resulting in the complete collapse of the Minsk Protocol ceasefire.[23]

After heavy fighting, DPR forces captured the symbolically important Donetsk International Airport on 21 January, the last part of the city of Donetsk that had been under Ukrainian control. Following this victory, separatist forces pressed their offensive on the important railway and road junction of Debaltseve in late January. This renewed heavy fighting caused significant concern in the international community. French president François Hollande and German chancellor Angela Merkel put forth a new peace plan on 7 February.[29][30]

The Franco-German plan, drawn up after talks with Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko and Russian president Vladimir Putin, was seen as a revival of the Minsk Protocol. President Hollande said that the plan was the «last chance» for resolution of the conflict.[29][30] The plan was put forth in response to American proposals to send armaments to the Ukrainian government, something that Chancellor Merkel said would only result in a worsening of the crisis.[29][31]

A summit to discuss the implementation of the Franco-German diplomatic plan was scheduled for 11 February at the Independence Palace in Minsk, the capital of Belarus. It was attended by Russian president Vladimir Putin, Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko, German chancellor Angela Merkel, French president François Hollande, DPR leader Alexander Zakharchenko, and LPR leader Igor Plotnitsky. Negotiations went on overnight for sixteen hours, and were said to have been «very difficult» by the German foreign minister.[32][33]

Following the talks, it was announced on 12 February 2015 that the parties to the conflict had agreed to a new package of peacemaking measures, the Package of Measures for the Implementation of the Minsk Agreements, which is commonly called Minsk II.[6][34][35][36] Some of the measures agreed to were an OSCE-observed unconditional ceasefire from 15 February, withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line, release of prisoners of war, and constitutional reform in Ukraine.[37]

Text of the agreement

The full text of the agreement is as follows:[38][39]

  1. Immediate and full ceasefire in particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine and its strict fulfilment as of 00:00 midnight EET on 15 February 2015.
  2. Pull-out of all heavy weapons by both sides to equal distance with the aim of creation of a security zone on minimum 50 kilometres (31 mi) apart for artillery of 100mm calibre or more, and a security zone of 70 kilometres (43 mi) for multiple rocket launchers (MRLS) and 140 kilometres (87 mi) for MLRS Tornado-S, Uragan, Smerch, and Tochka U tactical missile systems:
    • for Ukrainian troops, from actual line of contact;
    • for armed formations of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine, from the contact line in accordance with the Minsk Memorandum as of 19 September 2014The pullout of the above-mentioned heavy weapons must start no later than the second day after the start of the ceasefire and finish within 14 days.This process will be assisted by OSCE with the support of the Trilateral Contact Group.
  3. Effective monitoring and verification of ceasefire regime and pullout of heavy weapons by OSCE will be provided from the first day of pullout, using all necessary technical means such as satellites, drones, radio-location systems etc.
  4. On the first day after the pullout a dialogue is to start on modalities of conducting local elections in accordance with the Ukrainian legislation and the Law of Ukraine «On temporary Order of Local Self-Governance in Particular Districts of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts,» and also about the future of these districts based on the above-mentioned law.Without delays, but no later than 30 days from the date of signing of this document, a resolution has to be approved by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, indicating the territory which falls under the special regime in accordance with the law «On temporary Order of Local Self-Governance in Particular Districts of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts,» based in the line set up by the Minsk Memorandum as of 19 September 2014.
  5. Provide pardon and amnesty by way of enacting a law that forbids persecution and punishment of persons in relation to events that took place in particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine.
  6. Provide release and exchange of all hostages and illegally held persons, based on the principle of «all for all». This process has to end – at the latest – on the fifth day after the pullout (of weapons).
  7. Provide safe access, delivery, storage and distribution of humanitarian aid to the needy, based on an international mechanism.
  8. Define the modalities of a full restoration of social and economic connections, including social transfers, such as payments of pensions and other payments (income and revenue, timely payment of communal bills, restoration of tax payments within the framework of Ukrainian legal field).With this aim, Ukraine will restore management over the segment of its banking system in the districts affected by the conflict, and possibly, an international mechanism will be established to ease such transactions.
  9. Restore control of the state border to the Ukrainian government in the whole conflict zone, which has to start on the first day after the local election and end after the full political regulation (local elections in particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts based on the law of Ukraine and Constitutional reform) by the end of 2015, on the condition of fulfilment of Point 11 – in consultations and in agreement with representatives of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts within the framework of the Trilateral Contact Group.
  10. Pullout of all foreign armed formations, military equipment, and also mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under OSCE supervision. Disarmament of all illegal groups.
  11. Constitutional reform in Ukraine, with a new constitution to come into effect by the end of 2015, the key element of which is decentralisation (taking into account peculiarities of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, agreed with representatives of these districts), and also approval of permanent legislation on the special status of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts in accordance with the measures spelt out in the attached footnote,[note 1] by the end of 2015.
  12. Based on the Law of Ukraine «On temporary Order of Local Self-Governance in Particular Districts of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts», questions related to local elections will be discussed and agreed upon with representatives of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts in the framework of the Trilateral Contact Group. Elections will be held in accordance with relevant OSCE standards and monitored by OSCE/ODIHR.
  13. Intensify the work of the Trilateral Contact Group including through the establishment of working groups on the implementation of relevant aspects of the Minsk agreements. They will reflect the composition of the Trilateral Contact Group.

Signatories

The document was signed by:[38]

  • Separatist’s leaders Alexander Zakharchenko and Igor Plotnitsky
  • Swiss diplomat and OSCE representative Heidi Tagliavini
  • Former president of Ukraine and Ukrainian representative Leonid Kuchma
  • Russian Ambassador to Ukraine and Russian representative Mikhail Zurabov

Reactions

The new package, commonly referred to as «Minsk II», was criticised for being «highly complicated» and «extremely fragile», and for being very similar to the failed Minsk Protocol.[6][40][41] The New York Times reported that the plan had «included some tripwires», such as not demarcating control over the city of Debaltseve, which was the site of the most fierce fighting at the time of the plan’s drafting.[6][42] Following the Minsk talks, Chancellor Merkel, President Hollande, and President Poroshenko attended a European Union (EU) summit in Brussels.[43]

At the summit, the Minsk participants briefed EU leaders about the talks. During the briefing, they said that President Putin had tried to delay the implementation of a ceasefire by ten days, so as to force Ukrainian troops in Debaltseve to surrender their positions. For his part, President Putin said that the Debaltseve defenders were encircled, and that the separatists expected them «to lay down their arms and cease resistance».[43]

Kommersant reporter Andrey Kolesnikov wrote that implementation of the ceasefire in Debaltseve hinged upon whether or not Ukrainian forces were truly encircled, «Above all, does it exist or not? Vladimir Putin insisted that it [the encirclement] exists and that if a cease-fire agreement is reached, it will be odd if it isn’t violated: Those in the kettle will certainly try to get out of there; those who have boiled that kettle will try to collect the foam».[44]

US State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said on 13 February that the Russian Armed Forces had actively deployed around Debaltseve to assist the separatists in forcing out Ukrainian troops prior to the start of the ceasefire, the 15 February. Russia denied this, and Russian government spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that Russia could not assist in the implementation of Minsk II because it was «not a participant» in the conflict.[45]

Right Sector leader Dmytro Yarosh said that he reserved the right to continue fighting, and that Minsk II was unconstitutional. He said that his Ukrainian Volunteer Corps would continue fighting «until complete liberation of Ukrainian lands from Russian occupants», and promised «death to Russian terrorist-occupiers».[46][47][48] DPR leader Alexander Zakharchenko said that the ceasefire did not apply to Debaltseve, and that fighting would continue there.[49]

Efficacy

Though the fighting generally subsided after the ceasefire came into effect at 0:00 EET on 15 February, skirmishes and shelling continued in several parts of the conflict zone.[50] Shelling and fighting at Debaltseve continued, as DPR leader Alexander Zakharchenko said that the ceasefire did not apply to that area.[51] In the south of Donetsk Oblast, fighting between DPR forces and members of the Azov Battalion continued in villages near Mariupol.[51][52] By 16 February, Minsk II seemed on the verge of collapse.[53][54] Separatists continued a heavy assault on Debaltseve. Both sides said that they would not withdraw heavy weaponry as specified by the agreement whilst fighting in Debaltseve was ongoing.[55] Reuters described the ceasefire as «stillborn» in Debaltseve.[56] Ukrainian forces were forced to retreat from Debaltseve on 18 February, leaving separatist forces in control of the city.[57]

In the week after the fall of Debaltseve to pro-Russian forces, fighting in the conflict zone abated.[58] DPR and LPR forces began to withdraw artillery from the front lines as specified by Minsk II on 24 February, and Ukraine did so on 26 February. Ukraine reported that it had suffered no casualties during 24–26 February, something that had not occurred since early January 2015.[58][59]

The parliament of Ukraine approved a law on «special status» for Donbas on 17 March, as specified by Minsk II.[60] Later, in 2019, Ukraine’s parliament voted to extend regulations giving limited self-rule to separatist-controlled eastern regions, a prerequisite for a deal to settle the five-year conflict there.[61] The law was immediately criticised by Ukrainian politicians, separatist leaders, and the Russian government. Radical Party leader Oleh Lyashko said that the law was «a vote for de facto recognition of the Russian occupation in Donbas». Vice-parliamentary speaker Andriy Parubiy said that law was «not for Putin or the occupiers», but to show Europe that Ukraine was willing to adhere to Minsk II. Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov said that the law was a «sharp departure from the Minsk agreements» because it demanded local elections under Ukrainian jurisdiction.[60]

Representatives of the LPR and DPR said that the law was a «one-sided» modification of Minsk II, and that the agreement had been rendered void by this modification.[62] DPR leader Alexander Zakharchenko said that any change to Minsk II that had not been mutually agreed upon was «legally void», and that «nothing that had been agreed upon in Minsk has been carried out». He added that the DPR «must occupy all of the cities in which the referendum took place, and then politically cooperate [with Ukraine] as equal partners».[63] Despite this, representatives of the DPR and LPR continued to forward peace proposals to the Trilateral Contact Group on Ukraine.[64]

Ukrainian defence minister Stepan Poltorak said on 8 June 2015 that over 100 soldiers and at least 50 civilians had been killed since Minsk II came into effect. According to him, pro-Russian forces had violated the truce more than 4,000 times.[65] Contrary to the agreement, DPR representative Denis Pushilin and LPR representative Vladislav Deinego said on 10 June 2015 that their republics «would like to join the Russian Federation». In addition, they said that they consider Crimea, which was annexed by Russia in March 2014, to be part of Russia.[66]

American Defense Department official Michael Carpenter said on 2 March 2016 that at least 430 Ukrainian soldiers had died since the signing of Minsk II, that Russia maintained «command-and-control links» over the DPR and LPR, and that Russia was «pouring heavy weapons» into the Donbas.[67] Deputy head of the OSCE mission in Ukraine Alexander Hug said on 25 March 2016 that the OSCE had observed «armed people with Russian insignia» fighting in Donbas from the beginning of the conflict, that they had talked to prisoners who said they were Russian soldiers, and that they had seen «tire tracks, not the vehicles themselves, but the tracks of vehicles crossing the [Russo-Ukrainian] border».[68]

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said on 27 March 2016 that Russia was «not a party to the Minsk agreements», and that the agreements were «devoted to two conflicting sides».[69] The Parliamentary Assembly of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe however claims that the Minsk Protocol also includes the liberation of those hostages who have been abducted from the Ukrainian territory and are illegally detained in Russia, e.g. Nadiya Savchenko and Oleg Sentsov.[70]

On 27 December 2018, Ukrainian news agency UNIAN reported that not a single provision of the Minsk deal had been fully implemented.[7]

In July 2020, Office of The President of Ukraine announced Leonid Kuchma will no longer take part in the work of the Trilateral Contact Group (TCG) on resolving the situation in Ukraine’s east. Leonid Kuchma met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on 28 July.[71]

In June 2021, U.S. President Joe Biden and Russian President Vladimir Putin «agreed to pursue diplomacy related to the Minsk agreement.»[72]

A Normandy Format meeting was planned between Russia, Ukraine, Germany and France in Paris on 26 January 2022.[73][74] Ukraine fulfilled Russia’s condition for a meeting in Paris and decided to withdraw from Parliament the controversial draft law on the reintegration of the Crimea and Donbas region, because the law was contrary to the Minsk II.[75][76]

Elections in the DPR and LPR

While the 2015 Ukrainian local elections had been scheduled for 25 October, DPR leader Alexander Zakharchenko issued a decree on 2 July that ordered local DPR elections to be held on 18 October.[77] He said that this action was «in accordance with the Minsk agreements».[78] According to Zakharchenko, this move meant that the DPR had «independently started to implement the Minsk agreements».[78] Zakharchenko said that the elections would «take place ‘on the basis of Ukraine’s law on temporary self-rule status of individual districts of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions’, in so far as they are not at variance with the constitution and laws of the DPR».[78]

On the same day, President Petro Poroshenko responded that if DPR elections went forward in this unilateral manner, it would be «extremely irresponsible and will have devastating consequences for the process of deescalation of tension in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions».[78] In addition, the OSCE said that it would only send observers to elections in the conflict zone if Ukraine invited it to do so.[79] As specified in Minsk II, local elections in DPR and LPR-held territories must be observed by the OSCE to be deemed legitimate.[39] LPR leader Igor Plotnitsky followed the DPR by scheduling elections in the territory that he controlled for 1 November 2015.[citation needed]

Amidst a great reduction in violence, following an agreement to restart the implementation of Minsk II that was agreed to on 1 September, the Normandy four held a meeting on 2 October. At the meeting, it was agreed that elections in the conflict zone would be held in accordance with Minsk II.[80] In order to do this, French President François Hollande said that the elections would need to be postponed until 2016, as three months were required to prepare for them.[80] Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed to use his influence to prevent the DPR and LPR from holding early elections.[80]

Accordingly, the DPR and LPR announced on 6 October that their planned elections had been postponed until 21 February 2016.[81] Local elections in the rest of Ukraine went ahead on 25 October 2015. Following the postponement, German foreign minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said that if OSCE observers verified that the planned elections to be held in the separatist areas were in accordance with Ukrainian law and Minsk II, the «law on special status» for these areas would come into immediate effect.[82]

On 18 April 2016 the planned (organised by the DPR and LPR) local elections were postponed from 20 April to 24 July 2016.[83] On 22 July 2016 these DPR and LPR elections were again postponed to 6 November 2016.[84] On 2 October 2016 the DPR and LPR held «primaries» in which voters nominated candidates for the 6 November 2016 elections.[85] Ukraine denounced these «primaries» as illegal.[85] On 4 November 2016 both DPR and LPR postponed their local elections «until further notice»; head of the DPR Zakharchenko added that «In 2017, we will hold elections under the Minsk agreements, or we will hold them independently.»[citation needed]

Elections for the People’s Council of the Donetsk People’s Republic and the People’s Council of the Luhansk People’s Republic were organised and held by the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics on 11 November 2018.[86]

Evaluation and abandonment

Following the fall of Debaltseve in February 2015, about one-third of the Donbas region remained in separatist control.[87] A few days before the 2022 Russian invasion, French president Emmanuel Macron and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken opined that the Minsk agreements were «the way forward» to end the conflict in Donbas. Blinken added that it was an incomplete step as there were other outstanding issues.[88] The aim of the Russian intervention in Donbas was to establish pro-Russian governments that, upon reincorporation into Ukraine, would facilitate Russian inference in Ukrainian politics.[89] The agreements were thus highly favourable to the Russian side, as their implementation would accomplish these goals.[90]

In May and June 2021, Mark Galeotti proposed «it is time to recognize that the Minsk process has run its course — and may if anything be blocking any more meaningful dialogue»,[91] and suggested that as an external party, the United Kingdom might move diplomacy forward.[92] In a June 2021 interview, Vladislav Surkov, Putin’s aide for Ukraine policy from 2013 to 2020, who was removed from his role in February 2020, said that Ukraine «can be reformed as a confederation, with a lot of freedom for the regions to decide things by themselves». He said the country would be severed by the «geopolitical gravity» between Russia and the West, describing the Minsk agreements as an act that «legitimized the first division of Ukraine» in a «reconquest», «the first open geopolitical counter-attack by Russia [against the West]».[93] In October 2021, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said that «if the Americans are genuinely prepared to support the implementation of the Minsk Agreements, this issue can be settled very quickly.»[94]

A dispute emerged over the role of the Russian Federation, with the parties understanding Minsk as an agreement between Ukraine and Russia,[95][96][97][98] but Russian officials claiming the role of mediator, insisted that Ukraine negotiate directly with representatives of the self-proclaimed separatist republics in parts of Donetsk and Luhansk.[99] Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said he has «no intention of talking to terrorists».[100] The Russian side refused high-level talks, and the Kremlin endorsed an October 2021 Kommersant article by former Russian president Dmitri Medvedev entitled «Why It Is Senseless to Deal with the Current Ukrainian Leadership»,[101][102] which some have criticized.[103]

In November 2021, the Russian foreign ministry breached diplomatic protocol by releasing confidential correspondence with negotiators Germany and France.[104][105]

In December 2021, Chief of General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces Valery Gerasimov said that «Kyiv is not fulfilling the Minsk Agreements. The Ukrainian armed forces are touting that they have started to employ US-supplied Javelin anti-tank missile systems in Donbas and are also using Turkish reconnaissance/strike drones. As a result, the already tense situation in the east of that country is further deteriorating.»[106]

In January 2022, Oleksiy Danilov, the secretary of Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council, said that «The fulfillment of the Minsk agreement means the country’s destruction. When they were signed under the Russian gun barrel — and the German and the French watched — it was already clear for all rational people that it’s impossible to implement those documents.»[107]

In February 2022, Finnish President Sauli Niinistö said «the most possible solution (to the current situation) could be the Minsk agreement to be fulfilled or that there would be significant progress in its implementation.»[108]

On 15 February 2022, the Russian Duma voted to appeal to President Putin to recognise the self-proclaimed LPR and DPR.[109] The next day, a Russian government spokesman acknowledged that officially recognising the Donbas republics would not be in keeping with the Minsk agreements.[110] However, he also told journalists that Putin’s priority in regulating the situation in Donbas is the implementation of mechanisms adopted under those agreements.[111] Russia went on to officially recognise the self-proclaimed Luhansk and Donetsk people’s republics on 21 February 2022.[8] Following that decision, on 22 February 2022, President Putin said that the Minsk agreements «no longer existed», and that Ukraine, not Russia, was to blame for their collapse, accusing Ukraine of genocide in Donbas in his comments[112][113][9] – a statement largely seen as baseless and factually wrong by the wider world, academics studying genocide, and the United Nations.[114][115][116][117] Russia then invaded Ukraine on 24 February 2022.[10]

On 24 August 2022, after a meeting of the Crimea Platform, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy stated that current front lines in the war would not be frozen. «At the point where we are, we are not ready for a ceasefire. We explained that there will be no Minsk-3, Minsk-5, or Minsk-7. We will not play these games, we have lost part of our territories this way … it is a trap».[118]

Angela Merkel said in 2022 that the agreement had been «an attempt to give Ukraine time» and that Ukraine used it to strengthen its armed forces.[119]

See also

  • Normandy Format
  • OSCE Minsk Group, for resolving the Armenia–Azerbaijan conflict[120]
  • 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis
  • Outline of the Russo-Ukrainian War

Notes

  1. ^ The following measures are to be included in the Ukrainian law «On temporary Order of Local Self-Governance in Particular Districts of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts»:
    • Freedom from punishment, harassment, and discrimination of persons connected with the events that took place in particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts
    • Right of language self-determination
    • Participation of local self-government in the appointment of the heads of prosecutors’ offices and courts in the particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts
    • The possibility for central executive bodies to conclude agreements with relevant local authorities on economic, social, and cultural development of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts
    • The state will provide support for the socio-economic development of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts
    • Assistance from central executive bodies for cross-border cooperation by particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts with regions of the Russian Federation
    • The freedom to create people’s militia units by decision of local councils to maintain public order in particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts
    • The powers of local council deputies and officials, elected in early elections, appointed by the Verkhovna Rada according to this law, cannot be prematurely terminated

References

  1. ^ Galeotti, Mark (2019). Armies of Russia’s War in Ukraine. Elite 228. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. p. 31. ISBN 9781472833440.
  2. ^ «Ukraine ceasefire agreement signed in Minsk». CCTV America. 30 November 2001. Retrieved 1 October 2014.
  3. ^ «Chairperson-in-Office welcomes Minsk agreement, assures President Poroshenko of OSCE support» (Press release). Bern: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 5 September 2014. Retrieved 1 October 2014.
  4. ^ «OSCE Chief Monitor in Ukraine urges all sides to allow monitors to carry out duties safely» (Press release). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 15 September 2014. Retrieved 15 September 2014.
  5. ^ a b c Ukraine rebels vow to take back cities Archived 23 October 2014 at the Wayback Machine, Sky News Australia (23 October 2014)
  6. ^ a b c d «Ukraine crisis: Leaders agree peace roadmap». BBC News. 12 February 2015. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  7. ^ a b «Almost entire ‘gray’ zone in Donbas liberated by Ukraine without Minsk deal breach – adviser». UNIAN. 27 December 2018. Retrieved 22 April 2019.
  8. ^ a b Roth, Andrew; Borger, Julian (21 February 2022). «Putin orders troops into eastern Ukraine on ‘peacekeeping duties’«. The Guardian. Retrieved 22 February 2022.
  9. ^ a b «Ukraine conflict: Biden sanctions Russia over ‘beginning of invasion’«. BBC News. 23 February 2022. Retrieved 23 February 2022.
  10. ^ a b Sarkar, Alisha Rahaman; Marcus, Josh; Giordano, Chiara (24 February 2022). «Dozens dead and airports bombarded after Putin invades Ukraine — live». The Independent. Archived from the original on 15 May 2022. Retrieved 24 February 2022.
  11. ^ «Press statement by the Trilateral Contact Group» (Press release). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 2 September 2014. Retrieved 9 September 2014.
  12. ^ a b «Minsk Protocol» (Press release) (in Russian). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 5 September 2014. Retrieved 9 September 2014.
  13. ^ Welle (www.dw.com), Deutsche. «Ukraine to ‘re-examine’ strategy for dealing with the rebels | DW | 3 November 2014». DW.COM. Retrieved 29 July 2020.
  14. ^ a b «Ukraine deal with pro-Russian rebels at Minsk talks». BBC News. 19 September 2014. Retrieved 19 September 2014.
  15. ^ «Ukrainian peace talks lead to buffer zone deal». CBC News. 19 September 2014. Retrieved 19 September 2014.
  16. ^ «Nato top general says truce ‘in name only’«. BBC News. 20 September 2014. Retrieved 20 September 2014.
  17. ^ «Memorandum of 19 September 2014 outlining the parameters for the implementation of commitments of the Minsk Protocol» (Press release) (in Russian). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 19 September 2014. Retrieved 23 September 2014.
  18. ^ Poroshenko vows Kyiv will recapture militants-controlled areas, Interfax-Ukraine (23 October 2014)
  19. ^ «Ukraine vote could push the country into chaos». BBC News. 24 October 2014. Retrieved 25 October 2014.
  20. ^ Donetsk People’s Republic campaign reveals shambolic tendencies, Financial Times (23 October 2014)
  21. ^ «So-called elections not in line with Minsk Protocol, says OSCE Chair, calling for enhanced efforts and dialogue to implement all commitments» (Press release). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 31 October 2014. Retrieved 1 November 2014.
  22. ^ a b c Too early to discuss broader monitoring of Ukraine-Russia border — Lavrov, Interfax-Ukraine (5 December 2014)
  23. ^ a b «Ukraine forces admit loss of Donetsk airport to rebels». The Guardian. 21 January 2015. Retrieved 23 January 2015.
  24. ^ «Ukraine suffers considerable losses – DPR Defense Ministry». Tass Russian News Agency. 23 January 2015. Retrieved 23 January 2015.
  25. ^ «Ukraine rebel Zakharchenko ‘rejects truce talks’«. BBC News. 23 January 2015. Retrieved 23 January 2015.
  26. ^ «War Is Exploding Anew in Ukraine; Rebels Vow More». The New York Times. 23 January 2015. Retrieved 24 January 2015.
  27. ^ a b «Statement by the Chairmanship on the Trilateral Contact Group consultations in Minsk on 31 January 2015» (Press release). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 1 February 2015. Retrieved 1 February 2015.
  28. ^ «EU Stands by Sanctions Against Russia After Ukraine Truce Sealed». Bloomberg News. 12 February 2015. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  29. ^ a b c «Ukraine crisis: ‘Last chance’ for peace says Hollande». BBC News. 7 February 2015. Retrieved 7 February 2015.
  30. ^ a b «Putin Rejects Attempts to Contain Russia After Peace Talks Fail». Bloomberg News. 7 February 2015. Retrieved 7 February 2015.
  31. ^ «Western Nations Split on Arming Kiev». The New York Times. 7 February 2015. Retrieved 7 February 2015.
  32. ^ «‘Glimmer of hope’ for Ukraine after deal at Minsk peace summit». Reuters. 12 February 2015. Retrieved 13 September 2020.
  33. ^ Hudson, Alexandra; Madeline Chambers (12 February 2015). «German foreign minister: Minsk deal not all we would have wished for». Yahoo News. Reuters. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  34. ^ «Ukraine ceasefire deal agreed at Belarus talks». The Guardian. 12 February 2015. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  35. ^ «Breakthrough in Minsk as leaders agree to ceasefire deal on Ukraine». Euronews. 12 February 2015. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  36. ^ «OSCE Chairperson-in-Office gives full backing to Minsk package» (Press release). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 12 February 2015. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  37. ^ Ostroukh, Andrey; Gregory L. White; Julian E. Barnes (12 February 2015). «Ukraine Peace Talks Yield Cease-Fire Deal». The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  38. ^ a b «Package of Measures for the Implementation of the Minsk Agreements» (Press release) (in Russian). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 12 February 2015. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  39. ^ a b «Minsk agreement on Ukraine crisis: text in full». The Daily Telegraph. 12 February 2015. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  40. ^ Tisdall, Simon (12 February 2015). «Ukraine peace deal looks fragile in the extreme». The Guardian. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  41. ^ Mannteufel, Ingo (12 February 2015). «Minsk II leaves many questions unanswered». Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  42. ^ MacFarquhar, Neil (12 February 2015). «Leaders in Ukraine Talks Announce Cease-Fire Agreement». The New York Times. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  43. ^ a b Traynor, Ian (13 February 2015). «Putin tried to delay Ukraine ceasefire deal, EU summit told». The Guardian. Brussels. Retrieved 13 February 2015.
  44. ^ Kramer, Andrew E. (15 February 2014). «Despite Truce, Shelling Continues in Parts of Ukraine». The New York Times. Retrieved 16 February 2015.
  45. ^ Kramer, Andrew E.; Michael R. Gordon (13 February 2015). «U.S. Faults Russia as Combat Spikes in East Ukraine». The New York Times. Retrieved 14 February 2015.
  46. ^ «Mińsk-2 będzie nieważny? Kreml: Ukraińcy złamią rozejm w Donbasie. Prawy Sektor: Zachowujemy prawo do walki» [Minsk-2 will be unimportant? Kremlin: Ukrainians will break the truce in Donbas. Right Sector: We will reserve the right to fight]. Gazeta Wyborcza (in Polish). 13 February 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  47. ^ Luhn, Alec (13 February 2015). «Minsk ceasefire in balance as fighting escalates in eastern Ukraine». The Guardian. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
  48. ^ Yatsyshyn, Yuriy (14 February 2015). «Dmytro Yarosh: ‘Right Sector’ to fight until complete liberation of Ukraine from Russian occupants». Euromaidan Press. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
  49. ^ Huijboom, Stefan (15 February 2015). «Quieter, but guns of war still not silent, on first day of cease-fire in Donetsk». Kyiv Post. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
  50. ^ «Except for Debaltseve, Ukraine’s officials say fighting subsides in shaky truce». The Kyiv Post. 15 February 2015. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
  51. ^ a b «Fears for Ukraine’s ceasefire as clashes with Russia-backed rebels intensify». The Guardian. 15 February 2015. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
  52. ^ «Fighting Rages in Eastern Ukraine as Cease-Fire Deadline Approaches». The Wall Street Journal. 13 February 2015. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
  53. ^ «Ukraine truce fades as sides refuse to withdraw big guns». Reuters. 17 February 2015. Retrieved 17 February 2015.
  54. ^ «Ukraine Truce Hangs by Thread as Fighting Rages Near Eastern City of Debaltseve». Time. 17 February 2015. Retrieved 17 February 2015.
  55. ^ «Ukraine crisis: Army and rebels stall heavy arms pullout». BBC News. 17 February 2015. Retrieved 17 February 2015.
  56. ^ «Battle rages for town where Ukraine rebels reject ceasefire». Reuters. 16 February 2015. Retrieved 16 February 2015.
  57. ^ «Ukrainian soldiers share horrors of Debaltseve battle after stinging defeat». The Guardian. 18 February 2015. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  58. ^ a b «Ukraine begins artillery withdrawal, recognising truce is holding». Reuters. 26 February 2015. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
  59. ^ «Ukraine Heavy Arms Withdrawal: Situation in country’s east stabilizes, says military spokesperson». Ukraine Today. 26 February 2015. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
  60. ^ a b «Ukraine parliament offers special status for rebel east, Russia criticizes». Reuters. Kiev. 17 March 2015. Retrieved 17 March 2015.
  61. ^ «Ukraine extends ‘special status’ for conflict-hit regions». Reuters. 12 December 2019. Retrieved 29 July 2020.
  62. ^ ДНР И ЛНР отказались признать не согласованные с ними изменения закона об особом статусе [DPR and LPR refuse to recognise undiscussed changes to law on special status]. Interfax News Agency (in Russian). 17 March 2015. Retrieved 18 March 2015.
  63. ^ Захарченко призвал взять под контроль все города-участники референдума о независимости ДНР [Zaharchenko says the DPR must take control of all cities that participated in the independence referendum]. Interfax News Agency (in Russian). 17 March 2015. Retrieved 18 March 2015.
  64. ^ «Donetsk, Luhansk republics say election proposals forwarded to Contact Group on Ukraine». Russian News Agency «TASS». 12 May 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  65. ^ «Over 100 Ukrainian troops, 50 civilians killed during ceasefire: DM». Xinhua News Agency. 8 June 2015. Archived from the original on 14 June 2015. Retrieved 22 July 2015.
  66. ^ ‘ДНР’ та ‘ЛНР’ передумали й визнали Крим російським [‘DPR’ and ‘LPR’ changed their minds and recognized Crimea as Russian]. BBC Ukrainian Service (in Ukrainian). 10 June 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  67. ^ «Pentagon: Despite Minsk II, More Than 400 Ukraine Troops Killed». Voice of America. 2 March 2016. Retrieved 29 March 2016.
  68. ^ «OSCE ‘sees Russian soldiers, weapons in Ukraine for two years’«. Kyiv Post. 26 March 2016. Retrieved 29 March 2016.
  69. ^ «Russia accepts no claims on Savchenko in context of Minsk accords — Foreign Ministry». TASS. 27 March 2016. Retrieved 29 March 2016.
  70. ^ «RESOLUTION ON ABDUCTED AND ILLEGALLY DETAINED UKRAINIAN CITIZENS IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION». oscepa.org. 9 July 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 July 2015. Retrieved 8 April 2016. p. 47
  71. ^ «Kuchma leaves Trilateral Contact Group on Ukraine». eng.belta.by. 28 July 2020. Retrieved 29 July 2020.
  72. ^ «Biden’s support of Minsk accords during Geneva summit seen as Russia’s success — expert». TASS. 17 June 2021.
  73. ^ «Political advisers to hold four-way talks on Ukraine in Paris». Thomson Reuters. 22 January 2022. Archived from the original on 24 January 2022.
  74. ^ «Scholz, Macron say diplomacy can fix Ukraine-Russia standoff». Deutsche Welle. 25 January 2022. Archived from the original on 25 January 2022.
  75. ^ «At Russia’s request, Kiev withdrew the law on Crimea and Donbas from parliament». News Fox24. 25 January 2022.
  76. ^ «Macron plans diplomatic phone call with Putin to calm Ukrainian crisis». The Irish Times. 26 January 2022.
  77. ^ «Poroshenko says local elections in Ukraine will be held on 25 Oct, date on which they will be held in Donbas is hard to predict». Kyiv Post. Interfax. 11 June 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  78. ^ a b c d «Local elections in DPR to take place on 18 October – Zakharchenko». Interfax-Ukraine. 2 July 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
    «DPR, LPR attempts to hold separate elections in Donbas on 18 Oct to have destructive consequences – Poroshenko». Interfax-Ukraine. 2 July 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  79. ^ ОБСЄ направить спостерігачів на вибори на Донбасі лише за згоди України [OSCE will send observers to the elections in Donbas only with the consent of Ukraine] (in Ukrainian). Ukrayinska Pravda. 3 July 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  80. ^ a b c «Ukraine crisis: Pro-Russian rebels ‘delay disputed elections’«. BBC News. 6 October 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
    «Hollande: Elections In Eastern Ukraine Likely To Be Delayed». Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 2 October 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
    Bershidsky, Leonid (5 October 2015). «Ukraine Is Being Told to Live With Putin». Bloomberg News. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  81. ^ Zinets, Natalia; Pavel Polityuk (6 October 2015). «West, Ukraine, hail rebel decision to postpone disputed elections». Reuters. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
    «Ukraine rebels to delay elections». Associated Press. 6 October 2015. Archived from the original on 7 October 2015 – via Washington Post.
  82. ^ «Steinmeier: Law on Donbas special status should enter into force on election day». Ukraine Today. 10 November 2015. Retrieved 10 November 2015.
  83. ^ Захарченко відклав ‘вибори’ [Zakharchenko put off the ‘election’] (in Ukrainian). Ukrayinska Pravda. 19 April 2016. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  84. ^ Захарченко переніс вибори в ‘ДНР’ на листопад [Zakharchenko postponed the elections in ‘DPR’ to November] (in Ukrainian). Ukrayinska Pravda. 23 July 2016. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
    Бойовики ‘ЛНР’ також вирішили перенести свої ‘вибори’ [‘DPR’ militants also decided to postpone their ‘elections’] (in Ukrainian). Ukrayinska Pravda. 24 July 2016. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  85. ^ a b Trach, Nataliya (2 October 2016). «Defying Minsk process, Russian-backed separatists hold illegal elections». Kyiv Post. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
    «Donbass militia leader announces autumn primaries in Donetsk]». TASS news agency. 23 May 2016. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  86. ^ «Separatists win vote in Ukraine rebel regions by big margins». The Washington Post. 12 November 2018. Archived from the original on 14 December 2018. Retrieved 17 November 2018.
  87. ^ «War in Europe: Responding to Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine». www.crisisgroup.org. 24 February 2022.
  88. ^ Lister, Tim (9 February 2022). «What is the Minsk agreement and is it a way out of Ukraine crisis?». Retrieved 15 November 2022.
  89. ^ «Conclusions». Chatham House – International Affairs Think Tank. 22 May 2020. Retrieved 3 March 2022.
  90. ^ Kofman, Michael; Migacheva, Katya; Nichiporuk, Brian; Radin, Andrew; Tkacheva, Olesya; Oberholtzer, Jenny (2017). Lessons from Russia’s Operations in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine (PDF) (Report). Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. pp. 45–46.
  91. ^ Galeotti, Mark (1 June 2021). «Are the Minsk II Peace Accords Worth Preserving?». The Moscow Times. Retrieved 21 June 2021.
  92. ^ «The Minsk Accords: Should Britain declare them dead?». Council on Geostrategy. 24 May 2021. Retrieved 21 June 2021.
  93. ^ Foy, Henry (20 June 2021). «Interview: ‘An overdose of freedom is lethal to a state,’ says former key Putin adviser». The Irish Times. Retrieved 21 June 2021.
  94. ^ «Lavrov: U.S. could significantly accelerate implementation of Minsk Agreements on Donbas if it wanted». Interfax News Agency. 19 October 2021.
  95. ^ «Sajdik: Russia is party to conflict in Donbas». Ukrinform. n.d. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  96. ^ «The future of Minsk agreements: pressing for implementation or withdrawing?». Ukraine Crisis Media Center. 26 February 2021. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  97. ^ «France says Russia refused to hold ministerial meeting on Ukraine». Reuters. 9 November 2021. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  98. ^ AFP (18 March 2021). «G7 Says It Will Not Recognize Russia’s ‘Occupation’ of Crimea». The Moscow Times. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  99. ^ «Article by Vladimir Putin ‘On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians’«. President of Russia. 12 July 2021. Retrieved 26 January 2022. the outcome of both Minsk‑1 and Minsk‑2 which give a real chance to peacefully restore the territorial integrity of Ukraine by coming to an agreement directly with the DPR and LPR with Russia, Germany and France as mediators, contradicts the entire logic of the anti-Russia project.
  100. ^ «Ukrainian leader calls for revamp of peace process to end Donbas war». Financial Times. 26 April 2021.
  101. ^ «Russia to wait for responsible leaders in Ukraine, says Medvedev». TASS. 11 October 2021.
  102. ^ «Russia Shouldn’t Negotiate With ‘Vassal’ Ukraine, Ex-President Medvedev Says». The Moscow Times. 11 October 2021. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  103. ^ Vladimir, Socor (13 October 2021). «Putin’s Brutal Letter to Ukraine under Medvedev’s Byline». Jamestown. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  104. ^ «Germany decries Russia’s publication of diplomatic notes on Ukraine». DW. 18 November 2021. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  105. ^ Irish, John (19 November 2021). «France, Germany say Russia’s publication of notes breaks diplomatic rules». Reuters. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  106. ^ «Moscow to thwart any provocations by Kiev in Donbass, Russian military chief warns». Tass. 9 December 2021.
  107. ^ «Ukraine security chief: Minsk peace deal may create chaos». Associated Press. 31 January 2022.
  108. ^ «Finland’s president says Minsk agreement should be looked at again». Reuters. 4 February 2022.
  109. ^ «Russian Parliament Votes To Give Sovereign Recognition To Donbas». Russia Briefing. Dezan Shira & Associates. 15 February 2022. Retrieved 22 February 2022.
  110. ^ «U.S. Blinken warns Russia against declaring Ukraine breakaway regions independent». Reuters. Thomson Reuters. 16 February 2022. Retrieved 22 February 2022.
  111. ^ «Russia aware of Minsk Agreements breach by recognising Donetsk, Luhansk». 16 February 2022.
  112. ^ «Putin says Ukraine’s Minsk peace process is finished, blames Kyiv». The National Post. Reuters. 22 February 2022. Retrieved 22 February 2022.
  113. ^ «Minsk agreements cease to exist — Putin». TASS. 22 February 2022. Retrieved 22 February 2022.
  114. ^ «Ukraine crisis: Vladimir Putin address fact-checked». BBC News. 22 February 2022. Archived from the original on 23 February 2022. Retrieved 24 February 2022.
  115. ^ Hinton, Alexander (24 February 2022). «Putin’s claims that Ukraine is committing genocide are baseless, but not unprecedented». The Conversation. Archived from the original on 26 February 2022. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  116. ^ «Disinformation About the Current Russia-Ukraine Conflict – Seven Myths Debunked». Directorate-General for European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations (Press release). 24 January 2022. Archived from the original on 18 February 2022. Retrieved 22 February 2022.
  117. ^ Tabarovsky, Izabella; Finkel, Evgeny (27 February 2022). «Statement on the War in Ukraine by Scholars of Genocide, Nazism and World War II». The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles. Retrieved 6 April 2022.
  118. ^ «Russia-Ukraine war latest: What we know on day 182 of the invasion». TheGuardian.com. 24 August 2022.
  119. ^ «Putin says loss of trust in West will make future Ukraine talks harder». Reuters. 9 December 2022. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
  120. ^ «Press Statement by the Co-Chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group». www.osce.org. Retrieved 29 July 2020.

External links

  • Map: Plan for stabilization of the situation in south-eastern Ukraine (Ru.).
  • Text of the agreements, including English translations, at the United Nations:
    1. Protocol on the results of consultations of the Trilateral Contact Group (Minsk Agreement)
    2. Memorandum on the Implementation of the Provisions of the Protocol on the Outcome of Consultations of the Trilateral Contact Group on Joint Steps Aimed at the Implementation of the Peace Plan (Implementation of the Minsk Agreement)
    3. Package of Measures for the Implementation of the Minsk Agreements
  • Scanned original Russian-language source documents, at the OSCE:
    1. Minsk protocol: Протокол по итогам консультаций Трехсторонней контактной группы относительно совместных шагов, направленных на имплементацию Мирного плана Президента Украины П. Порошенко и инициатив Президента России В. Путина
    2. Memorandum on the implementation: Меморандум об исполнении положений Протокола по итогам консультаций Трехсторонней контактной группы относительно шагов, направленных на имплементацию Мирного плана Президента Украины П. Порошенко и инициатив Президента России В. Путина
    3. Package of measures: Комплекс мер по выполнению Минских соглашений
Источник

Понравилась статья? Поделить с друзьями:
  • Минпромторг как пишется правильно
  • Миноносец как пишется
  • Миноискатель как пишется
  • Минобороны сша как пишется
  • Минни маус на английском как пишется